Yahuri wrote:

m4m from my queue C: Yo

General
-you might need to change the lower 2 diff names to Normal and Hard. (i dont know much about naming exceptions, but Peckish is...not exactly standard vocabulary XD) Yeah Sonnyc mentioned this too and since I need to add an Easy I think it is right to do this now
-i had a hard time following the BPM. i dont know if it was because the offset, or because of strings? anyways i think its worth noting that sometimes the drum is early such as around here 01:00:377 This is under investigation currently, I am hoping to get the correct offsets within 24 hours

Peckish
00:09:057 - no instrument really stands out here, remove whistle Okay
00:30:997 (1) - not consistent with the 1/2 slider rhythm used before This I didn't change for the pitch focus and for adding some variation, since the sound is slightly different I didn't want to have exactly the same pattern
00:34:308 (1) - ^ As above
00:39:273 (3) - 00:40:514 (5) - fix blanket Sure
00:45:894 (3,4,5) - could make an equilateral triangle with slidertail3-4-5 All right
00:47:549 (1,2) - blanket? Yes
00:54:170 (1,2) - this has the sharpest flow change in sections similar to this. places like here 00:24:377 (1,2) - 00:57:480 (1,2) - have pretty smooth flow so make it consistent at least to that extent Eh you have a point but didn't change much here since the slider isn't very fast idk if it would cause problems (and rearranging the whole pattern afterwards :c)
01:30:583 (1,2,3,4,5) - this rhythm is slightly more intense than the Famished diff, the Famished diff has reverse sliders to follow the melody. BUT this diff has clicks on 01:31:203 (2) - 01:32:031 (4) - while Famished has slider ends for those. rhythm suggestion: https://puu.sh/tq43J/9ab9820778.jpg this is a slightly simpler rhythm than Famished, has all clicks on white ticks. you can apply this to all similar rhythms. Didn't change this because the rhythm in Normal is technically not accurate. I didn't want any blue tick stuff in Normal so I made a drag triplet like pattern here whereas in Hard there is not only blue ticks but even some 1/3 so I feel that Hard is still more complex even if the number of clickable objects seems to be fewer.

Famished
00:08:850 - no significant note here, remove whistle Okay
00:09:885 (4,1) - you could adjust the pattern a bit to get a jump Sure
00:30:170 - i think it would be better to put a 1/1 slider here rather than skipping over the drum Has been mentioned three times now so changed
00:45:894 (1,2,3,4) - its not clear how these slider angles fit together. suggestion: copy 2, rotate by 90 degrees -> new 3. copy new 3, ctrl+h -> new 4. (hopefully it should look a bit better) Didn't adjust this because the flow is exactly how I wanted it although I admit it's not the most beautiful arrangement
00:56:445 (3,1,2) - how about increasing the jump of 3-1 to match 1-2? they have about the same intensity Yes, you are right
00:58:514 (5,1) - this jump isnt consistent with the rest of the pattern, none of these have it 01:01:825 (5,1) - 00:57:066 (2,1) - 01:00:377 (4,1) Good catch
01:29:127 (1) - this spinner is pretty short, its also inconsistent with the rest of the diffs. i would just add another triple and a 3/2 slider. I get what you're saying but I think a spinner leading into kiai works well here. The slowdown slider in Ravenous is what I wanted here but in Hard diff I think that is not good and of course in Normal it is impossible (and also spinner too short in that diff) so leaving this for now.
01:42:997 (1) - remove NC Yes
01:43:824 (3) - add NC (keeps the 2-measure NC pattern going, as well as mark the end of kiai) I like it

Ravenous
00:17:748 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - pattern is ok, but it doesnt do a lot of good for emphasizing the 3 of each combo. so you could try a different variant of the square pattern (such as ctrl+g 3-4 of each combo) I wanted the spacing to be the decisive factor in variation during this pattern and perhaps the ctrl G would make it too complex for what I'm going for. I wanted to preserve the motion of the previous pattern while adding up the spacing to make the change instead of changing directions.
00:30:584 (2,1) - could make a jump Yes
00:32:032 (6,7,1) - this pattern does not work well for reading, theyre all stacked but the time spacing is different from 6-7 and 7-1 Third mention of this so changed. I didn't realize (for some reason) that the snapping was different on the stacks, error in judgement there.
00:36:790 (1,2,1) - could make the jump bigger from 2-1 to be at least as big as 1-2, its more intense Hmm, agree

Good luck~ Great mod, appreciate it.

