Please argue in an objektive manner and stop posting those passive-aggressive memes.
This is addressed to all reposters who keep shitposting.
This is addressed to all reposters who keep shitposting.
forum
Mapset and Spread Restructure (Proposed)
posted
Total Posts
614
Can we insert some osu meme here
actually rank maps are slowly decreasing
and this rule will cause no rank map xd
and this rule will cause no rank map xd
I completely agree with these changes!
As a newbie player, I really hate these really good, fun-to-play, creative maps, so I really need a lower difficulty to play
On top of that, I play on a really low resolution, so when mappers map a lot of diffs, they make me scroll a lot on my beatmaps and that annoys the fuck out of me :c
Good job, osu! staff, I think the community will love this in time!!!!!!!!!!!!DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
As a newbie player, I really hate these really good, fun-to-play, creative maps, so I really need a lower difficulty to play
On top of that, I play on a really low resolution, so when mappers map a lot of diffs, they make me scroll a lot on my beatmaps and that annoys the fuck out of me :c
Good job, osu! staff, I think the community will love this in time!!!!!!!!!!!!
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDdear osu!academy principal,
dont fix things that arent broken
dont fix things that arent broken
End me
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
To be honest I feel like if I gave any insightful feedback or a good argument, it would just go ignored anyways.CrimsonClaw wrote:
Please argue in an objektive manner and stop posting those passive-aggressive memes.
This is addressed to all reposters who keep shitposting.
This was a rule that was made out of the blue and it doesnt seem like anybody at all knew about it before hand considering the amount of QAT's and BN's getting upset over it.
The least he could have done was give a warning or make a discussion post on it whether to make it official or not
What about the TorchesStrykerto wrote:
Well everyone, ITS TIME TO GRAB YOUR PITCHFORKS
WE HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF PITCHFORKS AVAILABLE TODAY
---E
---F
---€
------<
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一E
︻̷̿┻̿═━═━E
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━━━╥━══E
AND FINALLY, OUR BEST SELLER
-----卐
All this does is limit the use of different mapping styles even further.
People have been complaining about "pp mapping" and that most of the newer maps are mapped with the same style which uses a lot of repeated back-and-forth jumps and a high OD. It's kind of relevant, because if you look at the insane difficulties in recently ranked songs, you will see that most of them fall into this mapping style.
Then there are maps that have several insanes. Often these GD insanes are mapped in a different style, which gives people of different skill levels the opportunity to enjoy the map. With the new rule, the mapper is essentially forced to delete the GD insanes and rank the map with his "pp mapping" style insane, because that is the difficulty that will get played the most. This leads to most maps having the same style insane.
TLDR: Enjoy playing the same map 100 times with a different song in the background.
People have been complaining about "pp mapping" and that most of the newer maps are mapped with the same style which uses a lot of repeated back-and-forth jumps and a high OD. It's kind of relevant, because if you look at the insane difficulties in recently ranked songs, you will see that most of them fall into this mapping style.
Then there are maps that have several insanes. Often these GD insanes are mapped in a different style, which gives people of different skill levels the opportunity to enjoy the map. With the new rule, the mapper is essentially forced to delete the GD insanes and rank the map with his "pp mapping" style insane, because that is the difficulty that will get played the most. This leads to most maps having the same style insane.
TLDR: Enjoy playing the same map 100 times with a different song in the background.
wow i left a post here!
Peppy, FYI, it's valentines day in Japan, not april fools day.
Decided to make a straw poll. The results show that this certainly was the best decision regarding osu ever made. http://strawpoll.me/6805999
Decided to make a straw poll. The results show that this certainly was the best decision regarding osu ever made. http://strawpoll.me/6805999
Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
Anxient wrote:
dear osu!academy principal,
dont fix things that arent broken
Not enoughTheBestName wrote:
What about the TorchesStrykerto wrote:
Well everyone, ITS TIME TO GRAB YOUR PITCHFORKS
WE HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF PITCHFORKS AVAILABLE TODAY
---E
---F
---€
------<
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一E
︻̷̿┻̿═━═━E
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━━━╥━══E
AND FINALLY, OUR BEST SELLER
-----卐
HOLy
*gives medal*Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
NO MORE MEMES GUYS GIVE IT UP
sameAce3DF wrote:
my nips are semi hard from all of this
everyone ·︻̷̿┻̿═━一 new criteria
no fucking way this is true.. holy fuck how can anyone think this is a good ideaAzer wrote:
Yauxo wrote:
Did anyone actually notice this?
This literally takes all the "community" out of the "community game". Why would you even want to do that.
What the actual fuck
I can make a petiton about the fact that we should make a petition!G3m4sSt4ffLP wrote:
Let's make a petetionHullahopp wrote:
I demand democracy
Exactly, thanks.Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
Just leaving it here as well to sum up my reaction in a nutshell.
Does staffs drank this before posting this thread
Insulting/threatening whoever came up with this is wrong, and the the memes (although dank) are useless, but this shouldn't need any discussion. It's a bad idea. There are no positives to it. In fact, it is the worst and most horrifying thing that might become reality since I realized Donald Trump has a legitimate shot at being president.
