Aiyamak .-.
cuma meyakinkan aja, kalo diliat dari referensi map ini https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1178641&m=1 sih hpnya gede (dan durasi bahkan lebih lama dari ini) '-'Xinely wrote:
kebanyakan lihat kantan hp 8 sih kyknya 0,5 jg ga ngefek banget jadi keep dolo deh
no reply means fixed, gracias!xtrem3x wrote:
(Shini and his crazy requests .-.) he is crazy i know :3
General:
don = d
kat = k
Big Don = D
Big Kat = KKantan
HP = 8 / OD = 3
00:00:496 - Delete this note .. is better start with drum sound, not vocal. if i remove this note then the diff is unrankable because drain time lol
00:11:059 - Change this note to d .. have more emphasis next note.
00:22:467 - Add d note here .. have triple drum sound but is fine with 1 note.
00:24:158 - SameFutsuu
HP=7 / OD =4
00:00:496 - 2 options ...
1 -
2 -
00:05:143 - move this note to 00:05:566- to consistence with 2nd option ^Muzukashii
HP/OD = 5
00:00:284 - Delete ... this emphasis seems weird added this due vocal, imo its k
00:02:820 - is Questionable, but delete this note
00:27:960 - this part have better emphasis with ddd KOni
HP/OD = 6
00:00:284 - change this for dkdkdK ... with alternate have better flow about vocal sound combined with BG sound.
00:05:777 - change this part for 2 triples ... ddk kdk (?)
00:12:221 - Delete this note ... this triple not nessesary
00:14:017 - change this for a complete stream -> kkddkkkkd ... is more fluid about BG sound.
00:19:298 - Same as 00:05:777-
no reply means fixed, thanks!Hitsu wrote:
Hi!
Your request from my queue t/551902General
Not bad mapset at all, gj.
Although I guess bg resolution must be 1366x768. its rankable for 16:9 resolutionKantan
00:20:777 (30) - higher pitch here, try k.Futsuu
00:14:017 (29) - ^. this time i dont map the vocal so i think d is betterMuzukashii
00:00:496 (1) - ^.
00:00:918 (2) - ^. and for above ^, i will see more suggestions later, imo weak vocal fits with d
00:01:341 (3) - try d finisher here instead. i have been used K for all diffs at this time so consistency
00:04:510 (14,15,16) - pretty much ddd.
00:05:989 (20,22) - ctrl+g.
00:13:172 (48) - d finisher. same as prev, literally this fits better with K as well
00:14:862 (55) - ^. ^
00:25:425 (96) - k. literally 00:25:214 (95,96,100) - they have same kind of drum so imo better for consistency with d
00:28:277 (109) - better remove this and make the next finisher. but the drum at 1/4 is so clear so imo better for triplet for last notes tooOni
00:04:721 (22) - d. pitch of vocal and downbeat, its k for multicolor in oni C:
00:05:143 (24) - k. just for variety and consistency for next part 00:18:453 (95,96,97,98) -
00:05:355 (25,26) - d. ^
00:07:996 (39,40) - ctrl+g. just personal taste if kdk sounds better
00:11:376 (57) - not the best place for quintuplet, remove this for better sound.
00:13:172 (65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73) - not consistent at all. Better do this putting finisher here 00:13:172 (65).
00:15:073 - add d here. consistent break 1/1 with 00:01:552 -
00:18:031 (91,93) - ctrl+g. same as prev, ddk sounds better
00:18:664 (95,96) - ^. reply on 5 sec part above
00:21:411 (109,110) - ^. ^
00:25:425 (127) - k. same as muzu
00:25:636 (128,129,130) - ddd better. kkd then
00:26:270 (132) - k, drum sound.
Gl with this one!
