Shmiklak wrote:

Hi from Wajiklak's queue

General

1. Metadata in iTunes (track 9)
2. Add more tags for example:
   piano - because this song is mostly piano
   Let My Music Play - name of song's album
   Is he russian guy? I'm not sure but seeems he is russian. We can see it in his facebook: http://puu.sh/pPHJy/b633379774.jpg
   http://www.facebook.com/fidel.wicked/
   So if he is russian I'm suggesting to add "russian" to tags too.

Easy

1. First and maybe most visible problem is your blankets. All they should be polished. If you don't know how to make perfect blankets check this: p/4516808

ah I'll be back later. Need to go right now. Will finish mod later

General

1. BPM / Offset: Sound perfect
2. Folder: Your .png image is quite a large file. I can give you a much smaller filesize of the same image: here.
3. Metadata: Perhaps add: piano, instrumental, house(?) to the tags. Pretty sure he is a russian artist, so russian metadata may be needed.
4. AiMod: Looks fine.
   
   

   Easy
   
   
   • 00:34:290 (1) - I would let this curve down more to better create a flow pattern between notes.
     
     00:38:040 (1,2,3) - You could consider making these symmetrical?
     
     00:50:227 (2,3) - not a fan of this sudden transition, I would just keep it curved for consistent with the previous slider bunch.
     
     01:10:852 (4) - Move this red anchor to (X:208 Y:356) for added consistency with when the sliderball turns.
     
     01:17:415 (4) - NC? I hear a small buildup, maybe it would be fitting?
     
     01:25:852 (5,1) - Make these the same slider type by copy+paste so they're consistent
     
     01:30:540 (1) - I would say extend this all the way till it is 1/1 away from the upcoming slider.
     
     01:43:665 (4,5) - The flow here isn't that good, curving the slider would fix that imo

   Normal
   • 
     
     00:47:883 (3,4) - Not a fan of this kind of pattern tbh, the flow gets messed up between both sliders
     
     01:01:477 (3) - move the end anchor to the right a touch, I think it will do a big difference
     
     01:12:727 (2) - Since it's larger than most of your current sliders of this type, I think you could get away with curving the first part for a really nice addition to flow and aesthetics.
     
     
     Flow

     
     
     01:17:415 (4) - (Same NC suggestion as in easy)
     
     01:27:024 (2,6) - Find a way to stack these perhaps it would look better imo
     
     01:41:086 (4,2) - ^ (more inclined to tell you to stack them here tho )
     
     01:43:196 (4,1,2,3) - Blanketing distance between these is different, make them consistent please XD
     
     01:54:446 (4,1,2,3) - ^ (opposite ways now though)
     
     02:06:633 (6,7) - Flow between these are funny, move slider 7 down to rectify a nice flow idea.
     
     02:09:680 (5) - Move further to the left in order to maintain flow as well.
     
     02:11:790 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not a fan of this to be honest, it is a strange contrast from what style you were previously mapping to, and I feel it should retain consistency through sliders, >.<
     
     02:22:102 (7) - I see what you've done from a stacking point of view, but sometimes stacking is not the best situation in every way, as you can see from stacking this you have not made room for the next note to neatly come off the slider.
     
     02:25:383 (5,6) - Perhaps blanket these, would make a better aesthetic look tbh.

   Hard
   • 
     
     00:02:414 (1) - Curve distance between this slider is uneven, think of these sliders as two normal curved sliders and use a red anchor in the middle to denote when one ends and one begins.
     
     
     Example

     
     
     (on the left is the new style and the right is your slider type
     
     00:06:165 (1,3) - Bad aesthetic flow between the slider borders, I would make slider 3 have a curvature the same as slider 1 and line it up so it's a slider blanket.
     
     00:31:477 (1) - I'm not a fan of the end curve, it doesn't look too good imo, using red anchors can be helpful in these scenarios:
     
     
     Slider

     
     
     01:25:852 (8) - This is inconsistent with the previous sliders, and although there is a beat (I think the beat is on 1/3 tho) there is a similar if not the same beat, here: 01:24:094
     
     01:34:758 (2,3) - Bad slider orientation, it doesn't look well structured and has a strange flow about it >.>
     
     01:47:415 (1,3) - Maybe make these the same slider type for consistent with the symmetry?
     
     01:49:758 (2) - Reverse the curve to the go the other way, I feel it will transition into the 1/4 nicer.
     
     02:04:290 (1) - The curve at the end is way too harsh, it doesn't look nice, I would use the suggestion above abouting using red anchors to support slider curves.
     
     02:13:665 (3) - imo removing the curve at the end would make for a clean finish on this slider.
     
     02:29:602 (3) - ^^ (except it's at the beginning)
     
     02:30:540 (1,2,3) - Keep these the same slider type since the music is the same.
     
     02:34:758 (2,3) - Slider end isn't blanketed correctly with slider 3.
     
     02:38:040 (1,2,3,4) - Why not make a diamond pattern with these, I feel it will look much cleaner and add a bit spice to this part?
     
     02:45:540 (1,2,3) - imo I wouldn't put the jump so soon into this pattern, just keep the ds the same for here.
     
     02:47:415 (1,2) - I would also make these the same slider type to add to the consistent flow into the next kiai.
     
     02:50:696 (5) - This is a touch too far out of the distance snap (my magic eye noticed this) /me runs
     
     02:53:743 (4) - Move this to (X:184 Y:36) and move 02:53:977 (5) - to (X:332 Y:88)
     
     02:58:196 (5,2) - Stack these for better consistency.
     
     03:17:883 (2) - Rotate 90 so it has a nicer ending flow.

   Insane

• [list:1337]
  
  00:02:414 (1) - Curvature suggestions in the hard are to be referred here aswell
  
  00:14:836 (5,1) - I think you could stack this together to make a nicer aesthetic look.
  
  00:17:415 (1) - Remove a white anchor from the first curve I think it looks nicer like that as it works well with the second curve on this slider.
  
  00:27:258 (2) - Move this further up to make the flow more consistent.
  
  00:29:602 (4,5,1) - Blankets? >.>
  
  01:05:227 (3,4) - I feel as if these should go the other way to make a more circular motion, I just feel it will be nicer XD
  
  01:35:696 (5,1) - Same slider type for consistency?
  
  01:35:344 (4) - Make this a double tap because the notes after this slider on the same music time are doubles (example: 01:37:219 and 01:39:094 )
  
  01:44:719 (4) - ^
  
  01:50:344 (4) - ^
  
  01:59:719 (4) - ^
  
  02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing between these kind of puts people off the fact it's a buildup because the pauses don't fit in well with the music.
  
