Oh baby here comes dat double-post oshitwaddup (bc I was forced to)
[Normal]
Hol ybeautiful diff daaaaaayum (update it!!)
[Apple's Pear]
00:11:359 (1,2) - Ehhhh (1) feels so forced and overall feels empty cuz its mapped like this. I think if you wanna emphasize the pause you could change (1) to just a note so it feels more like a pause but if you wanna emphasize the 1/2 or 1/4 sound playing here you could have another 1/2 slider at 00:11:712 - and delete (2) that way its more clear what you're going for. Also 00:17:006 (1,2,3) - here you don't have that same 1/2 tone but at least it's not so empty so ye
00:24:947 (7) - Add clap to head
00:31:124 (1) - Also this would be better as a finish than a clap eye em oh
00:37:124 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hoyl #the_relentless (it's fine tho)
01:28:300 (5,6,7,8) - kinda dull tbh maybe change (7) or (8) to two stacked notes? or maybe change 01:29:006 (7,8,9) - to something like this but a bit of rhythm variety would be cool like you did in sections before
[Aka]
00:09:771 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - Something about the jump from 00:10:653 (3) - to 00:11:183 (4) - makes me feel like it's not 3/2 it just visually looks like it would be 1/1 like the other notes before it and part of the reason is probably cuz 00:11:183 (4) - uses 1.4x instead of 1.5x. Might not seem like much but it can be a bit misleading because of the angle. So maybe moving 00:11:183 (4) - to x:448 y:332 would help slightly or a bit more even.
00:13:124 (3,4,5) - See like this is a better example of emphasizing the 3/2 spacing because even though it uses 2.0x vs the 1.4x, a player can see the bigger gap and realize there's a much bigger pause time and read the approach circle instead of the distance so it would be nice to do that in the example before but obviously not needed I just feel it helps visualize snaps better.
00:19:830 (1,2) - Also not really a problem but if you wanted to simplify the rhythm you could change (1) to a 1/2 slider also since there is a sound there but again not really needed if u dont want
00:36:065 (2) - If you want you can add a soft clap at 00:36:241 - this segment. Don't forget to use soft addition though since ur using drum samples
00:37:477 (3,4) - Move the clap from (4) to (3). That's where it goes. Also add a clap in the slider tail of (4)
00:46:300 (3) - Also clap on slider tail
00:48:771 (2,3) - Same as 00:37:477 (3,4) -
00:53:888 (2,3) - Move these a bit closer to (1). Highlight both and move (2) to x:204 y:44 so it looks like this using 1.3x spacing
01:25:477 (3,4,5) - Might sound a bit petty but please stack this. I remember having so many issues reading off-stacks like this when I was a noob because of the approach circles doing this
01:26:888 (5) - Add clap to the last repeat at 01:27:065 -
01:29:888 (2,3,4) - Note that off-stacks like this are more readable than 01:25:477 (3,4,5) - and I can't really explain why but I guess its because you can see the notes before you notice the approach circles? idk...Just leave this like it is this ones okay xd
01:31:653 (5) - Clap on slider head and make sure to use soft addition
01:38:183 (3) - Use finish on all the segments not just the last two so the samples better represent the toms. You could also get rid of the claps if you want and it would just be finishes here. Sounds better but up to you
[Bonsai]
00:17:888 (5) - Don't be afraid to start on dat blue tick yo (please don't be afraid ;-; [PLEASE!!!!! ;A;])
00:18:594 (1) - I love you for this. Dunno if it really matters to u but you could try to move the red node more to the center. Use 1/8 snap so you can see it's not centered.
00:20:447 (2) - This is fine as it is but somehow I wanna double. I guess it's okay for the difficulty lvl tho
00:32:006 (5,6,7) - Might wanna manual stack this. Looks weird auto stacked. If you do this it applies for others such as 00:34:300 (2,3,4) - etc.
01:05:712 (3,4) - imo clap should be on (3) not (4)
01:38:183 (2) - Add finishes on the first two repeats
[Shark]
00:08:183 (1) - Thank you :v
00:21:947 - I can see why the first two would be left empty but idk here there's a few more samples you could map to and leaving it empty just doesn't feel right. As an example you could change 00:21:947 (5) - to a 1/2 slider and then have two 1/4 small slider jumps at 00:22:300 - 00:22:477 - or something :^)
00:26:183 (6) - Minor but you could add a repeat to this. No need to change anything afterward either because the rhythm should be readable and if anything all sections before this do a good job of explaining the rhythm. Besides it's not like readability is a concern when you have something like 00:27:418 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - right after xd
00:29:888 (3) - Add clap to final repeat at 00:30:065 -
00:30:594 (8) - Similar suggestion as 00:26:183 (6) - but again minor
00:52:300 (1,2) - Move clap to (2) instead of (1)
00:53:006 (4) - Also remove clap from the slider head. Also 00:52:653 (3,4) - Sounds better to move the whistle to (4) instead of (3) trust
00:54:065 (3) - Clap but make sure to add a soft addition to this.
00:58:300 (2) - Same as above
00:58:653 (3) - Same as above but at 00:58:830 - Maybe also a whistle.
