you're right, this is goodB1rd wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/543149
finally a gud thread
was not expecting that
forum
ITT 2: We post shit that is neither funny nor interesting
posted
Total Posts
57,694
was not expecting that
polish such a nasty language
It got nuked, what was it?Raspberriel wrote:
you're right, this is goodB1rd wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/543149
finally a gud thread
was not expecting that
Considering b1rd liked it I don't have high expectations
what the fuck did you just sayJendrej wrote:
Bleh, rap. I don't want rap.
to me, you little
bitch? I'll have you know
The title was "Suggestion: Get a rhinoplasty" and a non-B1rd user (but with a similar name) called Peppy a fat-nosed Jew and said he probably had his yarmulke printed with a Japanese girl on it so that he wouldn't be lonely on Yom KippurMahogany wrote:
It got nuked, what was it?Raspberriel wrote:
you're right, this is good
was not expecting that
Considering b1rd liked it I don't have high expectations
B1rd posted a pic with the caption "(((peppy))) counting his shekels"
the first part was what I found funny and what I "was not expecting"
EDIT: I actually have it still open on my computer. The user who made the first post is now banned, but here's the verbatim quote:
and the pic B1rd posted:bridmaster wrote:
Peppy you saucy cunt I know you deleted my last suggestion because you couldn't handle the truth, you big nosed jew. I bet you have a yamulke with a print of a jap girl on it so that you don't feel lonely at yom kippur you absolute ass blaster.
Thanks man
its exactly what I expected
its exactly what I expected
Aki Adagaki is my new waifu as of last night. Please respect her ~
she shit reeeKisses wrote:
Aki Adagaki is my new waifu as of last night. Please respect her ~
Kisses wrote:
Aki Adagaki is my new waifu as of last night. Please respect her ~
i see why you chose her now
DeletedUser_6709840
/pol/ never disappoints.
Fake or not, this is probably the funniest thing to come out of this transition period. Also finding out RFK's son is a huge anti-vaxxer, but that's more disappointing than hilarious.B1rd wrote:
/pol/ never disappoints.
I heard a kid recently became a tetraplegic a vaccination. They definitely should not be mandatory.
My facial expression right now is that of my avatarAomi wrote:
Kisses wrote:
Aki Adagaki is my new waifu as of last night. Please respect her ~
i see why you chose her now
Except probably not as cuteKisses wrote:
My facial expression right now is that of my avatar
Deez nuts on your chin
this is becoming more sad than the entirety of the flat earth movementBlitzfrog wrote:
Except probably not as cuteKisses wrote:
My facial expression right now is that of my avatar
Deez nuts on your chin
Just to make it worse, I'm part of the flat earth movementRaspberrial wrote:
this is becoming more sad than the entirety of the flat earth movement
Long live the flat earthers
l m f a oBlitzfrog wrote:
Just to make it worse, I'm part of the flat earth movementRaspberrial wrote:
this is becoming more sad than the entirety of the flat earth movement
Long live the flat earthers
the flat earth movement has members all over the globe
Really though, if everything falls to the ground and the earth is round how can planes fly without falling into the sky when entering the bottom side of earth?!
this has been an issue for a long time now, compatibility over certain medications should be in mind, not the laws that surround itB1rd wrote:
I heard a kid recently became a tetraplegic a vaccination. They definitely should not be mandatory.
the law is designated to protect the people, not kill them or paralyze them
The problem is that laws are never perfect, and will always cause unintentional harm. There should never be any laws forcing anyone to put something in their body like this. On these issues there is a certain intellectual dogmatism, there is a lot of stigma against those who don't agree, in this case labelled "anti-vaccers", (similar to 'climate-change denialists', creationists, etc.). The thing is though that even established 'facts' in the scientific community are not always correct, and in fact often a scientific consensus on issues have turned out to be incorrect. This is why I hate this trend of authoritarianism, wherein people convinced of their intellectual superiority want to force laws on people 'for their own good.
Because "vactruth" and "naturalnews" are such great sources, right?B1rd wrote:
I heard a kid recently became a tetraplegic a vaccination. They definitely should not be mandatory.
Vaccines are good, don't listen to propaganda from anti-vaxxing shitters. They're directly harming others with their beliefs.
