Dawnsday wrote:

This is me, I'm perfectly central. I simply believe free speech is a necessity. I also believe the protests against Milo's speech was counter intuitive and wrong on a fundamental level.

Finding B1rd to be correct doesn't put me under any label. Do not try to force me under one.

Raspberriel wrote:

Dude, c'mon. He has the "all right good, all left bad" line of thinking.

Mahogany wrote:

ITT: Disagreeing with B1rd is having an "unpleasant attitude".

Kisses wrote:

No one said or implied that at all

B1rd wrote:

I used to have arguments with him about various things, but due to his unpleasant attitude whenever it comes to people with differing viewpoints I've stopped engaging with him.

abraker wrote:

You should have replied with a comeback

Raspberriel wrote:

what is this trend of putting 🅱️ emojis everywhere

Blitzfrog wrote:

abraker wrote:

You should have replied with a comeback

But my dad never came back, why should I?

abraker wrote:

Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.

Blitzfrog wrote:

abraker wrote:

Because unlike your father heaven nor hell is ready to accept you.

I'm assuming you mean neither is ready to accept me. Obviously Earth decided creating me was a good idea, because look, I click circles everyday. I am more useful than Einstein

abraker wrote:

Earth should now regret its decision because of that.

Kisses wrote:

。。。

Girls with natural red hair and purple eyes are the most beautiful in world

Kisses wrote:

。。。

Girls with natural red hair and purple eyes are the most beautiful in world

Faust wrote:

Kiyorami can look good in anything.

Kisses wrote:

。。。

Girls with natural red hair and purple eyes are the most beautiful in world

Blitzfrog wrote:

abraker wrote:

Earth should now regret its decision because of that.

I'm warming it up though, can't you tell the heat due to it's excitement?

Kisses wrote:

。。。

Girls with natural red hair and purple eyes are the most beautiful in world

B1rd wrote:

Nothing was overturned. Just blocked, from doing what Trump was voted into office to do. And the federal judge was overstepping was overstepping his boundaries.

8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

"Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."

It should be overturned soon. And I'm curious as to why you're so desperate to allow immigrants from a fundamentalist Muslim country in which women are treated like property.

B1rd wrote:

And I'm curious as to why you're so desperate to allow immigrants from a fundamentalist Muslim country in which women are treated like property.

Hika wrote:

Only thing I'll say is why he didn't ban SA? What a joke.

While oil’s collapse has deepened concern that Saudi Arabia will need to liquidate its Treasuries to raise cash, a more troubling worry has also emerged: the specter of the kingdom using its outsize position in the world’s most important debt market as a political weapon, much as it did with oil in the 1970s.

In April, Saudi Arabia warned it would start selling as much as $750 billion in Treasuries and other assets if Congress passes a bill allowing the kingdom to be held liable in U.S. courts for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to the New York Times. The threat comes amid a renewed push by presidential candidates and legislators from both the Democratic and Republican parties to declassify a 28-page section of a 2004 U.S. government report that is believed to detail possible Saudi connections to the attacks. The bill, which passed the Senate on May 17, is now in the House of Representatives.

Saudi Arabia’s Finance Ministry declined to comment on the potential selling of Treasuries in response. The Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency didn’t immediately answer requests for details on the total size of its U.S. government debt holdings.

“Let’s not assume they’re bluffing” about threatening to retaliate, said Marc Chandler, the global head of currency strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman. “The Saudis are under a lot of pressure. I’d say that we don’t do ourselves justice if we underestimate our liabilities” to big holders.

picky picky wrote:

holy shit what a non interesting topic

B1rd wrote:

I'm just glad that for once we have a president who actually sticks to his campaign promises and gets stuff done.

Mahogany wrote:

B1rd wrote:

I'm just glad that for once we have a president who actually sticks to his campaign promises and gets stuff done.

Actually in this case it's a very bad thing
This would be a positive for literally any other president <3

Mahogany wrote:

pretty much the same ppl tbh
Edit: US Federal court blocked donny's request to reinstate the travel ban! (for now) Hallelujah! This is why we have systems of checks and balances. Justice prevails, for now.

ahsoka08 wrote:

I would just like to say that this new bullshit order would have stopped no terrorist attacks if it were in place before

Madvillain wrote:

time to fire the entire atlanta falcons coaching staff

B1rd wrote:

As I've already said, checks and balances does not mean straight up blocking an order the President has jurisdiction over.