00:59:359 (1) - Remove clap from (1) and move it to 00:59:712 (2) - thanks
01:03:683 (1,2,3,4,5) - Lol damn this is trippy as hell tbh. Since you wanted to get the small hi hat at 01:03:683 (1) - I'd also make sense to map to the other drum sounds at 01:04:124 - and 01:04:212 - or maybe just the one at 01:04:212 - so it's at least another doubles rhythm and feels more intuitive...if that makes sense xd. If you wanna keep the rhythm though I'd highly suggest this change.
What I did was moved 01:03:683 (1,2) - to x:92 y:312 to keep that pseudo triangle with 01:03:241 (8,9) - , then stacked 01:03:947 (3) - and01:04:477 (5) - with 01:03:418 (9) - and finally moved 01:04:300 (4) - to x:4 y:240 to make dat sort of triangle with the other notes and a straight line with (8) and (9) again. This should at least make the spacing a bit more uh...digestible? idk it sounds better saying that in spanish xd like you can absorb the rhythm a bit more cuz of the spacing if that makes sense :v
01:34:830 (1) - Minor but might make more sense stacked over (10)
[Asphyxiation]
00:08:183 (1) - Minor af but move to x:192 y:96 so it makes a better line with 00:08:536 (1) -
00:17:712 (1,2,3) - Uh...I think you're trying to simplify rhythm here? idk. I really don't like this because the strongest sound is at 00:17:977 - and even if you wanted to argue that there's a very small click sound at 00:18:065 - I wouldn't say it warrants a note here vs that 3/4 rhythm.
00:41:183 (7) - NC to keep the 4/1 NC pattern consistent.
01:07:477 (10,11,12,13,1) - Minor also but I kinda see this playing better if it curved down a bit. Sloppy example
[Yang (rip)]
00:14:191 (6) - NC
00:15:426 (1,2,3) - NCs are backwards. Remove NC from (1) and start it at (3) like in the first few segments 00:08:191 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) -
00:17:014 (8) - Following that guideline this also needs NC and maybe also 00:17:720 (5) - cuz you NC'd 00:17:985 (1,1) -
00:19:661 (2) - Meh...maybe this too xd...I'll stop pointing out NCs I think you get the idea :v
00:41:985 (2) - okay last one NC this cuz you did that in the first 3/4 part at 00:17:985 (1,1) - etc xd
Eh I'll be honest I was kinda sleepy by the time I got to this diff but it seemed fine for the most part...except the NCs
KDS me in like 3 days so I get dat fatty 2 kds ;^)
[Normal]
Hol ybeautiful diff daaaaaayum (update it!!)
[Apple's Pear]
00:11:359 (1,2) - Ehhhh (1) feels so forced and overall feels empty cuz its mapped like this. I think if you wanna emphasize the pause you could change (1) to just a note so it feels more like a pause but if you wanna emphasize the 1/2 or 1/4 sound playing here you could have another 1/2 slider at 00:11:712 - and delete (2) that way its more clear what you're going for. Also 00:17:006 (1,2,3) - here you don't have that same 1/2 tone but at least it's not so empty so ye
00:24:947 (7) - Add clap to head
00:31:124 (1) - Also this would be better as a finish than a clap eye em oh
00:37:124 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - hoyl #the_relentless (it's fine tho)
01:28:300 (5,6,7,8) - kinda dull tbh maybe change (7) or (8) to two stacked notes? or maybe change 01:29:006 (7,8,9) - to something like this but a bit of rhythm variety would be cool like you did in sections before
[Aka]
00:09:771 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - Something about the jump from 00:10:653 (3) - to 00:11:183 (4) - makes me feel like it's not 3/2 it just visually looks like it would be 1/1 like the other notes before it and part of the reason is probably cuz 00:11:183 (4) - uses 1.4x instead of 1.5x. Might not seem like much but it can be a bit misleading because of the angle. So maybe moving 00:11:183 (4) - to x:448 y:332 would help slightly or a bit more even.
00:13:124 (3,4,5) - See like this is a better example of emphasizing the 3/2 spacing because even though it uses 2.0x vs the 1.4x, a player can see the bigger gap and realize there's a much bigger pause time and read the approach circle instead of the distance so it would be nice to do that in the example before but obviously not needed I just feel it helps visualize snaps better.