6th wrote:

Hey ! Yo \O

[Easy]
00:25:607 (2,3) - 01:39:676 (3,1) - Blankets can be improved Tried something
00:19:814 (4,5,1) - Considering the note density at the beginning this is a bit too sudden imo. Since 00:19:400 - is not clickable you may want to remove 00:19:814 (4) - to nerf it. Made the thing clickable instead and added a slider to make it easier to negotiate
00:55:814 (3) - I can understand that you made it end at 00:57:055 - for consistency with 00:52:504 (3) - but it doesn't follow the music actually. 00:56:642 - sounds pretty important :/ I didn't want to suddenly map the percussion from mapping the violin so I left it ignored. If more people say things I can do something about this
01:29:124 (3) - Again, I don't really agree with that but it's more personal.

[Normal]
Great diff. Thanks
00:29:952 (5,6,7,1) - This is a bit too dense considering there is no slider. You could easily nerf it by removing 00:29:952 (5) - which is not really noticeable in the song, especially for a beginner. I originally had nothing there, it was -Mo-'s mod which prompted me to put a note there. Can change if I get another comment about it

[Hard]
00:30:986 (1) - Move it at like (8;239) ? It flows nice and gives some emphasis to it. Sure
00:47:124 (4,1) - Space them further for aesthetics http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7117579 All right
00:53:745 (4) - CTRL+G ? It will give some emphasis to 00:54:159 (1) - Since I didn't put jumps at any of the other instances of this beat I don't want an inconsistent spacing change here
01:29:124 (1) - That spinner is a bit short and needs fast spinning for hard players. Therefore the pause after it may be too short, which is why I advise to remove it. I REALLY like how the spinner does its work here but one more comment about this and it's going to be replaced with a triple and slider

[Insane]
Really interesting map ! Appreciate it!
00:19:400 (1) - Just a suggestion : you could change the direction to clockwise here to emphasize it. Other people have said this so I tried it actually, and the jumps felt smaller because of the change in direction, which isn't what I want to do here, so I guess the direction change idea is finally bust
00:26:021 (1,2,3) - This is the only stacked triplet, consider changing it for consistency. Wow good catch, I didn't realize the rest were all unstacked lol. However due to spacing consistency I think this one will stay stacked or else 4 and 5 become inconsistent with the next pattern and there's no real good place to put them

Good luck. Thanks for the mod

Ohwow wrote:

Hi from my roastin queue (M4M)

[Easy]
00:55:814 (3,1) - Angle (3) down a bit so it's parallel to (1) Changed "1" instead"
01:25:814 (3,4) - blanket? Okay
01:39:676 (3,1) - i think it can be blanketed a little better Tried my best
00:49:193 (2,1) - ^ Yes
Couldn't find many problems

[Normal]
00:42:573 (3) - shouldn't this be a slider? Similar to 00:40:917 (1) Good idea
01:32:228 (5) - end slider on the white tick. I see that you're trying to map to the violin/cello sound but you're missing out on the loud sound on the white tick as a result. It just sounds weird ending it early on the blue tick. Not too big of a problem though. I think the violin is more important to follow here, similar reasons that some percussions are ignored, as it is a low diff I think the player hasn't learned to hear the backbeat as much yet, this is the most distinctive noise in the map and not mapping it seems more awkward.
01:35:538 (5) - ^
01:38:848 (5) - ^

[Hard]
00:42:573 (4) - maybe angle the slider like this instead so it has better flow (from the previous slider and to the next circle) Good idea

01:32:228 (3,3,3) - Same as normal I think trying to map every sound results in less emphasis on each individual sound, and the violin is what I really want to capture, not the bass of the other string instruments. Still I'm looking into more homogenous patterning here, maybe if BN agrees I can change this
01:40:504 (1,2,3) - have more a triangular pattern since it's mainly those 3 sliders. Okay, this looks nice

Suggestion

01:33:883 (1,2,3) - ^ just suggesting some patterns that you may or may not like better. C: 'Since you can't see the whole pattern of this due to AR I think the current one is more triangular and flowy, it's a good concept though

Another suggestion

01:37:193 (1,2,3) & 01:30:573 (1,2,3) - ^ same as the other two, but i'll leave you to make up your own pattern (if you think your current pattern is good then you can just ignore these)
00:56:435 (3,1) - This kind of spike in spacing should be apparant at spots such as 00:57:055 (2,1) - 00:53:745 (4,1) - and 01:00:366 (4,1) - imo Yes you are right, adjusted spacings in other spots as well.

