it was all a coincidence that i like *namirin
Love(..?)
EDIT (cos i forgot how to mod for some reason): Good luck! I'm looking forward to the day it's ranked. (yay potential pp)- 00:09:659 (1) - idk if i'm nitpicking or not, but maybe remove NC here and add one over at 00:08:880 (5) - and 00:10:049 (3) - for consistency with the earlier parts.
- 00:12:971 (1) - this is a rly weird jump i feel, like when i do it my cursor ends up in the middle of the slider since it's a large jump, barely avoiding sliderbreaking and i just hold it there till the next slider comes. it feels like there's no real movement there which is weird cos it's a slider, you know. i find having a curved slider that blankets the next which starts at circle (3) better. (though this problem is gone after playing it like 4 times, i'll just leave it here so you can consider what is better for the map)
- 00:35:178 (5) - ok so circle (4) is a piano key while circle (5) is *namirin's voice. they're not the same thing so it's kinda weird that you stack these two together. imo a simple linear pattern from (4) to NC(1) should suffice.
- 00:59:529 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - the piano keys at (1) and (3) are pretty loud, to the point that probably (2) don't really fit. consider changing that into a 1/2 slider
- 01:01:477 (4,5,6,7) - i think this pattern could be improved as the triangle thing looks a little bad with those circles spaced that inconsistently. a proper triangle shape could do fine, but here's one idea of mine that i really like : http://imgur.com/ooPggEW (1.45x spacing for those 3)
- 01:24:659 (8) - this sounds more like 2 separate circles, no?
- 01:32:938 (4,1) - in some areas you give circles in 1/4 beat low distance spacing (ie 00:37:711 (1,2,3,4) - ), and over here there is a triplet relatively far away from the previous slider.you can say that the distance are clearly different in the editor, but in a cs4.5 map like this, it's quite hard to notice this while playing. maybe consider stacking them to the slider end or overlap slightly such that it's way more obvious.
- 01:44:334 (2,3) - there's no sound at (3) unless i heard wrong, so imo 2 circles are misleading, please consider having just 1 1/4 slider instead. (btw there are 2 piano sounds i think, at where (2) is and at 01:44:432 - , maybe you can structure a pattern to capture those keys too)
- 01:58:945 (3,4) - very noticeable 5 note stream or piano keys and rum beats mixed together that i really think is more important than the 2nd loud piano key you've mapped at present.
- 02:01:477 (6) - i'm probably nitpicking again, but that's a not entirely 1/8 beats if you hear the sound at 50% speed. maybe replace it with a 1/4 slider and a circle, though it might not matter much.
- 02:20:568 (7) - in this jump sequence, the quitar goes up to a high tone, then drops from 02:20:178 - onwards to a low tone. maybe the jumps will feel better if the spacing decreases at this circle, where it can be placed at somewhere around (350,275).
- 02:27:581 (1,3) - i'm kind of a slider nazi, hence i deMAND THIS SLIDER TO BE SYMMETRICAL!! (turn on grid snap for ez help)
- 02:43:555 (1) - and 02:44:334 (1) - NCs looks nice and all, but they are actually redundant, don't you think?
- 03:25:243 (1,2,1,2) - 2 circles to capture just 1 piano key is a little too much i believe. perhaps you can replace them with sliders with increasing sv? (the other circles are alright at there are 4 piano keys this time, 03:26:023 (1,2) - though you might need to change the spacing of the circles at 03:26:023 (1,2) - )
- 03:44:529 (3,4) - this is really confusing imo like (3) is in a stack which makes it hard to notice it's 1/8, plus it's aiming to the opposite of (4), which just misleads me to think (4) does not exist until later. i recommend at least fix (3) such that it is aiming towards (4).
- 04:01:087 (3) - oi NC here to tell you've changed the sv again.
- 04:04:789 (3) - i'd prefer the slider end to be clickable as that part has the same distinctive sound as 04:04:399 (2) - . (like what you did at 04:07:516 (2,3,4) - )
- 04:09:854 (5) - it'll be confusing you overlap like this... *flashbacks to the 1/8 spacing sliders* ..i'm shivering.
- 04:59:529 - there's that very noticeable sound that i think it's better to map. (norly you wont believe how many times i missed at that section)
- 05:12:776 (1,3) - SAME!!
- 05:46:087 (2,3,4) - ya you're mapping to the piano keys, but there's no transitionhere that hints towards it since you've been mapping the other stuff too for a full 5-10 seconds. 05:36:152 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this works as you used only circles to map to the other sounds, which helps as a transition to the circle-only piano keys pattern thing. i really suggest doing the same to that, ie turning 05:45:503 (1) - to 2 circles.