Thize wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

tbh the only reason I'm this upset is because I don't want to ever see Trump or his prominent supporters (see: Richard Spencer), who all happened to be cheering for the Pats, happy ever again

Raspberriel wrote:

maybe I'm just a huge goddamn sociopath, but I really do not wanna see Trump supporters happy about anything

Foxtrot wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

maybe I'm just a huge goddamn sociopath, but I really do not wanna see Trump supporters happy about anything

Do you even realize what you're saying or are you just so blinded with hate that the only thing you can see and talk about is Trump? Yeah, you sound like a goddamn sociopath. Calm the fuck down. You're no different from the right-wingers who want to see liberal tears all the goddamn time for no good reason.

Raspberriel wrote:

Just returning them the favor. If they'll never see eye to eye, what's the point?

I should also clarify that I'm only talking about the Internet Trump supporters.

Raspberriel wrote:

Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"

I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.

Raspberriel wrote:

Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright".

Raspberriel wrote:

I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.

Madvillain wrote:

How about we change the subject to something a bit more amicable?

Raspberriel wrote:

Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"

I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.

I'll probably just deactivate Twitter tbh

Raspberriel wrote:

Sorry to say, but those aren't just "12-year-old kids on the Internet." People really are that obnoxious.

Foxtrot wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

Sorry to say, but those aren't just "12-year-old kids on the Internet." People really are that obnoxious.

Whatever suits your safe space, hon.

Foxtrot wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

Sorry to say, but those aren't just "12-year-old kids on the Internet." People really are that obnoxious.

Whatever suits your safe space, hon.

Kisses wrote:

Raspberriel wrote:

Mostly because on the internet, they're 10x worse as if you meet with an average one irl. At least you have a chance of having a decent conversation irl than over the internet, where they just say "lol libruhl tears amiritre #pepe #tcot #maga #altright"

I'll probably lighten up on this soon enough, but I don't know when. The past few months have broken me in a few ways, tbh. Like, before the election, I don't think I've ever told someone to kill themselves or even use "kys," but that's went out the window.

I'll probably just deactivate Twitter tbh

lol. Hard times living in a first world country right

big suck wrote:

Foxtrot wrote:

Whatever suits your safe space, hon.

Insulting somebody doesnt make you in the right, hahahaha

Raspberriel wrote:

Did I ever say I'm literally struggling like some random third-world child right now? I didn't. Also, JonTron pulled this same shit a few weeks ago.

big suck wrote:

Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA

big suck wrote:

Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA

Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically???

big suck wrote:

Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA

big suck wrote:

Just finished reading the entirety of this discussions and boy of boy there are so many illogical fallacies in place, foxtrot is quick to anger and responds impulsively the the rest of you have been firing that flame and giving him the reason to "disprove" your arguments which he has been massively failing to do so. Really Foxtrot just because somebody acts like a 12 year old over the internet, that really makes them 12 automatically??? what kind of assumption is that even...? anywho all of you are idiots that have no idea what you're talking about and just stirring drama for no reason lmao HAHAHAAHA

B1rd wrote:

Feel free to go back to Reddit if this place triggers you too much.

big suck wrote:

then again.. who am I to banter over a bunch of idiots. this board is for the "not so logical discussions" afterall

B1rd wrote:

Also, I'm pretty sure that most Trump supporters are 16+, just putting it out there.

Foxtrot wrote:

Then again, anyone who has the chance to vote and doesn't shouldn't be taken seriously at all, regardless of age.

Kisses wrote:

Foxtrot wrote:

Then again, anyone who has the chance to vote and doesn't shouldn't be taken seriously at all, regardless of age.

There are different reasons as to why some people don't vote other than stubborness, ignorance, ungratefulness that people died for to give them the right to vote (got I hate typing this line) etc

ungratefulness that people died for to give them the right to vote (got I hate typing this line)

Raspberriel wrote:

Funny how tolerance only entered the picture again once your side came to power.

big suck wrote:

then again.. who am I to banter over a bunch of idiots. this board is for the "not so logical discussions" afterall

Dawnsday wrote: