Around when it was pointed out that you were acting Jester, Nakata. I thought that was quite obvious.
For the record, this game does not utilize phantom votes. If you are inactive you will be prodded. If you don't pick up your prod, I will forcibly replace you. If you are prodded repeatedly without any sign of picking up your activity beyond the bare minimum, I will forcibly replace you. If, after a significant period of time, I am unable to fill an inactive slot, that slot will be modkilled.Wojjan wrote:
I'll put up a vote for a no lynch until I decide to drop in again, just to save me a nasty phantom vote for D2.
It was really more or less after I had "give up".Mashley wrote:
Around when it was pointed out that you were acting Jester, Nakata. I thought that was quite obvious.
There could be significance behind all of this.secksey wrote:
*glare*
you got me.
It was pointed out when strager instructed Cuddles to post that he thought that I was an obvious Jester.Mashley wrote:
But you said that before anyone said you might be a jester?
No... you didn't... Go and look back at the postsNakata Yuji wrote:
It was pointed out when strager instructed Cuddles to post that he thought that I was an obvious Jester.Mashley wrote:
But you said that before anyone said you might be a jester?
I said that afterwards bro <3
Nakata Yuji wrote:
damn you got me.
vote for me guys.
Wojjan wrote:
Aha. There's our WIFOM.
Well well. You've been very very indecisive as of late Two. You just now said there is not a jester in this game, and Nakata is playing against town, be he a townie or predator. I'm all for lynching people playing against tow, how about you?Two wrote:
unvote, vote Mashley
wow?DiamondCrash wrote:
Nakata Yuji; Roleclaim.
Nakata Yuji (5) - NoHitter, Mashley, mernomyon, rust45, Oyashiro Beatrice
strager wrote:
Or is it because the voters are town and really think Nakata is scum, possibly because they *are* scum? And you're just trying to get votes off them to defend your buddy or some shit?Two wrote:
Is it maybe because half of the voters know that nakata is town and won't give up the lynch?
well, you started the chain previous to the revelation of my role.Two wrote:
Why would I start the chain of votes on my "buddy"? I'm not stupid enough to not know how sticky votes are on the first day. More importantly, why have you still not posted a reason for voting for me? I thought the vote was just your usual bs so I ignored it, but I guess you have a reason?
This is all a distraction though. While I don't know if nakata was honest when they posted their role, I really think they were because of the circumstances and how they've been playing so far. Please don't be dumb and lynch them thx.
Yeah.Two wrote:
More importantly, why have you still not posted a reason for voting for me? I thought the vote was just your usual bs so I ignored it, but I guess you have a reason?
This is complete bullshit and you know it as well as I (and any other veterans here, including SFG) do.Two wrote:
Why would I start the chain of votes on my "buddy"? I'm not stupid enough to not know how sticky votes are on the first day.
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).strager since we are on the subject of mafia/wwg veterans, why is it that one such as yourself limited the options to three? There are more than that.
Nice. "There are other options, but I can't think of any right now. You already stated the true case."Two wrote:
Either you're a Townie trying to cover up Nakata's mistake (in which case, why did you say in IRC that Nakata posted their role?) or you're scum trying to either (1) get the votes off your scum buddy who (oops!) "claimed" to get out of a rough situation, or (2) get votes onto another player by playing "hero" by "protecting" Nakata from "possible scum" (like DC and I, who were in IRC at the time).strager since we are on the subject of mafia/wwg veterans, why is it that one such as yourself limited the options to three? There are more than that.
are you trying to pull a Mashley here?
Maybe you should contribute next time?Oyashiro Beatrice wrote:
And so it seems that the discussion has died....
OK Mashley. When you unvote, please give a reason.Mashley wrote:
Should have done this sooner, but Unvote, Vote No Lynch since I no longer have a reason to suspect Nataka
no you weren't the first person to vote for them, you were the third (I was first, nohitter was second)Mashley wrote:
after something unusual (which I won't elaborate on, that's strager's job) she said strager noticed it seemed quite likely that she could be vanilla and it'd be best to wait until she says something that actually makes sense.
