Worminators wrote:
okay have my small mod
00:22:064 (1,2,3,4) - Would follow the song better if it was 1/4 sliders imo - Disagree.
00:24:730 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - You could have used a higher spacing for theses notes, for more emphasis. - No need since its 1/6th in a 1/4 section. Its consistent with the rest of the long streams as well.
00:28:342 - There's a note here that hasn't been mapped - Intentional, I let all the BN's who bubbled this to begin with know about that and they all agree with leaving it out. You cant notice it at full speed while playing either.
00:29:064 (11) - Flow would be better if (11) was at the (6) place imo - Yeah it does.
00:33:397 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I don't like how this part is different from 00:44:064 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - and 01:40:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - - Explained this a few times way back in the thread. The first and third are the exact same, the second one is different because its in a different section thats more intense and the drums are a lot different than in the first and third instances.
02:49:613 (1,2,3,4,1) - This pattern seems too much spaced for the intensity of this part of the song. Fair enough, scaled it down a bit.
05:23:014 (1) - This stream is already hard enough, can't you move this note a bit down so it follows the curve better? - Gotta have that click for the finish.
forum
UNDEAD CORPORATION - Bloodthirsty Nightmare Lul...
posted
Total Posts
513
Topic Starter
idunno if you'd take this suggestion but i feel like it fits the guitar a lot better with this rhythm (also not sure if you've changed this already)
01:36:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these two patterns currently don't represent the guitar well , which is the most noticeable and strongest part of the song
i've used this rhythm pattern on similar sections with that guitar riff being most dominate, and it just fits so much better using that rhythm, especially when (1) is stacked on the (2) sliderhead
the reason it fits so much better is because the first 3 notes are all open notes on the guitar, which is really simple to play (literally just strumming three times without your finger touching the frets). it sounds extremely simple too, so no movement in the cursor with the (1) stacked on the slider head of (2) is honestly the best way to represent a simple guitar pattern like that. simple and easy to play without any unnecessary movements. making the next 3 notes jumps fits with the change in guitar too so thats what i'd do for the next 3 notes.
something like this is what i've come up with, and i'm not really a mapper so that pattern probably sucks but i've tried using other rhythms and none of them really get the job done compared to this one. i really think this objectively fits the riff the best and i hope you can find a way to use it well...
01:36:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these two patterns currently don't represent the guitar well , which is the most noticeable and strongest part of the song
i've used this rhythm pattern on similar sections with that guitar riff being most dominate, and it just fits so much better using that rhythm, especially when (1) is stacked on the (2) sliderhead
the reason it fits so much better is because the first 3 notes are all open notes on the guitar, which is really simple to play (literally just strumming three times without your finger touching the frets). it sounds extremely simple too, so no movement in the cursor with the (1) stacked on the slider head of (2) is honestly the best way to represent a simple guitar pattern like that. simple and easy to play without any unnecessary movements. making the next 3 notes jumps fits with the change in guitar too so thats what i'd do for the next 3 notes.
something like this is what i've come up with, and i'm not really a mapper so that pattern probably sucks but i've tried using other rhythms and none of them really get the job done compared to this one. i really think this objectively fits the riff the best and i hope you can find a way to use it well...
hurricane mithew
tbh... THIS MAP LOOK GREAT U DID A GOOD JOB THERE! 
Topic Starter
Yeah I can do that. Only reason I mapped it as it is now was to make it easier. But yeah, were going full buff on this. Ill fiddle around with some patterns later.mithew wrote:
idunno if you'd take this suggestion but i feel like it fits the guitar a lot better with this rhythm (also not sure if you've changed this already)
01:36:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - these two patterns currently don't represent the guitar well , which is the most noticeable and strongest part of the song
i've used this rhythm pattern on similar sections with that guitar riff being most dominate, and it just fits so much better using that rhythm, especially when (1) is stacked on the (2) sliderhead
the reason it fits so much better is because the first 3 notes are all open notes on the guitar, which is really simple to play (literally just strumming three times without your finger touching the frets). it sounds extremely simple too, so no movement in the cursor with the (1) stacked on the slider head of (2) is honestly the best way to represent a simple guitar pattern like that. simple and easy to play without any unnecessary movements. making the next 3 notes jumps fits with the change in guitar too so thats what i'd do for the next 3 notes.