All of these labels are perfectly accurate descriptions of people who blatantly go against scientific conclusions/data.B1rd wrote:
there is a lot of stigma against those who don't agree, in this case labelled "anti-vaccers", (similar to 'climate-change denialists', creationists, etc.)
You're a logical person, generally, so why are you defending anti-vaccination politics? Do you just consider it another thing to be libertarian about?
Oh my god b1rd is also an anti-vaxxer or at least a sympathizer
This keeps getting better and better
This keeps getting better and better
DeletedUser_6709840
Those people aren't "directly harming anyone with their beliefs", you can't harm other people with opinions. That's absurd. You claim vaccines are good, but that's just a claim. Ifa kid was made tetraplegic from a vaccine, as declared by a court, then that would seem to point towards vaccines being not so good. The human body and how different chemicals and compounds affect it is a very complex issue, you can't say for certain that none of the things used in the large multitude of vaccines don't cause serious harm to certain individuals. And some of these things might take decades for the harmful effects to show up. I've already made my point about how scientific consensuses aren't always right. How do we know that the protestors aren't right on this issues? We don't know 100%.DaddyCoolVipper wrote:
Because "vactruth" and "naturalnews" are such great sources, right?
Vaccines are good, don't listen to propaganda from anti-vaxxing shitters. They're directly harming others with their beliefs.
All of these labels are perfectly accurate descriptions of people who blatantly go against scientific conclusions/data.
You're a logical person, generally, so why are you defending anti-vaccination politics? Do you just consider it another thing to be libertarian about?
A certain example I can think of is the lipid hypothesis. A few decades ago, there was a big scare about saturated fats and heart disease. There were lots of scientific studies that showed a link of saturated fats to heart disease. And because of that, there was a big shift from animal fats to industrial vegetable oil. Well, it turns out that saturated fat actually don't cause heart disease, and in fact these vegetable oils which are heavily processed and contain trans fats are actually extremely harmful to the human body. Should the government have banned products containing saturated fats because of the scientific consensus at the time?
I really consider the term "vaccination politics" silly. I don't deal in terms of things like that, I deal in terms of the useful scope of the government. I don't have anything against vaccines specifically. I think generally vaccines are a good thing for society. But there is this statist slogan of "ideas so good, they have to be mandatory". Good ideas don't have to be forced onto other people, in fact this is just detrimental. For reasons like: It opens up a whole lot of abuses possible by the government when people have no choice in what they consume. Like naturalnew.com alludes to, it is plausible that corruption and corporate interests are at play when it comes to vaccines. Just like it is with "the war on drugs", in which private prisons were at work in colluding with the government to create a whole lot of victimless crimes and thus inflate the prison population. This is possible when you have monopolistic control on a certain product, especially when you force consumption. As well, the government is in no way liable to damages caused by vaccines like a private company would be.
I don't take these positions on such a issues because it's the "libertarian position". I take a position based on pragmatism from looking at history and the useful role of the government. In this case, "more freedom" creates a better outcome for everyone.
PLEASE DONT TELL ME YOURE SERIOUSLY AN ANTI VAXXER THAT IS THE STUPIDEST THING IVE EVER HEARD
omg i heard MMR vaccines cause autism???
HE IS, IT'S AMAZING HOLY SHIT THIS IS THE BEST DAY EVERHika wrote:
PLEASE DONT TELL ME YOURE SERIOUSLY AN ANTI VAXXER THAT IS THE STUPIDEST THING IVE EVER HEARD
Just my 2 cents - if someone thing vaccines are "bad" should really read about people whos lives got saved by this, get a book, read about it, get some knowledge etc. We have this kind of people in poland too.... and 100% of them are people who doesn't even finished middle school - tl;dr ignorant idiots.
From my own life, I am from little kid very susceptibility to any sickess, especially flu. Without vaccines i could be either forever sick or at worst dead.
But for now... *popcorn*
From my own life, I am from little kid very susceptibility to any sickess, especially flu. Without vaccines i could be either forever sick or at worst dead.
