from your queue
- [Insane]
- 00:10:611 (6,7) - In my option these patterns doesn't work good. You have missed strong guitar sound at 00:10:805 what sounds confusing. I think you have 3 ways to improve their (in priority):
1. Change to 1/2 slider+circle
2. Change to 1/2 slider+2 circles (triplet under slider I mean)
3. Silenced end of the slider - 00:12:740 (1) - I can't see reasons for use nc here. The instumental part was started on 00:12:934 (2) - , so nc there will be more correct.
- 00:16:805 (4) - just move to 471 193 for aesthetic. Looks like blanket with this placement
- 00:25:128 (1) - given that you tried to make distance to NC more than usually, this small spacing looks weird. Should be more spacing between
- 00:28:031 (6,1,2) - flow pls. It's nearly linear flow with different spacing. I think you know that this structure of flow doesn't playng good. You can move 00:28:224 (1) - to 461 274 (looks pretty nice and like hexagon a bit xD) or 406 162http://puu.sh/nBr9K/83c4c58669.jpg
- 00:29:579 (6,1) - same as before, it's should be has more distance
- 00:34:128 (6) - Overmapped. Not sure that it's so needed
- 00:36:160 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - Hm, I have deleted patterns here and found that rhythm doesn't mapped correctly. You have undermapped some drum patterns at 00:36:450 , 00:37:031 and 00:37:611. Listen carefylly to verify this. Overall I think this model of rhythm should fit better with song http://puu.sh/nBrQp/0798b13364.jpg or something similar
- 00:48:547 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same issue about rhythm. http://puu.sh/nBrWx/3db5dccde8.jpg or something similar
- 01:14:095 (5,6,7,8,9) - feels overmapped imo, but should work I guess
- 01:25:708 (1,2,3) - same stuff about flow, linear flow with unstable spacing doesn't play good.
- 01:27:257 -I feel that this tick should be clickable, sounds too strong to be, Don't forget add NC if you will apply
- Also I noticed that you are often added overmapped triplets like 01:16:224 (1,2,3) - , 01:17:773 (1,2,3) - , 00:46:805 (1,2,3) - etc. I am not agree with that, but I guess you are not agree too. Just said xD
- [Hard]
- 00:00:160 (1) - This slider much faster that same slider in Insane diff. I feel it really weird because slow slider will work here too. This was not forbidden haha
- 00:10:611 (4) - same as in Insane
- 00:27:837 (3,4,5) - Should be consistent spacing? I can't find reasons for that.
- 00:32:482 (3,4,5) - okay, it's pretty nazi but absence of lines of spacing bothers me xD. Btw it's same before
- 00:49:321 (3) - This rhythm does look pretty fine for hard, but I think that 1/2 slider+circle instead will look better
- 01:14:482 (5,1) - Are you really sure with use 2.3 gap here? You don't never used gaps like this before plus it's would playing pretty hard for Hard diff
- 01:14:869 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - The end of the diff looks pretty simplistically. From 1/1 to 1/1 rhythm will pretty bored for Hard diff imo. I am agree that this rhythm will look fine for Normal and less, but not for Hard and higher. You could keep some 1/1 sliders, but I think that you should predominantly map 1/2 beats, like in Insane
- 01:27:257 - same as in Insane, should be clickable imo
- [Normal]
- 00:34:611 (1,2) - I am not sure that this rhythm good fit to song. 00:34:805 heard not so strong, but 00:35:192 sounded better that 00:34:805. You could change this rhythm to circle+1/1 gap+1/2 repeat slider or 1/2 slider+1/1 repeat. Those options should work better than now
- 00:48:740 - Clap is sounds pretty steady here, so overall I think 1/2 slider instead of 00:48:547 should have more sence
- [Easy]
- 00:02:482 - Probably it's requires more work, but you could add claps to sliderticks
- 00:19:128 (1) - 413 241 for better triangle
- 00:33:063 (3) - I think this slider is off a bit
- 00:45:450 (3,1,2,3) - just suggest a square flow, looks better http://puu.sh/nBvU1/a92f06d050.jpg