1. fine

1. 00:42:604 (1) - why not try this rhythm ?
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:46:149 (1,2,3,4) - it kinda sound weird to map strong white tick there for sliderend , you can move previous spinner a bit and make it end on red tick then start first slider on white tick , that work better imo
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:331 (1,2,3,4,5,8,9) - better make those white tick clickable , it plays a lots better , try this rhythm ?
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:09:467 (3,4) - this spacing might be a bit too much which will make flow not good imo and I would prefer to have bigger spacing here 01:09:876 (5,1) - xD , try move 01:09:467 (3) - to around x252 y60
5. 01:15:331 (8,9) - similiar to what I said above , maybe bigger spacing here 01:15:604 (9,1) - would be nice , try move 01:15:604 (9) - to around x369 y270
6. 01:37:695 (6) - might be good to nc so it easier to notice the spacing change here
7. 01:42:195 (6) - ,01:46:422 (6) -, 01:50:922 (7) - same ^
8. 01:49:149 (6,1) - stacking sound better imo
9. 02:55:558 (3) - nc for spacing change ? if you apply here , apply others too
10. 04:02:046 (1) - end spinner here 04:03:546 - instead , I think that make the next note easier to catch lol
11. 04:10:773 (1,2) - might be good to make spacing here bigger so flow will be nice imo , try move 04:10:773 (1) - to around x160 y184 ?
12. 04:16:228 (1,2) - similiar to what I said above , try move (2) to around x448 y208?
13. 04:22:637 (6,1) - spacing here should be bigger than 04:22:501 (5,6) - so it make sense with the song more since 04:22:773 (1) - sound more emphasized than 04:22:637 (6) - , try move 04:22:637 (6) - to around x344 y116
14. 04:23:864 (1,2) - similiar to what I said above , would be nice to make this spacing 04:23:864 (1,2) - bigger than 04:24:001 (2,3) - , try move 04:24:001 (2) - to around x224 y132
15. 04:24:819 (7,1) - why sudden lower spacing at emphasized beat that make flow here a bit weird imo , try move (1) to around x264 y32
16. 04:42:546 (1,2,3,4) - yea this one same as what I said here 00:46:149 (1,2,3,4) -
17. 04:45:273 (3,4,5,6,9) - a bit similiar to this 00:48:331 (1,2,3,4,5,8,9) - , try this rhythm ?
    SPOILER

    
18. 04:50:046 (6) - nc here instead of 04:50:183 (1) - ?
19. 04:51:137 (5) - nc here instead of 04:51:273 (1) - ?
20. 04:50:046 (6,1) - would be nice to make spacing here lower than 04:49:910 (5,6) - so it make sense with music a bit since 04:50:046 (6) - sound more emphasized than 04:50:183 (1) - , try move (6) to around x328 y116 ?
21. 04:52:092 (5) - sliderend here for downbeat sound not that good imo , try this rhythm ?
    SPOILER

    
22. 04:57:342 - there is no sound here so maybe change to this rhythm?
    SPOILER

    

CelsiusLK wrote:

[general]

1. fine

[xiao mei 2015]