But for now... *popcorn*
i wish there was a block optionB1rd wrote:
You claim vaccines are good, but that's just a claim. Ifa kid was made tetraplegic from a vaccine, as declared by a court, then that would seem to point towards vaccines being not so good. The human body and how different chemicals and compounds affect it is a very complex issue, you can't say for certain that none of the things used in the large multitude of vaccines don't cause serious harm to certain individuals. And some of these things might take decades for the harmful effects to show up. I've already made my point about how scientific consensuses aren't always right. How do we know that the protestors aren't right on this issues? We don't know 100%.
why would you ever want to block b1rd, this is fucking hilariousRailey2 wrote:
i wish there was a block option
i find it rather sad.
When people hold such twisted opinions, i always find it rather sad.
He probably thinks that ''but we don't know 100 percent'' is a valid argument for letting parents neglect their children and putting everyone around them at danger. The world is a more dangerous place because of idiots like him.
i really hope that he never has children. He'll do some really dumb shit to them without even realizing it.
When people hold such twisted opinions, i always find it rather sad.
He probably thinks that ''but we don't know 100 percent'' is a valid argument for letting parents neglect their children and putting everyone around them at danger. The world is a more dangerous place because of idiots like him.
i really hope that he never has children. He'll do some really dumb shit to them without even realizing it.
There is always the ignore option.Railey2 wrote:
i wish there was a block optionB1rd wrote:
You claim vaccines are good, but that's just a claim. Ifa kid was made tetraplegic from a vaccine, as declared by a court, then that would seem to point towards vaccines being not so good. The human body and how different chemicals and compounds affect it is a very complex issue, you can't say for certain that none of the things used in the large multitude of vaccines don't cause serious harm to certain individuals. And some of these things might take decades for the harmful effects to show up. I've already made my point about how scientific consensuses aren't always right. How do we know that the protestors aren't right on this issues? We don't know 100%.
... so because he doesn't believe in vaccines makes this a fair and valid statement?Railey2 wrote:
i really hope that he never has children. He'll do some really dumb shit to them without even realizing it.
Railey don't turn in Mahogany or Taiga, it would greatly piss me off
Can someone explain to me what is going on? Too many posts, cbb reading Dem allKisses wrote:
... so because he doesn't believe in vaccines makes this a fair and valid statement?Railey2 wrote:
i really hope that he never has children. He'll do some really dumb shit to them without even realizing it.
Railey don't turn in Mahogany or Taiga, it would greatly piss me off
b1rd is an anti-vaxxerBlitzfrog wrote:
Can someone explain to me what is going on? Too many posts, cbb reading Dem all
I mean even though he is possibly an antivaxxer, it doesn't completely mean he'd be a shitty dad
hopefully
hopefully
He'd influence his kids with his opinion so yes he'd be a shitty dad
So do sjws who impose their kids with being trans and gender identity bullshit because they cant be cis and hetero
No, i have absolutely no faith in people like him.Kisses wrote:
... so because he doesn't believe in vaccines makes this a fair and valid statement?Railey2 wrote:
i really hope that he never has children. He'll do some really dumb shit to them without even realizing it.
Railey don't turn in Mahogany or Taiga, it would greatly piss me off
He's not an anti-vaxxer, he made that clear enough in his post.
The problem lies far deeper.
it's like he was indoctrinated to uphold a rather unrealistic ideal of freedom, even in cases where it's super impractical and detrimental. Just look at how free markets work in his mind.
At the same time he fundamentally distrusts everything with the label ''government'' for no apparent reason, while having blind faith in everything that carries the label ''free''.
Then he also has no scientific literacy to speak of, and is as a result completely unable to distinguish fact from fiction.
He also has a religious background, so that might play into some of his ideas as well.
in other words, his priorities are completely messed up. He'd rather protect the right over anti-vaxxers to make their own decisions, because
A) Having them do otherwise would require governmental interference (''government'' label -> bad)
B) He thinks theres a reasonable possibility that they could be right (scientifically illiterate)
C) if we give people freedom, everything will magically fix itself or at least get better (indoctrinated ideal of freedom)
He probably knows that vaccines work. But he still thinks that anti-vaxxers should be allowed to do what they do. That's how fucked he is. His biggest problem is that he thinks of freedom like this wonder-medicine. Problem? Could probably be solved with more freedom, then things will regulate themselves for sure.
Yeah i think that's a really bad combination.
lmao, Alex Jones just tweeted out a quote from noted Democrat Senator Cory Booker because Booker voted against a bill most Democrats supported
Even funnier, the quote is about "building bridges across our differences," which is exactly what Republicans like him HAVEN'T been doing for the past eight years. So now that Congress is "finding common ground" favoring Republicans, NOW you're calling for everyone to start singing Kum-ba-ya around the campfire? Piss off, Alex.
