Shad0w1and
Shad0w1and wrote:
I
01:18:314 (2,3) - I suggest delete these two and bring the spinner to 01:18:314 - I like it more qhen it starts from a big white one
01:57:514 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - every 8 notes get a NC should be enough, or you should NC 01:56:714 (5) - new combos are placed according to lyrics
00:49:714 (4,5) - this stacking stopped the motion, which is really weird, seperate them will feel a lot better rearranged
02:00:714 (3) - NC maybe, applied to all diffs good
00:50:314 - should still be NC here fixed already
01:17:814 - consider whistle okay
tbh if I were you, I will change sampleset for the reversed arrow, maybe use soft-whistle as the normal-hitnormal. applied to all diffs will see about that
H
01:15:114 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2) - this is really hard to read, something like this could help will see about that
01:15:914 (1,2) - ^ ↑
01:18:314 (2,3) - same as insane, maybe delete them I like it
E
tick rate 1 works better imo I like 2 more
hackSL
hackSL wrote:
Insane
00:40:314 (5) - спейсинг чуток уменьшить и сдвинуть левее. http://puu.sh/pJ42d/74676b2379.jpg подвинул
00:45:114 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - 1,2,3 можно было бы с уменьшением спейсинга как-нибудь разместить, а 4,5,1 уже с увеличением. играться будет интереснее, только не знаю как на общем фоне это выглядеть будет, так что наверно не обязательно. чуть подвинул тут и там, реверснул (5)
01:18:714 (1) - на этом моменте чет совсем не хочется крутить спиннер, с возвратными слайдерами мне кажется интереснее игралось бы. хотя опять же имхо там звук на фоне
Hard
01:08:914 (4,5) - уменьшить спейсинг до 2.2 не понял смысл, но ладно
01:09:514 (1,2) - здесь до 2.5 ↑
01:18:714 (1) - аналогично как в инсе аналогично
01:35:114 (1,5) - может наклонить чуток слайдеры? 1 влево, 5 вправо где-то на 1 клетку. нет, я хочу так
01:41:514 (1) - левее надо конец слайдера перенести, а то как-то не очень с предыдущим слайдером смотрится. со следующим, может?
Pata-Mon
Pata-Mon wrote:
[Normal]
- soft-hitnormal is completely same as the music, that will make players can't here anything when they hit them (for example: Normal, 00:21:114 (2,4) - ), that means no feedback. Personally I think players need to here something when they're playing. it's audible enough to give feedback
- spread is ok? normal to hard will ask for opinions, but I find it acceptable
[Hard]
- 01:38:314 (1,3) - a bit near, move 3 to (447,144) no it's alright
[Insane]
- 00:49:514 (3,4) - and 00:49:914 (5,6) - use same ds why? it's a tiny jump
- 01:14:314 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - maybe it's a bit difficult in hard diff? and this makes a spread issue as well maybe
- 00:47:714 (3,4) - a bit near ...so?
Neoskylove
Neoskylove wrote:
[Easy]
00:13:514 (1,2) - 00:16:714 (1,2) - I think this flowbreak is not good. this is my suggestion. This could be better? maybe... well, it changes nothing in terms of gameplay but looks worse in my eyes
00:29:514 - ~00:51:914 - just same rhythms... It is boring. I recommand you change 00:35:914 (1,2,3) - this rhythm.. well it's easy, what do you expect. regarding 3/2, it's fairly simple when one keeps a constant rhythm when mapping
01:11:114 (1,2,3,4) - in music, it have too many clap sounds, but you used less beats. I think this is awkward. Could you make more rhythms like this? there are still slider ticks that somehow substitute claps
[Normal]
00:50:314 (3,4,5,1) - for better looking, I recommand you make a triangle like this I think that current triangle looks good enough
01:38:314 (1,2,3) - ^ ↑
01:29:514 (2,3) - 01:30:914 (5,6) - 01:32:714 (2,3) - 01:34:714 (6,1) - 01:37:514 (4,5) - 01:48:514 (2,3) - ^ it doesn't change anything for a player, like really, no one plays with a ruler
[Hard]
00:49:714 (4,5) - You didn't used stack before. so this stack pattern is very awkward. I think it souldn't be stacked. it's okay for Hard
01:14:314 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - OMG this stream is very hard in Hard diff. just use reverse sliders. It is 150bpm, I think 150 is not too slow.. I don';t think 5 notes are that hard to click, keeping it for now
[Insane]
01:36:914 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - OMG this straight pattern is very Hard....// not quite, it would be harder without 01:37:314 (4,5,6) being a stack
Thanks!