Jonawaga wrote:
im here for your mod
[Kantan][Futsuu]
- 00:06:411 (9,10) - ctrl+g because 00:06:411 - this is much more high in pitch and should be mapped with a k rather than a d
it's nice w[Muzukashii]
- 00:06:411 - k same reasoning as kantan
[Oni]
- 00:03:665 (11) - switch to d because the pitch falls dramatically from the previous note here
- 00:07:045 (24) - ^
- 00:08:946 (32) - consider switching this to k because the pitch is rising here
- 00:08:524 (30,31,32,33,34) - the placement here makes it seem like a vocal pattern, and it that's the case then not including 00:09:580 - this vocal beat seems slightly awkward. Consider moving 00:09:369 (34) - this 1/2 forward or adding something
- 00:24:369 (93) - consider switching this to k or differentiating 00:24:158 (92,93) - these in some way because the vocal singer makes a whole octave jump there and the pitch really rises imo 93 and 94 are stronger there so i use k for them
good luck~
- 00:05:143 (24) - / 00:01:763 (7) - consider switching the second one to k so that these are consistent i would like to save this for making variety and the pattern is same, just i swapped the color ><
- 00:18:664 (96) - ^ ^
thanks all for the mods >_<Nifty wrote:
here from that nifty queue~
(this may be my shortest mod to date)
- Kantan -Consider making 00:11:481 (17) - a finisher, especially since you made 00:14:862 (21) - one
00:19:932 (28) - remove finisher, you didn't put one 00:16:552 (23) - here that is because no cymbal at 00:16:552 -
00:24:791 (35) - consider making D, since the vocals as well as the synth bg both pitch downward
- Futsuu -00:14:017 (29) - consider adding a finisher here to mimick the previos 2 finishers, I find the note important enough
00:22:890 (48,49) - ctrl g, to make a subtle mirror of the first rhythm you used, as well as following the vocals
00:24:580 (53,54) - ctrl g, flows well with previous pattern, as well as making 54 the same note as 55 and 56 (which it is in the music) kk instead since i use k for cymbal that i dont give finish lol
- Muzu -00:03:031 (8) - change to k, feels better with the k's before all beaing on the beat, as well as lining up with the music more
00:06:411 (21) - same as before, change to k
00:24:158 (91) - same as before, change to k, again. This feels like umbrellas but whatever it's cool drum 00:24:158 - is pretty low so i prefer d
It would be acceptable to delete 00:28:172 (108,109) - , put a 00:27:749 - d here, and add 00:28:383 (109) - a finisher here. Simply plays better, I don't think you need the 3let at the end, and you should be emphasizing that last note anyways
- Oni -00:09:791 (50) - this finisher is uncomfortable, and I don't it's rankable. If you're going to keep it, though, put one 00:11:481 (58) - here and 00:08:101 (40) - because they are the same strong points hoyl how could it happen lmao
00:13:172 - would be better mapped as a 1/4 spaced 5 (ddkdk), a 1/2 spaced d, then a 1/4 spaced 3let (kkd). If you're confused refer to this with the corresponding notes i prefer how those triplets work for emphasis the vocal so i would like to keep this ><
00:18:665 (96,97) - ctrl g, feels betters on the hands and the ears
That's all I got ~ good luck on rank ^^
thanks for mod ~Diva Days wrote:
[Muzukashii]
Fine to me.
[Oni]
00:05:883 (28) - better delete this note for song, Those streams not match at song.
00:08:841 (44) - ^ : like Muzukashii
00:14:017 (71),(72),(73) - dkd not match at song, change to ddk as u did it at (65),(66),(67) i will hear more opinion from bn about this, imo it fits for variety
00:19:404 (100) - same as 00:08:841 (44)
That's all. the only some part at Oni diff is just odd to me.
i'll add star here.
no reply means fixed thanks KinKin wrote:
Hi there!
it's been a really long time (modding)
[Oni][Muzukashii]
- 00:10:003 - since you're mapping a lot of vocal, maybe you should map this note ? moved 00:10:425 (50) - for cover that vocal w
- 00:13:172 (63,64,65) - it's maybe just me, but the ddk feels weird to play (at least for me). Maybe it'll be better to change it into D k i really want to keep this because i use triplet for emphasis the stress vocal thats why im making 3 triplets 00:13:172 (63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71) -
- 00:21:834 - this break isn't consistent with other break on your diff. eee hmm at least its same with muzu?
[Futsuu]
- 00:14:862 (55) - maybe change this one into D ? It will flow better and make the pattern easier with the kkk
- 00:19:932 (74) - 00:26:481 (101) - maybe it should be a K with the cymbal crush ?
- 00:24:158 (91,92,93,94) - I feel like d k d K sounds better with the vocal
[Kantan]
- 00:08:101 (17) - I think this one flow better as D with this pattern 00:06:834 (13,14,15,16) -
- 00:28:383 (64) - change it into D ? It sounds & flow better with this k 00:27:960 (63) -
I might be outdated, I didn't knew you're now mapping taiko ôwô im new QAQ
- 00:28:383 (40) - same thing as Futsuu. change it into D ?
anyway, good luck \o
I'll continue with my mod in some minutes, laptop re-started and I lose my progress orz ._. dissapointed D:Raiden wrote:
Oni is lacking some structure, if you want to use the red tick vocal rhythm, use it across all the map :p I understand the point but there are unexpected drums that are ruining consistency
00:11:376 (57,58) - should be deleted well, there are noticeable drums here that she is following constant throughout the whole song imo
00:20:672 (106,107) - ^ same here, also we can keep a relation between 00:20:566 (107,108,109) - 00:22:256 (115,116,117) - 00:23:946 (123,124,125) - 00:25:636 (131,132,133) -, drums are the same so it could counts as consistency too imo
00:21:834 - filled here I can hear the same cymbal as 00:23:101 - 00:24:791 - 00:26:481 - so it's consistency too.
