_FrEsH_ChICkEn_ wrote:

8
8----------------------[---\
8 -]
8----------------------[---/
o

이거 와꼬형꾜야~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!?!?!?!?!?

Steins wrote:

Happy Onii

00:03:796 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - why not kddkd kdk ?
00:07:739 (59,60,61,62,63) - mhmm kdkkd ?
00:09:796 (76,77,78,79) - maybe k dkd will be better
00:12:024 (94,95,96) - try like this ?
00:14:167 (114) - maybe add note here ?
00:14:767 (118) - maybe k is better than d at this place
00:14:767 (118) - d will be better
01:01:396 (84) - d ?
01:15:196 (197) - maybe k ?
01:15:881 (202) - add note maybe
01:04:653 (111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119) - try this ?
01:09:624 (150) - k ?
01:12:710 (173,174,175,176) - dkd d will be better i think
01:15:024 (195) - k ?
01:17:853 (1) - spinner finish here 01:19:910 (1) - ?
01:23:681 (26) - add note here (k) ?
01:25:481 (42,43) - switch kd ?
01:25:996 (46) - kk ?
01:26:253 (48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57) - try this ?
01:28:739 (68,69,70) - kd k ?
01:30:796 (87) - d ?
01:33:110 (105) - k ?
01:38:939 (153) - k ?
01:42:539 (7) - switch in dk ?
01:44:424 (24) - d ?
01:52:653 (93) - k ?
01:50:939 (77,78,79,80,81,82,83) - ddkddkk ?
01:56:253 (123) - d ?
02:00:539 (159) - K ?
02:01:224 (165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181) - try this
02:05:510 (202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209) - like this
02:12:881 (267) - d ?
02:15:453 (288) - start with k ?
02:26:253 (366) - i don't think spinner is good at this place try to make patterns on drum ?
02:36:796 (435) - mmmhm change in k ?
03:01:224 (579) - k ?
03:11:853 (619) - d ?
03:13:224 (625) - k ?
03:30:196 (1) - 03:31:396 (1) - add spinner ?
03:36:024 (36,37,38,39,40) - kdkdk ?
03:40:396 (75,76) - kd ?
03:48:710 (149) - d ?
03:57:367 (37) - k ?
03:59:681 (57,58) - d - k ?
04:01:224 (71) - start with k ?
04:12:539 (174) - k here
04:12:881 (177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193) - try this
04:21:967 (257,258,259) - maybe ddk better here ?
04:31:053 (343,344,345) - kdk ?
04:49:396 (479) - d ?
04:50:081 (485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495) - [img]try%20this%20https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799676[/img] sound like a bit repetitive so maybe try to found other patterns
05:03:281 (15) - add note ?
05:04:481 (19,20,21) - why not dkdk ?
05:13:567 (50) - add note ?
05:15:453 (56,57,58) - try kddk ?

Good luck suwa suwa ^.^

Steins wrote:

Happy Onii

00:03:796 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - why not kddkd kdk ?

For consistency with 00:01:567 (9,10,11) - and 00:02:939 (20,21,22) -

i want to keep it for now since i guess it isn't serious problem.

00:07:739 (59,60,61,62,63) - mhmm kdkkd ?

It seems better to prevent same kkdkd patterns.

00:09:796 (76,77,78,79) - maybe k dkd will be better

I personally following sound pitch on here rather than pattern.

00:12:024 (94,95,96) - try like this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799240

re-arranged.

00:14:167 (114) - maybe add note here ?

I'd better to keep empty here for this 00:14:253 (114) - finisher

00:14:767 (118) - maybe k is better than d at this place

I don't want to keep k 3 times for overall ballance. you can see them 00:14:424 (115,116) -

00:14:767 (118) - d will be better

It's already d.

01:01:396 (84) - d ?

re-arranged.

01:15:196 (197) - maybe k ?

ok.

01:15:881 (202) - add note maybe

as i said before about finisher ballance problem, nope.

01:04:653 (111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119) - try this ? http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799341

as i said about 3 time problem.

01:09:624 (150) - k ?

ok.

01:12:710 (173,174,175,176) - dkd d will be better i think

kdk

01:15:024 (195) - k ?

I personally intended 2 noted stream for here.

