[General]
- hard and insane have different endpoints because the last slider in these diffs has its sliderend mapped to silence (01:10:576 (3) - ), i'd probably make that slider a note on both diffs for consistency's sake and avoiding overmap
- 00:04:620 (1) - missing a clap at sliderend?
- 00:10:576 (4) - idk, having this be a 1/1 slider starting at 00:10:796 fits much better with the vocals and beat in my opinion, especially for an easy diff where the rhythm should be as simple as possible
- 00:14:105 (4) - ^
- 00:14:105 (4,1) - blanket looks a bit ugly. moving 00:15:208 (1) - to 284;233 fixes it, but then you'll have to fix 00:16:090 (2) - 's placement afterwards
- 00:17:635 (4) - same as before
- 00:21:164 (5,1) - idk about the "anti-jump" here. i'd probably do something like this instead
- 00:28:885 (5,1) - that's a pretty big jump for an easy.. i'd probably place (5) at 404;264 instead
- 00:41:679 (3) - NC for consistency with 00:36:385 (1,2,1,2) - ?
- 00:45:208 (3) - ^
- 00:53:590 (1,2,3) - strong beats here are mapped wrongly I guess, this rhythm would make the strong beats clickable instead
- 00:57:120 (1,2,3) - ^
- 00:27:340 (3) - move the middle sliderpoint to 114;104 so it's exactly in the middle of the slider?
- 01:07:267 (5) - ^, move to 260;68?
- 01:10:576 (5) - move to 348;240 to make a triangle?
- 00:10:576 (7,8) - i feel like this rhythm would be more interesting to play like this
- 00:14:105 (7,8) - ^
- 00:17:635 (7,8) - ^ aa you get it
- 00:28:002 (1,2,3,1) - spacing here in general feels really weird, every note has a different spacing lol
- 00:33:738 (3,4) - kinda weird overlap, something like this would work better imo
- 00:48:738 (1,2,3) - not a big of these kinds of overlaps in a hard diff but not gonna interfere in your style D:
- 00:02:745 (7) - this note is mapped to silence
- 00:05:943 (6,7) - spacing feels too low imo
- 00:19:620 (3,4) - why do these two have lower spacing than the rest of the 1/4 sliders? D:
- 00:21:164 (1) - i wouldn't NC this as it's still part of the "high speed slider" pattern
- 00:23:480 (4,5) - pretty huge jump with not much flow, i think something like this would work better (as long as you dont make it offscreen like my example)
- 00:28:223 (4) - doesn't feel too rhythmically good to start a slider on a red tick, i'd rather have 2 notes here
- 00:35:943 (1,2) - swap NC since (2) starts the measure
- 00:50:061 (1) - would flow better with the next slider if this was ctrl+g'd