1. 00:07:612 (2) - 노말 샘플셋쓰시고 에디션만 소프트로 해두시면 더 깔끔해지는거 같아요 클랩쓰니 좀 어색한거 같고 샘플셋바꾸는게 젤 무난할거같아여
2. 00:26:954 (2,1) - 이건 어디까지나 제 기준이에여, 2번 노트를 오른쪽 상단 쪽으로 옮기시면 더 플레이가 재밌을거같아요, 바로 뒤에 슬라이더는 앞뒤만 바꿔주시면 다음 배치하고도 그럭저럭 알맞고 괜찮아보여요
3. 01:07:612 (1) - 동선 반대로 하시는건 어떨까여 좀 더 부드러워지는거 같은데
4. 01:39:717 (1) - 리듬 http://puu.sh/qEiBB/793711f8fc.jpg 이렇게 하시는게 더 음악하고 맞는거같아여, 네 배치요? 저도몰라요^^

HelloSCV wrote:

[Over Cash]

1. 00:07:612 (2) - 노말 샘플셋쓰시고 에디션만 소프트로 해두시면 더 깔끔해지는거 같아요 클랩쓰니 좀 어색한거 같고 샘플셋바꾸는게 젤 무난할거같아여 넵
2. 00:26:954 (2,1) - 이건 어디까지나 제 기준이에여, 2번 노트를 오른쪽 상단 쪽으로 옮기시면 더 플레이가 재밌을거같아요, 바로 뒤에 슬라이더는 앞뒤만 바꿔주시면 다음 배치하고도 그럭저럭 알맞고 괜찮아보여요 그냥 리매핑 해버림
3. 01:07:612 (1) - 동선 반대로 하시는건 어떨까여 좀 더 부드러워지는거 같은데 굿
4. 01:39:717 (1) - 리듬 http://puu.sh/qEiBB/793711f8fc.jpg 이렇게 하시는게 더 음악하고 맞는거같아여, 네 배치요? 저도몰라요^^
   ㄴㄴ 안맞는거 같음요~ 00:32:349 (1,2,3,4) - 이 파트도 같은 부분이라... 그리고 다른 난이도 다 고치려면 힘듦 ㅠ

아 귀찮아서 하나만 함 ㅅㄱ

아맞다 그리고 슬라이더 슬라이드로 힛사쓰는건 언랭아니에요? 옛날에 막 힛사파일 전체길이를 못담는다니 뭐라니 말많았는데
그런가용... 님 맵에는 상당히 많은걸로 알아요 ㅋㅋ

HelloSCV wrote:

아니 저 랭맵에 그런건 없거든여????????? 언랭맵에만 많음ㅋ

W h i t e wrote:

Super Ultra Elite of Elite Gorgeous God Legend HelloSCV

W h i t e wrote:

Super Ultra Elite of Elite Gorgeous God Legend HelloSCV

HighTec wrote:

i noticed a few things while playing over cash diff, no kd unless somthin helpd

00:02:086 (3) - rly hard to hit on your first run, when the song is this silent u dont expect sv changes rly red combo can expect this style, also slider tick, too.
00:09:454 (3) - i feel like notes like these deserve a NC, there is a p big change in the songg (i know its done consistent but then u can also change it consistently :^) ) No... If i do, i changed all kinds of the new combo stuff.
00:28:533 (2,1) - the spacing here felt way too low while playing. having such a spacing reduction feels weird after having jumps like 00:28:401 (1,2) - yaya
ok
01:03:007 (3,4) - should have more spacing than 01:03:138 (4,5) - imo due to the pitch of the main soundd ok

yes the jumps play so sweet i lovvv em

cant wait to see this bubbled~

Lasse wrote:

from m4m
tickrate4 seems a bit much at most spots, not sure if it's actually needed for hitsounding at any spot. if not, str 2 would be fine I changed to tick rate 2!

[hitsounding]
(based on highest diff)
00:01:296 - if anything, hitsounded sliderticks should be lower volume, this gives more feedback than head/tail right now
probably happens a few more times

[over cash]
00:01:033 (2) - weird stack intentional? all others are autostacked
00:07:349 (1,2) - why not something like vhttp://i.imgur.com/hhQ5FTQ.jpg ? really feels like 00:07:349 (1) - should have a bit more emphasis cause music is building up slightly
00:12:217 (2) - such a weak sound, but it gets a huge jump and then drum 00:12:349 (3) - gets barely any spacing? how about stacking this on 00:12:875 (1) - head or something? // similar for 01:19:586 (2,3) - and 01:49:059 (2,3) - I want to keep these patterns. I think it doen't need more spacing ;w;...
00:25:507 (1) - mapping a repeat feel so weird here since white/blue tick are way more important. 1/4 slider would be nicer
00:32:612 (2) - really don't get why you sometimes drop spacing so much on such strong beats?
01:01:165 (2) - barely audible sound but the jump is quite big. doesnt really fit
01:01:954 (2,1,2) - really strong spacing increase with such obtuse angles is really hard to snap to properly. could try something like http://i.imgur.com/lZ9ockT.jpg (might need to adjust 01:02:349 (1) - a bit then)
01:15:507 (1,2) - drums are so similar here, so 2x repeat, 2x 1/4 slider or 4 circles all seem better than this
01:31:296 (3,4) - seems kinda huge for the intensity of the song here
00:24:980 (1,2,3,4) - 01:32:349 (1,2,1,2) - no idea why the idea behind both pattern (except rhythm) is completely different, when the song does the same thing It is starting of jumping parts, imo. these kiai parts have a lot of jump patterns before the 1st kiai. so added like this.
01:46:559 (1) - why does this suddenly drop spacing so much when song is very consistent?
01:47:612 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this doesn't really fit the overall spacing/movement you used in this part

