Dirai, the map you referred isn't "recent". It was ranked 5 months ago.
By "recent" I mean a map that has been ranked before ranking criteria changed, which I highly doubt had a change, or at least something about this case.HappyRocket88 wrote:
Dirai, the map you referred isn't "recent". It was ranked 5 months ago.
I didn't ask you to mod the set? Oko was gonna be my ranking BN of the set for about 2 or 3 days already, what if I went around on all the sets which are bubbled and put a placeholder on all of them? I had 7 mods already, not including some random irc stuff with people and also Oko going over a few things, I think that's plenty.Wafu wrote:
It's not like you don't want or need mods. If you get 12SP, it doesn't make further modding any worse or any useless. You are just spitting into modder's face. If you don't want anyone else to touch your map, don't take it on qualification or learn to accept the fact that anyone is eligible to mod. Even if you got 100 mods before Okoratu's qualification, you'd be obligate to answer them. It's not about speed or how many mods come. If you didn't want to be 'unfair' to Oko, because he was already modding it, how could you be 'unfair' to me completely denying me to say a word?Hula wrote:
Wafu, I didn't want/need anymore mods, this has been modded by many people now, especially consider it's a ENN set. So I'm not gonna wait on a placeholder which was posted whilst Okoratu was half way through modding for the rank, why would I do that? I had been spamming this set on modhelp and modreqs since I submitted it over 2 weeks ago every day, that's how i got BNs and mods . I'm not obliged to wait for every person in osu to mod my map.
In terms of implication this is the exact same as having unused files in a mapset. It's a waste of space and extra bandwidth on the osu's server for every single person that downloads it. Seriously..? There is literally 0 reason to not change this outside of the "meme".gracefu wrote:
I disagree, Wafu is not "correct". The mapset doesn't actually break any rules in the RC. You *could* tighten the rules a little, but it doesn't *technically* break any rules (at least regarding the audio quality). Especially with such a hype rank date, it'd be a real real shame to DQ this because of something trivial and doesn't actually break any RC.
Xexxar pls not this map... not this map!
Xexxar wrote:
In terms of implication this is the exact same as having unused files in a mapset. It's a waste of space and extra bandwidth on the osu's server for every single person that downloads it. Seriously..? There is literally 0 reason to not change this outside of the "meme".
he has a right to mod it but so does everyone else and if someone else wants to rank it then they're allowed to do that just as much as Wafu has the right to mod it lol. If he has legitimate concerns, he should have brought it up beforehand, or mentioned it afterwards without being a child about it.Xexxar wrote:
Not only that but he still has the right to mod a map while it's qualified. The whole purpose of the qualified section is to promote an increase in a beatmap's quality. If he has legitimate concerns this mapset should be DQ'd so they can be properly addressed instead of rushed for your "le ranked at same day as title" meme.
...It's so easy to lie and get people believe. I already proved why the quality is so terrible, I even posted it, so don't claim it's the highest quality available.Timorisu wrote:
If I can get 0 kpbs ranked then Hula can get 192 kpbs ranked. I really don't see the problem here. Besides, Hula said that this is the original mp3, as in there is no better quality or kbps available. So where IS the problem???
Stop your shit or else I nuke this.Hula wrote:
Well. Rip the deam.
What's there to discuss? We've fucking exhausted everything there is to discuss on this mapset already. Haven't you read the drama? I'm not changing anything, since i'm only doing stuff which has been done a million times over. that doesn't make it more valid. The concern about mp3 quality is the most valid by now.
The effory people are putting into the discussion about this map is way too over the top. Sorry that people try to improve your work. My condolences.
Other mapsets with more real issues about playability and stuff would benefit. This whole thing is just annoying. get off your horse. your works are far from perfect.
Especially wafu, don't want his mods, sorry mate. arrogance is not helping you.
Edit: i kindly now ask Wafu to stop posting on this thread since he's only feeding and enabling the drama. Immature basically. your attitude isnt helping either
I'll accept mods from other people
Why should it be illegal to mod a qualified map though? It's not ranked or anything.Stefan wrote:
Wafu, could you please stop that?
If you're too late to mod the mapset before it gets qualified then you're too late. Stop complaining about pointless things which doesn't exist. You're free to mod and help now if there are issues with the mapset but a "Placeholder post" is nothing a mapper needs to follow or wait for. There is no reason to keep this nonsense here.
Thanks.
Hi Tess.Tess wrote:
Why should it be illegal to mod a qualified map though? It's not ranked or anything.Stefan wrote:
Wafu, could you please stop that?
If you're too late to mod the mapset before it gets qualified then you're too late. Stop complaining about pointless things which doesn't exist. You're free to mod and help now if there are issues with the mapset but a "Placeholder post" is nothing a mapper needs to follow or wait for. There is no reason to keep this nonsense here.
Thanks.
Do note I haven't read the entire thread yet, this post just stood out to me.
the point was that he complained that he was stolen the opportunity to mod it PRIOR qualification. He just posted a placeholder and people went over that.Tess wrote:
Why should it be illegal to mod a qualified map though? It's not ranked or anything.Stefan wrote:
Wafu, could you please stop that?
If you're too late to mod the mapset before it gets qualified then you're too late. Stop complaining about pointless things which doesn't exist. You're free to mod and help now if there are issues with the mapset but a "Placeholder post" is nothing a mapper needs to follow or wait for. There is no reason to keep this nonsense here.
Thanks.
Do note I haven't read the entire thread yet, this post just stood out to me.
So.. the concern is that the .mp3 does not have the absolute maximum quality-to-filesize ratio that it could have, do I understand this correctly..?Sieg wrote:
Audio quality difference is not more than 3-5% which is negligible for this bitrate anyways (you won't be able to recognize it blindly). That's why I state again that quality all the same.
Caught up to the thread now, and yeah, I agree. I do agree with Wafu's point but the placeholder thing seems rather silly.Loctav wrote:
the point was that he complained that he was stolen the opportunity to mod it PRIOR qualification. He just posted a placeholder and people went over that.Tess wrote:
Why should it be illegal to mod a qualified map though? It's not ranked or anything.
Do note I haven't read the entire thread yet, this post just stood out to me.
No one said that modding it past qualification is "illegal".
I didn't say it makes your argument wrong somehow, it just means the impact is basically non-existent and there would be no reason to throw a major fit about it - if Hula literally has an .mp3 provided to him, I'd say he should just add it, but there's no reason to throw fits either way, since the impact is not going to be felt by literally anyone.Wafu wrote:
I did provide it. It was just spammed. p/4803647Jenny wrote:
insisting on something you yourself can't deliver seems a bit.. y'know
+Most people won't care doesn't make counter-argument on why was I wrong.
That everyone does have 20$ stuff doesn't mean those with better need to see all the noise. The glitches are pretty audible here.Jenny wrote:
impact is not going to be felt by literally anyone.
Wafu wrote:
That everyone does have 20$ stuff doesn't mean those with better need to see all the noise. The glitches are pretty audible here.Jenny wrote:
impact is not going to be felt by literally anyone.
*RV's version which is worse. lolTess wrote:
Really though Wafu provided the mp3 like 3-4 times now and Hula just ends up going for RV's version. This could've been solved 4 pages ago.
Omg. Can you stop?Wafu wrote:
*RV's version which is worse. lolTess wrote:
Really though Wafu provided the mp3 like 3-4 times now and Hula just ends up going for RV's version. This could've been solved 4 pages ago.
If we did get it from the same site then yes Wafu's version would 'solve' everything. However, I have a hunch that there is something else going on.Tess wrote:
Really though Wafu provided the mp3 like 3-4 times now and Hula just ends up going for RV's version. This could've been solved 4 pages ago.
they said that was their last post on this subjectHula wrote:
Omg. Can you stop?
I haven't gone with any mp3 tess. I said i'd have a lookk later on my laptop
You guys should see the email notification i'm getting lol