DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDTo be honest I feel like if I gave any insightful feedback or a good argument, it would just go ignored anyways.CrimsonClaw wrote:
Please argue in an objektive manner and stop posting those passive-aggressive memes.
This is addressed to all reposters who keep shitposting.
What about the TorchesStrykerto wrote:
Well everyone, ITS TIME TO GRAB YOUR PITCHFORKS
WE HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF PITCHFORKS AVAILABLE TODAY
---E
---F
---€
------<
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一E
︻̷̿┻̿═━═━E
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━━━╥━══E
AND FINALLY, OUR BEST SELLER
-----卐
Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
Anxient wrote:
dear osu!academy principal,
dont fix things that arent broken
Not enoughTheBestName wrote:
What about the TorchesStrykerto wrote:
Well everyone, ITS TIME TO GRAB YOUR PITCHFORKS
WE HAVE A WIDE VARIETY OF PITCHFORKS AVAILABLE TODAY
---E
---F
---€
------<
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一E
︻̷̿┻̿═━═━E
▄︻̷̿┻̿═━━━╥━══E
AND FINALLY, OUR BEST SELLER
-----卐
*gives medal*Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
sameAce3DF wrote:
my nips are semi hard from all of this
no fucking way this is true.. holy fuck how can anyone think this is a good ideaAzer wrote:
Yauxo wrote:
Did anyone actually notice this?
This literally takes all the "community" out of the "community game". Why would you even want to do that.
What the actual fuck
I can make a petiton about the fact that we should make a petition!G3m4sSt4ffLP wrote:
Let's make a petetionHullahopp wrote:
I demand democracy
Exactly, thanks.Natsu wrote:
in first place this is a community game, WE DONT NEED A COUNCIL, we need open discussions about new rules, I hope this big disagreement, between your council and the community make you step back guys. This rule do more bad than good, listen to the comunity thanks.
Terrible?? No!Xantaria wrote:
terrible change
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
sameAnxient wrote:
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
I don't know what you are talking about my friend.KuranteMelodii wrote:
Does staffs drank this before posting this thread
no it isn'tAnxient wrote:
i cant even tell if this is sarcasm anymore but ill assume that it is for the sake of my sanityWafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AristocracyAscendance wrote:
Why is there a council in the first place, that wasn't voted on DIRECTLY BY THE COMMUNITY in a COMMUNITY GAME
lmfao yes xdLyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
lmaoLyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
LyWang wrote:
'exciting news'
You gonna be kidding me right?
If I claim a person's death would be exciting, what would be his response?
4HeadJamesHappy wrote:
👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good newmapping™ go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌 newmapping™ right👌👌there👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my self 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (exciting news: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠOOOOOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌GoodMapping™
p/4892856Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
mappers. goodbyeXilver wrote:
what people leave
I don't evenXilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/383715Wafu wrote:
I think it's a cool change honestly. We're forcing people to do the spread properly, which is absolutely alright in my opinion. We don't need the "fill-in" difficulties. There are usually there when mapper fails to make the spread consistent. On the other hand, I think this will prevent some people from mapping easy difficulties. Like really easy. Meaning, if there is some very fast song, people tend to make somewhat normal-ish easy, so lower difficulty would be sometimes appropriate.
Just read the 8 first page and BD post I think it should be enough to understand what's wrong with this rule.Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
Why is someone with 13 kd on the councilXilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
can't agree more tbhNara wrote:
Nice!!
Why do you need to wait a few days in order to see what happens? Can you not clearly see that this rule is not appreciated by the community, or would you like it to be clearer somehow?Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
mathew wrote:
-_-
Ikr? I thought the same thing as well lmaojonathanlfj wrote:
Approval rule: Can agree with this, but it shouldn't be retroactively applied to already submitted maps
Ranking rule: Remember the days when we can't have more than 8 difficulties in a mapset? Now we can't have more than 6. This just seems a huge step backwards to me and pleases no one.
Just my 2c
a mentionNozhomi wrote:
Just read the 8 first page and BD post I think it should be enough to understand what's wrong with this rule.Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.
xlni wrote:
Xilver wrote:
Hello!
As part of the Criteria Council we are currently gathering feedback from what people leave, and we will sort it out in the next couple of days. In the meantime, we are going to observe how the current changes work and how they turn out to be. Please leave your constructive feedback in order for it to be considered by us, and make sure to stand out and give your valid reasons as to what you agree or disagree on.mappers. goodbyeXilver wrote:
what people leave