Republicans need a taste of their own "obstructionism" poison, but I don't see it happening given that some Democrats in Congress are complete chickenshits. They've been way too complacent for far too long. What they couldn't do with 58 Senators, the Republicans are now doing with only 52.
I'm sure some of you are cheering right now because "fuck the left." Hope you're happy.
EDIT: Now that I've gotten my monthly "bitch about politics" session out of the way, does anyone else here have any podcasts they listen to?
Even funnier, the quote is about "building bridges across our differences," which is exactly what Republicans like him HAVEN'T been doing for the past eight years. So now that Congress is "finding common ground" favoring Republicans, NOW you're calling for everyone to start singing Kum-ba-ya around the campfire? Piss off, Alex.
Republicans need a taste of their own "obstructionism" poison, but I don't see it happening given that some Democrats in Congress are complete chickenshits. They've been way too complacent for far too long. What they couldn't do with 58 Senators, the Republicans are now doing with only 52.
I'm sure some of you are cheering right now because "fuck the left." Hope you're happy.
EDIT: Now that I've gotten my monthly "bitch about politics" session out of the way, does anyone else here have any podcasts they listen to?
zzz, go on with your circlejerk, I literally said 'I think vaccines are a good thing' but of course you wouldn't see that with all your 'anti-vaxxer' hysteria nonsense. All I was saying was why government forced vaccination was a bad thing, but of course none of my points were appreciated at all.
Maybe the people complaining about freedom should go and live in 1950's Russia and tell me how bad freedom is because they can't force people and their kids to take a multitude of vaccines.
Maybe the people complaining about freedom should go and live in 1950's Russia and tell me how bad freedom is because they can't force people and their kids to take a multitude of vaccines.
So, you're complaining that Republicans are trying to find some common ground now, even though they didn't support democrats' cancerous bills in the past? (although it doesn't really matter since Obama used his executive actions to force through whatever he could)Raspberriel wrote:
'm sure some of you are cheering right now because "fuck the left." Hope you're happy.
Co-optional (formerly TGS) podcast is niceRaspberriel wrote:
does anyone else here have any podcasts they listen to?
Whenever you make a post of politics I'm reading the words but I have no idea how you get so worked up about what you've said.Raspberriel wrote:
lmao, Alex Jones just tweeted out a quote from noted Democrat Senator Cory Booker because Booker voted against a bill most Democrats supported
Even funnier, the quote is about "building bridges across our differences," which is exactly what Republicans like him HAVEN'T been doing for the past eight years. So now that Congress is "finding common ground" favoring Republicans, NOW you're calling for everyone to start singing Kum-ba-ya around the campfire? Piss off, Alex.
Republicans need a taste of their own "obstructionism" poison, but I don't see it happening given that some Democrats in Congress are complete chickenshits. They've been way too complacent for far too long. What they couldn't do with 58 Senators, the Republicans are now doing with only 52.
I'm sure some of you are cheering right now because "fuck the left." Hope you're happy.
EDIT: Now that I've gotten my monthly "bitch about politics" session out of the way, does anyone else here have any podcasts they listen to?
Bad English by me but too lazy to reword it
They are also shitty parents too, yes, whats your point?Yuudachi-kun wrote:
So do sjws who impose their kids with being trans and gender identity bullshit because they cant be cis and hetero
It's not even about "trying to find common ground" here, the Republican Congressmen are just full of obstructionists. Remember, Mitch McConnell once filibustered a proposal he made himself (about the debt ceiling) because Democrats voted almost unanimously for it. But hey, the government's super-partisan now, and I don't know why I keep expecting that to change any time soon. And the Dems are for sure not gonna respond in kind, especially with the continuing "when they go low, we go high" shtick that's backfired on them multiple times -- there was a fire at a North Carolina GOP office and Dems made a successful GoFundMe to fix it. The GOP responded with the ever-so-loving gesture of stripping away some of their governor's powers because a Democrat's about to replace him. And that's just one example of shady tactics they've pulled off in recent memory.
But I'm rambling again.
But I'm rambling again.