01:17:853 (1) - spinner finish here 01:19:910 (1) - ?

it's overlap, nope.

01:23:681 (26) - add note here (k) ?

it would be nice for consistency with 01:26:510 (49,50) - here.

01:25:481 (42,43) - switch kd ?

re-arranged.

01:25:996 (46) - kk ?
01:26:253 (48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57) - try this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799416

re-arranged but i mostly follow your example on here.

01:28:739 (68,69,70) - kd k ?

nope since i re-arranged this part too.

01:30:796 (87) - d ?

cool.

01:33:110 (105) - k ?

For music consistency with 01:33:453 (107,108,109) - here. so, nope.

01:38:939 (153) - k ?

cool.

01:42:539 (7) - switch in dk ?

ok.

01:44:424 (24) - d ?

For music consistency with 01:44:081 (21,22,23) - here.

01:52:653 (93) - k ?

hmmmm ok

01:50:939 (77,78,79,80,81,82,83) - ddkddkk ?

re-arranged

01:56:253 (123) - d ?

i don't think it's necessary to change.

02:00:539 (159) - K ?

as i said about finisher problem.

02:01:224 (165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181) - try this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799481

I learned that having odd number notes while streaming is pretty hard by test players or opinions. so i prefer keep here.

02:05:510 (202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209) - like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799491

I personally like kkd,ddk rather than kdk,dkd

02:12:881 (267) - d ?

mmmm nope.

02:15:453 (288) - start with k ?

ok.

02:26:253 (366) - i don't think spinner is good at this place try to make patterns on drum ?

I follow vocal pitch for here which i really love.

02:36:796 (435) - mmmhm change in k ?

re-arranged.

added one

03:01:224 (579) - k ?

cool.

03:11:853 (619) - d ?
03:13:224 (625) - k ?

I intended same color for this part. but i will try to change if someone will point out here too.

03:30:196 (1) - 03:31:396 (1) - add spinner ?

I guess It will be not good for stream ballance.

03:36:024 (36,37,38,39,40) - kdkdk ?

03:36:024 (744) - here is k and 03:36:196 (746) - here is d.

if you play here by 25%, you could notice that i used additional note for here. so i rather keep kkddk for what i've intended.

03:40:396 (75,76) - kd ?

cool.

03:48:710 (149) - d ?

noooooo

03:57:367 (37) - k ?

cool.

03:59:681 (57,58) - d - k ?

cool.

04:01:224 (71) - start with k ?

cool.

04:12:539 (174) - k here

ok.

04:12:881 (177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193) - try this Image

re-arranged.

04:21:967 (257,258,259) - maybe ddk better here ?

mmmmm nope.

04:31:053 (343,344,345) - kdk ?

cool.

04:49:396 (479) - d ?
04:50:081 (485,486,487,488,489,490,491,492,493,494,495) - [img]try%20this%20https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3799676[/img] sound like a bit repetitive so maybe try to found other patterns

ofc, they repetitive because there's mainly used 1/2 sounds and i used 90%+ additional notes for here.

therefore, it's my intension. but i will change if someone will point out here too.

05:03:281 (15) - add note ?

i follow bell sound here.

05:04:481 (19,20,21) - why not dkdk ?

because sound pitch is different.

05:13:567 (50) - add note ?

i reduced density here while setting lower sv.

05:15:453 (56,57,58) - try kddk ?

ok.

Good luck suwa suwa ^.^

HimeragiKarin wrote:

Nice! Good luck

game rock wrote:

Hi, from my queue~

d
k
D (Big d)
K (Big k)

[ Happy Oni]

00:41:681 (331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341,342,343,344,345,346,347) - Change all this to to follow better the rhythm and the consistency with 00:19:739 (157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173) -

it would be better because i already used ddddkkkkddkkddkk pattern for 2 times xD i think it's acceptable

04:34:824 (365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381) - Change all this to to follow better the rhythm and the consistency with 02:23:167 (345,346,347,348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361) -

tbh, i randomly mapped here. it's really glad that you pointed out here

05:02:767 - Change to k to follow the tone in this part.

I want to keep here since it's not pitch problem but different sound.