This could be a big test to see if they actually care about the opinion of their community or not
1 Map per Icon makes absolutely no sense, and the Insane diff in addition to an Extra or Ultra diffs should not count for Marathon Maps.
1 Map per Icon makes absolutely no sense, and the Insane diff in addition to an Extra or Ultra diffs should not count for Marathon Maps.
When you can't open the website without it crashing in a few seconds, you know that shit is going down.
But really now, this has to be a joke
omar it's not funny cut it out
omar it's not funny cut it out
Terrible?? No!Xantaria wrote:
terrible change
That's too nice of a word.
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
Why exactly do we need more [Easy] and [Normal] diffs? A good difficulty spread is very important, which is why we need more Extras, not the other way around.
Why is there a council in the first place, that wasn't voted on DIRECTLY BY THE COMMUNITY in a COMMUNITY GAME
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
sameAnxient wrote:
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
I don't know what you are talking about my friend.KuranteMelodii wrote:
Does staffs drank this before posting this thread
It has been decided by 2 or 3 people, whole mapping staff is against it.
no it isn'tAnxient wrote:
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
Although I am not std player
but I don't agree with the structure
but I don't agree with the structure
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
This would mean a lot less well made ranked insane/extra diffs. Some more hard/easy diffs. Cleaner look when looking at ranked beatmaps, probably more comparable to commercial rhytm games.
I think it'd be better to add some category that's easier to rank for this kind of spreads (one diff per category), but let people do it how it's been done.
Mappers are not working for you, they do it because they want to. This would probably make them less likely to rank a map.
Please use carrot, not stick.
Also, why is this not news on the front page?
I think it'd be better to add some category that's easier to rank for this kind of spreads (one diff per category), but let people do it how it's been done.
Mappers are not working for you, they do it because they want to. This would probably make them less likely to rank a map.
Please use carrot, not stick.
Also, why is this not news on the front page?
I simply cannot agree with these changes.
It's too much limitation and it's going to result in less mappers and no creativity.
It's too much limitation and it's going to result in less mappers and no creativity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AristocracyAscendance wrote:
Why is there a council in the first place, that wasn't voted on DIRECTLY BY THE COMMUNITY in a COMMUNITY GAME
But anyway. This discussion can rest now. The backlash was big enough, and i am sure the staff does not want to risk huge amounts of drops in the number of active players. Its okay, guys.
lmfao yes xdLyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
.
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good newmapping™ go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌 newmapping™ right👌👌there👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (exciting news: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌GoodMapping™
lmaoLyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
i pay 420 oss coins to revert change
Welp. Looks like I can stop trying to finally rank a map.
LyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
worst fl player
4HeadJamesHappy wrote:
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good newmapping™ go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌 newmapping™ right👌👌there👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (exciting news: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌GoodMapping™
p/4892856Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
mappers. goodbyeXilver wrote:
what people leave
I don't evenXilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Approval rule: Can agree with this, but it shouldn't be retroactively applied to already submitted maps
Ranking rule: Remember the days when we can't have more than 8 difficulties in a mapset? Now we can't have more than 6. This just seems a huge step backwards to me and pleases no one.
Just my 2c
Ranking rule: Remember the days when we can't have more than 8 difficulties in a mapset? Now we can't have more than 6. This just seems a huge step backwards to me and pleases no one.
Just my 2c
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/383715Wafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/361576
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/325107
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/341991
Oh, the irony :^)
Maybe this is an elaborate ruse by ztrot to see how active the mapping community is and to see if they actually care?
plzholdmethisisbs
plzholdmethisisbs
Just read the 8 first page and BD post I think it should be enough to understand what's wrong with this rule.Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Why is someone with 13 kd on the councilXilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Im sorry wut?
No this is dumb
No this is dumb
can't agree more tbhNara wrote:
Nice!!
Why do you need to wait a few days in order to see what happens? Can you not clearly see that this rule is not appreciated by the community, or would you like it to be clearer somehow?Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Also, the council idea is stupid. What a great way to run a community driven game.
mathew wrote:
-_-
Ikr? I thought the same thing as well lmaojonathanlfj wrote:
Approval rule: Can agree with this, but it shouldn't be retroactively applied to already submitted maps
Ranking rule: Remember the days when we can't have more than 8 difficulties in a mapset? Now we can't have more than 6. This just seems a huge step backwards to me and pleases no one.
Just my 2c
Kitami Erika
a mentionNozhomi wrote:
Just read the 8 first page and BD post I think it should be enough to understand what's wrong with this rule.Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
BD post is on page27
delet second rules please,never saw an shittier rule than this
While we have to wait for the final decision for few days
how should bns continue their work
qualifing maps which meet this new rc or else a disqualofication will come up?
how should bns continue their work
qualifing maps which meet this new rc or else a disqualofication will come up?
i tried almost a year to rank my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/307034
and this just screw it all up QWQ
and this just screw it all up QWQ
so Centipede can be rankable if add another lower diff? lmfao
xlni wrote:
Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.mappers. goodbyeXilver wrote:
what people leave
i am not a mapper.
i am still horrified by these changes
Having tons of difficulties is one of the things i liked most
this makes me sad in the inside
i am still horrified by these changes
Having tons of difficulties is one of the things i liked most
this makes me sad in the inside