00:19:830 (1,2) - Also not really a problem but if you wanted to simplify the rhythm you could change (1) to a 1/2 slider also since there is a sound there but again not really needed if u dont want
00:36:065 (2) - If you want you can add a soft clap at 00:36:241 - this segment. Don't forget to use soft addition though since ur using drum samples
00:37:477 (3,4) - Move the clap from (4) to (3). That's where it goes. Also add a clap in the slider tail of (4)
00:46:300 (3) - Also clap on slider tail
00:48:771 (2,3) - Same as 00:37:477 (3,4) -
00:53:888 (2,3) - Move these a bit closer to (1). Highlight both and move (2) to x:204 y:44 so it looks like this using 1.3x spacing
01:25:477 (3,4,5) - Might sound a bit petty but please stack this. I remember having so many issues reading off-stacks like this when I was a noob because of the approach circles doing this
01:26:888 (5) - Add clap to the last repeat at 01:27:065 -
01:29:888 (2,3,4) - Note that off-stacks like this are more readable than 01:25:477 (3,4,5) - and I can't really explain why but I guess its because you can see the notes before you notice the approach circles? idk...Just leave this like it is this ones okay xd
01:31:653 (5) - Clap on slider head and make sure to use soft addition
01:38:183 (3) - Use finish on all the segments not just the last two so the samples better represent the toms. You could also get rid of the claps if you want and it would just be finishes here. Sounds better but up to you
[Bonsai]
00:17:888 (5) - Don't be afraid to start on dat blue tick yo (please don't be afraid ;-; [PLEASE!!!!! ;A;])
00:18:594 (1) - I love you for this. Dunno if it really matters to u but you could try to move the red node more to the center. Use 1/8 snap so you can see it's not centered.
00:20:447 (2) - This is fine as it is but somehow I wanna double. I guess it's okay for the difficulty lvl tho
00:32:006 (5,6,7) - Might wanna manual stack this. Looks weird auto stacked. If you do this it applies for others such as 00:34:300 (2,3,4) - etc.
01:05:712 (3,4) - imo clap should be on (3) not (4)
01:38:183 (2) - Add finishes on the first two repeats
[Shark]
00:08:183 (1) - Thank you :v
00:21:947 - I can see why the first two would be left empty but idk here there's a few more samples you could map to and leaving it empty just doesn't feel right. As an example you could change 00:21:947 (5) - to a 1/2 slider and then have two 1/4 small slider jumps at 00:22:300 - 00:22:477 - or something :^)
00:26:183 (6) - Minor but you could add a repeat to this. No need to change anything afterward either because the rhythm should be readable and if anything all sections before this do a good job of explaining the rhythm. Besides it's not like readability is a concern when you have something like 00:27:418 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - right after xd
00:29:888 (3) - Add clap to final repeat at 00:30:065 -
00:30:594 (8) - Similar suggestion as 00:26:183 (6) - but again minor
00:52:300 (1,2) - Move clap to (2) instead of (1)
00:53:006 (4) - Also remove clap from the slider head. Also 00:52:653 (3,4) - Sounds better to move the whistle to (4) instead of (3) trust
00:54:065 (3) - Clap but make sure to add a soft addition to this.
00:58:300 (2) - Same as above
00:58:653 (3) - Same as above but at 00:58:830 - Maybe also a whistle.
00:59:359 (1) - Remove clap from (1) and move it to 00:59:712 (2) - thanks
01:03:683 (1,2,3,4,5) - Lol damn this is trippy as hell tbh. Since you wanted to get the small hi hat at 01:03:683 (1) - I'd also make sense to map to the other drum sounds at 01:04:124 - and 01:04:212 - or maybe just the one at 01:04:212 - so it's at least another doubles rhythm and feels more intuitive...if that makes sense xd. If you wanna keep the rhythm though I'd highly suggest this change.
What I did was moved 01:03:683 (1,2) - to x:92 y:312 to keep that pseudo triangle with 01:03:241 (8,9) - , then stacked 01:03:947 (3) - and01:04:477 (5) - with 01:03:418 (9) - and finally moved 01:04:300 (4) - to x:4 y:240 to make dat sort of triangle with the other notes and a straight line with (8) and (9) again. This should at least make the spacing a bit more uh...digestible? idk it sounds better saying that in spanish xd like you can absorb the rhythm a bit more cuz of the spacing if that makes sense :v
01:34:830 (1) - Minor but might make more sense stacked over (10)
[Asphyxiation]
00:08:183 (1) - Minor af but move to x:192 y:96 so it makes a better line with 00:08:536 (1) -
00:17:712 (1,2,3) - Uh...I think you're trying to simplify rhythm here? idk. I really don't like this because the strongest sound is at 00:17:977 - and even if you wanted to argue that there's a very small click sound at 00:18:065 - I wouldn't say it warrants a note here vs that 3/4 rhythm.
00:41:183 (7) - NC to keep the 4/1 NC pattern consistent.
01:07:477 (10,11,12,13,1) - Minor also but I kinda see this playing better if it curved down a bit. Sloppy example
[Yang (rip)]
00:14:191 (6) - NC
00:15:426 (1,2,3) - NCs are backwards. Remove NC from (1) and start it at (3) like in the first few segments 00:08:191 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) -
00:17:014 (8) - Following that guideline this also needs NC and maybe also 00:17:720 (5) - cuz you NC'd 00:17:985 (1,1) -
00:19:661 (2) - Meh...maybe this too xd...I'll stop pointing out NCs I think you get the idea :v
00:41:985 (2) - okay last one NC this cuz you did that in the first 3/4 part at 00:17:985 (1,1) - etc xd
Eh I'll be honest I was kinda sleepy by the time I got to this diff but it seemed fine for the most part...except the NCs
KDS me in like 3 days so I get dat fatty 2 kds ;^)