[Ravenous]
Imo the circle spam in the beginning (00:08:642 - 00:21:055) isn't really reflecting the song as much as it should (the only thing that it's reflecting is its gradual increasing intensity, in which you mapped by increasing spacing over time). In the music, 00:17:745 - 00:21:055 is different from the rest, yet you still mapped it with squares. I would try to make a different pattern just cause the square spam just looks kind of dull to me. Just my subjective opinion.
00:08:642 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) & 00:14:435 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - It would be better if these squares are more perfect. (either use polygon creator or copy/paste 2 circles and rotate 90 degrees to make your squares) Adjusted the squares. The reason I used this pattern is like you said, to reflect the rising intensity. I don't really think the different rhythm at 17 seconds needs a different pattern, maybe back and forth jumps could work but I don't want any of those in the intro.
00:08:642 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the angle change between the two squares are bigger than the other angle changes like 00:09:469 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - and 00:10:297 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - You should make it consistent (by using ctrl+shift+r)
00:12:159 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - The pattern you were going for with the squares kinda got broken here, most likely cause you ran out of room. Shift the whole pattern up so that you have more room to stack 00:13:193 (3) - onto 00:12:159 (2) - Tried something here, don't know if the spacing is too much now
00:32:021 (6) - Should this be a slider like 00:35:331 (5) - ? Nah more emphasis on the stop here
00:37:193 (2,1) - You can blanket this better Yes
01:10:297 (3,1) - spacing maybe too far? Moved down a bit
01:16:917 (3,1) - ^ Eh this one should be fine

That's it, good luck, sorry if i sound harsh. My tip is to just work a bit on the aesthetics and make cleaner patterns (make teh squares more perfect) Hey it's a "roasting" queue right? The squares are a pain in the butt if I'm honest

FruityEnLoops wrote:

Hey
Really sorry for the wait time. I've been really busy recently, due to IRL things, etc... I get it, no need to apologize. I took a while to reply as well so
Anyway, here's the mod
This color = Personal opinion & thougths
This color = Not important for ranking
This color = Unrankable.

General :
- I don't really know why do you add a 71 bpm timing point before the 145 one. It falsifies the BPM of the song on the menu, and on the webpage I like timing everything but yeah changed for those reasons
- This is isn't a problem, but i'm still gonna point it out : Your maps are GOOD, but not original. They take the average concept of every normal map, without adding anything. I won't say that you need to remap anything, but I think you should think about some simple but new concepts for your next map This is actually something I've been aware of for many months. Ever since I started seriously mapping, creativity has been my biggest issue. Some of it was the music I chose to map, very repetitive songs where the focus wasn't musical changeability, but my repertoire of patterns/mapping techniques is not extensive, and I've been told this before. I can't help it really, except to map more and map different types of music to try and get more experience I suppose.
Easy :
- You REALLY need to higher the slider speed during kiai time and progressively through the song. I don't think that's rankable, increasing SV on an Easy diff
- You should also add custom hitsounds. I'm sure you can find anything related to FF on internet I hate hitsounding. The hitsounds here were done by a good friend of mine, and you're probably right about finding better hitsounds somewhere but if I'm honest I'm quite lethargic about these things.

Normal :
Nothing to say. May be speeding up the sliders for kiai, but not for the whole song. Maybe I could get away with it on a Normal but speeding SV is really not something I like doing in lower diffs.

Hard :
01:27:469 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Or you choose to use the same sliders, or you replace the sliders before with those three stacks. Will think about it
01:29:124 (1) - I think this slider is breaking the rythm. Uh, the spinner you mean?

Ravenous :
01:25:814 (1,2) - Just like for the hard, you shouldn't change how you map this sound ^^ I had it all triples, but variety is nice and someone mentioned it was a bit boring to have triple triple triple so I changed it up a bit.
The map is really, really fun to play. Especially on osu!droid.
But I think you use to many circles. BUT it is still fun to play, and following the rules, so keep it I appreciate the kind words I didn't even think of how it would play on osu!droid lol, don't know anyone who plays that. I think having more circles in a Insane is not a bad thing either.

Wow, really couldn't find anything else. Maybe i'm too tired. I'll check the map tomorrow, and make another post if I find anything else (no kudos for the other post, of course)

Hope it helped

Warpyc wrote:

sometimes you make me wonder if you're actually deaf

Warpyc wrote:

You probably dont want it but you're getting it anyways tyty

also unformatted as all hell because lazy fair

Ravenous

why is it ar9 when its so low bpm and sr at least lower it to a decimal ar like 8.5-8.7 Ugh fine, hate you lot
also make it od8 I know you want to No, 7.5 is as high as I'll go

the jump from 00:09:262 (4) - to 00:09:469 (1) - is the same as 00:10:090 (4) - to 00:10:297 (1) - even though there clearly is differnece in how intense the sound is and this goes for all of the squares in the start pretty much, just thought I should point this out since sometimes you make me wonder if you're actually deaf (lets be honest we need to keep the pp high so keep it) You're deaf you little.... anyway I know it's not a perfect pattern but it's mapped to the intensity rising, if that makes sense.