something like this is what i've come up with, and i'm not really a mapper so that pattern probably sucks but i've tried using other rhythms and none of them really get the job done compared to this one. i really think this objectively fits the riff the best and i hope you can find a way to use it well...
what I'm doing with my life rip, saw the nonupdated version, soooorrryyyyyy
Topic Starter
Where is the 3rd BN*GhostZ wrote:
Where are the mods FeelsBadMan
Twist it
Bop it
Topic Starter
Qualify it.
Topic Starter
Dream is over boys.
I STILL HAVE HOPEEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
You're joking right? Please tell me you're joking.EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
Wait til I get BN owoEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
reallyEphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
my set is over then
let me join you
gayzmcgee for bn?EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
ok_hand
you heard it hereIdealism wrote:
gayzmcgee for bn?EphemeralFetish wrote:
Dream is over boys.
gayzmcgee get moddin
What the fuck rip? D:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Topic Starter
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.F1r3tar wrote:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Never forget
EphemeralFetish wrote:
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.F1r3tar wrote:
I guess that means you can go for loved.
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?
Id rather not share a spot next to some of the trash that ends up in there.[/quote]
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?[/quote]
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who the fuck do you think you are to say that? val0108?[/quote]
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
AyanokoRin wrote:
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who is he to say that? Isn't the mappers chant to say everytime bad quality is pointed out on their maps that "quality is subjective"? Or that only is used when convenient?
Most of this mappers (BD, rustbell, caren_sk, Mazzerin) are way more reputated mappers than this EphemeralFetish guy whose map is receiving SO MUCH attention just because of it's Star Rating. Still he feels entitled to call the other's work "trash"
Well, when a map is objectively bad like arles maps ( which are just jumpspams and don't portray the music ), I don't see why it shouldn't be called trash.Frc wrote:
AyanokoRin wrote:
You don't really need to be val0108 to guess that some of the stuff in loved has horrible quality.
Who is he to say that? Isn't the mappers chant to say everytime bad quality is pointed out on their maps that "quality is subjective"? Or that only is used when convenient?And talking about the "trash" you pretty much mean arles maps or everything that has jumps is trash for you? Now this guy thinks he is the hot shit because he maps streams when other map jumps.
Most of this mappers (BD, rustbell, caren_sk, Mazzerin) are way more reputated mappers than this EphemeralFetish guy whose map is receiving SO MUCH attention just because of it's Star Rating. Still he feels entitled to call the other's work "trash"
I could give you a lot of other reasons why the loved category has some really shit maps, but I have better things to do and I'm not going to fill this thread more than it already is with drama. Goodbye.
Now maps can be "objectively bad" but endless trash has been ranked in this last years because "quality is subjective lol". You guys are pretty funny
what a joke...
Fetish has a point. He wanted this ranked; not loved
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
Dawnsday wrote:
Fetish has a point. He wanted this ranked; not loved
If his reason not wanting loved is because he then becomes associated with trash then so what? Let's hope a qualified BN picks up this set.
This again? I have nothing wrong if he "thinks" those maps are trash, but putting it in a way that "it's objectively trash"? That's quite hypocritical for what we've seen on the last years
That's the thing HE THINKS IT'S TRASH (As do I but that's beside the point.) It's his opinion and the opinion of others; not objective. Stop treating it as such.
Dawnsday wrote:
That's the thing HE THINKS IT'S TRASH (As do I but that's beside the point.) It's his opinion and the opinion of others; not objective. Stop treating it as such.
Well it may be hard to know if he considers it to be trash or thinks its trash by his own opinions when someone after that said that those maps "are objectively trash", wouldn't you think?