05:05:510 - ^

^

05:08:253 - ^

but i will try to use k for here

05:16:481 - Change to k to follow the tone and the consistency with 05:10:996 - and 05:13:739 -

i want to keep for dd kk ballance with here 05:16:481 (57,58,59,60) -

I love this Beatmap *w*! I hope my mod has been helpful you :3, Good luck~ ~

bbj0920 wrote:

생각해보니까 아직도 BN 달고 계시네요!?

Niko-nyan wrote:

[Happy Oni]
00:00:710 - Piano's sound was a bit high for me, maybe you can use k (include the cymbal by drum)

ok

00:05:510 - Current pattern isn't bad at all but you may change to k because there is no ryhme at all that really low

that will be good for consistency with 00:02:596 - here too xD

00:38:424 - there is a sound here. Add a k here to make some flow on the map

i guess i gave break for here.

00:51:967 - most comfortable sound is mapped (like 00:50:596 -)

re-arranged

01:22:139 - the pattern is fine but there is no sound at the next white line. so remove it to increase the flow.

I follow sound for here. so i guess nope.

01:27:624 - to make a different pattern, delete the first red line.

i mainly follow 01:27:624 (56,58,60,62) - these 8 bit sounds for here so idk i should delete here

but i will try to change if you have some example for here

2nd kiai - the first part after kiai - i didn't feel the flow, very very bad flow .w.

i know it's excuse but i did my best and probably used a lot of useless pattern for avoiding 'boring' since it's long song

03:09:796 - 03:31:653 - no variation? Also there is some of finishers that isn't good. Check more carefully to add the finishers.

i tbh know this part doesnt make satisfy but don't have any idea except re-mapping for here. but i will try to do if it's seriously bad.

[General]
Much of the green lines is unused well. Please remove it.

all green lines are for SV itself. idk what you mean.. need re-update? or can you point out them?

this is first verse. Not my full mod.

Jona wrote:

Mod as requested through ingame chat :3
kind of short mod, sorry about that

[Happy Oni]

1. 00:16:996 - k
   
   It's not bad at all but i want to keep for consistency with 00:18:367 (146,147,148,149) - here
   
   instead, i re-arranged 00:16:653 (132,133,134) - here for pattern ballance
   
   
2. 00:37:910 - Just a suggestion, but dkdk[/color sounds pretty nice aswell
   
   I know what you mean but i follow 'other sound' compared 00:38:253 (307) - this d.
   
   but if someone will point out here, i will try to change
   
   
3. 00:40:310 - k
   
   00:40:139 (319) - changed here to k instead of changing color of 00:40:310 -
   
   
4. 01:34:996(119,120) - k d?
   
   Cool!
   
   
5. 01:45:967 - k
   
   I want to keep d for finishers consistency here. but i changed 01:46:139 - this color to k for pattern ballance
   
   
6. 03:39:539 - Add circle?
   
   I personally think this placement is most fit. sorry
   
   
7. 04:04:139 - k
   
   ok

Good luck!

_S u w a k o_ wrote:

bbj0920 wrote:

생각해보니까 아직도 BN 달고 계시네요!?

?? 무슨 일이신지??

bbj0920 wrote:

예전에 대화했을 때 BN 그만두려고 모딩 안 하고 계신다고 들었던거 같은데요 ㅋㅋ

_FrEsH_ChICkEn_ wrote:

My first Taiko! mod.
Seems too hard for me. Because I'm not Taiko player also I never mapped Taiko too.
I hope It was be help to Nana No It wasn't

IRC

2015-10-18 00:27 Nanatsu: ACTION is listening to [http://osu.ppy.sh/b/798128 you (feat. nayuta) - Diamond Smile]
2015-10-18 00:27 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 아여기센
2015-10-18 00:27 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ACTION is editing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/798128 you (feat. nayuta) - Diamond Smile [Happy Oni]]
2015-10-18 00:27 Nanatsu: 그거
2015-10-18 00:27 Nanatsu: 태고음이랑
2015-10-18 00:27 Nanatsu: 거기음이랑 다르니까
2015-10-18 00:27 Nanatsu: 테스트같은거로 들어야됨
2015-10-18 00:28 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 오케
2015-10-18 00:28 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 그냥 드럼치는듯하게
2015-10-18 00:28 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 보면되나?
2015-10-18 00:29 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 00:07:396 (57) - 이거
2015-10-18 00:29 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 빨갱이도 괜찮은거같은데?
2015-10-18 00:29 Nanatsu: ㄴㄴ너무
2015-10-18 00:29 Nanatsu: 똑같은거쓰면 지루함ㅋㅋㅌ
2015-10-18 00:30 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 끵
2015-10-18 00:30 Nanatsu: 오니정도면 그렇게 가도되거든
2015-10-18 00:30 Nanatsu: 근데 이건 5성이라 일단
2015-10-18 00:30 Nanatsu: 이너오니
2015-10-18 00:30 Nanatsu: 엑스트라급
2015-10-18 00:30 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 와근데
2015-10-18 00:30 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 존나 지금어지러움시발이거보니까ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:30 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 랭킹3만위가 4성모딩하는느낌이
2015-10-18 00:30 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 이런건가
2015-10-18 00:31 Nanatsu: 난 만들어쉬밤
2015-10-18 00:31 Nanatsu: ㅋㅋㅋㅌㅋ
2015-10-18 00:31 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:31 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 00:53:596 (33) - 얘 빨갱이로 바꾸는건?
2015-10-18 00:32 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 와 존나어지럽네진짜ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:32 Nanatsu: 와 모기 두마리시발
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 01:01:224 (83) - 얘를 파랑 01:01:567 (86) - 얘를 빨강으로 바꿔도 괜찮을거같음
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ시발 목디?
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 모기?
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 형 우리집에
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 지금 나방 존나많거든?
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:33 Nanatsu: 저기는 느려지는 부분이라서
2015-10-18 00:33 Nanatsu: 좀 간단하게 하려고
2015-10-18 00:33 Nanatsu: 사실 그부분 삭제해도될거같다생각했는데 애매하네 53초
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 뭐 이건어차피 모딩이니까 형 맘대로 하는거징
2015-10-18 00:33 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 빼애앵ㄱ
2015-10-18 00:34 Nanatsu: 01:01:224 - 여기 바꿈 ㄳ
2015-10-18 00:34 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 올 ㅋ
2015-10-18 00:34 Nanatsu: 567은 리어레인지
2015-10-18 00:34 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 01:20:081 - 와 여기 존나맘에든다
2015-10-18 00:34 Nanatsu: dk배치가 좀ㅇ 이상함
2015-10-18 00:34 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 아하
2015-10-18 00:35 Nanatsu: ddk나 그런거
2015-10-18 00:35 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 01:45:967 (37) - 얘뭔가 파랑이 더 어룰리지않어?
2015-10-18 00:36 Nanatsu: 저 부분은
2015-10-18 00:36 Nanatsu: 아니 저 부분이라기보단
2015-10-18 00:37 Nanatsu: 이 맵은 대체로 큰 동으로 넣고있어서
2015-10-18 00:37 Nanatsu: 좀 의도라면 의도
2015-10-18 00:37 Nanatsu: 키아이는 큰동쓰고있음전부다
2015-10-18 00:37 Nanatsu: 쉑스
2015-10-18 00:37 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 아하
2015-10-18 00:37 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ태고에서 내가 의도를 읽어줄거라고 생각하면
2015-10-18 00:37 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 클나
2015-10-18 00:38 Nanatsu: 01:32:424 (99) - 여기 안넣었네 큰동ㅅㅂㅋ
2015-10-18 00:38 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 01:56:939 (129,130) - 이것도 아까말한의도??
2015-10-18 00:38 Nanatsu: 전부다
2015-10-18 00:38 Nanatsu: 큰동으로
2015-10-18 00:39 Nanatsu: 약간 끊는식
2015-10-18 00:39 Nanatsu: 대충 테스트 돌려보면
2015-10-18 00:39 Nanatsu: 감올걸
2015-10-18 00:39 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 흠
2015-10-18 00:39 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 너무빨라서 뭐가뭔지 모르곘어ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:39 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 근데 빨강이가 크긴하넴
2015-10-18 00:40 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 02:45:024 - 여기파랑이 하나추가해서
2015-10-18 00:40 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 좀더 흥하게가능할듯
2015-10-18 00:41 Nanatsu: 스트림은 02:45:110 - 여기서
2015-10-18 00:41 Nanatsu: 시작하지않아 노래는?
2015-10-18 00:41 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅇㅇ 그렇긴한데
2015-10-18 00:41 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 무너가 파랑이넣으니까 흥해
2015-10-18 00:41 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 02:45:110 - 여긴느 대부분
2015-10-18 00:41 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 하나하나돌아가는식인데 그앞에 같은사운드 두개 따딱 있으면 뭔가 드럼같고 좀더 있어보이길래 ㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:41 Nanatsu: 아 근데 태고는
2015-10-18 00:41 Nanatsu: 큰 노트 뒤나 앞에 뭐넣으면 상당히싫어함
2015-10-18 00:41 Nanatsu: ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:42 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 아하
2015-10-18 00:43 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 와 어렵다
2015-10-18 00:44 Nanatsu: 사실 d k 변경 그런건
2015-10-18 00:44 Nanatsu: 매우매우매우주관적인거라서
2015-10-18 00:44 Nanatsu: 사람 마다 다르고 좀 귀찮은거라서 보통 모딩에서도
2015-10-18 00:44 Nanatsu: 낮은난이도에서만 예기하고그래 ㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:44 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅇㅇ 그런거같아..
2015-10-18 00:44 Nanatsu: 낮은 난이도는 아무래도 좀 확연하니까
2015-10-18 00:45 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 04:51:281 (496) - 얘 큰둥이 어울릴거같..?
2015-10-18 00:45 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 형 여기까지가 내 한계야
2015-10-18 00:46 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 태고는 도저히 못보겠어...
2015-10-18 00:46 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: ㅠㅠㅠㅠ
2015-10-18 00:46 Nanatsu: 저기를 큰동으로 바꾸면 일관성이 흐트러져서 일단 킵
2015-10-18 00:46 Nanatsu: ㄴㄴ 많이바꿈 ㄳㄳㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:46 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 올 ㅋ
2015-10-18 00:46 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 아니 매니아 처음모딩할때는 플레이를 어케하는지아니까 대충 기본은 잡고갔는데
2015-10-18 00:46 _FrEsH_ChICkEn_: 태고는 뭐 그냥 하나도없네ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
2015-10-18 00:47 Nanatsu: 인죵