00:10:425 - should be filled after the previous reasons, this part could be acceptable.
don't think it's veto worthy but just so you note it for future maps Thanks Raiden senpai <3
good luck!
2017-03-01 03:25 -Sh1n1-: let's start with irc on harumachi nely
2017-03-01 03:25 Xinely: oni right?
2017-03-01 03:25 -Sh1n1-: yes
2017-03-01 03:25 -Sh1n1-: 00:12:115 (61) - will be better as k imo
2017-03-01 03:25 -Sh1n1-: I prefer 00:12:327 (62) - as k tbh but...
2017-03-01 03:25 -Sh1n1-: there will be repetitive with 00:12:749 (63) -
2017-03-01 03:26 Xinely: i think same
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: so change?
2017-03-01 03:26 Xinely: ok 00:12:115 (61) - k then
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: okie
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: nice
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: second one
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: 00:22:890 (119,120) -
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: 00:24:580 (127,128) -
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: and 00:26:270 (135,136) - is too repetitive
2017-03-01 03:26 -Sh1n1-: to add a little bit of more variation
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: I suggest you the following:
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: 00:21:411 (112,113,119,120) - could be the first couple as dK and kK
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: then you could do the same with 00:24:580 (127,128,135,136) -
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: so my suggestion is:
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: press Ctrl+G at 00:24:369 (126,127) -
2017-03-01 03:27 -Sh1n1-: also to follow vocal better
2017-03-01 03:28 Xinely: hoyl so many, wait
2017-03-01 03:28 -Sh1n1-: don't worry take your time
2017-03-01 03:28 -Sh1n1-: check every example pls
2017-03-01 03:29 -Sh1n1-: is only one movement xD
2017-03-01 03:29 -Sh1n1-: examples make it bigger
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: >.<
2017-03-01 03:30 Xinely: i did but not sure if its same like your or not
2017-03-01 03:30 Xinely: lol
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: only press ctrl+g at 00:24:369 (126,127) -
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: and no more
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: xD
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: what did you do?
2017-03-01 03:30 Xinely: lmao
2017-03-01 03:30 Xinely: what i have done
2017-03-01 03:30 -Sh1n1-: lool
2017-03-01 03:31 Xinely: 00:21:834 (112,113,119,120) - <-
2017-03-01 03:31 -Sh1n1-: ctrl+z?
2017-03-01 03:31 Xinely: ok done
2017-03-01 03:32 Xinely: did the ctr+g
2017-03-01 03:32 -Sh1n1-: oks
2017-03-01 03:32 Xinely: *ctrl
2017-03-01 03:32 -Sh1n1-: now muzu
2017-03-01 03:32 -Sh1n1-: are u at muzu?
2017-03-01 03:33 Xinely: ok
2017-03-01 03:33 -Sh1n1-: well I have a doubt about this pattern:
2017-03-01 03:33 Xinely: ya im in muzu rn
2017-03-01 03:33 -Sh1n1-: 00:15:284 (56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) -
2017-03-01 03:33 -Sh1n1-: if you take a look to 00:01:341 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) -
2017-03-01 03:33 -Sh1n1-: shouldn't they keep consistency?
2017-03-01 03:33 -Sh1n1-: at least make something similar
2017-03-01 03:34 -Sh1n1-: for example:
2017-03-01 03:34 -Sh1n1-: follow this step by step pls
2017-03-01 03:34 -Sh1n1-: 00:15:495 (57) - could be at 00:15:918 -
2017-03-01 03:34 Xinely: wait wait
2017-03-01 03:35 -Sh1n1-: what happens?
2017-03-01 03:35 -Sh1n1-: first ones are only examples
2017-03-01 03:35 Xinely: ok done
2017-03-01 03:35 -Sh1n1-: 00:16:129 - should be k
2017-03-01 03:36 Xinely: yap k
2017-03-01 03:36 -Sh1n1-: remove 00:16:341 -
2017-03-01 03:36 Xinely: yap removed
2017-03-01 03:36 -Sh1n1-: and change 00:17:186 - to k too
2017-03-01 03:36 Xinely: did it as well
2017-03-01 03:36 -Sh1n1-: that's all at muzu
2017-03-01 03:36 -Sh1n1-: nice
2017-03-01 03:37 Xinely: i should map based on oni first and removing notes for lower diffs later w
2017-03-01 03:37 -Sh1n1-: yes
2017-03-01 03:37 -Sh1n1-: but
2017-03-01 03:38 -Sh1n1-: futsuu is fine don't worry
2017-03-01 03:38 -Sh1n1-: at futsuu I have only one concern:
2017-03-01 03:38 Xinely: wait wait
2017-03-01 03:38 -Sh1n1-: 00:26:481 (62) - finish should be removed right?
