Mackenzie wrote:

Requalification Notice

This has been requalified upon request by the mapper within 12 hours after disqualification. Please check the map nicely and then you are free to disqualify it.

###WTF QUALIFY CAP

monstrata wrote:

Doesn't matter if the sampleset/volume is different. A green line will always override a red line so there can be no errors. Green Line > Red Line. Errors only appear when two red lines or two green lines are stacked because osu won't know what information to take. If there are double red lines, osu won't know which red line's information to prioritize, same with double green lines.

For example: if one green line says 40% volume and 1.2x SV multiplier, but another green line says 80% volume and 0.5x SV, the game might produce a section with 80% volume and 1.2x SV because it doesn't know which to prioritize. I'm unsure what occurs when both green lines have the same information, but errors still occur there too.

However in this case, the dq wasn't necessary.

Spaghetti wrote:

Mackenzie wrote:

Requalification Notice

This has been requalified upon request by the mapper within 12 hours after disqualification. Please check the map nicely and then you are free to disqualify it.

###WTF QUALIFY CAP

someone could've used that to qualify it but u wasted it ;-;

monstrata wrote:

Qualify, then post .

baraatje123 wrote:

Spam the qualify button for 10+ minutes until it works
Then Post

monstrata wrote:

Double lines aren't unrankable when it's red + green tho... Only if its double red or double green. Unless of course, the sampleset/volume/SV etc... of the green line used was a mistake...

monstrata wrote:

However in this case, the dq wasn't necessary.

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

Fort wrote:

inb4 hvick FC lmao

Azer wrote:

02:22:013 (1) - making this slider last so long really hurt the quality of this map, everyone broke on it, it's a huge jump and I personally expected it to be a regular 3 point return slider

jesus1412 wrote:

02:39:467 (1,2) - Your 1/8 kicksliders feel too long imo with current distancing. You should consider reducing the distance between them and the next jump in a few cases. This happens multiple times in the map, I won't list them all.

Just jesse thoughts. I didn't read anything from the thread before this post but it seems like more people than just me noticed it.

fartownik wrote:

02:31:013 (2,3,4,5) - this is even worse, especially (4) and (5). Big-blackish 1/8 usage.
02:39:467 (1,2) - Same.

Karen wrote:

whats the diff name?
小妹？

fartownik wrote:

Fort wrote:

inb4 hvick FC lmao

and lmao, that's totally FCable every time AFTER you look it up in the editor, but I don't think a map should require you to do that. The mapping of that part is just subpar.

Asphyxia wrote:

Now that this map is disqualified, your first 2 green lines (00:08:922 - and 00:26:376 - ) are unsnapped by 1 ms. You might want to snap them correctly!

Mercurial wrote:

OH GOD, NOT AGAIN, NOT AGAIN THIS QAT BULLCRAP.

At least, this one is well justified though.

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Disqualification Notice

Hello!

Unfortunately, the Quality Assurance Team has decided to disqualify this beatmap. The following is a list of reasons and examples for the disqualification. We do not outline every issue in detail, so make sure to take the idea behind each reason and apply it to the entire beatmap as issues might be found in more than the spots mentioned below. If you have any questions, please reply to this post and we will do our best to clarify any misunderstandings.

Xiao Mei 2015

Misleading patterns

• 
  There are multiple 1/8 sliders in this map that are very misleading. They are used in a way that players think there is going to be a small break between, yet there's a large jump into the next object instead.

1. 02:22:013 (1,2) -
2. 02:31:013 (2,3) -
3. 02:31:422 (4,5) -
4. 02:39:467 (1,2) -

If you happen to have concerns about this disqualification, you can contest the decision with this form. Before using this form, please read the instructions carefully.

The Beatmap Nominators may handle this mapset after the issues have been addressed.

Good luck!

###M

Hinsvar wrote:

Udah dibilangin ga percaya sih mz hhe

monstrata wrote:

I'm waiting on Fort. Unfortunately Kuron-kun's bubble isn't going to count .

monstrata wrote:

So, due to new BNG rules since we made changes, I need to rebubble...

So this is (re)Bubble #1.


good luck Fort!!

Krfawy wrote:

We managed remove a doubled timing point at 03:45:683 - so now everything should be rankable. Also testplayed the map (with HT ofc) and played nicely.

#2

Okoratu wrote:

Krfawy is officially #1and not #2

- Ping - wrote:

what happened with kuron kun

Spaghetti wrote:

- Ping - wrote:

what happened with kuron kun

he was banned for a reason nobody knows

Rumia- wrote:

just some feedback from a testplay xD

01:57:876 - i really wished you catch this beat since i often misread it q.q
and this part seems can bit expressed more of the main music instead of the bass like move 01:59:104 (1,2,3) - 1/2 earlier
and 01:59:649 - add a 1/2 slider and also change 01:59:922 (4) - to a 1/2 slider as well so it express the main instrument nicely it can be miossread at first time but if you try again you will get im putting some 1/1 consistent pattern at that part so it can be good on readability
02:01:013 - same to this part , i know you want the map to be ease on these part but i dont think it would be so hard im guess i will keep this one
02:32:104 (3,4) - give some more distance , feels too packed here while the music is going fast , its hard to predict the slider head imo idk why but if im put more distance on this sliders, 02:32:240 (4,1) - this distance will be increased and can make some misses i think, i guess this one can be okay
02:55:558 (3) - i think this one is better if you placed it near 2 and move it on 02:55:422 - im trying to make drum patterning there so yeah
02:59:104 (1) - shorten this by 1/1 and add a circle at 02:59:649 - , i think its better to play imo since we always press strong beat , not release sorry, but i like to put some slider tick on there, it's really beautiful >////<
03:54:955 (3,4,5,6) - looks a little untidy , stack it properly ? owo (i bet people who play this didnt notice this one so yeah im gonna keep this one for unbubbling ;_;)
04:02:046 - add a circle here in the middle of the triangle slider and start spinner 1/4 after would be nice imo oh god why, i want 2015 combo on here please ;_;

the rest are very nice and well to play indeed

hope it helps! it really helped me but you're late, and im late to reply this too because i need to think this reply @_@

DakeDekaane wrote:

Just looked out of curiosity and skimmed through it. Some comments, suggestions and personal complains.

00:29:785 (2) - At first glance this was reaaally awkard given you've faithfully kept following this synth sound, and then you do this a considerable ammount of times. I would've complained lots about this, but took my time to notice your intention here, just something to consider? it can be acceptable, so yeah i think some retries can make plays better xD
00:29:649 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - A bit curious about why you didn't follow this new and catchy rhythm. it follow synth sound right? D:
00:33:740 (8) - For a similar reason this should be a 1/2 slider :< i make that 3/34 slider to make sure 00:34:285 (2,3,4) - can be more readable
00:46:013 - 00:52:558 - You have this strongest sound in the main beats, but you go for the offbeat sounds in the background, making this feel a bit weird. Same for the final section. I haven't seen a single point about this in the received mods, but still wanted to say it. for this one i know right what im doing here, im just want to try something new for this map like to put melodical pattern and ignore some downbeats, if this one can be consistent it can be good at gameplay i think, some players just need to adapted with this on few tries
01:18:740 - 01:20:922 - Are the NC spam really necessary? Same for 01:27:467 - 01:34:013 - yeah i put that NC spam and it looks necessary because to make sure you can read that jumpy pattern, so i put 12 12 12 12 pattern
01:20:922 (1) - 01:25:285 (1) - There's absolutely no reason to have this as a 3/4 slider, you have this constant 1/2 beat. yeah it right but looks this 3/4 pattern can be acceptable because follow synth sound there and put 1/2 looks boring i guess lol
03:26:140 (3) - I want to complain about these sliders, there's no held note at all here, just plain hits too hard to make patterning there xD
04:05:455 (2) - Something similar for 00:33:740 (8) - , you have this constant 1/2 for the synth thing, yet you pass over it. Applies for similar sliders. this patterning same like 00:27:467 (1,2) - but with more impact because it's kiai right there >:D

Long time I've seen a map of yours. It's nice to see people improving. Good luck!

Note: I'm not going to qualify.

Mackenzie wrote:

go

Weeaboo wrote:

he abused bn privileges.

monstrata wrote:

inb4 "rebubbles should have occurred before Mackenzie flamed" etc...

Congrats Fort! First map to get 4 bubbles? xD.

Weeaboo wrote:

he abused bn privileges.