1. 00:42:604 (1) - why not try this rhythm ? because it's a transition pattern and this 00:42:740 - part has low sound, so i put that pattern
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:46:149 (1,2,3,4) - it kinda sound weird to map strong white tick there for sliderend , you can move previous spinner a bit and make it end on red tick then start first slider on white tick , that work better imo yeah i think this sounds better but, for some reason i want to put downbeat patterning at 00:42:740 - because on here has bery strong downbeat sound since i put same SV on both part
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:48:331 (1,2,3,4,5,8,9) - better make those white tick clickable , it plays a lots better , try this rhythm ? same at here, tbh i put some upbeat patterning on here to make some different gameplay on this map, look various and didnt boring right?
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:09:467 (3,4) - this spacing might be a bit too much which will make flow not good imo and I would prefer to have bigger spacing here 01:09:876 (5,1) - xD , try move 01:09:467 (3) - to around x252 y60 okie
5. 01:15:331 (8,9) - similiar to what I said above , maybe bigger spacing here 01:15:604 (9,1) - would be nice , try move 01:15:604 (9) - to around x369 y270 a bit
6. 01:37:695 (6) - might be good to nc so it easier to notice the spacing change here okay re-setting combo on that part
7. 01:42:195 (6) - ,01:46:422 (6) -, 01:50:922 (7) - same ^
8. 01:49:149 (6,1) - stacking sound better imo hummm i didnt stack this but i set some combo there
9. 02:55:558 (3) - nc for spacing change ? if you apply here , apply others too 02:54:740 (1) - this SV change already known well as slow pattern and high AR on this map make that pattern easier to read so dont worry with this
10. 04:02:046 (1) - end spinner here 04:03:546 - instead , I think that make the next note easier to catch lol
11. 04:10:773 (1,2) - might be good to make spacing here bigger so flow will be nice imo , try move 04:10:773 (1) - to around x160 y184 ?
12. 04:16:228 (1,2) - similiar to what I said above , try move (2) to around x448 y208?
13. 04:22:637 (6,1) - spacing here should be bigger than 04:22:501 (5,6) - so it make sense with the song more since 04:22:773 (1) - sound more emphasized than 04:22:637 (6) - , try move 04:22:637 (6) - to around x344 y116
14. 04:23:864 (1,2) - similiar to what I said above , would be nice to make this spacing 04:23:864 (1,2) - bigger than 04:24:001 (2,3) - , try move 04:24:001 (2) - to around x224 y132 itz zigzag movement boyz
15. 04:24:819 (7,1) - why sudden lower spacing at emphasized beat that make flow here a bit weird imo , try move (1) to around x264 y32 okay a bit
16. 04:42:546 (1,2,3,4) - yea this one same as what I said here 00:46:149 (1,2,3,4) - maybe because im bored with downbeat i map like this, but this one quite fun
17. 04:45:273 (3,4,5,6,9) - a bit similiar to this 00:48:331 (1,2,3,4,5,8,9) - , try this rhythm ? yeah im already explained this thing, so let's try this one
    SPOILER

    
18. 04:50:046 (6) - nc here instead of 04:50:183 (1) - ?
19. 04:51:137 (5) - nc here instead of 04:51:273 (1) - ? im already put very consistant NC on here even i didnt put combo at downbeat, just like upbeat combo, so im gonna keep this one
20. 04:50:046 (6,1) - would be nice to make spacing here lower than 04:49:910 (5,6) - so it make sense with music a bit since 04:50:046 (6) - sound more emphasized than 04:50:183 (1) - , try move (6) to around x328 y116 ? 04:50:046 (6,1) - but i think distance on here very fits and very strong enough to emphazise pattern (especially for this one)
21. 04:52:092 (5) - sliderend here for downbeat sound not that good imo , try this rhythm ? oh sorry but i really like this one because http://puu.sh/jeHen/8ccfc1ed13.jpg (120 degrees pattern :3)
    SPOILER

    
22. 04:57:342 - there is no sound here so maybe change to this rhythm? that's why i put that slider like that, for interesting patterning and i think hitsound in that pattern can cover overmapping on that part, so i think this will be very nice ending[
    SPOILER

    

nice1

let me know afterward

Rukaru wrote:

oh it's bubbled already but...

here, mod as requested.
probably won't help much though. xD

[Custom Difficulty Name]
01:01:695 (3) - this would play better if you stack it on 01:01:831 (4)
02:46:285 (2,3,4) - try this rhythm (see timeline, ignore my placement) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3442703 this one can emphasize the music better than current rhythm. get something inspired lel
04:00:955 (1,2) - I believe this would be better if you change to slider. this is the starting point of 04:01:228 (1,2,3). it has the same sound. i believe it can be repetitive lol, that circle just for boom
04:02:046 (1) - shorten this spinner a bit to the red tick? done
[]
well that's all. very short mod for a 5 minutes song. lol

I cannot say I enjoy this map. how can player ranked 50k enjoy a super hard map anyway? xD
that was a joke. don't take it seriously.

no kd if this does not help. thank you.