2017-03-01 03:38 Xinely: 1/2 finisher is ok in futsuu?
2017-03-01 03:38 -Sh1n1-: yes
2017-03-01 03:39 Xinely: 00:26:481 (62) - may i keep the finish?
2017-03-01 03:39 Xinely: at least its consistent with muzu oni
2017-03-01 03:39 Xinely: and cymbal at there is strong
2017-03-01 03:39 -Sh1n1-: following your previous patterns, you are not enphasizig this kind of cymbals
2017-03-01 03:39 -Sh1n1-: at least at this diff
2017-03-01 03:39 -Sh1n1-: in the other hand if you wanna keep
2017-03-01 03:39 -Sh1n1-: then add finish at the same spot in Kantan
2017-03-01 03:39 -Sh1n1-: cause it will be the only diff without finish
2017-03-01 03:40 -Sh1n1-: I prefer removing at futsuu tbh, cause there will be a better consistency.
2017-03-01 03:40 Xinely: 00:23:101 (53) - yap asking that in case i can finish it? xD
2017-03-01 03:40 Xinely: added finish for kantan
2017-03-01 03:40 Xinely: hmm so
2017-03-01 03:41 Xinely: no finish for kantan futsuu as lower diffs, finish on muzu oni as higher diffs?
2017-03-01 03:41 -Sh1n1-: at 00:23:101 - the pattern will looks really weird tbh
2017-03-01 03:41 -Sh1n1-: talking about futsuu
2017-03-01 03:41 -Sh1n1-: yes
2017-03-01 03:41 -Sh1n1-: that's my intention
2017-03-01 03:41 Xinely: yap i got that, removed on futsuu lol 00:26:481 (62) -
2017-03-01 03:42 -Sh1n1-: okie
2017-03-01 03:42 -Sh1n1-: that's it imo
2017-03-01 03:42 -Sh1n1-: didn't you add another change?
2017-03-01 03:42 Xinely: nope
2017-03-01 03:43 -Sh1n1-: well update now
2017-03-01 03:43 Xinely: updated
2017-03-01 03:44 -Sh1n1-: okie, I'll redownload to be sure :3
2017-03-01 03:44 Xinely: also how about raiden's word about the break in oni?
2017-03-01 03:44 -Sh1n1-: well I asked about it to chromoxx
2017-03-01 03:44 -Sh1n1-: did u read the thread?
2017-03-01 03:44 Xinely: yes
2017-03-01 03:44 -Sh1n1-: its fine imo
2017-03-01 03:44 -Sh1n1-: also as Raiden said
2017-03-01 03:44 Xinely: he said its k, he poked me as well
2017-03-01 03:45 -Sh1n1-: don't think it's veto worthy but just so you note it for future maps
2017-03-01 03:45 -Sh1n1-: yes
2017-03-01 03:45 Xinely: ok ><
2017-03-01 03:46 -Sh1n1-: Oni
2017-03-01 03:46 -Sh1n1-: 00:12:115 - you said ok but is still don
2017-03-01 03:48 Xinely: hoyl fuck, i changed that till twice due fucked up with ur second point lol
2017-03-01 03:48 Xinely: ok k for real now
2017-03-01 03:51 -Sh1n1-: did u update?
2017-03-01 03:51 Xinely: not yet
2017-03-01 03:51 -Sh1n1-: update pls
2017-03-01 03:52 Xinely: ok done
2017-03-01 03:52 -Sh1n1-: okie
2017-03-01 03:53 -Sh1n1-: let me post in thread :3
2017-03-01 03:53 Xinely: ok
As xexxar stated in another pending mapset, this shouldnt exceed 30s at allXexxar wrote:
As is the spinner is clearly extended over no audio. The spinner should end on 00:29:545 - , which even you should know considering that's where you made the 5% volume line. For this reason I have decided to bubble pop this map as it is too short and does not meet length requirements for ranking.
See to either extending the mp3 (not recommended) or mapping a different song that does meet the length requirement.
(note: I am aware that there is arguably a tiny amount of audio after the point I mentioned. I am also aware that there are two other ranked mapsets with this same issue. I still believe this to be abuse of what the rule intends to stop and as such have decided to pop this map.)
as other same ranked ver are extending the spinner as well.. also if you listen in 25%, you still can notice the spinner sound until 00:30:496 - (this cant be hear in 100% speed tho) so yeahMy Angel Azusa wrote:
As xexxar stated in another pending mapset, this shouldnt exceed 30s at all
yaKuranteMelodii wrote:
@pishi can i take the mp3 for my set, then?