they wouldMahogany wrote:
I thought you said the kids at your school would kill you if you were gay
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) I concurKupcaH wrote:
Because 2D is better than 3D. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
What if I don't want to date anyonePhilosofikal wrote:
go be the person you would want to date
That doesnt really work out all the time; why? cos lifePhilosofikal wrote:
If you are single it is because you are boring or between relationships
go be the person you would want to date
that's quite reasonable. desire to date or be in a relationship is not a universal human desire by any means. just don't go off and claim you're asexual because that's as basic as the urge to eat or sleep and is just not possible. Just have fuck-buddies, don't fall into the moral social construct of monogamy, it's unnatural and we along with 99.999% of all life on this planet aren't wired for it.Mahogany wrote:
What if I don't want to date anyone
This isn't what I meant at all. My point is to go be the kind of person that someone would want to spend a lot of their time with. Go be part of something bigger than yourself and create an ecosystem of thoughtful ideas in your brain. Then you'll be an interesting person that people will want to be around, and you'll have surrounded yourself with like minded people in the process. Dating can be beyond easy if you want it to be, and can meet basic minimum qualifications. It's like making a friend, except in the end you also get to fuck them.Kisses wrote:
That doesnt really work out all the time; why? cos lifePhilosofikal wrote:
If you are single it is because you are boring or between relationships
go be the person you would want to date
e.g. some men prefer women with more submissive personalities (im not talking sexually) but that doesnt mean acting the same way would get him the partner he desires.
No it's not. It's just a simpler version than the paragraph I just typed. You just took it completely literally.Kisses wrote:
That's a lot different than just "go be the person you would want to date"
Looking at your play count versus your rank makes the sting go away quite a bit, frankly. How can I expect you to comprehend words when you can't even comprehend circles? You have the worst level of play time to skill level of anyone I've ever seen, and I thought I was bad in that regard.Kisses wrote:
I found the cure for autism
Wow, how rude on both sides.Philosofikal wrote:
Looking at your play count versus your rank makes the sting go away quite a bit, frankly. How can I expect you to comprehend words when you can't even comprehend circles? You have the worst level of play time to skill level of anyone I've ever seen, and I thought I was bad in that regard.Kisses wrote:
I found the cure for autism
1. I never said I was good. I'm pretty mediocre.Khelly wrote:
At 20,000 playcount I had 4800pp. You're shit too Philosophical.
Playing with a tablet doesn't suddenly make you good.Philosofikal wrote:
1. I never said I was good. I'm pretty mediocre.Khelly wrote:
At 20,000 playcount I had 4800pp. You're shit too Philosophical.
2. Remind me how many times you complained about being shitty with mouse? I could probably be way better at this game if I switched to tablet, but I play this game to improve my dexterity.
So are you going to deny that it's not instant? Because it was pretty instant.RoseusJaeger wrote:
It's a matter of practice
So will you change your phrase to "Playing with a tablet will most likely not suddenly make you good" rather than an absolute "doesn't"?RoseusJaeger wrote:
It may have been instant for you, but that's not the case for probably 9/10 players
I'm sticking with doesn't because I'm not going to perpetuate a stupid notion within the community that a tablet will instantly make you betterKhelly wrote:
So will you change your phrase to "Playing with a tablet will most likely not suddenly make you good" rather than an absolute "doesn't"?RoseusJaeger wrote:
It may have been instant for you, but that's not the case for probably 9/10 players
that was long before you started blatantly cheatingKhelly wrote:
I love how you're so insecure about your own skills and how you bitched about the fact that you constantly can't and haven't improved in a long time that you still believe this.xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
that was long before you started blatantly cheatingKhelly wrote:
or maybe it was exactly when you started
don't know, i've learned to stop trusting people ever since thinking goose was legit
Talk to me more about gpus.xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
dont try to make this about me, ive moved on to better things than this game, life things, you wouldn't understand
you're the one who brought up how 'good' you got with tablet and i think it would be unhealthy for him to get self expectations set by a cheaterKhelly wrote:
Talk to me more about gpus.xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
dont try to make this about me, ive moved on to better things than this game, life things, you wouldn't understand
It's entirely about you though because you won't let it go.
WTF? CPUs and GPUs are designed for entirely different purposes. I feel like you don't really know what you are talking about here. This is like comparing Bitcoin ASICs to desktop CPUs for hashing power and saying that the ASIC is going to replace the CPU for computational tasks. They are good at different things.xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
you're the one who brought up how 'good' you got with tablet and i think it would be unhealthy for him to get self expectations set by a cheater
anyway, did you know gpu's are going to replace cpu's soon, it's just taking a really long time both because nvidia is the only company trying to make it happen but unlike amd they don't have any rights to the x86-64 instruction set that is still being used purely for cpu's that have the dated and inefficient design of having very few but individually powerful cores, and also because even if the instruction sets were adapted noone wants to bother writing their programs to utilize hundreds or thousands of the much smaller cores on a gpu despite that it would be dozens if not hundreds of times faster.
an $11,000 E7-8890 v3 CPU tops out at ~400 gflops of throughput, meanwhile a $600 980 ti gets close to 6000. What a joke, in under a decade ye olde cpu standard is going to fall so far behind gpu's in terms of silicon that the transition will be inevitable. CPU's will go the way of ethernet/sound/dedicated physx cards
why do you think that is? a transistor is a transistor. the instructions for the things you are mentioning (computational tasks) are in favour of cpu's, and that's what people write for.Philosofikal wrote:
WTF? CPUs and GPUs are designed for entirely different purposes. I feel like you don't really know what you are talking about here. This is like comparing Bitcoin ASICs to desktop CPUs for hashing power and saying that the ASIC is going to replace the CPU for computational tasks. They are good at different things.
