ty so much for modding !! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaElectroz wrote:
[Shocking Easy][Pachi's Shocking Normal]
- 00:01:091 - Kinda curious why this part has a faster SV compared to the rest in the diff zz actually you did this in Hard too and I don't know why either. i didnt even notice that LOL
- 00:29:105 - I don't really see a reason to map this tbh, it's not an important beat but I got a feel like you mapped it for the sake of patterning with 00:28:223 (4) which I don't know why you're making a pattern with these either. [b][/color][/b]
- 01:06:826 This doesn't need to be mapped either, you didn't even make this clickable in other diffs to begin with lol fixed
- Fine I guess, but I'm not a fan with aesthetics with CS2 cuz it makes things really cramped.well i didnt really want to have easy and normal to be cs 3 dont really know why lul
[Shocking Hard]
- Generally looks okay but I'm more concerned about the spread, this diff could've used a lot denser rhythm than this considering how Easy already introduced 1/2 rhythms occasionally.
- I wish there could be a better way to handle 1/1 and 3/4 spacings, something like 00:11:679 (1,2,3) can be misleading, idk I would do sth like use different DS for each spacings, or just do any other stuff that indicate the difference in beat spacings so players will be like "hey this thing is different" or sth to make gameplay more predictable.
[Shocking Booty]
- 00:07:488 (4,5) - So this is a stack but 00:03:958 (4,5) isn't? I don't know if you did this instinctively without a reason but if you did then you should make them the same way for consistency. i'm a idiot
- 00:12:120 (2,3,4) - Uneven visual spacing zz actually I was expecting you to use the same kind of pattern on 00:15:649 (2,3,4) considering you already did it with 00:08:590 (2,3,4) - 00:12:120 (2,3,4) which has a pretty much the same rhythm. uhhh fixed now i guess
- 00:28:002 - Add sth on this for consistency with 00:31:532 ?
- 00:39:473 (1,2) - Swap NC I guess according to what you did in other measures of this section.
Overall the concept and aesthetics are kinda okay-ish but they could've been polished more, and Normal could be buffed more with 1/2 rhythms for a proper spread, good luck~
- AR8 or 8.5 should be enough for this, AR9 is kinda fast for uh 136 bpm song and it's not like AR9 will help much in terms of readability since you didn't use many big spacings in the first place.
- 00:04:068 (5) - No need to map this imo, kinda overmapped + you didn't map 00:07:598 anyways.
- Also 00:03:958 should be clickable but up to you I guess would be kinda too many circles if i make that clickable i think,i think that slider on 00:03:738 (4) - is enough things above are btw fixed~
- 00:10:796 (8,9) - Looks cramped compared to how you paired other sliders zz give more importance to visual spacing pls spacing increased
- 00:15:208 (1,2) - Aren't they supposed to have the same shape according to how you did things earlier? Idk if 00:15:649 (2,5,8) are meant to be a variation or whatever but if they are then you could have apply that concept with the later measure 00:18:738 (1,2) - 00:19:620 (3,4) otherwise the thing you did in this measure will be pretty inconsistent compared to others since you used to pair up sliders on other measures unlike this one which you applied a different concept. i actually didnt really pay attention to the shapes except on some more important points..xd but yeah did 00:15:208 (1,2) - the same shape now
- 00:24:914 (4,5) - 00:31:973 (5,6) - aaa yes pretty misleading cuz you didn't space these big enough to indicate the difference in beat spacings from those circles earlier.
- 00:24:914 (4,5) - 00:31:973 (5,6) - I prefer 1/2 sliders instead of circles tbh, currently it's kinda unclear whether you're following vocal or the main melody and using sliders will make 00:24:914 (4,5) - 00:31:973 (5,6) more noticeable to interpret as the same instrument rather than vocal.
[b]- 00:28:223 (4,5,6) - Nah this kind of stack usually doesn't play well, when you're stacking stuff you want the strongest sound to be the last circle of the stack, in this case 00:28:223 (4,6) are equally strong so the emphasis on whatever you intended to emphasize is pretty much gone. am a idiot sry
- 00:49:179 (3,5) - Visual spacing visual spacing thingy, if 00:48:738 (1,2,3,4,5) are meant to be in the same jump pattern then yeah 00:49:179 (3,5) should be less cramped compared to how other circles are spaced. all clean now
- 01:02:855 (1,1,1) - Idk I don't think this idea reflects the repeated drums very well, the pattern can be misleading to begin with since 01:03:738 (1) is not the same rhythm as 01:02:855 (1,1) yet you made 01:02:855 (1,1,1) looked like the same rhythm on all these 3 sliders which is not. everything cleaner now
<3
and to venix....doing your mod later am lazy now lul :3...