Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.Blitzfrog wrote:
But my dad never came back, why should I?abraker wrote:
You should have replied with a comeback
Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.Blitzfrog wrote:
But my dad never came back, why should I?abraker wrote:
You should have replied with a comeback
I'm assuming you mean neither is ready to accept me. Obviously Earth decided creating me was a good idea, because look, I click circles everyday. I am more useful than Einsteinabraker wrote:
Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.
Earth should now regret its decision because of that.Blitzfrog wrote:
I'm assuming you mean neither is ready to accept me. Obviously Earth decided creating me was a good idea, because look, I click circles everyday. I am more useful than Einsteinabraker wrote:
Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.
Holy heck, you google searched that image, thirsty as FaustFaust wrote:
Kiyorami can look good in anything.
The heat? You mean that stink from your shit. Even Donald's poop has better value than your crap.Blitzfrog wrote:
I'm warming it up though, can't you tell the heat due to it's excitement?abraker wrote:
Earth should now regret its decision because of that.
This.B1rd wrote:
Nothing was overturned. Just blocked, from doing what Trump was voted into office to do. And the federal judge was overstepping was overstepping his boundaries.
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
It should be overturned soon. And I'm curious as to why you're so desperate to allow immigrants from a fundamentalist Muslim country in which women are treated like property.
Maybe women like being treated like property /sB1rd wrote:
And I'm curious as to why you're so desperate to allow immigrants from a fundamentalist Muslim country in which women are treated like property.
Because the US loves their good relations with SA, for a good reason; it's not even unique to Trump or Republicans in general.Hika wrote:
Only thing I'll say is why he didn't ban SA? What a joke.
While oil’s collapse has deepened concern that Saudi Arabia will need to liquidate its Treasuries to raise cash, a more troubling worry has also emerged: the specter of the kingdom using its outsize position in the world’s most important debt market as a political weapon, much as it did with oil in the 1970s.
In April, Saudi Arabia warned it would start selling as much as $750 billion in Treasuries and other assets if Congress passes a bill allowing the kingdom to be held liable in U.S. courts for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to the New York Times. The threat comes amid a renewed push by presidential candidates and legislators from both the Democratic and Republican parties to declassify a 28-page section of a 2004 U.S. government report that is believed to detail possible Saudi connections to the attacks. The bill, which passed the Senate on May 17, is now in the House of Representatives.
Saudi Arabia’s Finance Ministry declined to comment on the potential selling of Treasuries in response. The Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency didn’t immediately answer requests for details on the total size of its U.S. government debt holdings.
“Let’s not assume they’re bluffing” about threatening to retaliate, said Marc Chandler, the global head of currency strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman. “The Saudis are under a lot of pressure. I’d say that we don’t do ourselves justice if we underestimate our liabilities” to big holders.
Don't be so picky with your topicspicky picky wrote:
holy shit what a non interesting topic
Actually in this case it's a very bad thingB1rd wrote:
I'm just glad that for once we have a president who actually sticks to his campaign promises and gets stuff done.
Like Hitler. Hail Hitler.Mahogany wrote:
Actually in this case it's a very bad thingB1rd wrote:
I'm just glad that for once we have a president who actually sticks to his campaign promises and gets stuff done.
This would be a positive for literally any other president <3
This is a perfect example of checks and balances. God bless.Mahogany wrote:
pretty much the same ppl tbh
Edit: US Federal court blocked donny's request to reinstate the travel ban! (for now) Hallelujah! This is why we have systems of checks and balances. Justice prevails, for now.
How do you know it wouldn't have stopped the terrorists before they came into the country? Same as with the illegal immigrant and multiple time felons who murdered someone the tenth time they reentered the country. It's just a temporary ban until a vetting processes is established.ahsoka08 wrote:
I would just like to say that this new bullshit order would have stopped no terrorist attacks if it were in place before
That is literally the purpose of checks and balances you dimwit. It's the entire reason the US isn't living under a fascist dictatorship. Yet.B1rd wrote:
As I've already said, checks and balances does not mean straight up blocking an order the President has jurisdiction over.