[extra]
00:07:349 (1) - similar to highest diff, something like http://i.imgur.com/UMkUPhd.jpg works better with emphasis here I think
00:12:217 (2) - stack feels even more unfitting than low spacing on highest // 01:22:743 (2,3) - also doesn't really fit with how you use stacks in other cases
quite similar spacing concerns overall as highest diff, lots of thing apply here too I think stack makes good flows, i don't wanna change these.
00:29:717 (1) - shouldn't this be stacked like you did on 01:37:086 (1) - and other similar spots?
00:33:138 (5) - part of the main melody but suddenly like no spacing at all?
I can understand some pattern>spacing things, but often it ends up feeling really unfitting and doesn't play that well..
01:03:928 (2,3,4,5) - sounds are so similar, but 5 suddenly has such huge spacing. seems kinda random when you could at least do http://i.imgur.com/SmjtRWo.jpg I think huge spacing like the highest diff seems much better
01:38:138 (1) - ctrlg on this makes angles overall way nicer
01:41:691 (4) - you had jumps on this sound all the time, so why a stack here? it doen't need to be consistant. stacks are kind of patterns those hit more comfortable.

[another]
some of the emphasis things from highest diff apply here again in this case, i don't wanna change.
00:12:217 (2,3) - think something like http://i.imgur.com/62FFtZu.jpg would play nice and fit a bit better emphasis wise
00:17:875 (2,3) - 00:18:270 (4,5) - are like the same thing musically, but once normally spaced and once stacked?
00:34:717 (3,4) - more random feeling stacks // 00:36:822 (3,4) - I just don't think suddenly forcing stop when the music is so consistent and your movement is so jumpy fits or plays well... same with above opinions
00:58:138 - ending this 1/8 earlier and putting something here would fit much better as the sound is so different
01:26:822 (1,2) - pls no http://i.imgur.com/hpnQPSk.jpg -- autostack on 01:27:087 (2,4,1) - kills your pattern

Yes, this diff has a lot of stacks, so i changed a little bit doesn't have stacks.

[gg hyper]
00:13:665 (2,3,4) - idk what your rhythm is supposed to follow, but doing http://i.imgur.com/XBuMXs7.jpg like you did on 00:11:033 (1,2,3,4) - makes more sense to me
00:22:086 - similar here, http://i.imgur.com/qv4aq2O.jpg would fit the melody much better
00:27:086 (5) - making this shorter so you can make 00:27:612 - would be great as it starts a new phrase. and all the other times this happens, downbeat is clickable
01:03:928 (2) - similar rhythm thing, http://i.imgur.com/eDmGtbO.jpg seems better. or maybe what you did on 01:08:138 (2,3,4) -
01:49:717 - making this clickable would be great with how important the beat is

[adv]
patterns like 00:01:033 (2,3,4) - and 00:02:612 (2,3,4) - seems way nicer to read with some more spacing
00:14:059 (4) - ctrlg would make it way easier to follow/play and still fit fine // 00:31:033 (2) -
01:21:033 (2) - something is wrong with this stack, circle becomes really hard to see ingame http://i.imgur.com/cHlACRa.jpg
01:49:717 - no click?

[gg standard]
fine

[beginner]
gap to standard feels quite big at some spots like 01:03:401 (1) - , but since the diff isn't really needed for the spread it might be okay that way
fine besides that

Len wrote:

adv
00:19:717 (3) - add rev 1 and note here 00:20:112 -
01:27:086 (3) - same as abov

hypr
00:15:770 (3) - ctrl g
00:28:401 (5) - distance is too big. its hyer not other highest
01:12:875 (1) - ctrl g

anthr
00:09:849 (5) - 309 122
00:20:638 (2) - 114 123
01:16:033 (1) - bok buk out zz
01:44:059 (2,3) - ctrl g and stack 34

ex
ar9.4

ovr
ar9.7
01:32:963 (2,3) - 1/8 01:33:007 - and 01:33:072 -
01:41:296 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - make easier or make pattern like this 01:47:612 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -
01:42:612 (1,2) - suddenly changed distance it makes hard imo
01:43:401 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
01:44:717 (1,2) -

poke me freely

Sonnyc wrote:

Nominated.

handsome wrote:

grats!