Giving my own answer here: How Stuff Works has a bunch of cool podcast series -- I've been binging Stuff You Missed in History Class over the last month and it's pretty fascinating.Mahogany wrote:
Co-optional (formerly TGS) podcast is niceRaspberriel wrote:
does anyone else here have any podcasts they listen to?
It's usually something I find ridiculous on Twitter that sparks it, or if it isn't one single incident, then it's usually my general impressions on what I've been seeing on my feed over a few weeks. It's also only happened when I'm feeling particularly bitchy in real life (no surprise there).Kisses wrote:
Whenever you make a post of politics I'm reading the words but I have no idea how you get so worked up about what you've said.
Bad English by me but too lazy to reword it
The Democratic party has never had any moral high-ground. That's just been a pretense to justify all their self-serving actions and to label their opponents as evil. It's funny you would accuse republicans of shady shit considering all of the things they have done in this recent elections, including but not limited to sending violent agitators to Trump rallies.
There is. Feel free to go ahead and block me, considering all of your petty name calling and insults I don't care for anything you have to say anymore.Railey2 wrote:
i wish there was a block option
Ok this is some serious business right here, how did clicking circles lead to the concern of other's babies or politics. I guess this really is OT
I'm just going to point at two things.
My president elect Donald Trump and my classy president Barack Obama.
My president elect Donald Trump and my classy president Barack Obama.
I can't wait until trump breaks down and has to quit
Guess we can call that day triumpantMahogany wrote:
I can't wait until trump breaks down and has to quit
you're going to wait a long time Maho
No one cares about clicking circles hereBlitzfrog wrote:
Ok this is some serious business right here, how did clicking circles lead to the concern of other's babies or politics. I guess this really is OT
Catching fruits is cool though
I could point to the fact that many of the strict voter ID laws/early voting restrictions were only put into place after Obama was elected, since they affect Dem voters more than GOP voters (in NC, black early voting turnout this year, compared to 2012 levels, was higher in counties literally under states of emergency because of Hurricane Matthew than in counties with those laws in place). Not to mention, many of the Supreme Court cases related to gerrymandering had to do with arrangements favoring the GOP.B1rd wrote:
The Democratic party has never had any moral high-ground. That's just been a pretense to justify all their self-serving actions and to label their opponents as evil. It's funny you would accuse republicans of shady shit considering all of the things they have done in this recent elections, including but not limited to sending violent agitators to Trump rallies.
This doesn't mean the Democrats are automatically innocent just because their opponents did something wrong -- they've played the "reduce the number of polling places" game before, like in Arizona. Not to mention several Democrat Congressmen have zero integrity, as they've demonstrated again and again *coughbobmenendezcough*
unfortunatelyZain Sugieres wrote:
you're going to wait a long time Maho
Moving on to a different topic, HOLY SHIT the mania pp system just became hyperinflated as fuuuuck. Someone in the mania subforum said it best: it's like "Zimbabwe's currency" now.
He can't handle it and he's not even elected yetZain Sugieres wrote:
you're going to wait a long time Maho
I don't think I have to worry
The strict voter ID laws were likely a necessity to stop illegal immigrants, dead people etc. voting Democrat. Obama almost directly encouraged illegals to vote. Frankly, the Democratic party has always used minorities as a tool to power. They import voters from third-world countries, they pander to minorities with welfare and social-program money.Raspberriel wrote:
I could point to the fact that many of the strict voter ID laws/early voting restrictions were only put into place after Obama was elected, since they affect Dem voters more than GOP voters (in NC, black early voting turnout this year, compared to 2012 levels, was higher in counties literally under states of emergency because of Hurricane Matthew than in counties with those laws in place). Not to mention, many of the Supreme Court cases related to gerrymandering had to do with arrangements favoring the GOP.
This doesn't mean the Democrats are automatically innocent just because their opponents did something wrong -- they've played the "reduce the number of polling places" game before, like in Arizona. Not to mention several Democrat Congressmen have zero integrity, as they've demonstrated again and again *coughbobmenendezcough*
Here is another amusing video concerning the elections. http://puu.sh/tl54x/19e89b8d51.mp4
Obviously, integrity is not something that goes in hand with politics. But for what it's worth, I still think the Democratic party is worse. The good think about this election though is that Trump shook up the GOP establishment as much as he did the Democrats.