Thize wrote:
So you're only pissed about this because the people you don't like happen to enjoy the team. What a great reason. What about the fact that the Patriots won on overtime and the Falcons horribly choked, while everyone else was expecting them to win because NOBODY every wins on overtime? Are you going to blame it on Brady for doing a great job because he's friends with Trump and Trump openly supported him?Raspberriel wrote:
tbh the only reason I'm this upset is because I don't want to ever see Trump or his prominent supporters (see: Richard Spencer), who all happened to be cheering for the Pats, happy ever again
Do you even realize what you're saying or are you just so blinded with hate that the only thing you can see and talk about is Trump? Yeah, you sound like a goddamn sociopath. Calm the fuck down. You're no different from the right-wingers who want to see liberal tears all the goddamn time for no good reason.Raspberriel wrote:
maybe I'm just a huge goddamn sociopath, but I really do not wanna see Trump supporters happy about anything
Just returning them the favor. If they'll never see eye to eye, what's the point?Foxtrot wrote:
Do you even realize what you're saying or are you just so blinded with hate that the only thing you can see and talk about is Trump? Yeah, you sound like a goddamn sociopath. Calm the fuck down. You're no different from the right-wingers who want to see liberal tears all the goddamn time for no good reason.Raspberriel wrote:
maybe I'm just a huge goddamn sociopath, but I really do not wanna see Trump supporters happy about anything
Glad to see that you won't give up being as stubborn as a donkey, then. If you'll never see eye to eye as well, then I don't think you should get the respect you think you deserveRaspberriel wrote:
Just returning them the favor. If they'll never see eye to eye, what's the point?
I should also clarify that I'm only talking about the Internet Trump supporters.? ? ?
lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altrightRaspberriel wrote:
Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"
I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.
Though you should probably spend more time worrying about the people who actually voted him for POTUS and not some 12 year old kids on the Internet. They can't even vote!Raspberriel wrote:
Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright".
Jesus christ, you consider that broken? Lighten the fuck up, please. I've seen this election breaking people down in worse ways than that. You're a very tame case.Raspberriel wrote:
I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.
And how about we drop the "let's drop this subject" meme. If you wanna talk about something, just write it. Don't put other people down for wanting a continued discussion.Madvillain wrote:
How about we change the subject to something a bit more amicable?
lol. Hard times living in a first world country rightRaspberriel wrote:
Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"
I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.
I'll probably just deactivate Twitter tbh
Whatever suits your safe space, hon.Raspberriel wrote:
Sorry to say, but those aren't just "12-year-old kids on the Internet." People really are that obnoxious.
Did I ever say I'm literally struggling like some random third-world child right now? I didn't. Also, JonTron pulled this same shit a few weeks ago.Kisses wrote:
lol. Hard times living in a first world country rightRaspberriel wrote:
Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"
I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.
I'll probably just deactivate Twitter tbh
I never said nor implied you did at all. Damn, I guess I'll back out, I don't want to lose a limb in this strifeRaspberriel wrote:
Did I ever say I'm literally struggling like some random third-world child right now? I didn't. Also, JonTron pulled this same shit a few weeks ago.
o boi u just became the even bigger brutebig suck wrote:
Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA
big suck wrote:
Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA
Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically???Holy shit why would you be this mad at that hahahaha
wtfbig suck wrote:
Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA
All my fallacies are logical. And Foxtrot isn't being angry, just pointing out irrational reactions about Trump. So far there hasn't been any arguments about any specific subjects. But if you find something to disprove, feel free to go ahead and disprove it, you're a big guy.big suck wrote:
Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA
im sorry if I ever indicated being triggered, hate to dissapoint you but im not. Youre just hiding behind some lies to try an make me look bad. What does that say about you? Insulting s9me guy for adding his two cent, thats what I call childishB1rd wrote:
Feel free to go back to Reddit if this place triggers you too much.