Wait, I wasn't? Okay then. Should probably have checked that first...Two wrote:
no you weren't the first person to vote for them, you were the third (I was first, nohitter was second)Mashley wrote:
after something unusual (which I won't elaborate on, that's strager's job) she said strager noticed it seemed quite likely that she could be vanilla and it'd be best to wait until she says something that actually makes sense.
also what does the part I quoted even mean
Here it is. Nataka, tell us all why would said this, please?Nakata Yuji wrote:
magikarp
Here's how to stop being a dick.Nakata Yuji wrote:
You're over-analyzing buddy. Actually, it's a useless tidbit of information that I give you when you figure out, but veterans might be able to discern its use.
Yes, that is it. That's the most important thing.Nakata Yuji wrote:
fine, if you're so eager to know.
magikarp --> splash.
That's really it d00d
Why, I can't want to stay alive?DiamondCrash wrote:
So, Nakata, why have you changed from trying to get yourself killed to trying to keep yourself alive, hm?
Please explain this, why would you want someone dead but not by lynch?Two wrote:
2. I did want Nakata to die, but I didn't want them to be lynched, so accusing me of lying about that is just stupid.
WIFOM. This is certainly not a valid defense, nor is it a valid case against you.Two wrote:
Why is it that people so readily started to bandwagon on someone who was against the lynching of the person who was night killed
Only those involved have an inclination to mention it. This is similar to Doctors (GA's in WWG terminology) commenting on the success of their protection the following day.Two wrote:
and why has no one talked about the fact that two people died at night?
You claim you wanted to have Nakata be a "decoy". You wanted the mafia to nightkill him, because he would seem important to you.Two wrote:
I did want Nakata to die, but I didn't want them to be lynched, so accusing me of lying about that is just stupid.
Would you care to elaborate on this. This would make sense if you've seen Nakata's roleclaim, but you claim you didn't.Two wrote:
I already knew that Nakata had the equivalent of a vanilla role in this game because of how they posted.
How would me knowing based on how they posted only make sense "if I've seen their roleclaim"?NoHItter wrote:
Would you care to elaborate on this. This would make sense if you've seen Nakata's roleclaim, but you claim you didn't.Two wrote:
I already knew that Nakata had the equivalent of a vanilla role in this game because of how they posted.
???Two wrote:
In effect it pretty much proves to me that strager and Wojjan aren't mafia.
Everybody has a role that's at least somewhat interesting.OP wrote:
Furthermore, while there will be near-vanilla roles, EVERY role has at least one night action. This will hopefully keep the game more interesting and involving for the players.
I've had a theory about this (and not in response to Two's comment; this goes back to Day 1). I guess it's time to make that theory public.0_o wrote:
I think you should stop being 100% sure of things, Two; if I recall correctly you said Wojjan was 100% town last game as well. Also there AREN'T any vanilla roles this game:Everybody has a role that's at least somewhat interesting.OP wrote:
Furthermore, while there will be near-vanilla roles, EVERY role has at least one night action. This will hopefully keep the game more interesting and involving for the players.
This is just bullshit reasoning. You knoow we aren't mafia because you know who the mafia is.Two wrote:
In effect it pretty much proves to me that strager and Wojjan aren't mafia.
if you wanna talk about last game, I kept saying that Wojjan was 100% human even after I knew he wasn't0_o wrote:
I think you should stop being 100% sure of things, Two; if I recall correctly you said Wojjan was 100% town last game as well.
Can you please explain your logic, Two?Ph0X wrote:
???Two wrote:
In effect it pretty much proves to me that strager and Wojjan aren't mafia.
I don't see your logic.
If every role can splash, then that means there are no aux roles, meaning there couldn't have been a scum killed. Which there was.Two wrote:
And for the record I can splash too. I'm pretty sure every role can splash.
I don't consider WIFOM "logic".Two wrote:
I did explain my logic. It should have been obvious to everyone who has played as much as the 3 of us that Nakata was vanilla. So, the chances of you or Wojjan not realizing that and nightkilling Nakata are next to none. And like I just said, Wojjan is playing completely differently this game than last game, and even though they're experienced I doubt they consciously made a decision to change that dramatically.
rust's comment makes sense to me.Two wrote:
and rust45 I'm waiting for a post from you that makes any sense at all
Two wrote:
Yeah I did know 100% that they were town and I did know 100% that they were vanilla.
Even with the "Splash" argument, you cannot be 100% certain that someone is town. After all, you yourself said every role can splash.Two wrote:
It should have been obvious to everyone who has played as much as the 3 of us that Nakata was vanilla