I actually removed some stuff about "illegals voting" from my earlier post. Here's what I wrote:
The whole "Obama encouraging illegals to vote" situation was just so ambiguously worded, though. Plus, the Internet does have a penchant for taking Obama statements out of context (see: his quote "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam" which he did actually say, but followed it up in the same speech with "But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.").
But who knows, maybe I'm just talking a bunch of hot air and Trump truly will make America great. Only time can tell, though.
But -- I'll just address beforehand that the report about "3 million illegal immigrants voting" originated from... two tweets. None of them linked to any outside sources, just literally said "we've found 3 million non-citizens voting." The tweeter never released his methods or data when asked for them. And somehow, that was enough for Infowars to write an article on it.Out of curiosity, I do want to see whether his claim is legit or not, but it's been almost two months and he hasn't released an update. He does insist that he's working on it, but ehhhhh...
The whole "Obama encouraging illegals to vote" situation was just so ambiguously worded, though. Plus, the Internet does have a penchant for taking Obama statements out of context (see: his quote "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam" which he did actually say, but followed it up in the same speech with "But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.").
But who knows, maybe I'm just talking a bunch of hot air and Trump truly will make America great. Only time can tell, though.
hahahahRaspberriel wrote:
Plus, the Internet does have a penchant for taking Obama statements out of context "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam" which he did actually say, but
Obama is such a lolcow. Thank goodness he will be gone in 6 days.
I don't know, if you are absolutely determined to buy your weebshit in physical form instead of just looking at scans you can hardly complain about the price.Kisses wrote:
Talking about expensive stuff, p/5744161; drinking whisky and coffee while playing Skyrim in a dark room. NEET life is best life. My save that I started today is already at 10 hours lol.
It's a novel not a manga, there are no scans. Also don't you think I've heavily search for it online already?B1rd wrote:
I don't know, if you are absolutely determined to buy your weebshit in physical form instead of just looking at scans you can hardly complain about the price.
me irkl
Obama has had fewer scandals in 2 terms than trump has in 2 weeksB1rd wrote:
Obama is such a lolcow. Thank goodness he will be gone in 6 days.
Obama was a fine president
If by 'fine', you mean utterly useless then I guess you're right on that.
And it's not because I'm in favor of Trump. But I digress.
My Saturday has gone by way too quickly I haven't even felt like I spent much of it ;___;
And it's not because I'm in favor of Trump. But I digress.
My Saturday has gone by way too quickly I haven't even felt like I spent much of it ;___;
mfw reading everything Mahogany postsFuZ wrote:
Jordan wrote:
mfw reading everything Mahogany postsFuZ wrote:
mfw something something Kisses something fingering someone's legs offFuZ wrote:
Raspberriel wrote:
mfw something something Kisses something fingering someone's legs offFuZ wrote:
I guess that means I'm doing a pretty good job
'someones'Raspberriel wrote:
mfw something something Kisses something fingering someone's legs offFuZ wrote:
osu! client fucked itself over so hard I have to uninstall and lose everything after trying to troubleshoot for almost an hour, hagh.
Its not osu's FaulstFaust wrote:
osu! client fucked itself over so hard I have to uninstall and lose everything after trying to troubleshoot for almost an hour, hagh.
all of this are the works of jews and we're going to be all dead at some point so why bother arguing and living in the first place :^)
Because there is always hope for dnextgendNextGen wrote:
all of this are the works of jews and we're going to be all dead at some point so why bother arguing and living in the first place :^)
ew its you
trying to get the nth post of this thread through posting multiple times is like cheating at the special olympics
you'll be the king of the retards but at what cost
you'll be the king of the retards but at what cost
nah I did that to make everyone still here from 2 years ago cry bc I'm backCyclohexane wrote:
trying to get the nth post of this thread through posting multiple times is like cheating at the special olympics
you'll be the king of the retards but at what cost
Cyclohexane wrote:
trying to get the nth post of this thread through posting multiple times is like cheating at the special olympics
you'll be the king of the retards but at what cost
For the 2000th page Granger tried to do this but I blocked xir
ahsoka08 wrote:
Hey is my man Enet still here?
I like you
Hi
posting on page 3k
fuck i was betrayedsilmarilen wrote:
posting on page 3k
^fail
whylol wrote:
ur still disgusting