( o_o)
forum
t+pazolite - Kick-ass Kung-fu Carnival
posted
Total Posts
154
Imamoto knows what's up.Azer wrote:
02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider
whats the diff name?
小妹？
小妹？
02:39:467 (1,2) - Your 1/8 kicksliders feel too long imo with current distancing. You should consider reducing the distance between them and the next jump in a few cases. This happens multiple times in the map, I won't list them all.
Just jesse thoughts. I didn't read anything from the thread before this post but it seems like more people than just me noticed it.
Just jesse thoughts. I didn't read anything from the thread before this post but it seems like more people than just me noticed it.
Agreed. Should be fixed.Azer wrote:
02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider
02:31:013 (2,3,4,5) - this is even worse, especially (4) and (5). Big-blackish 1/8 usage.
02:39:467 (1,2) - Same.
and lmao, that's totally FCable every time AFTER you look it up in the editor, but I don't think a map should require you to do that. The mapping of that part is just subpar.Fort wrote:
inb4 hvick FC lmao
Topic Starter
Azer wrote:
02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider
jesus1412 wrote:
02:39:467 (1,2) - Your 1/8 kicksliders feel too long imo with current distancing. You should consider reducing the distance between them and the next jump in a few cases. This happens multiple times in the map, I won't list them all.
Just jesse thoughts. I didn't read anything from the thread before this post but it seems like more people than just me noticed it.
okay guys i know what you mean, but im really considering this one, im sure it will be okay if im doing this thing, probably this will make biggest emphasize on song. i think this one is not a big deal for someone like me since i can play this pattern without misses.fartownik wrote:
02:31:013 (2,3,4,5) - this is even worse, especially (4) and (5). Big-blackish 1/8 usage.
02:39:467 (1,2) - Same.
maybe i will wait QAT to decide this since i want to keep this one.
ye xiao meiKaren wrote:
whats the diff name?
小妹？
fartownik wrote:
and lmao, that's totally FCable every time AFTER you look it up in the editor, but I don't think a map should require you to do that. The mapping of that part is just subpar.Fort wrote:
inb4 hvick FC lmao
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.
Xiao Mei 2015
Misleading patterns
Misleading patterns
There are multiple 1/8 sliders in this map that are very misleading. They are used in a way that players think there is going to be a small break between, yet there's a large jump into the next object instead.
- 02:22:013 (1,2) -
- 02:31:013 (2,3) -
- 02:31:422 (4,5) -
- 02:39:467 (1,2) -
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###M
Mercurial
Now that this map is disqualified, your first 2 green lines (00:08:922 - and 00:26:376 - ) are unsnapped by 1 ms. You might want to snap them correctly!
Topic Starter
yeah, okay well done qat. you made rule so im follow rule
okay will updated later :3Asphyxia wrote:
Now that this map is disqualified, your first 2 green lines (00:08:922 - and 00:26:376 - ) are unsnapped by 1 ms. You might want to snap them correctly!
Mercurial wrote:
OH GOD, NOT AGAIN, NOT AGAIN THIS QAT BULLCRAP.
At least, this one is well justified though.
Yeah, cause it's the QATs fault that people bubble maps while they are in process of being fixed.
KAWOKAOWAKOWKAWOAK :v asoooo kumaha yeuh.... tos alus" ranked kalahkah kena DQQuality Assurance Team wrote:
Disqualification Notice
Hello!
Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.Xiao Mei 2015
Misleading patterns
There are multiple 1/8 sliders in this map that are very misleading. They are used in a way that players think there is going to be a small break between, yet there's a large jump into the next object instead.
- 02:22:013 (1,2) -
- 02:31:013 (2,3) -
- 02:31:422 (4,5) -
- 02:39:467 (1,2) -
If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.
The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.
Good luck!
###M
I hope everything will be fixed 
Udah dibilangin ga percaya sih mz hhe
Topic Starter
ah biasa lah, ane dah ngobrol banyak ke testplayer, mereka bilang gak apa"Hinsvar wrote:
Udah dibilangin ga percaya sih mz hhe
ya sudah lah ane ganti aja, yg penting sekarang kombonya masih tetep 2015 :3
hate this beatmap because it fking not neat
I meant it
I meant it
Topic Starter
it's very boring if i map 1/2 and 1/1 repetitive pattern, so i create this map LOL
Kuron-kun
#2 where
I'm waiting on Fort. Unfortunately Kuron-kun's bubble isn't going to count .
