o
mostly my opinion but hoping to mayb make something clear
i guess you can apply some of the suggestions i give to more sections as all seem to be kinda similar in a way (love the consistency -w-)
[rsi simulator (fetish edition)]
change hp to 4 pls its already so killing ;w;
00:10:731 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i'd prefer not to start off with stream jumps like these, it is more fun to do it later than to start off with. this'll trigger the players who can play this map for sure
00:16:230 (2) - this note can be a little hard to read because it kinda overlaps with the stream, i'd prefer not to have it overlapped at all (ya i know about the ar but still)
00:20:286 (2,3) - shouldnt this just be one entire returning slider? having the kickslider inbetween looks like a meanie move too
00:26:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - try to relook these jumps maybe, i dont like the flow change a lot that's happening at 00:26:397 (3,4) -
00:27:397 (7) - maybe NC because the note has big timing gaps around it?
00:44:509 (1,1,1) - i dont see a particular reason for the NCs, there is no big timing change or spacing change or anything !! also if u wanna keep it consistent NC 00:44:286 (2) - and yes 00:44:064 (1) - can be alone with their own NC perfectly fine =w=
00:52:730 (1,2,3) - would be fun to see a little higher SV (mayb like 1,5 orz) to put more emphasis on the section
01:01:397 (4) - maybe to have more emphasis on the ending of the section, add a NC here
01:15:730 (3,4,5) - expected a way bigger spacing here due to the stronger hitsounds and the triangle now kinda breaks the flow here
01:18:508 (4,4) - can this overlap be avoided? ;w;
01:35:397 (5) - would move this along with the rest of the stream to make it a bit more consistent, also NC because rythm change
01:42:619 (9) - stronger beat, more spacing pls!
02:20:064 (1) - idk if u can but i'd point this slider a bit more towards 02:20:397 (2) - so the connection is a bit more clearr
02:47:391 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - can this plspls be higher spacing? it makes the spacing after incredibly hard to read
03:33:236 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - maybe it'd be more fun if this was aligned with the linear jumps before this, would look a bit more logical to me
03:47:236 (2,3,4,5) - I'd personally change this to a slider like 03:47:013 (1) - so catch more of the main tune instead of the drum. would make the section more consistent and most likely better to play
03:58:569 - why not start a kiai time here and end it on 04:12:347 - to just have that sweet kiai on the singing here
04:12:347 (9) - NC to emphasise the start of the new voice?
04:14:124 (1) - no real reason to NC this imo, it doesnt help readability orz
04:27:013 - start here kiai too and end it on 04:40:791 - ??
04:40:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe remove this little part because u didnt map this the other time, would make it more consistentt
05:22:958 (16,1,2) - not a big fan of the sudden snappy curve here, maybe change it around a bit?
06:27:902 (1,2,3,4) - i dont rly like how this looks, maybe make 06:28:124 (3,4) - identical to 06:27:902 (1,2) - ?
again things repeat themselves so u can do it on urself \o/
not too sure about some jump patterns but they played fine enough so didnt rly complain
rank this or ill eat ur dog
mostly my opinion but hoping to mayb make something clear
i guess you can apply some of the suggestions i give to more sections as all seem to be kinda similar in a way (love the consistency -w-)
[rsi simulator (fetish edition)]
change hp to 4 pls its already so killing ;w;
00:10:731 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - i'd prefer not to start off with stream jumps like these, it is more fun to do it later than to start off with. this'll trigger the players who can play this map for sure
00:16:230 (2) - this note can be a little hard to read because it kinda overlaps with the stream, i'd prefer not to have it overlapped at all (ya i know about the ar but still)
00:20:286 (2,3) - shouldnt this just be one entire returning slider? having the kickslider inbetween looks like a meanie move too
00:26:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - try to relook these jumps maybe, i dont like the flow change a lot that's happening at 00:26:397 (3,4) -
00:27:397 (7) - maybe NC because the note has big timing gaps around it?
00:44:509 (1,1,1) - i dont see a particular reason for the NCs, there is no big timing change or spacing change or anything !! also if u wanna keep it consistent NC 00:44:286 (2) - and yes 00:44:064 (1) - can be alone with their own NC perfectly fine =w=
00:52:730 (1,2,3) - would be fun to see a little higher SV (mayb like 1,5 orz) to put more emphasis on the section
01:01:397 (4) - maybe to have more emphasis on the ending of the section, add a NC here
01:15:730 (3,4,5) - expected a way bigger spacing here due to the stronger hitsounds and the triangle now kinda breaks the flow here
01:18:508 (4,4) - can this overlap be avoided? ;w;
01:35:397 (5) - would move this along with the rest of the stream to make it a bit more consistent, also NC because rythm change
01:42:619 (9) - stronger beat, more spacing pls!
02:20:064 (1) - idk if u can but i'd point this slider a bit more towards 02:20:397 (2) - so the connection is a bit more clearr
02:47:391 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - can this plspls be higher spacing? it makes the spacing after incredibly hard to read
03:33:236 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - maybe it'd be more fun if this was aligned with the linear jumps before this, would look a bit more logical to me
03:47:236 (2,3,4,5) - I'd personally change this to a slider like 03:47:013 (1) - so catch more of the main tune instead of the drum. would make the section more consistent and most likely better to play
03:58:569 - why not start a kiai time here and end it on 04:12:347 - to just have that sweet kiai on the singing here
04:12:347 (9) - NC to emphasise the start of the new voice?
04:14:124 (1) - no real reason to NC this imo, it doesnt help readability orz
04:27:013 - start here kiai too and end it on 04:40:791 - ??
04:40:791 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe remove this little part because u didnt map this the other time, would make it more consistentt
05:22:958 (16,1,2) - not a big fan of the sudden snappy curve here, maybe change it around a bit?
06:27:902 (1,2,3,4) - i dont rly like how this looks, maybe make 06:28:124 (3,4) - identical to 06:27:902 (1,2) - ?
again things repeat themselves so u can do it on urself \o/
not too sure about some jump patterns but they played fine enough so didnt rly complain
rank this or ill eat ur dog