cool opinion you have therehuono_tuuri wrote:
There just isnt any players that this map is meant for.
cool opinion you have therehuono_tuuri wrote:
There just isnt any players that this map is meant for.
could we just quote this from now on?Stefan wrote:
In the end, the map won't bite off your face when you decide to avoid it.
if you'd have actually looked at the threads and did more than post insinuative bullshit, you'd have realized people did not think quaver's difficulty spike was "okay". Maybe it'd be better for everyone involved if you cut your sarcastic commentary career short.Reddit wrote:
apoplectic, ignorant crap
"If you don't like it leave" stopped being an effective argument in most people's lives once testicles started to drop and periods started to occur. Maps will, and should, be judged by community perspective. Of course, most people have no idea what they're talking about, but that's normal, and you don't figure shit out without making a fool of yourself once or twice, so it's a natural process. Ironic you're calling it the "same quote over and over again" when you responded with the obligatory response to that quote... but I digress.Stefan wrote:
In the end, the map won't bite off your face when you decide to avoid it.
Yeah ok whatever floats your boat.Shiirn wrote:
Reddit wrote:
apoplectic, ignorant crap
Im aware at how upset people were at Quaver having a retarded difficulty spike that had no justification even being there. Im saying how is this a issue for getting the map ranked when this maps difficulty spike actually fits the music however overmapped you may feel it is. Im not saying "Hey everyone look the entire map is perfect just because i can justify the main thing people are complaining about". I just think it would be better to focus on other parts of the map and try to find real issues instead of "please dq muh overmapping uwu". But whatever, when this map gets inevitably DQed for something unreasonable because he isnt Monstrata or Fycho and doesnt have his special license for using huge jumps in his maps yet. I guess on the bright side i get to make some memes on how Quaver and HAI-TAI is ok but this isnt.Shiirn wrote:
if you'd have actually looked at the threads and did more than post insinuative bullshit, you'd have realized people did not think quaver's difficulty spike was "okay". Maybe it'd be better for everyone involved if you cut your sarcastic commentary career short.
i don't think it doesn't fit the song but its definitely overused (honestly everyone overuses this)Battle wrote:
that normal-hitfinish6 is still triggering tho
It's used in most if not all Mazzerin's maps. That sound is like his map's identity now despite being used by others before he ranked anything lolmithew wrote:
i don't think it doesn't fit the song but its definitely overused (honestly everyone overuses this)Battle wrote:
that normal-hitfinish6 is still triggering tho
hmm this actually used to be a triangle triple 03:25:176 (2,3,1) - but gayz and talala both disliked it, after I changed it to this talala could pass it and said it's much better, well the movement isn't awkward at least, the spacing goes up on the strong guitar notes in this section and the triple is part of it (it's the whole white tick after the strongest guitar note, ex: 03:23:676 (1,2,3,4) - 03:24:137 (1,2,3) - 03:24:599 (1,2,3,4,1) - 03:25:060 (1,2,3,1) - and so on)Ekoro wrote:
this isn't disqualified yet come on /s
to me, a map shouldn't be disqualified because of raw difficulty ; even if everyone knows that a 15* would barely make it to ranking no matter how good the map is
the harder the map is, the less you should use technical patterns and use mostly flow-friendly patterns, so the map is still playable while retaining the challenge.
03:23:214 - 03:26:445 - this part is really a pain to play, especially 03:24:945 (3,1,2,3,1) which is really awkward to play because of the very high BPM
03:52:522 (1,2) - this may be too much, i don't really see why the spacing is so high and sudden here.
that's all here, the map is technically ok (even if i admit that there are some overdone jumps, but eh, can we justify it through the song?)
i feel like i already posted on this topic, giving exactly the same opinion
The RSI tag is a medical warning for people who plan to retry this map a ton of time because streams like these really mess up your hands without proper breaksmarshallracer wrote:
It is incredible how you're still allowed to use the "rsi" tag although it doesn't have to do ANYTHING with this map
Yeah, it's hard and stuff but why should it have relevance in this map (or any other map you've used it in for that matter)?
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
If it's about helping people to find "difficult" maps, that's not how tags are supposed to be used. They're predominantely meant for additional sources or relevant people/media/events (if any) it has relevance to.
This can be done in the description aswell without abusing the tags for thisRoseusJaeger wrote:
The RSI tag is a medical warning for people who plan to retry this map a ton of time because streams like these really mess up your hands without proper breaks
This is perfectly fine as long as this issue can and will be discussedBlue Dragon wrote:
just a quick reminder that tags can be changed without a DQ so finding wrong things there will not take the map down
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/368060 this map has rsi in the tags, and rightfully so. there isnt a reason why rsi SHOULDNT be in the tags of this mapmarshallracer wrote:
It is incredible how you're still allowed to use the "rsi" tag although it doesn't have to do ANYTHING with this map
Yeah, it's hard and stuff but why should it have relevance in this map (or any other map you've used it in for that matter)?
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
If it's about helping people to find "difficult" maps, that's not how tags are supposed to be used. They're predominantely meant for additional sources or relevant people/media/events (if any) it has relevance to.
>locking forum for a map in qualified, killing any discussionS A V E R Y wrote:
Never mind...
Somebody lock this thread...
It's just about the correct usage of tags reallyXendogenesis wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/368060 this map has rsi in the tags, and rightfully so. there isnt a reason why rsi SHOULDNT be in the tags of this mapmarshallracer wrote:
It is incredible how you're still allowed to use the "rsi" tag although it doesn't have to do ANYTHING with this map
Yeah, it's hard and stuff but why should it have relevance in this map (or any other map you've used it in for that matter)?
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
If it's about helping people to find "difficult" maps, that's not how tags are supposed to be used. They're predominantely meant for additional sources or relevant people/media/events (if any) it has relevance to.
after all its a 9 star map
but like, there's a connection between rsi and the mapmarshallracer wrote:
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
If you could elaborate that further I'd be glad to read how these two are connectedAncuL wrote:
but like, there's a connection between rsi and the mapmarshallracer wrote:
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
I listed my reasons why I am so salty about itMazzerin wrote:
why are you so salty Bakari once suggested and 'allowed' me to use it, ever since then I've been using it on any of my high bpm maps with lots of 1/2 and 1/4 in a row successfully
marshallracer wrote:
This can be done in the description aswell without abusing the tags for thisRoseusJaeger wrote:
The RSI tag is a medical warning for people who plan to retry this map a ton of time because streams like these really mess up your hands without proper breaks
If we're going after Shiirn's thoughts though :marshallracer wrote:
It's just about the correct usage of tags reallyXendogenesis wrote:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/368060 this map has rsi in the tags, and rightfully so. there isnt a reason why rsi SHOULDNT be in the tags of this map
after all its a 9 star map
I realize it's a 9* diff, fine, but if you want to make clear to the players that they can hurt themselves while playing this map (which in itself sounds absurd, though it's not impossible), you can more than clearly state this in the creators words or even a sb (even if this may impair the maps appearence in the beginning)
I gave you a reason why you shouldn't use "rsi" as a tag, you even qouted it
We'd have to decide as to how we classify a tag such as "rsi", or why even bother using itShiirn wrote:
also memes can be put in tags fairly easily without anyone really giving a shit, missing or misleading tags are far more disruptive than superfluous tags
I know I didn't include a lot of the article but this are the key sentences. RSI is a medical condition. How is a medical condition as such related to any of the previously mentioned points, including the map itself? Did the drummer or guitarist suffer from RSI after playing this song repeatedly? Even so it wouldn't be relevant to the tags at all.Wikipedia wrote:
Repetitive strain injury (RSI) and associative trauma orders are umbrella terms used to refer to several discrete conditions that can be associated with repetitive tasks, forceful exertions, vibrations, mechanical compression, or sustained/awkward positions.
[...]
Some examples of symptoms experienced by patients with RSI are aching, pulsing pain, tingling and extremity weakness, initially presenting with intermittent discomfort and then, with a higher degree of frequency.
As marshallracer said, there definitely isn't. If you look at how you get rsi, it just makes no sense.AncuL wrote:
but like, there's a connection between rsi and the mapmarshallracer wrote:
I see no connection between rsi and artist, song, album and/or mapper.
Enon wrote:
don't find reason to make a map that you hate going to disqualify
Blue Dragon wrote:
just a quick reminder that tags can be changed without a DQ so finding wrong things there will not take the map down
why do you exclude the high bpm part from your ifmarshallracer wrote:
I listed my reasons why I am so salty about itMazzerin wrote:
why are you so salty Bakari once suggested and 'allowed' me to use it, ever since then I've been using it on any of my high bpm maps with lots of 1/2 and 1/4 in a row successfully
Even if Bakari "allowed" you to use it and you've used it several times already, it's still an incorrect usage of a tag
If "lots of 1/2 and 1/4" are the only requirement for a map to have rsi as a tag, then maybe I'd suggest to everyone who makes a map with streams, no matter the BPM or speed of those as long as they are 1/2 or 1/4, to put rsi in their tags
I'll have to admit I overread that and I'm sorry about itMazzerin wrote:
why do you exclude the high bpm part from your if