.
Topic Starter
what??monstrata wrote:
I'm waiting on Fort. Unfortunately Kuron-kun's bubble isn't going to count
o god
So, due to new BNG rules since we made changes, I need to rebubble...
So this is (re)Bubble #1.
good luck Fort!!
So this is (re)Bubble #1.
good luck Fort!!
We managed remove a doubled timing point at 03:45:683 - so now everything should be rankable. Also testplayed the map (with HT ofc) and played nicely.
#2
#2
Topic Starter
monstrata wrote:
So, due to new BNG rules since we made changes, I need to rebubble...
So this is (re)Bubble #1.
good luck Fort!!
guys thanks for bub, ily <3Krfawy wrote:
We managed remove a doubled timing point at 03:45:683 - so now everything should be rankable. Also testplayed the map (with HT ofc) and played nicely.
#2
Krfawy is officially #1and not #2
Monstrata did a bubble #1 so my bubble is a bubble #2 deal with it. wwwOkoratu wrote:
Krfawy is officially #1and not #2
Rebubbling to show i've checked the change Krfawy mentioned .
Bubble #2
. Bubble #2
how many bubble do you gave in this page ? O.O
Topic Starter
probably monstrata bubble #1
then krfawy bubble #2
but im confused on this, so nvm
then krfawy bubble #2
but im confused on this, so nvm
no krfawy is 1st bubble since ur last update and monstrata is 2nd bubble thats how it works now
bubbles start counting after last update
bubbles start counting after last update
4 bubbles and 2 flames
what happened with kuron kun
he was banned for a reason nobody knows- Ping - wrote:
what happened with kuron kun
he abused bn privileges.Spaghetti wrote:
he was banned for a reason nobody knows- Ping - wrote:
what happened with kuron kun
just some feedback from a testplay xD
01:57:876 - i really wished you catch this beat since i often misread it q.q
and this part seems can bit expressed more of the main music instead of the bass like move 01:59:104 (1,2,3) - 1/2 earlier
and 01:59:649 - add a 1/2 slider and also change 01:59:922 (4) - to a 1/2 slider as well so it express the main instrument nicely
02:01:013 - same to this part , i know you want the map to be ease on these part but i dont think it would be so hard
02:32:104 (3,4) - give some more distance , feels too packed here while the music is going fast , its hard to predict the slider head imo
02:55:558 (3) - i think this one is better if you placed it near 2 and move it on 02:55:422 -
02:59:104 (1) - shorten this by 1/1 and add a circle at 02:59:649 - , i think its better to play imo since we always press strong beat , not release
03:54:955 (3,4,5,6) - looks a little untidy , stack it properly ?
04:02:046 - add a circle here in the middle of the triangle slider and start spinner 1/4 after would be nice imo
the rest are very nice and well to play indeed
hope it helps!
01:57:876 - i really wished you catch this beat since i often misread it q.q
and this part seems can bit expressed more of the main music instead of the bass like move 01:59:104 (1,2,3) - 1/2 earlier
and 01:59:649 - add a 1/2 slider and also change 01:59:922 (4) - to a 1/2 slider as well so it express the main instrument nicely
02:01:013 - same to this part , i know you want the map to be ease on these part but i dont think it would be so hard
02:32:104 (3,4) - give some more distance , feels too packed here while the music is going fast , its hard to predict the slider head imo
02:55:558 (3) - i think this one is better if you placed it near 2 and move it on 02:55:422 -
02:59:104 (1) - shorten this by 1/1 and add a circle at 02:59:649 - , i think its better to play imo since we always press strong beat , not release
03:54:955 (3,4,5,6) - looks a little untidy , stack it properly ?
04:02:046 - add a circle here in the middle of the triangle slider and start spinner 1/4 after would be nice imo
the rest are very nice and well to play indeed
hope it helps!