  02:13:665 (3) - I'm not a fan of where the red anchor is in relation to the white anchors, I would just make a downward curve at the first part to be consistent with the upcoming slider.
  
  02:31:711 (5,1) - Blanket suggestion as at 00:29:836
  
  02:38:977 (5,6) - Slider type should be the same to be consistent with the music.
  
  02:43:665 (1) - Curve this more so it's a more profound blanket with the previous note 4.
  
  03:07:102 (5) - Pull the first white anchor down a little bit more on follow my slider suggestion above.

-Space- wrote:

Hey! Mod from my queue

General

1. BPM / Offset: Sound perfect
2. Folder: Your .png image is quite a large file. I can give you a much smaller filesize of the same image: here.
3. Metadata: Perhaps add: piano, instrumental, house(?) to the tags. Pretty sure he is a russian artist, so russian metadata may be needed.
4. AiMod: Looks fine.
   
   

   Easy
   
   
   • 00:34:290 (1) - I would let this curve down more to better create a flow pattern between notes. changed
     
     00:38:040 (1,2,3) - You could consider making these symmetrical?
     
     00:50:227 (2,3) - not a fan of this sudden transition, I would just keep it curved for consistent with the previous slider bunch. changed
     
     01:10:852 (4) - Move this red anchor to (X:208 Y:356) for added consistency with when the sliderball turns. the coordinates dont make sense to me ;_;
     
     01:17:415 (4) - NC? I hear a small buildup, maybe it would be fitting? changed
     
     01:25:852 (5,1) - Make these the same slider type by copy+paste so they're consistent
     
     01:30:540 (1) - I would say extend this all the way till it is 1/1 away from the upcoming slider. some QAT member said one measure space between spinner and next note to be on safe ground, furthermore it fits well since theres a little different section in the music where the spinner ends
     
     01:43:665 (4,5) - The flow here isn't that good, curving the slider would fix that imochanged
     
     everything which isnt noticed by me couldnt get fixed because i remapped a few section due to DS issues (evrything fine now^^)

   Normal
   • 
     
     00:47:883 (3,4) - Not a fan of this kind of pattern tbh, the flow gets messed up between both sliders puh... you are right took me a while to find a solution but i got a nice pattern now!
     
     01:01:477 (3) - move the end anchor to the right a touch, I think it will do a big difference uhh damn, it does make a big difference
     
     01:12:727 (2) - Since it's larger than most of your current sliders of this type, I think you could get away with curving the first part for a really nice addition to flow and aesthetics. changed
     
     
     Flow

     
     
     01:17:415 (4) - (Same NC suggestion as in easy) there's already an NC oO well anyways there is definetly now an NC
     
     01:27:024 (2,6) - Find a way to stack these perhaps it would look better imo stacked
     
     01:41:086 (4,2) - ^ (more inclined to tell you to stack them here tho ) stacked
     
     01:43:196 (4,1,2,3) - Blanketing distance between these is different, make them consistent please XD uhm.. i edited that section to adjust DS from the previous fix.... i think its okay now D:
     
     01:54:446 (4,1,2,3) - ^ (opposite ways now though) fixed (also driveby overlap fix hehe)
     
     02:06:633 (6,7) - Flow between these are funny, move slider 7 down to rectify a nice flow idea. adjusted it i think
     
     02:09:680 (5) - Move further to the left in order to maintain flow as well. good poijnt fixed.
     
     02:11:790 (1,2,3,4) - I'm not a fan of this to be honest, it is a strange contrast from what style you were previously mapping to, and I feel it should retain consistency through sliders, >.< i made them less strange, they still have the special character but they seem more appropriate to the rest of the map now
     
     02:22:102 (7) - I see what you've done from a stacking point of view, but sometimes stacking is not the best situation in every way, as you can see from stacking this you have not made room for the next note to neatly come off the slider. its still stacked but in a much better way
     
     02:25:383 (5,6) - Perhaps blanket these, would make a better aesthetic look tbh.

   Hard
   • 
     
     00:02:414 (1) - Curve distance between this slider is uneven, think of these sliders as two normal curved sliders and use a red anchor in the middle to denote when one ends and one begins. fixed
     
     
     Example

     
     
     (on the left is the new style and the right is your slider type
     
     00:06:165 (1,3) - Bad aesthetic flow between the slider borders, I would make slider 3 have a curvature the same as slider 1 and line it up so it's a slider blanket. uhhh.. i kinda remapped that part as i fixed smth.. i think it looks good how it is now (maybe it wasnt in your version idk )
     
     00:31:477 (1) - I'm not a fan of the end curve, it doesn't look too good imo, using red anchors can be helpful in these scenarios: ma slider is beautiful now (: fixed.
     
     
     Slider

     
     
     01:25:852 (8) - This is inconsistent with the previous sliders, and although there is a beat (I think the beat is on 1/3 tho) there is a similar if not the same beat, here: 01:24:094 made a regular 1/2 slider so its consistent now
     
     01:34:758 (2,3) - Bad slider orientation, it doesn't look well structured and has a strange flow about it >.> more structured now, fixed.
     
     01:47:415 (1,3) - Maybe make these the same slider type for consistent with the symmetry? changed, good point
     
     01:49:758 (2) - Reverse the curve to the go the other way, I feel it will transition into the 1/4 nicer. ctrl + J'd it
     
     02:04:290 (1) - The curve at the end is way too harsh, it doesn't look nice, I would use the suggestion above abouting using red anchors to support slider curves. added red anchor, feels better now
     
     02:13:665 (3) - imo removing the curve at the end would make for a clean finish on this slider. i made that curve at the end a bit cleaner, didint remove it because it flows well into next slider imo
     
     02:29:602 (3) - ^^ (except it's at the beginning) polished the slider, looks good now
     
     02:30:540 (1,2,3) - Keep these the same slider type since the music is the same. they already have same shape? oO (adjusted pattern since i changed the longer slider before)
     
     02:34:758 (2,3) - Slider end isn't blanketed correctly with slider 3. fixed
     
     02:38:040 (1,2,3,4) - Why not make a diamond pattern with these, I feel it will look much cleaner and add a bit spice to this part? i dont really get what you mean by diamond pattern >.< I'll catch you inagme hopefully and ask you
     
     02:45:540 (1,2,3) - imo I wouldn't put the jump so soon into this pattern, just keep the ds the same for here. each jump couple has the same DS, furthermore the pattern is quite nice and appropriate here (and i spend like 15mins to make that pattern ;_;)
     
     02:47:415 (1,2) - I would also make these the same slider type to add to the consistent flow into the next kiai. hmm.. i copy pasted (1) and put it for (2), it has good flow but not too the long (3) slider. I probably didnt do that pattern like you intended but its fine now (still same slider now)
     
     02:50:696 (5) - This is a touch too far out of the distance snap (my magic eye noticed this) /me runs damn... fixed, same Ds now
     
     02:53:743 (4) - Move this to (X:184 Y:36) and move 02:53:977 (5) - to (X:332 Y:88) oki
     
     02:58:196 (5,2) - Stack these for better consistency. changed
     
     03:17:883 (2) - Rotate 90 so it has a nicer ending flow. changed
   
   
   

   Insane

• [list:1337]
  
  00:02:414 (1) - Curvature suggestions in the hard are to be referred here aswell aye
  
  00:14:836 (5,1) - I think you could stack this together to make a nicer aesthetic look. stacked with slidertail
  
  00:17:415 (1) - Remove a white anchor from the first curve I think it looks nicer like that as it works well with the second curve on this slider.already made it looking less strange... :/
  
  00:27:258 (2) - Move this further up to make the flow more consistent. changed the shape of (1) and (2) in opposite direction instead since this slider is anchored of stacks
  
  00:29:602 (4,5,1) - Blankets? >.> fixed
  
  01:05:227 (3,4) - I feel as if these should go the other way to make a more circular motion, I just feel it will be nicer XD nice idea xd
  
  01:35:696 (5,1) - Same slider type for consistency? adjusted shape
  
  01:35:344 (4) - Make this a double tap because the notes after this slider on the same music time are doubles (example: 01:37:219 and 01:39:094 ) that one is a bit tricky: so i wanted to warn the player for the incoming rhythm change, so i put a slider there (since sliders are easier to hit than doubles),...yeah ill keep that in mind since you are the first modder who mentions that. So no change for now
  
  01:44:719 (4) - ^
  
  01:50:344 (4) - ^
  
  01:59:719 (4) - ^ and i tried to make consistency, so i made at every beginning and ending of these 2 sections a slider isntead of double
  
  02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing between these kind of puts people off the fact it's a buildup because the pauses don't fit in well with the music. uhm so i think i make them closer? idk, changed to same DS like in the previious stream
  
  02:13:665 (3) - I'm not a fan of where the red anchor is in relation to the white anchors, I would just make a downward curve at the first part to be consistent with the upcoming slider. i dont really get what you mean ;_; but since the strange slider before seemed okay to you i just copied that, lol D:
  
  02:31:711 (5,1) - Blanket suggestion as at 00:29:836 good point, fixed
  
  02:38:977 (5,6) - Slider type should be the same to be consistent with the music. adjusted shape again..
  
  02:43:665 (1) - Curve this more so it's a more profound blanket with the previous note 4. yes!
  
  03:07:102 (5) - Pull the first white anchor down a little bit more on follow my slider suggestion above. fixed

Best of luck in getting this ranked!

EDIT: Forgot to say, your insane is more like a Light Insane, so I would consider changing the diff name.i personally dislike that diff name. Since you are the first modder who mentions this I'll keept "Insane" but I'll keept that in mind if someone else says that ill change it

sonic8889 wrote:

hello ! m4m from my queue
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/472474

Insane

00:04:055 (1) - I would NC, cause the sluggish followpoint looks bad due to NC consistency that isnt possible to change, so no change for now (if any other modder mentions this visually bad looking ill change the NC consistency for the whole map)

00:19:055 (1) - ^same ^

01:44:719 (4) - Random slider when rest are notes, you should change since you are now the 2nd modder who mentions this (which was consistent) i made all patterns with a double instead of the slider, so changed

01:50:344 (4) - ^same ^

01:59:719 (4) - ^ ^

02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - Ending these on a red tick makes it sound like something is missing. You should extend to the blue tick, or even the yellow tick before the white tick. I don't think it'll be too hard because, it is an insane extending the sliders isnt an option because i want to emphasize that specific sound in the music which does end at the red tick. I considered placing simple circles at the blue ticks to make it more fluent but that doesnt feel very good. So i probably just keep that for now until it gets mentioned again.

02:12:727 (2,4) - Add more shape to these, a simple curve doesn't look good next to the other 2 sliders made all 4 same now since everything looked really awkward, good point actually

02:23:508 (2,3) - Make these straight changed

I have no more issues with this diff

Hard

01:39:211 (4,5,6) - Make this triangle straighter adjusted pattern, symmetrical triangle now

02:45:540 (1,2) - Big DS change compared to the rest of the jumps each jump pair has the same DS (it just looks visually further away than the others, so pattern is clean and reasonable)

those are the only problems i found with this diff xd

Normal

00:13:665 (1,3) - This can confuse a normal player, I think you should change it i think its good readable since no sliderheads are stacked so it is good readable imo (looks also very clean), so no change for now

01:27:258 (3,4,5) - Weird hitsounding, might wanna check it woops..., Fixed.

01:58:665 (1) - this spinner looks out of place It probably would be better to just map this part but on the other hand at the start of the spinner you can hear a silent sound coming up which gets louder and louder and that would fit a spinner. I consider mapping it but im not 100% sure but i definetly keep that in mind!

no other problems

Easy

01:43:665 (4,1) - This will def. confuse an easy player hmm... i made the same slider type for (1) from (4), the pattern itself is okay imo but same slider type is neccessary, yes

Sorry for short mods! this mapset is already really good and i feel is ready for ranking. Good luck! short mods =/= bad mods Thankyou

@-Space-

If you actually ever read this, I changed everything what you said in General topic (except russian metadata), also used your png Thank you!

1. The BG feels way too squeezed. I highly recommend you to found an alternative.
2. The difficulty spread design feels pretty weak personally. Insane felt something similar with Hard, with a higher AR. Easy was mostly 1/1, while Normal contains several 1/2 beats, resulitng a big gap.

1. 01:17:415 (1) - I don't think a new combo is needed according to your combo cycle.
2. 01:44:133 - 01:46:008 - Missing clap.
3. 01:58:665 (4) - The slider path is offscreen. You must fix this.
4. 02:20:696 - I don't think a whistle suits here according to the music.
5. Frankly speaking, this difficulty felt rather boring because you've used 1/1 over and over the whole difficulty. Indeed 1/1 is a simple rhythm that is appropriate for the lowest difficulty, but that doesn't mean that you can't take advantage of other rhythms to make this difficulty more interesting.

1. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - I think you can put some hitsounds here. It's too quiet currently.
2. 03:02:415 (5) - Seems you forgot a new combo here.

1. 01:12:727 (2,3) - Keeping the spacing will maintain consistency with 01:16:477 (2,3) etc.
2. 01:24:915 (6) - Missing nc I guess.
3. 01:40:735 (3) - 01:44:485 (3) - 01:50:110 (3) - You can make these 1/4 spacing more balanced.
4. 02:07:571 (1,2) - This jump feels too much in this calm section.
5. 02:45:540 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This pattern feels weak in structure personally. The formation kinda feels apart from the song.
6. 02:49:055 (4) - Consider removing this? Sometimes giving a pause has a good emphasizing effect.

1. 00:40:618 (2) - 01:31:008 (1) - Spacing could be improved.
2. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - I think you can give more spacing between these objects, since there is a 1/2 time interval. It isn't intuitive enough to read properly the current rhythm.
3. 02:08:508 (2,3,4) - This jump feels too much in this calm section.
4. 02:47:883 - 02:48:821 - Missing clap.
5. 02:52:336 (5,6,7,1) - The flow and the stack didn't felt natural along the song for me.

Sonnyc wrote:

~General~

1. The BG feels way too squeezed. I highly recommend you to found an alternative.
2. The difficulty spread design feels pretty weak personally. Insane felt something similar with Hard, with a higher AR (Yes..., thats a point. I thought about deleting Hard and name Insane "Hard" so there's no similiar difficulty and the spread might be more pleasant..., but idk). Easy was mostly 1/1, while Normal contains several 1/2 beats, resulitng a big gap.

~Easy~

1. 01:17:415 (1) - I don't think a new combo is needed according to your combo cycle. i just thought there'd be a NC not bad because the music is changing a little bit there but i removed the NC
2. 01:44:133 - 01:46:008 - Missing clap. fixed
3. 01:58:665 (4) - The slider path is offscreen. You must fix this. fixed
4. 02:20:696 - I don't think a whistle suits here according to the music. its the same music like between 00:34:290 - and 00:41:790 - with a consistent whistle HS on the white ticks, so for me there has to be a whistle sound (like i did for the whole section)
5. Frankly speaking, this difficulty felt rather boring because you've used 1/1 over and over the whole difficulty. Indeed 1/1 is a simple rhythm that is appropriate for the lowest difficulty, but that doesn't mean that you can't take advantage of other rhythms to make this difficulty more interesting. to be honest: the song itself is quite simple and there is not much variation for my thoughts. I understand that it looks kinda boring and you get worned out pretty fast but other rhythms (i dont really get what other kind of rhythm you mean, an example would have been helpful... :/) dont fit in an Easy diff for me. Therefore the upgrade from 1/1 mapping to the 1/2 mapping which is represented in Normal seems kinda appropriate to me.

~Normal~

1. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - I think you can put some hitsounds here. It's too quiet currently. forgot them~ added now
2. 03:02:415 (5) - Seems you forgot a new combo here. not only there.... so i added every NC which was at the same point like this

~Hard~

1. 01:12:727 (2,3) - Keeping the spacing will maintain consistency with 01:16:477 (2,3) etc.changed
2. 01:24:915 (6) - Missing nc I guess. yep, fixed
3. 01:40:735 (3) - 01:44:485 (3) - 01:50:110 (3) - You can make these 1/4 spacing more balanced. gonna fix that (will keep an eye on DSing more often and go through the whole diff again, insane either)
4. 02:07:571 (1,2) - This jump feels too much in this calm section. made it shorter
5. 02:45:540 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This pattern feels weak in structure personally. The formation kinda feels apart from the song. i persoanlly think thats a structured pattern but it does kinda feel apart from the song, ill give you that. So i consider redoing this
6. 02:49:055 (4) - Consider removing this? Sometimes giving a pause has a good emphasizing effect. hmm... there's a beat obviously but it surely feels better with a short pause. So i removed the circle for now

~Insane~

1. 00:40:618 (2) - 01:31:008 (1) - Spacing could be improved. not only in this section, more like in the whole diff. I'll go through the map once again and make more consistent DSing, so there will be more structure then
2. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - I think you can give more spacing between these objects, since there is a 1/2 time interval. It isn't intuitive enough to read properly the current rhythm. yeeeeeees.. i agree with that!
3. 02:08:508 (2,3,4) - This jump feels too much in this calm section. yea
4. 02:47:883 - 02:48:821 - Missing clap. fixed
5. 02:52:336 (5,6,7,1) - The flow and the stack didn't felt natural along the song for me. removed the stack, jumps feel nice to me, but i'll consider your note when i go through the map for DS's

Not a bad map here. For the higher difficulties, I think you can take more advantage of distance snapping logic. That way will make several patterns work better in structure. I think you need some more mapping experience along that to make a future outcome with more interesting patterns.I'll go through both diffs, insane and hard, and work more with DSing... also i will try to do more interesting patterns (i have some in my mind, so it'll be good)

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi M4M from my Queue
my map : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/476937
Hope this mod helps

General : maybe name the difficulties like Easy? Normal ? Hard ? idk its just an idea :p huh? its already named like that D:

MOD

Normal
00:07:805 (1) - better avoid 1/4 sliders in normal just avoid blue tick i think they fit well into this diff because easy has very simple rhythm, the upgrade in normal with the 1/2 and rare 1/4 things, and Hard with every beat
00:22:805 (1) - ^
00:39:680 (5) - ^ u got them i wont mention all
00:43:665 (1,2,3) - aesthetic wierd flow agreed, made clean blanket and better aesthetic
03:01:946 (4,1,2) - ^ ^^

Hard
01:12:493 - 01:14:368 - 01:16:243 - imo u still can map those i hear a beat good point, changed that
01:34:758 (2,3,4) - the jump from this can be little hard to read for hard level player looks totally fine to me, but i keep it in mind if someone says the same i will change, but for now no change
01:35:227 - 01:37:102 - 01:38:977 - 01:40:852 - and u ignore all these downbeats with rly strong beat this section is supposed to represent the vocals, not the beat in first place (since this section is the only one with "vocals" i wanted to make variety which looks absolutely fine to me)
i recommand using this rhythm but its up to u
01:55:383 (2,3,4,5,6) - it starting to get dull here 01:55:735 (3,4,5) - remove and change to 1/2 slider like this i see what you mean. Changing this would result in changing 01:51:985 (3,4,5) - 01:44:485 (3,4,5) - 01:40:735 (3,4,5) - 01:36:985 (3,4,5) - too because of consistency and same sound as you pointed out. I totally agree with u that it gets kind of dull there but since none of the previous modders pointed that out I'll wait for a 2nd opinion. But thankyou for pointing that out that might be a neccessary change
01:59:485 (3,4,5) - same for here
02:01:477 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - its better if u avoid long streams like this in hard since u will only keep one hard dont make it so complicated this is a very straight and easy to read stream. It is a part of the song which a stream just fits perfectly and since making a harder difficulty which has the stream in it (and in this difficulty here not) wouldnt make sense because you cant make a harder diff for this song
02:46:946 (7) - nc every NC is placed on a downbeat, i'll consider that but i would have to change it at every equal spot in the map
02:54:680 (1) - remove nc? fixed

sorry if its little short Good luck

Phyloukz wrote:

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi M4M from my Queue

General : maybe name the difficulties like Easy? Normal ? Hard ? idk its just an idea :p huh? its already named like that D:

lazyboy007 wrote:

Hey from modding queue for NM!

Easy:

00:53:040 (1,3) - not optimal for an Easy, but hey, it's fine as is :p hmm i guess you mean the ciircle (3) being in slider (1) not symmetrically or smth... anyways i adjusted the blanket section in between being horizontally perfect
01:08:040 (1,2) - consider moving the red points on those a little just so they blanket better changed
01:47:415 (4,5) - same here yes, changed
02:00:540 (1) - extend this to 2:03:821 having a whole measure space between spinner and next note (in Easy diff) would not result in any possible issues ranking the map. Furthermore at the point, the spinner ends for now, starts a "new section" of the music. the spinner is a great tool to end the previous section (unfortunately im not able to map the section after the spinner cuz Easy diff.) and the note after the spinner to start the very new section. So yeah, ending the spinner at that point would just make sense to me, furthermore its less stressful for dthrfl players watching out for the next note (they got some more time)

nice map ^^

Normal:

00:04:055 (4,1) - consider moving 4 next to 1, the stacking that happens with 00:04:993 (2) - is too fast and hard to read for a normal diff i agree, its kinda confusing especially its right at the beginning. I changed that making blanket for (4) and (1)
01:58:665 (1) - also extend this to the next white tick same measure reasoning like in easy, but in normal i got told 1/2 of a measure space (but here in normal it would definetely sound better putting the end of the spinner your way, since there's the clap sound. I keep that in mind and think about it...)

Great map:p

Hard:

Hm, even if star rating says otherwise, this feels more like an insane than it does a Hard. But the map's really great! i agree with that. it feels way more like an insane than a hard, thats why i made two diffs because i tried to make a hard and an insane. unfortunately that didnt work, both diffs seemed to be almost the same. I think i just have to live with that

Good luck going for ranked and take a star thanks for the star <3

General

Easy

Normal

Hard

1. 01:48:118 - aimod
2. 00:47:415 (3) - try it? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5640769
3. 01:59:602 (5,6) - unnecessary still blanket,you can do this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5640782 to make it more neat.
4. 02:15:540 (5) - NC here
5. 03:18:586 (1) - end should be with a finish not whistle.

1. ar5 maybe better?
2. 00:07:805 (1) - not suggest to catch 1/4 in Normal,you can change it to 1/2
3. 00:13:665 (1,2,3) - crowded,you don't have to blanket every objects,try to break the limit.
4. 01:22:102 (3,4,5,1) - lots of 1/2 maybe too hard for beginner,I found you put this pattern oftenly,try to avoid too much 1/2 consecutive circle.
5. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - also crowded.
6. 02:07:805 (1,4) - try to stack?
7. 02:34:055 (5,1) - not suggest stacking here,because you haven't put any 1/2 stack in your diff
8. 03:19:055 (1) - finish hs.

Spork Lover wrote:

Yo M4M <3

General

As a follow-up on Sonnyc's post, I agree that the lower diffs (Normal mainly) overall aren't really aesthetically interesting. While the map is nice to play, and has good flow, there are some places, where you spice up some stuff (Mostly applies to the normal imo (And to some extent easy diff)) I'll give you a few ideas below

Easy

01:18:352 (5) - Give this a red anchor point near the end of the slider, and extend it to 01:19:055 to emphasize the long note in the song. completely ignoring the clap in the music isnt a good idea imo, its just confusing for a newbie
02:15:540 (5) - Consider NC, the NC pattern is long considering you only use sliders x) fixed
02:19:290 (1,2,3) - Emphasis is wrong here since your downbeat is on the reverse arrow. For these three, I'd go "Reverse, note, slider" instead. really good point, all downbeats should be clickable now!
02:26:790 (1,2,3) - Same
^ There are a lot more of these, but I'm just throwing is out, that you should really consider making downbeats clickable on an easy diff.

Map is consistent in the style it's rocking right now tbh, but you could technically add some more interesting sliders if you REALLY want to, doesn't really matter too much too me in the easy tho, it's mainly in the normal diff where it'd have a bigger impact.

Normal

00:47:415 (5) - I'd NC this, since you've been NC'ing every measure untill now. (Also, you NC the next similar section). yes, fixed
01:07:102 (3,2,3) - There are some fairly awkward overlaps going on here, and those should be improvable without remapping everything x) wtf went wrong there lmao, should be decent stacking there right now
01:49:290 (1,2,3) - Odd transition, since you're going linear on 1,2, but force the player to move back on 2,3. (Theoretically, some just stop instead), but it makes the flow a little wonky. good point, changed

02:08:040 (2,3,4) - Fix the overlap 4 does with the note 1 before this section (Do a triangle pattern with 1 too basically) (Make it more polished than this suggestion, but here's a rough idea https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5639236) chnaged
02:45:540 (1,4) - There's an easy blanket that could be done here ^
^ There are sections like these two, where you miss easy-to-make blankets/overlaps like those, try to find 'em all and change them accordingly :3 ill watch out xD

Overall, I feel the map is too closely related to the easy, and too far from the hard (Due to using stuff like 00:23:040 (1,3) and 00:47:883 (2,3) in the hard diff), consider doing some sort of mixture that keeps the neat blankets and overlaps, while also adding some more interesting slider shapes like in the hard diff ^^. hmmm... i think the normal diff is in a pretty good spot right now. But i will try to find some parts in which some more creative sliders could be appropriate to make it a little bit exclusiver (and to make it a bit more to the hard than to the easy, as you said)

Hard

01:08:040 (1,3) and 01:08:508 (2,4) - These overlaps are unrankable, 'cause the hitburst isn't gone yet, so the only thing that makes you able to see the next slider is the approach circle (And that same approach circle is non existent with HD ;o) ayy thats understandable with a (rarely) good reasoning xD, Fixed.
01:17:180 (6,3) - Blanket 3 with 6 like 01:17:415 (1,2) do, and with the same spacing (You might have to rotate 1 and 2 a bit to achieve this.
02:23:977 (3,4,5,1,2) - This is really neat, gj >//< this looks impossible to me, lol. But i made the pattern clearer, so it has better structure now
02:33:352 (3) - Hmm, I don't approve of this shape tbh, the top anchor seems a bit too sharp for my liking. made it a way better shape
02:39:680 (7) - Relocation idea that you can ignore if you want ^^ https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5639299 i want to keep the circular flow from 02:38:977 (5,6) - resulting in flowing into another direction for 02:39:915 (1) - to emphasize the strong downbeat

Final thoughts:
I think the best idea would be to do a minor rework to the normal diff, so that the aesthetics from the hard difficulty in the slow parts are transitioned over to the normal as well, but overall, the set is super nice! gonna try to adjust the normal more to the hard diff, and thanks <3
Good luck on the mapset buddy, looking forward to hear from ya <3
Adios~

[Crz]Sword wrote:

from my queue
[EZ]

1. 01:48:118 - aimod oh.. fixed xd
2. 00:47:415 (3) - try it? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5640769 i want it to be the same slider as 00:48:352 (4) - . And this shaping is required to keep the pattern for 00:46:477 (2,3,4) - alive
3. 01:59:602 (5,6) - unnecessary still blanket,you can do this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5640782 to make it more neat. yea good idea. changed that
4. 02:15:540 (5) - NC here aye
5. 03:18:586 (1) - end should be with a finish not whistle.

[NM]

1. ar5 maybe better? thin kits betetr ye
2. 00:07:805 (1) - not suggest to catch 1/4 in Normal,you can change it to 1/2 i think about it..., it just seems not that hard to hit cuz it is rarely but still consiustent over the map.. so yeah. I'll catch some other opinions and decide
3. 00:13:665 (1,2,3) - crowded,you don't have to blanket every objects,try to break the limit. whats the bad thing about many blankets which give my map structure and clean patterns? I like that style so i keep it
4. 01:22:102 (3,4,5,1) - lots of 1/2 maybe too hard for beginner,I found you put this pattern oftenly,try to avoid too much 1/2 consecutive circle. ^
5. 02:02:415 (1,2,3,4) - also crowded. ^
6. 02:07:805 (1,4) - try to stack? chnaged
7. 02:34:055 (5,1) - not suggest stacking here,because you haven't put any 1/2 stack in your diff yea, good point. Changed that
8. 03:19:055 (1) - finish hs. changed

try to break the blanket limit in your lower diffs.
GL!

Suzuki_1112 wrote:

Hello from my queue~
sorry your beatmap is very good so,less mod.QAQ
I think you can change your diff name,Easy→Normal,Normal→Hard,Hard→Insane I think the star rate 1.44 for the easiest diff isnt appropriate for a Normal diff. Furthermore the current hard would be too easy for an Insane imo. But yes, the current Normal diff would fit as a Hard diff better - I think its fine how it is currently
[Easy]
00:26:790 (2,3) - Reverse Selection, Then Flip Horizontally Changed
[Noraml,Hard]
Perfect! Two Star*****! Omg..., Thank you soooooo much <3
Good Luck for rankkk!

1. 00:31:477 (4) - why not make this one horizonal just like ur general design in the first part?
2. 00:34:290 (1) - 1->2 0.77ds
3. 01:26:790 (1) - touching the hp bar, can drag 01:23:977 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - together down a bit so that it won't break ur patterns
4. 02:23:040 (6) - u forgot nc here
5. 03:18:586 (1) - why finish..? this surprises me lol

1. 01:45:540 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is too many 1/2 sliders spamming, try adding more variety. a random suggestion, maybe apply to where u think it fits
2. 02:25:383 (2) - a biiit offscreen
3. 02:38:977 (3) - this is a really well blanketed pattern, but the slider path of 3 is kinda vague and maybe not that friendly for players of this level to read, u can consult other ppl for that as well

1. i think ar8+od7 is pretty enough for this diff
2. 00:50:930 (6) - this might flow visually better
3. 00:51:165 (1,2,3,4) - keep ds here feels a bit boring, try ctrl-g 3 and 4 separately, would be fun and better make for the latter jumps imo
4. 01:37:571 (4) - touch hp bar

Garden wrote:

this track is beatiful <3
[Easy]

1. 00:31:477 (4) - why not make this one horizonal just like ur general design in the first part? changed
2. 00:34:290 (1) - 1->2 0.77ds fixed
3. 01:26:790 (1) - touching the hp bar, can drag 01:23:977 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - together down a bit so that it won't break ur patterns good point, changed
4. 02:23:040 (6) - u forgot nc here fixed
5. 03:18:586 (1) - why finish..? this surprises me lol yeaaaa..., its pretty random. Removed it at all diffs

[Normal]

1. 01:45:540 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this part is too many 1/2 sliders spamming, try adding more variety. a random suggestion, maybe apply to where u think it fits hmm.. I agree with the lack of variety in this part. Despite that i want to keep 01:47:415 (1,2,3,4) - as sliders (since i think it fits the best) and changing smth before and after that part would break consistency. I keep this how it already is for now because you are the first modder who mentions this and I think for an Easy that is still acceptable
2. 02:25:383 (2) - a biiit offscreen indeed. thanks for mention this (it'd be unrankable lol). Fixed obv.
3. 02:38:977 (3) - this is a really well blanketed pattern, but the slider path of 3 is kinda vague and maybe not that friendly for players of this level to read, u can consult other ppl for that as well i'll keep that pattern for now, it is good to read (no overlaps at the "hard part" of the pattern) and i think people even if they are newbie will not break at that point imo

[Hard]

1. i think ar8+od7 is pretty enough for this diff i wanna keep ar 8.5 for now but i change it to od7
2. 00:50:930 (6) - this might flow visually better it feels way better, yes. I made it being a blanket with 00:51:165 (1) - to be more structured (and hey... one more or less blanket in my mapset? who cares xD
3. 00:51:165 (1,2,3,4) - keep ds here feels a bit boring, try ctrl-g 3 and 4 separately, would be fun and better make for the latter jumps imo it is kinda boring yes, I ctrl + g'd 00:52:102 (3) - but now there's an inconsistency (the jump 00:51:633 (2,3) - is ds1.78 or smth like that and i cant make it further away because i need the overlap with 00:50:696 (5) - , so yea...). I keep it now with just flipping 00:52:102 (3) - , should be no problem i guess... well i hope lol
4. 01:37:571 (4) - touch hp bar unrankabler too lmao, thanks xd. Fixed

Namki wrote:

Hello.
[Easy]
As I can see and hear:
00:04:290 (2) - this is mapped for the same music as this 00:19:290 (2,3) - , but for 00:19:290 (2,3) - you've put whistle here 00:04:290 (2) - and for this 00:19:290 (2,3) - here 00:19:759 (3) - . You should've put whistle here 00:19:759 (3) - instead of 00:19:759 (3) - .
Same here 00:27:259 (3) - . 00:27:259 (3) - istead of 00:27:259 (3) - .
01:34:290 (1) - whistle here. Because here you've put whistle 01:04:290 (1) - . Ooops... I forgot to recheck the HS's, Thank you for pointing that out, all HS are fixed now!
And I saw few bad blankets like this one 02:51:165 (3,4) - . huh..? that blanket is on point oO I'll go through the the diff once again and try to check every blanket just in case

[Normal]
01:22:805 (1) - swap with 01:22:571 (5,1) - , this strong beat should be emphasized 01:23:040 - . the sound that comes up in the music with the slider 01:22:805 (1) - (whose tail is placed on the downbeat which should normally get emphasized like u said but not here) is very special and unique in the song, so it makes more sense to me to emphasize that sound instead of making the simple emphasize at the downbeat (which is at every point in the whole map the case). The slider fits the best to emphasize that sound imo
And here 01:26:321 (5,1) - . And here 01:30:071 (5,1) - and others. ^
02:38:977 (3) - I'm not sure with this slider, path isn't this clear as it should be in Normal tbh. it is very special and maybe a bit hard to read for normal, but why not smth different, smth that could make someone remember the map. Furthermore since that point 02:38:040 (1) - you have time to read that clean pattern which isnt stacked with other objects, so its clean and easier to read.
01:34:290 (1) - whistle, ye. Fixed

[Hard]
00:31:477 (1) - NC looks random. removed nc
02:46:711 (6,7) - 2.17x looks inconsistent here, make 2.3 as before. fixed
03:01:711 (6,7) - and here, yes. ^
01:34:290 (1) - and whistle, I guess. added whistles to the whole part
Btw, there's no triplets in first kiai, maybe add few? think its fine how it is, nevertheless ill consider that

good luck~

1. Turn Widescreen Support off since there is no storyboard.
2. See if you can get a 192kbs mp3 file. 128kbs is rankable but it can be improved.

1. 00:09:915 (1,2) - 1.30x -> 2.30x is rather large and it plays really awkwardly since it isn't consistent with the previous parts. If you're gonna break the spacing, you should do it on a downbeat instead since there's nothing in the song that suggests such a large spike in spacing.
2. 00:13:665 (1) - I feel this slider shouldn't be stacked under the notes because it falls on a powerful beat, and a change in spacing and/or flow should represent that.
3. 00:24:915 (1,2) - Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding what in the song says there should be almost doubled spacing here. It just doesn't make sense on a Hard difficulty. If you're gonna do it, you should do it on a powerful beat and do it fairly consistently.
4. 00:29:836 (5,6) - Same as the above. This happens a lot so just please consider nerfing the spacing here, because 2.30x is too big of a spike for sure. Maybe 1.70x would be more fitting, but even then I don't get what about that beat is so powerful.
5. 00:35:930 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - This pattern looks kinda funny and lopsided: http://i.imgur.com/dzYiYyY.jpg Consider neatening it up, maybe making it more circular? It's just really weird.
6. 01:39:094 (4,5,4,5) - Maybe to add some variety, you can stack these two doubles.
7. 02:54:680 (7,1) - I'm concerned that this may be too challenging to read on a Hard difficulty because of the overlap. Consider not having the 02:54:915 (1) slider end overlap with the 02:54:680 (7) one.
8. 02:56:555 (6,1) - I'd increase spacing or break flow to emphasize this downbeat which has a powerful piano hit on it.

1. 00:55:383 (1,2) - The flow here is a bit harsh for a Normal diff. Consider this instead: http://i.imgur.com/XTLo2FQ.png Of course, adjust spacing after.
2. 01:24:446 (5,6,1) - Fix your spacing here. 1.05x is rather inconsistent and it's noticeable while you're playing.
3. 01:48:821 (4,1) - 1.16x is too inconsistent for a Normal. Fix this 100%.

1. 01:02:415 (3,4) - This flow is rather awkward for an Easy diff. Consider having the first slider lead into the second one much smoother.

Smoothie World wrote:

[General]

1. Turn Widescreen Support off since there is no storyboard. fixed
2. See if you can get a 192kbs mp3 file. 128kbs is rankable but it can be improved. i dont think im able to find another one >.<

[Hard]

1. 00:09:915 (1,2) - 1.30x -> 2.30x is rather large and it plays really awkwardly since it isn't consistent with the previous parts. If you're gonna break the spacing, you should do it on a downbeat instead since there's nothing in the song that suggests such a large spike in spacing. the DS increase is e.g. consistent with 00:06:165 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and so on. the amount of increase seems (according to other opinions including mine) comfortable. even with mouse it feels really pleasant although i suck with mouse. therefore you are the first modder who says that >.< So no change for now it will 99% stay 1.3 -> 2.3 increase for these parts
2. 00:13:665 (1) - I feel this slider shouldn't be stacked under the notes because it falls on a powerful beat, and a change in spacing and/or flow should represent that. i agree with that, gonna change that later because im despairung on that part atm...
3. 00:24:915 (1,2) - Yeah, I'm having trouble understanding what in the song says there should be almost doubled spacing here. It just doesn't make sense on a Hard difficulty. If you're gonna do it, you should do it on a powerful beat and do it fairly consistently. this spacing is only at specific parts of the song, its not on a random red tick or smth like that, so... And why does spacing increase in a hard not make sense? It is >Hard< so it should be a bit harder, and same DS over and over like in a normal doesnt make sense to me tbh >.<
4. 00:29:836 (5,6) - Same as the above. This happens a lot so just please consider nerfing the spacing here, because 2.30x is too big of a spike for sure. Maybe 1.70x would be more fitting, but even then I don't get what about that beat is so powerful. same reasoning as above
5. 00:35:930 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - This pattern looks kinda funny and lopsided: http://i.imgur.com/dzYiYyY.jpg Consider neatening it up, maybe making it more circular? It's just really weird. i agree, that looked kinda random, i gave it more structure should be fine now
6. 01:39:094 (4,5,4,5) - Maybe to add some variety, you can stack these two doubles. ill consider that
7. 02:54:680 (7,1) - I'm concerned that this may be too challenging to read on a Hard difficulty because of the overlap. Consider not having the 02:54:915 (1) slider end overlap with the 02:54:680 (7) one. it has the best flow 2 objects can actually have in that pattern, so imo its fine
8. 02:56:555 (6,1) - I'd increase spacing or break flow to emphasize this downbeat which has a powerful piano hit on it. uhh... you are actually right, but the circumstances to change that are soooooooooooo high.. ill probably do that later (im sitting here for almost 2h now)

[Normal]

1. 00:55:383 (1,2) - The flow here is a bit harsh for a Normal diff. Consider this instead: http://i.imgur.com/XTLo2FQ.png Of course, adjust spacing after. i agree with that, made it flow pleasanter now
2. 01:24:446 (5,6,1) - Fix your spacing here. 1.05x is rather inconsistent and it's noticeable while you're playing. fixed
3. 01:48:821 (4,1) - 1.16x is too inconsistent for a Normal. Fix this 100%. fixed

[Easy]

1. 01:02:415 (3,4) - This flow is rather awkward for an Easy diff. Consider having the first slider lead into the second one much smoother.fixed

1. 00:44:602 (4) - missing stack with 00:46:477 (2) like you did almost other pattern example 00:41:790 (1,3), etc... but i think you missing this stack
2. 00:51:165 (3) - the end point would be nice if move little down to better flow after objects example i like this flow 00:43:665 (3,4,5)

1. 00:30:071 (4) - this zig-zag look like un-symmetry I kindy like more this slider 00:30:071 (4), this is better than that slider, maybe copy-paste? for nice design lol
2. 00:39:680 (5,1) - as you style, the 4 should be NC then in 1 remove NC, this could be fix you consistency style
3. 00:54:680 (4,1) - ^ same happen
4. 02:39:680 (4,1) - ^ same
5. 02:54:680 (4,1) - ^ same
6. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color

1. 00:24:915 (1,2) - this spacing couldn't be make jump because as you style consistency you don't make song let me example look pattern and listen song in 00:17:415 (1,2,3) - this part song is going repeative and more more but you didn't make jump, so that in 00:24:915 (1,2) -shouldn't make jump, could be nice if use normal spacing if you care consistency (I m fine inconsistency just let you know lol)
2. 00:39:915 (6) - Missing put NC
3. 01:12:727 (4) - missing put NC
4. 02:13:665 (3) - missing put nc
5. 02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc....
6. 02:36:633 (2,3,4) - this spacing kindy weird for me, would be nice if 02:36:868 (3,4) could be same as spacing 02:36:633 (2,3) example this print https://puu.sh/qfoQS/abd9988058.jpg but this spacing is weird when i did play test or you could use normal spacing like you did in 02:41:790 (1,2,3,4)
7. 02:43:430 (6,7) - same happen as 02:35:930 (6,7)
8. 02:50:930 (6,7,1) - ^ same
9. 02:51:633 (2,3,4) - again spacing weird like this https://puu.sh/qfp3y/ade38ecfd4.jpg or use you own
10. 02:58:430 (6,7,1) - slider 1/4 ?

Phyloukz wrote:

Pereira006 wrote:

[Easy]
[Normal]

Gameplay:

1. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color i dont really know what you mean, firstly i thought its the combo color sequence but that seems alright >.<

I mean in (1) remove NC and put NC in (2) too keep it consistency

[Hard]

Gameplay:

[list]
[*]02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc.... okay let me try to explain: I personally hear at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - a different sound as at 02:39:680 (7,1) - . If you listen to what comes after (so the measure 02:36:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - compared to the measure at 02:39:915 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ) these examples you may notice a difference there. And at 02:39:680 (7,1) - i hear "a cut" (sorry for bad english) in the music whereas at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - the music goes pleasanter into the next measure (thats why i made at that spot a circle-circle-slider pattern which feels pleasanter than an 1/4 slider into 1/2 slider). I hope you can get what i mean. this is btw consistent over the last 2 kiai, at the first one i made only 1/4 slider to 1/2 slider pattern I understand what you trying explain but I what mean if you listen 2 kiai and 1 kiai they are repeative, example in 00:50:930 (6) - that you said "cut" but the "cut" of sound is same thing as 02:35:930 (6,7), Why I did point this, just let you know if you missing to fix consistency or intentional lol but I'm fine this treat as inconsistency.
[]
pretty cute map and song c:
Any question if you don't understand my english or something ask me in-game I will explain my best
Also let me know Sonnyc will bubble or not

Thank you very much for your mod, was really important to fix the spacing inconsistency in the last 2 kiai's

Phyloukz wrote:

Pereira006 wrote:

[Easy]
[Normal]

Gameplay:

1. 02:07:805 (1,2) - wrong place combo color i dont really know what you mean, firstly i thought its the combo color sequence but that seems alright >.<

I mean in (1) remove NC and put NC in (2) too keep it consistency Omg, I didnt even notice the NC was wrong there lmao, Fixed!

[Hard]

Gameplay:

[list]
[*]02:35:930 (6,7) - I suprise why you didn't use slider of 1/4 like other pattern ? example 00:50:930 (6,1), etc.... okay let me try to explain: I personally hear at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - a different sound as at 02:39:680 (7,1) - . If you listen to what comes after (so the measure 02:36:165 (1,2,3,4,5) - compared to the measure at 02:39:915 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ) these examples you may notice a difference there. And at 02:39:680 (7,1) - i hear "a cut" (sorry for bad english) in the music whereas at 02:35:930 (6,7,1) - the music goes pleasanter into the next measure (thats why i made at that spot a circle-circle-slider pattern which feels pleasanter than an 1/4 slider into 1/2 slider). I hope you can get what i mean. this is btw consistent over the last 2 kiai, at the first one i made only 1/4 slider to 1/2 slider pattern I understand what you trying explain but I what mean if you listen 2 kiai and 1 kiai they are repeative, example in 00:50:930 (6) - that you said "cut" but the "cut" of sound is same thing as 02:35:930 (6,7), Why I did point this, just let you know if you missing to fix consistency or intentional lol but I'm fine this treat as inconsistency. honestly deep inside me (lol?) it disturbed me not having the consistency in the first kiai (since i got the idea at the start of the 2nd kiai...). So I added the consistency for the first kiai time: 00:50:930 (6,7,1) - and 00:58:430 (6,7,1) - got changed into circle-circle-slider pattern to fit the policy i made in 2nd and 3rd kiai except that they are normally 1.3x snapped to the previous object (at 2nd and 3rd kiai its 2.3). so yeah... maybe check that out if that is okay first :>
[]
pretty cute map and song c:
Any question if you don't understand my english or something ask me in-game I will explain my best
Also let me know Sonnyc will bubble or not

Thank you very much for your mod, was really important to fix the spacing inconsistency in the last 2 kiai's

Fixed obviously