It's not about your personality at all. I have no idea who you are. It's about the fact that you seem like an incredibly anti-intellectual person, so I have no idea where this mentality of skill at this game comes from.Khelly wrote:
Ah, I see that personality is a qualifier for deserving.
No one is naturally good at osu. There are just people who play less retardedly and people who play more. :^)
this guy xDPhilosofikal wrote:
It's not about your personality at all. I have no idea who you are. It's about the fact that you seem like an incredibly anti-intellectual person, so I have no idea where this mentality of skill at this game comes from.
BOTH OF YOU GUYS NEED TO GROW UPPhilosofikal wrote:
Looking at your play count versus your rank makes the sting go away quite a bit, frankly. How can I expect you to comprehend words when you can't even comprehend circles? You have the worst level of play time to skill level of anyone I've ever seen, and I thought I was bad in that regard.Kisses wrote:
I found the cure for autism
That's probably why we are so good at treating each other like garbage. It's practically a competition at this point. Like a black hole of perpetual disappointment.Khelly wrote:
Are you me
ehh guess thats trueKhelly wrote:
Meanness is human nature.
Let me know when you're running Windows on a bitcoin minerxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
why do you think that is? a transistor is a transistor. the instructions for the things you are mentioning (computational tasks) are in favour of cpu's, and that's what people write for.
I can't, ASIC isn't capable of that and you know it, but imagine taking all those thousands of tiny weak logical cores and having them execute the same SSE, MMX, etc instructions that drive current mainstream CPU's. You know it's possible. In the same way supercomputers utilize distributed computing to split a workload across hundreds of cpu's, you could split a workload across hundreds of smaller low voltage cores and get a massively higher throughput. There are limitations if you were to attempt to implement this on current architectures of course, namely the fact that a single register is responsible for 16 or more cores, and schedulers would need to be completely revised on the silicon level to accommodate a much larger instruction cache, but it can be done. The performance gain would be huge over just having 4 - 8 higher voltage cores, you end up getting things done much slower like that, regardless of how much higher the IPC per core is in comparison.Philosofikal wrote:
Let me know when you're running Windows on a bitcoin minerxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
why do you think that is? a transistor is a transistor. the instructions for the things you are mentioning (computational tasks) are in favour of cpu's, and that's what people write for.
and think of the programmers! well it's a bitter pill to swallow but the end result will be worth it if and when it does happen.i get you're new here so i'll lay it down for youAomi wrote:
aw now u just made me curiousxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
edit: nvm that was too much
is geek a bad wordxxjesus1412fanx wrote:
edit: nvm that was too much
hey this sounds just like mekiritoduel wrote:
I'm single mostly because of trust issues and while I'm an absolute retard when it comes to human relationships in general (I'm an extremely systematic person, I can't deal with emotionally precarious situations like a non-dumbass) I'm 101% sure that I'm just not a very attractive person in general. I could go on about that for several million centuries but I'll put them in a short-ish list.
- I play a weaboo game about clicking circles to japanese music
- Extreme introvert
- Awful social anxiety
- Long shoulder length hair, partially dyed blue
- Cynical and arrogant at times
- B O R I N G
xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
if stefan propositioned me for sex i would reluctantly accept every inch
Zain Sugieres wrote:
xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
if stefan propositioned me for sex i would reluctantly accept every inch
?????Aomi wrote:
if stefan propositioned me for sex i would reluctantly accept every inch
(:Aurani wrote:
Aomi having some wet dreams here eh.
yesQuillGill wrote:
but i thought aomi is grill
DIdn't you know?chaee wrote:
?????Khelly wrote:
I am a girl
what????
excuse youchaee wrote:
i dont know of any girls that are actually decent at standard so you can imagine my surprise
dude wtf
chaee wrote:
i dont know of any girls that are actually decent at standard so you can imagine my surprise
dude wtf
I TOLD HER YOU WAS A GIRL AND SHE WAS LIKE NOOOOOOOOOOOO ITS JUST A MEME JOSHKhelly wrote:
chaee wrote:
i dont know of any girls that are actually decent at standard so you can imagine my surprise
dude wtf
Thanks mate
its just a meme joshlol wrote:
I TOLD HER YOU WAS A GIRL AND SHE WAS LIKE NOOOOOOOOOOOO ITS JUST A MEME JOSH
suck it chaee
I can't really take that seriously when it comes from someone who uses a bigger font to differentiate himself and get more attention.balldoowell wrote:
I just now read the posts at page like 16-18 wtf is actually wrong with y'all.
Now I can see clearly why you guys are single jesus
rip bro, you will be missed._StormEx_ wrote:
Coz I'm alr married to a 2d Character.