00:25:607 (7,8) - shouldnt this also be a tripple since the music is exactly the same as 00:26:021 (1,2,3) - this obviously goes for the rest of the section as well I don't hear it? Triple between 8 and 1 I could get behind but not 7 and 8

00:30:159 (1,2) - looks bad, you can do better Well you're right about that

00:40:504 (4,1) - a bit nitpicky but the spacing feels oddly low between these two notes It's a little low maybe, maade it a teensy bit wider but not much really

00:48:986 (5,1) - !^ I dont really see any reason why you would decrease the spacing here This used to be a jump like the notes before it, Sonnyc said it was inconsistent with the exact pattern you pointed out so I nerfed it.

00:53:331 (1,2) - once again this looks pretty meh I guess, yeah.

01:02:435 (1,2,3,4,5) - evil overmapping B-but the violin!

01:03:262 (1,2,1,2) - this section is nc'd like these are two sections of double jumps but it feels and plays like these three are in a row Eh I guess you're right it's a bit much

01:03:469 (2,1,2) - here's a random pattern I just came up with that plays and looks a lot better imo https://puu.sh/tMW9n/f8914f2c44.png Pfft, I like me my overlap stacks

01:29:124 (1,2,3,4) - this should just be a tripple like the rest since the music is the same There's a quad sound, maybe it's an echo, but it's there I'm pretty sure

01:29:538 (1,1) - git gud at blanketing kiddo For the love of God....

gotta say the rest of the map is real good, especially the kiai sections ayy tyty

and nice hitsounding Laine ye she did good

Battle wrote:

on the insane 01:52:702 (2) - i don't really get why this isn't like 01:51:047 (2) - since it sounds like it's doing the same thing with the strings I asked several people including someone who regularly looks at this sort of music and he told that the first one is a quad and the second a triple, Nao also said that the first has some glissando type thing and the second is less pronounced, they used to both be triplets before.
also it would be nice if you used sliders for 00:13:607 (1,2,3) - instead of circles, the change in rhythm isn't really expected and would be better gameplay wise unless you don't care about that Well fine, it's not the first complaint about this so
00:58:917 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - is similar to 00:32:642 (1,2,3,4) - rhythm wise even coming after a pause but yet mapped differently It sounds different to me, I hear more strings in the first one
00:26:021 (1,2,3) - stuff like this would sound a LOT more natural if the triplet note would be moved to 00:26:331 - and whatever for the other points, triplets starting on a white and ending on a red typically sound awkawrd Maybe, but the times in the map where I DO have triples after as single on the white tick are mapped to violin sounds, which aren't present here, these are percussion triples so I want to keep the pattern different while following music.
oh yeah and I'm pretty sure stuff like 00:32:848 (2,3,4) - is supposed to be 1/6 like below to follow strings, I can kinda see not using it for the sake of rhythm simplification but idk it's up to you The strings are weird, there isn't a lot of places where you can keenly hear what snap they're following, one particular point which has a repeat slider is an exception to this however.

d

00:52:297 (1,2,3) - and 00:55:607 (1,2,3) - could use more emphasis considering how spaced 00:56:642 (1) - is lol The last one is a drag drum sound which is why it has extra emphasis, the first two are quicker
01:00:159 (2,3,4) - is kinda meh since 4 doesn't really have anything worthwhile to deserve that huge spacing and that kinda just takes away emphasis from 3 The emphasis is meant to be 3 and 1, can't have a tiny spacing between them as it feels really weird to play in my opinion. Spoke with Nao and changed this.

offset sounds off, playing it feels a bit late so you should probably fix that lol Offset has been checked several times, too many people think it's perfect/late/early and this is the best one anyone could agree on. I blame the nature of the song.

also I don't really see any metadata linked here so z I couldn't find an official release at first but apparently....The official release is weird as this is technically two songs, but only one is mapped, so I'll change some tags. http://www.square-enix.co.jp/music/sem/ ... e_Fall/en/

kinda only looked at the top diff so ya lol

CanadianBaka wrote:

it's a bubble party

1. moved everything -8ms
2. added two timing sections to time the intro a bit because it's kinda ugly when you play that with Nightcore or in Mania/Taiko and it isn't synced up at all, and when it gets palyed in the main menu the pulasting of the osu!logo is noticably off too
3. The whole first section is off time-signature-wise by two beats, thus the new section at 00:09:477 -
4. 00:13:599 - These three beats here are much earlier for some reason, no need to mp3-edit though because it is mapped as a slider in every diff and thus has much accuracy-leniency, I just added a timing section there to move it -20ms and back again
5. 01:23:944 - The strings around here until the Kiai are mostly much earlier, so added a timing section there and moved it -12ms

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Songs with Japanese titles must use the Modified Hepburn method of romanisation in the "Romanised Title" field. As a non-unicode field, long vowels such as "おう" and "うう" should be romanised into "ou" and "uu" to avoid macrons. (Refer to this link for more information). Loan words should be expressed using romanisation from the original language.

alice soft wrote:

V IamKwan: those are offical SE sites linked not fansites; pretty official sounding imo.