Nyan wrote:

01:45:967 (37,38) - 두 가지 방법이 있는데, 하나는 01:45:967 (37) - 의 Finish를 풀고 01:46:139 (38) - 에 Finish를 집어넣는 방법이랑,
01:46:139 (38) - 자체를 삭제하는 방법이 있습니다.

일단 제 의도는 1/1를 따르는 것이 아닌 노래 자체의 음정을 따르고 있는 쪽입니다.

물론 1/1를 따르는 것도 타격감 상으로 봐도, 밸런스 상으로 봐도 괜찮다고 생각합니다만

상당히 주관적인 입장에 있어서, 노래 자체를 좀 더 따르고 싶다고 생각합니다. 개인적으로 좋아하는 부분이기도 하고요.

또한 Break를 주기에는 악기의 음이 너무 확연하기 때문에 일단 킵하고 싶다고 생각합니다.

01:51:453 (83,84) - 이건 문제 없지만, 위의 항목에서 두 번째 방법을 택했다면 일치하게 만들 수 있습니다. ^

01:56:939 (130,131) - 위와 같은 방법으로. ^


03:44:081 (815) -
03:46:653 (838) - 이것 두 개는 Finish를 빼셔도 좋습니다.

킵 하되, 앞 부분의 똑같은 부분에 Finish 를 조금 더 일관성 있게 리 어레인지 했습니다.

첫번째 제안 부분에 해당 되는 앞 부분도 일관성을 위해서 바꿨습니다. ( 즉흥적으로 짜내다 보니까 일관성에 다소 미흡한 점이 있긴 합니다 )

03:57:624 (39,40) -
04:08:596 (140,141) - 맨 처음과 같은 방법으로.

Quizmaegi wrote:

개인적인 의견만 넣어놨습니다

01:45:196 - d

상당히 괜찮다고 생각합니다. 노래에 맞춰서 비워뒀었는데 좋은 느낌이네요.

01:45:796 ~ 01:45:967 - kdk

01:45:967 - 가 K 이기 때문에 킵 하겠습니다.

01:52:139 ~ 01:52:996 - kdddkkddddd

이 부분도 01:52:996 - 가 K라서 일단 킵 하는 쪽으로.

01:56:939 ~ 01:57:110 - ddk

01:56:939 - 가 D입니다.

01:57:281 ~ 01:57:624 - ddkdd

괜찮다고 생각합니다. 1번이랑 비슷한 관점에서.

02:23:167 ~ 02:24:269 - dkdkddkkdkdkddkk

개인적으로도 좀 더 낫다고 생각합니다

02:26:253 ~ 02:28:310 - 스피너로 대체해보시는 게...

보컬을 따르고 있기 때문에 상당히 의도적인 부분 중 하나입니다. 일단 킵하고 싶습니다.

04:12:881 ~ 04:14:253 - 너무 복잡하다고 생각됩니다, dkdkddkk을 이용해 보세요

음, 이 패턴에도 위와 같은 패턴을 쓰기엔 조금 단조롭지 않을까 생각합니다.

다른 의견이 있다면 바꾸어 보겠습니다.

04:34:824 ~ 04:36:196 - dkdkddkkdkdkddkkd

02:23:167 ~ 02:24:269 - 와의 일관성을 위해서 이 곳도 바꾸었습니다.

04:57:496 - d

타이밍이 이상하네요. 저는 이 부분에 1/4를 사용하고 있습니다.

(아 그리고 OD를 4.7로 해놓으신 이유가...?)

HP가 4.7, OD가 5.5입니다. 밸런스 적으로 문제는 없다고 생각합니다.

Aldwych wrote:

안녕하세요! Mod requested IG :

[General]

Why the first part is louder than the second?

ohhh.. i didn't noticed.. thanks!

Not sure if your High SV on Finishers is legit. I don't felt comfortable on them since i find it odd.

I will try to get modding about it too!

[Happy Oni]

00:02:939 You should go kdd instead, the clap is on the first note. And the melody differs for the first ddk you used, here the melody goes down.

ummm i kinda prefer dkk for here.

00:04:310 kkd instead imo. The melody looks like the same as your next kkd (42).

hmm i think it was for consistency with 00:01:567 (9,10,11) - here

00:06:539 I'm more for kddkd or kddkk instead. The first k is for the vocals and this little sound you have on your second k too. Honestly i don't know why you go dkdkd here.

I'll apply kddkd!

00:11:253 Swap with next? The melody goes down on the second.

cool

Imo even if the intro is correct, i find a bit overmapped (maybe keep in mind if other people tell it too).

ikr alright

00:38:253 You can go D here, your pattern allows it.

I personally love it! but I'm not sure BNs will allow it ;w;
anyway applied!

00:43:053 ^

I guess it's not necessary to change since previous notes were long stream pattern

00:44:939 kkd instead? The melody goes down and the last note looks like the (6).

It sounds better!

01:06:367 I'm more for a finish here than on the previous note. Even if you have to delete the next note.

I intended a finisher here for vocal pitch

01:08:767 Even here i don't understand your finisher.

^

02:28:996 For this kind of note i'm more for a k, not only because of the natural clap, but it also fit well with kkddk imo.

ok!

02:42:710+ : k too on the natural clap, it fits way better, also because you used K on the other notes make a difference between them and it's cool.

I follow same sound with other d for here. i think it's not necessary to change

04:23:681 When watching on the autoplay, i found this stream a bit long. Maybe you should cut it. I also don't find why it is so long too.

04:24:281 - cut here thanks!

I found nothing important after.

I don't really like the music that much, but that's a quite good map. I'm sure that it can still be improve but i'm not that good on modding map that need a good stamina to be played D:

Gl hf for rank

Skeuddy wrote:

Hi, Nanatsu, from my queue

Happy Oni

1. 01:54:881 (113) - d
   
   I follow same instrument sound with 01:55:053 (114,116,117,119) - them. i want to keep.
   
   
2. 02:44:767 (509,511,513) - k
   
   I follow same instrument sound with previous 'd's. i want to keep here too.
   
   
3. 04:37:396 (385) - ^
   
   cool
   
   
4. 05:02:253 (10) - ^
   
   ok
   
   
5. 05:04:996 (20) - ^
   
   ok
   
   
6. 05:21:110 (71) - Replace on spin to 05:21:967
   
   It would be nice idea too but i prefer K, so i'd better keep
   
   
   Other good

LCM01 wrote:

2nd mod

MOD

01:20:081 K -> D

I still prefer K so i changed 01:20:339 (2) - here to d for song pitch and swap stuff <3 thanks

01:22:139 kkddkdk

cool

01:27:624 dkddkdk

cool too

01:33:453 kkd

I personally think ddk is more fit to song

( i know pitch is a bit different with 01:33:110 (104,105,106) - but i think basic pitch following way is same )

01:48:367 swap 58 60

hmm ok

01:53:681 dkddk

dkkdd because the last k is not same sound with 01:54:196 (108) - this k

02:06:367 dkkkd

I intended big d for 02:06:367 (212) - so i don't want to use 5plets here ;w;

02:29:169 kkdkd

yeah

02:42:024 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3853897

since many ppl are pointing out here, I think it's necessary to change. really thanks for nice idea

03:09:453 move to 03:09:624

It's my intend for SV and D ballance

04:05:339 k

ok

04:48:539 onward: 5plets lack variables

well if you here just song, the part was used only 1/2 but not 1/4s. so i additionally used 1/4 pattern for here.

therefore, it's no wonder to have lack various patterns. while having consistency too. but if you have any ideas, i will try to apply

04:54:710 (521,522) k

the pitch is same with 04:54:024 (519,520) - here

Map is getting better, Ill mod 3rd time if possible

Shiroi Hiroshi wrote:

m4mあなたが言ったように
Shiawasesa

SPOILER

00:01:996 - k?
00:02:081 - d?
00:02:167 - k?
00:04:739 - k?
00:04:824 - d?
00:04:910 - k?

I don't want to make harder on beginning part since there's less sound than others. ( I even will perfer delete suggestion for here )

Therefore, Sorry.

tag: j-core hp5 ?

HP 4.7 is my intention,

added J-Core on tag.
あまり役に立たない場合グッドラックのおばあちゃん、申し訳ありません

1. 00:09:796 (27,28,29,30) - d kkd→ddk d? ここまで、kkdkd ddkが一つの塊になってるので、統一性を重視して、そうするべきだと思います
2. 00:38:253 (258) - unrankableではないですが、finishはオススメ出来ませんので remove finish。もしkeepなら、一つ前のkを消しましょう
3. 00:54:024 (37) - change to K? High pitch
4. 00:56:339 (47) - move to 00:56:510 ? I like this pattern
5. 01:05:424 (119,120) - ctrl + g? ddkdk is fine
6. 02:32:424 (400) - change to d Same as 02:31:053 (389) -
7. 03:10:996 (618) -03:12:539 (624) - 03:13:739 (629) - 03:15:281 (636) - 03:16:481 (641) - remove finish.They are not bigger sound.
8. 03:19:224 (652) - 03:20:081 (656) - change to D Lower pitch
9. 03:37:910 (761,762,763,764,765) - dkdkd is fine?
10. 05:08:253 (32) - change to d? ここまでddkdで置かれているので合わせましょう
11. 05:18:367 (63) - 05:21:110 (71) - どちらもdon に。理由は上とほとんど同じです

ManP wrote:

hi! m4m ;3

[Happy Oni]

1. 00:09:796 (27,28,29,30) - d kkd→ddk d? ここまで、kkdkd ddkが一つの塊になってるので、統一性を重視して、そうするべきだと思います
   
   niceです<3
   
   
2. 00:38:253 (258) - unrankableではないですが、finishはオススメ出来ませんので remove finish。もしkeepなら、一つ前のkを消しましょう
   
   この部分は他の人のModdingによって修正したので、一旦保留したいと思います。もしBNが指摘すれば消す方向に！
   
   
3. 00:54:024 (37) - change to K? High pitch
   
   00:54:710 (38) - このKと別感を与えたいと思ったので。。
   
   
4. 00:56:339 (47) - move to 00:56:510 ? I like this pattern
   
   この部分の3連打はボーカルを強調するために使っているので、00:56:510ここよりは00：56：681 - ここに使ってみたいと思いますけど、個人的にはキープしたいと。。
   
   
5. 01:05:424 (119,120) - ctrl + g? ddkdk is fine
   
   cool~
   
   
6. 02:32:424 (400) - change to d Same as 02:31:053 (389) -
   
   cool~
   
   
7. 03:10:996 (618) -03:12:539 (624) - 03:13:739 (629) - 03:15:281 (636) - 03:16:481 (641) - remove finish.They are not bigger sound.
8. 03:19:224 (652) - 03:20:081 (656) - change to D Lower pitch
   
   うん....なんていうか。確かにBigger Soundはありませんが、音が長く使用されているので一種の強調だと思います。でもre-arrangeは必要そうですね！
   
   
9. 03:37:910 (761,762,763,764,765) - dkdkd is fine?
   
   成る可くkdkdkやdkdkdは避けたいと思っています^^;
   
   
10. 05:08:253 (32) - change to d? ここまでddkdで置かれているので合わせましょう
    
    hmmm ok desu
    
    
11. 05:18:367 (63) - 05:21:110 (71) - どちらもdon に。理由は上とほとんど同じです
    
    はい！

GL :3

Nofool wrote:

o/
pretty cool to play overall even tho some patterns don't reflect that much the song, as i suggest it a bit, you should try to use some more peer patterns to get more variety (the song ask for it in the first kiai parts and the part just before).

a lot of big overlap :c ask a QAT about it before trying to rank, probably unrankable ;w; and some unecessary big notes imo, like - 02:42:881 (498,502,506) - etc.

huh i will try to ask then xd

[Happy Oni]
- 00:16:653 (83,84,85) - kkd instead of kdk ? to reverse - 00:15:281 (72,73,74) -, ddkdk ddk => kkdkd kkd.

cool!

- 00:19:481 (106) - d ? might just play better.

hmm okay if you think so

- 00:27:967 (173,174,175,176,177) - try kdkdk instead of kkdkd ? to not repeat - 00:27:111 (165,166,167,168,169) - and to get a k at - 00:28:310 - like at other similar spots like - 00:25:567 -.

re-arranged to kkddk instead

- 00:40:481 (272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280) - what about ddkkd k ddk here ? to get something similar to - 00:39:110 (262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269) -.

I placed them to emphasize vocal sound rather than for consistency on here. but i tried re-arranged!

- 01:10:653 (159,160,161,162,163) - try ddkkd instead of dkdkd ? like at - 01:05:167 (116,117,118,119,120) -.

oh sure

- remove - 01:13:481 (182) -, change next note to k and use ddk at - 01:13:739 - instead of just k d ? sounds more like it and reflect the structure at - 01:11:853 -.

cool!!!!!

- 01:14:853 (194,195) - maybe swap colors ? long ddkkd pattern isn't particularily funny to play (and doesn't fit the song that much).

it's way way better <3

- 01:42:710 - why not trying some xx xxxx structure here ? dk kddk instead of ddkkddk sounds much better.

applied ofc

- 01:45:539 (33,34) - maybe swap colors ? same at - 01:50:939 -, i would suggest to use dkddk.

ok!

- 01:48:024 - refer to - 01:42:710 -, k dk kddk instead of kkdkddk k ? same at - 01:53:510 - and - 01:58:996 -.

it's good to represent 2/4 plets! thanks!

- 03:20:081 (656) - D instead of K and remove next k ?

it's way better too

- move - 03:30:967 (706) - to - 03:31:139 - ? might be a bit cooler to get a reversed pattern here.

ummm it's my intention sorry

- 03:31:910 - duplets should star here õ_o like at - 03:34:653 - ? or else make it similar to - 01:20:081 -.

I can't put note on 03:31:910 - here because of pervious sv. also i want to avoid same pattern because it's long song and same repeat.. i guess it will be kind of boring

- 03:42:710 - 03:48:196 - a bit too dense, doesn't reflect much the song imo, try to make it more similar to what you did at - 01:31:053 - 01:36:539 -.

yeah re-arranged well than before! thanks!

- second kiai : same thing about xx xxxx structures (i mean try to use them if you applied my suggestions in the first kiai).

I applied on here since it's really cool too! thanks!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

good luck'

Nofool wrote:

o/
pretty cool to play overall even tho some patterns don't reflect that much the song