What ?Trash Boat wrote:
Enjoy your bottleneckZelda wrote:
Haha time to download 191GB of chinese cartoons, this'll be great.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaIppE wrote:
Just ignore him, he clearly has no idea what he is talking about.
This hurts so bad ;_;Zelda wrote:
Not everyone lives in a shitty third world country that still believes in bandwidth limits.
Ouch.Zelda wrote:
I do quite enjoy my unlimited bandwidth. Not everyone lives in a shitty third world country that still believes in bandwidth limits.
there's a very good reason for it though, the networking infrastructure isn't keeping up with how fast third world countries are populating, so it has to be rationed to maintain some stability.Zelda wrote:
I do quite enjoy my unlimited bandwidth. Not everyone lives in a shitty third world country that still believes in bandwidth limits.
***plot intensifies***Zelda wrote:
That's what the ISPs with bandwidth limits want you to think.
ifZelda wrote:
Not even. The infrastructure doesn't care about whether you download 100GB or 200GB, the only thing it cares about is how quickly you do it.
Bandwidth limits don't do jack shit to "maintain stability", this is what you have speed limits for. The only thing a bandwidth limit is good for is for an ISP to make more money.
So hows that taxpayer money working for the ISPs over there. Fixing the infrastructure like it was supposed to?xxjesus1412fanx wrote:
if
there were no limits you'd eventually reach a point where there's a lot more simultaneous traffic than the system can handle it's either impose limits or decrease the actual speed even more
it does this by discouraging people from just having stuff downloading/uploading at all times, which would eventually all add up since there would always be more people starting to do than would be stopping
no you can'tKhelly wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNH5EUw7gxk
I can beat him.
Apparently yes, I've seen comments saying the fact mario maker is being released on 9/11 is insensitive.Khelly wrote:
Does anyone even care anymore
:-)Brian OA wrote:
Poop in bag and repress memories afterwards