1. 00:34:013 (1,2,3,4) - Ini tergolong susah banget buat dibaca karena perbedaan spacing-nya yang cukup kentara di sini (mengingat (2,3) perlu gerakan yang jauh lebih cepat daripada (1,2) dan (3,4) tapi spacing-nya tampak sama aja).Kalau bisa sih spacing (1,2) dilebarin lagi, atau gabungin (2,3) jadi satu kick slider.
2. 01:03:808 - Ini ga sekalian di-map aja karena ada bunyi yang cukup... kedengeran di sini? Ya, bakal ngerusak pattern di sini sih emang...
3. 01:05:649 - 01:05:922 - Sama dengan saran di atas (dan sekali lagi bakal ngerusak pattern yang ada sih tapi bakal jauh lebih ngikutin musik).
4. 01:25:285 (1) - Gak ada apa-apa di 01:25:490 tapi ada bunyi keras yang bisa diikutin di 01:25:422. Tolong ini dibikin jadi slider 1/2. Slider ginian berpotensi ngebingungin pemain dan sama sekali gak ngikutin instrumen yang ada (dan slider seperti ini juga biasa jadi biang kerok DQ).
5. 01:46:422 (2,3,4,5) - mz spacing-nya ga konsisten
6. 02:22:013 (1) - IMO, daripada dibikin sepanjang 3/4 mending 1/2 aja sih. Saya khawatir pemain bakal kesulitan banget ngebaca ini lalu tau-tau pindah ke 02:22:285 (2,3,4) yang jaraknya cuma 1/4 ketukan karena gerakannya harus presisi banget.
7. 02:22:967 (3) - Ini jangan di-stack dong; somehow ngebingungin banget waktu dimainin (udah dites berkali-kali)... Flow-nya juga kerasa rusak kalau naruh kayak gini sih. Coba pindahin ke (401,288)?
8. 02:39:467 (1) - Sama dengan 02:22:013 (1).
9. 03:14:983 (1,1) - Ini spacing-nya tolong dikecilin biar lebih kebaca; coba pindahin 03:15:462 (1) ke (115,111)?
10. 03:17:032 (2,1) - Jauhin ke (94,289) biar offset shift di sini lebih terbaca?
11. 03:17:850 (1) - (193,121)? Alasan sama dengan dua usul di atas.
12. 03:26:975 (2) - Ubah ini jadi circle dan biarin 03:27:090 kosong? Jauh lebih ngepas sama musik yang ada di sini karena 03:27:090 sendiri kosong dari sananya.
13. 03:27:667 (5) - ^
14. 04:12:137 (2,3) - Mirip kasusnya dengan suggestion pertama di sini; disaranin cukup pake 1/4 kick slider karena ga ada yang perlu ditekanin di 04:12:273 sampai perlu pattern seperti ini, dan perubahan spacing di sini bisa dibilang sangat kerasa dan bisa membingungkan, apalagi mengingat musik yang ga kuat-kuat amat.

Hinsvar wrote:

*Bold = Unrankable atau sangat penting buat diperhatikan; merah = Patut dipertimbangkan karena dapat dikatakan bermasalah; hitam = Saran-saran kecil untuk membantu meningkatkan kualitas map

1. 00:34:013 (1,2,3,4) - Ini tergolong susah banget buat dibaca karena perbedaan spacing-nya yang cukup kentara di sini (mengingat (2,3) perlu gerakan yang jauh lebih cepat daripada (1,2) dan (3,4) tapi spacing-nya tampak sama aja).Kalau bisa sih spacing (1,2) dilebarin lagi, atau gabungin (2,3) jadi satu kick slider. -> 00:34:013 (1,2) - ini pattern mati (cocok untuk anti jump), 00:34:285 (2,3,4) - ini pattern melodi (ini menurut ane enak buat jumping, soalnya ngepas sama lagu), menurut ane ini gak apa" kok asal bisa baca pattern aja gampang ini
2. 01:03:808 - Ini ga sekalian di-map aja karena ada bunyi yang cukup... kedengeran di sini? Ya, bakal ngerusak pattern di sini sih emang... ->01:05:240 (4,5,6) - ane gk ngedenger suara drum sekeras ini sama 01:06:604 (6) -
3. 01:05:649 - 01:05:922 - Sama dengan saran di atas (dan sekali lagi bakal ngerusak pattern yang ada sih tapi bakal jauh lebih ngikutin musik). -> ane tetap konsisten ngikutin melodi yang ada disini, walau pun disana ada suara 1/4 pattern kayanya player bakalan kagok baca ini pattern soalnya disini ane prefer follow melody
4. 01:25:285 (1) - Gak ada apa-apa di 01:25:490 tapi ada bunyi keras yang bisa diikutin di 01:25:422. Tolong ini dibikin jadi slider 1/2. Slider ginian berpotensi ngebingungin pemain dan sama sekali gak ngikutin instrumen yang ada (dan slider seperti ini juga biasa jadi biang kerok DQ). -> tenang aja lah hins, konsistensi gk bakal bisa bikin map ini DQ, ane yakin kalau ane bikin pattern sama kaya 01:20:922 (1) - pasti player lain gk bakal ngerasain ini pattern kelewat atau enggak, dan ane prefer follow drum pattern sound, tapi ane perbaiki penempatan disini
5. 01:46:422 (2,3,4,5) - mz spacing-nya ga konsisten
6. 02:22:013 (1) - IMO, daripada dibikin sepanjang 3/4 mending 1/2 aja sih. Saya khawatir pemain bakal kesulitan banget ngebaca ini lalu tau-tau pindah ke 02:22:285 (2,3,4) yang jaraknya cuma 1/4 ketukan karena gerakannya harus presisi banget. Ane perbaiki penempatan disini
7. 02:22:967 (3) - Ini jangan di-stack dong; somehow ngebingungin banget waktu dimainin (udah dites berkali-kali)... Flow-nya juga kerasa rusak kalau naruh kayak gini sih. Coba pindahin ke (401,288)? nice1
8. 02:39:467 (1) - Sama dengan 02:22:013 (1). menurut ane kalau yg ini mah udah asik xD
9. 03:14:983 (1,1) - Ini spacing-nya tolong dikecilin biar lebih kebaca; coba pindahin 03:15:462 (1) ke (115,111)? justru lebih bingung lagi kalau spacing nya kecil soalnya pattern 03:15:462 (1,2) - spacing nya besar, tapi ane fix sedikit deh
10. 03:17:032 (2,1) - Jauhin ke (94,289) biar offset shift di sini lebih terbaca?
11. 03:17:850 (1) - (193,121)? Alasan sama dengan dua usul di atas. re-setting placement part
12. 03:26:975 (2) - Ubah ini jadi circle dan biarin 03:27:090 kosong? Jauh lebih ngepas sama musik yang ada di sini karena 03:27:090 sendiri kosong dari sananya. -> ini teh biar kerasa suara dug nya, sama ngurangin kemungkinan misshit, jadinya pakai slider aja lah
13. 03:27:667 (5) - ^_^
14. 04:12:137 (2,3) - Mirip kasusnya dengan suggestion pertama di sini; disaranin cukup pake 1/4 kick slider karena ga ada yang perlu ditekanin di 04:12:273 sampai perlu pattern seperti ini, dan perubahan spacing di sini bisa dibilang sangat kerasa dan bisa membingungkan, apalagi mengingat musik yang ga kuat-kuat amat. nah kalau ini versinya di perbesar distance nya supaya lebih greget xD

yes

Ipas wrote:

OMG Hinsvar that mod is awesome
Go Rank!

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Cherry Blossom wrote:

Spaghetti wrote:

never added me to the modders list on the map post better kms

monstrata wrote:

Double lines aren't unrankable when it's red + green tho... Only if its double red or double green. Unless of course, the sampleset/volume/SV etc... of the green line used was a mistake...

monstrata wrote:

Doesn't matter if the sampleset/volume is different. A green line will always override a red line so there can be no errors. Green Line > Red Line. Errors only appear when two red lines or two green lines are stacked because osu won't know what information to take. If there are double red lines, osu won't know which red line's information to prioritize, same with double green lines.

For example: if one green line says 40% volume and 1.2x SV multiplier, but another green line says 80% volume and 0.5x SV, the game might produce a section with 80% volume and 1.2x SV because it doesn't know which to prioritize. I'm unsure what occurs when both green lines have the same information, but errors still occur there too.

However in this case, the dq wasn't necessary.

Mackenzie wrote:

Requalification Notice

This has been requalified upon request by the mapper within 12 hours after disqualification. Please check the map nicely and then you are free to disqualify it.

###WTF QUALIFY CAP

monstrata wrote:

Doesn't matter if the sampleset/volume is different. A green line will always override a red line so there can be no errors. Green Line > Red Line. Errors only appear when two red lines or two green lines are stacked because osu won't know what information to take. If there are double red lines, osu won't know which red line's information to prioritize, same with double green lines.

For example: if one green line says 40% volume and 1.2x SV multiplier, but another green line says 80% volume and 0.5x SV, the game might produce a section with 80% volume and 1.2x SV because it doesn't know which to prioritize. I'm unsure what occurs when both green lines have the same information, but errors still occur there too.

However in this case, the dq wasn't necessary.

Spaghetti wrote:

Mackenzie wrote:

Requalification Notice

This has been requalified upon request by the mapper within 12 hours after disqualification. Please check the map nicely and then you are free to disqualify it.

###WTF QUALIFY CAP

someone could've used that to qualify it but u wasted it ;-;

monstrata wrote:

Qualify, then post .

baraatje123 wrote:

Spam the qualify button for 10+ minutes until it works
Then Post

monstrata wrote:

Double lines aren't unrankable when it's red + green tho... Only if its double red or double green. Unless of course, the sampleset/volume/SV etc... of the green line used was a mistake...

monstrata wrote:

However in this case, the dq wasn't necessary.

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

Fort wrote:

inb4 hvick FC lmao

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

jesus1412 wrote:

02:39:467 (1,2) - Your 1/8 kicksliders feel too long imo with current distancing. You should consider reducing the distance between them and the next jump in a few cases. This happens multiple times in the map, I won't list them all.

Just jesse thoughts. I didn't read anything from the thread before this post but it seems like more people than just me noticed it.

fartownik wrote:

02:31:013 (2,3,4,5) - this is even worse, especially (4) and (5). Big-blackish 1/8 usage.
02:39:467 (1,2) - Same.

Karen wrote:

whats the diff name?
小妹？

fartownik wrote:

Fort wrote:

inb4 hvick FC lmao

and lmao, that's totally FCable every time AFTER you look it up in the editor, but I don't think a map should require you to do that. The mapping of that part is just subpar.

Asphyxia wrote:

Now that this map is disqualified, your first 2 green lines (00:08:922 - and 00:26:376 - ) are unsnapped by 1 ms. You might want to snap them correctly!

Mercurial wrote:

OH GOD, NOT AGAIN, NOT AGAIN THIS QAT BULLCRAP.

At least, this one is well justified though.

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Disqualification Notice

Hello!

Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.

Xiao Mei 2015

Misleading patterns

• 
  There are multiple 1/8 sliders in this map that are very misleading. They are used in a way that players think there is going to be a small break between, yet there's a large jump into the next object instead.

1. 02:22:013 (1,2) -
2. 02:31:013 (2,3) -
3. 02:31:422 (4,5) -
4. 02:39:467 (1,2) -

If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.

The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.

Good luck!

###M

Hinsvar wrote:

Udah dibilangin ga percaya sih mz hhe

monstrata wrote:

I'm waiting on Fort. Unfortunately Kuron-kun's bubble isn't going to count .

monstrata wrote:

So, due to new BNG rules since we made changes, I need to rebubble...

So this is (re)Bubble #1.


good luck Fort!!

Krfawy wrote:

We managed remove a doubled timing point at 03:45:683 - so now everything should be rankable. Also testplayed the map (with HT ofc) and played nicely.

#2

Okoratu wrote:

Krfawy is officially #1and not #2

- Ping - wrote:

what happened with kuron kun

Spaghetti wrote:

- Ping - wrote:

what happened with kuron kun

he was banned for a reason nobody knows

Rumia- wrote:

just some feedback from a testplay xD

01:57:876 - i really wished you catch this beat since i often misread it q.q
and this part seems can bit expressed more of the main music instead of the bass like move 01:59:104 (1,2,3) - 1/2 earlier
and 01:59:649 - add a 1/2 slider and also change 01:59:922 (4) - to a 1/2 slider as well so it express the main instrument nicely it can be miossread at first time but if you try again you will get im putting some 1/1 consistent pattern at that part so it can be good on readability
02:01:013 - same to this part , i know you want the map to be ease on these part but i dont think it would be so hard im guess i will keep this one
02:32:104 (3,4) - give some more distance , feels too packed here while the music is going fast , its hard to predict the slider head imo idk why but if im put more distance on this sliders, 02:32:240 (4,1) - this distance will be increased and can make some misses i think, i guess this one can be okay
02:55:558 (3) - i think this one is better if you placed it near 2 and move it on 02:55:422 - im trying to make drum patterning there so yeah
02:59:104 (1) - shorten this by 1/1 and add a circle at 02:59:649 - , i think its better to play imo since we always press strong beat , not release sorry, but i like to put some slider tick on there, it's really beautiful >////<
03:54:955 (3,4,5,6) - looks a little untidy , stack it properly ? owo (i bet people who play this didnt notice this one so yeah im gonna keep this one for unbubbling ;_;)
04:02:046 - add a circle here in the middle of the triangle slider and start spinner 1/4 after would be nice imo oh god why, i want 2015 combo on here please ;_;

the rest are very nice and well to play indeed

hope it helps! it really helped me but you're late, and im late to reply this too because i need to think this reply @_@

DakeDekaane wrote:

Just looked out of curiosity and skimmed through it. Some comments, suggestions and personal complains.

00:29:785 (2) - At first glance this was reaaally awkard given you've faithfully kept following this synth sound, and then you do this a considerable ammount of times. I would've complained lots about this, but took my time to notice your intention here, just something to consider? it can be acceptable, so yeah i think some retries can make plays better xD
00:29:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - A bit curious about why you didn't follow this new and catchy rhythm. it follow synth sound right? D:
00:33:740 (8) - For a similar reason this should be a 1/2 slider :< i make that 3/34 slider to make sure 00:34:285 (2,3,4) - can be more readable
00:46:013 - 00:52:558 - You have this strongest sound in the main beats, but you go for the offbeat sounds in the background, making this feel a bit weird. Same for the final section. I haven't seen a single point about this in the received mods, but still wanted to say it. for this one i know right what im doing here, im just want to try something new for this map like to put melodical pattern and ignore some downbeats, if this one can be consistent it can be good at gameplay i think, some players just need to adapted with this on few tries
01:18:740 - 01:20:922 - Are the NC spam really necessary? Same for 01:27:467 - 01:34:013 - yeah i put that NC spam and it looks necessary because to make sure you can read that jumpy pattern, so i put 12 12 12 12 pattern
01:20:922 (1) - 01:25:285 (1) - There's absolutely no reason to have this as a 3/4 slider, you have this constant 1/2 beat. yeah it right but looks this 3/4 pattern can be acceptable because follow synth sound there and put 1/2 looks boring i guess lol
03:26:140 (3) - I want to complain about these sliders, there's no held note at all here, just plain hits too hard to make patterning there xD
04:05:455 (2) - Something similar for 00:33:740 (8) - , you have this constant 1/2 for the synth thing, yet you pass over it. Applies for similar sliders. this patterning same like 00:27:467 (1,2) - but with more impact because it's kiai right there >:D

Long time I've seen a map of yours. It's nice to see people improving. Good luck!

Note: I'm not going to qualify.

Mackenzie wrote:

go

Weeaboo wrote:

he abused bn privileges.