Hey now, you can't just leave the shitstorm you created just because other people laughed at you. Take responsibility of itbig suck wrote:
then again.. who am I to banter over a bunch of idiots. this board is for the "not so logical discussions" afterall
Definitely a more accurate statement than mine. I think saying 12 was a bit exaggerated. Then again, anyone who has the chance to vote and doesn't shouldn't be taken seriously at all, regardless of age.B1rd wrote:
Also, I'm pretty sure that most Trump supporters are 16+, just putting it out there.
There are different reasons as to why some people don't vote other than stubborness, ignorance, ungratefulness that people died for to give them the right to vote (god I hate typing this line) etcFoxtrot wrote:
Then again, anyone who has the chance to vote and doesn't shouldn't be taken seriously at all, regardless of age.
It's not about reason either. It's about adult citizens who complain about their own country and yet they don't go out and vote (and that's how Trump obviously won; a lot of the people were fed up with the status quo and they went out and done something about it. But it seems like no one on the left wants to admit that -- calling everyone racist is much easier). It's sad seeing people wasting away their rights like that, because people in other countries would kill for a chance like that.Kisses wrote:
There are different reasons as to why some people don't vote other than stubborness, ignorance, ungratefulness that people died for to give them the right to vote (got I hate typing this line) etcFoxtrot wrote:
Then again, anyone who has the chance to vote and doesn't shouldn't be taken seriously at all, regardless of age.
ungratefulness that people died for to give them the right to vote (got I hate typing this line)That's pretty ungrateful of you
Well, there's "tolerance", as in, being tolerant of Muslims, LGQTBQQ, terror attacks, other liberals, and people and groups you already like. Then there's the tolerance of allowing people you don't necessarily agree or with or like the right to speak, give them basic respect, and not use violence against them. Liberals have never been tolerant against people of the other side, and have been pretty hypocriticial in things like being tolerant of Muslims, but not Christians. Respecting free speech and such, has mainly been a virtue of the right.Raspberriel wrote:
Funny how tolerance only entered the picture again once your side came to power.
So, you called us a bunch of idiots, yes I would say that was an insult and yes I would say you are acting triggered. What lies am I hiding behind? Are you actually gonna add something useful to the conversation or are you going to leave like you said you would?big suck wrote:
then again.. who am I to banter over a bunch of idiots. this board is for the "not so logical discussions" afterall
Well done, I see your 10,000 hours in MS paint has paid off.Dawnsday wrote:
You don't tolerate intolerance. That's how tolerance dies. Intolerance should not be tolerated under any circumstance.B1rd wrote:
Liberals have never been tolerant against people of the other side
So, you called us a bunch of idiots, yes I would say that was an insult and yes I would say you are acting triggered. What lies am I hiding behind? Are you actually gonna add something useful to the conversation or are you going to leave like you said you would?big suck wrote:
then again.. who am I to banter over a bunch of idiots. this board is for the "not so logical discussions" afterall
Well done, I see your 10,000 hours in MS paint has paid off.[/quote]Dawnsday wrote:
Yes you doDawnsday wrote:
You don't protest free speech with free speech
Making voting mandatory is stupid, but it should be a right regardless. People have the right to throw away their rights, so I can't exactly do anything about it but except have an opinion on their character. Unfortunately, there's always going to be all kinds of misinformed people who are gonna vote, but we can't exactly throw democracy out of the window because of that.B1rd wrote:
I never thought it was possible to change the status quo through voting. And if all choices are bad, then there's not much reason to vote. In Australia voting is mandatory, which is pretty shitty because it just forces uninterested and uninformed people make uninformed choices.
Out of curiosity, but why do you keep quoting one sentence out of an entire paragraph and make an argument out of that, instead of just answering to the paragraph itself?Mahogany wrote:
You don't tolerate intolerance. That's how tolerance dies. Intolerance should not be tolerated under any circumstance.B1rd wrote:
Liberals have never been tolerant against people of the other side
That's some good stuffDawnsday wrote: