wow congratulation~
xD *-*/JUDYDANNY wrote:
I didnt notice this thread. (baka)
shat ap uProphecy wrote:
Not many Taiko BN
Note: Ono only lists, in opposite of my CtB/O!M list, then BN which are only taiko and not multimodeProphecy wrote:
Not many Taiko BN
ming was originally specialized in Taiko mode.baraatje123 wrote:
Why he added MingMichael (mostly CtB) is a miracle to me
and can play tako. yeah, Nice CtB too..Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
ming was originally specialized in Taiko mode.
There is no such thing as "taiko BN". Any BN can do any mode if they wish, but it's in their best interest not to touch things they know nothing about, cause that would make them lose points easily.baraatje123 wrote:
Note: Ono only lists, in opposite of my CtB/O!M list, then BN which are only taiko and not multimode
to the point it's almost unbearable for some like meProphecy wrote:
Not many Taiko BN
ming is fully capable of taiko. Whether he mods or not doesn't matter. He played, mapped and modded for that mode for several years, while those other BNs of yours don't.OnosakiHito wrote:
I only add those who are fully capable of Taiko. Not adding everyone here.
Also, every BN is allowed to mod other modes.
This list is about giving mapper an accurate overview about people they can lean on when they have problems or need an accurate mod for their Taiko maps.Hahahaha.
This, pretty much. I'll just say this:Nwolf wrote:
Stop complaining you don't even know how exhausting this /can/ be
That's all I can say about current situation. What Raiden explained is rather natural since, as he said, people are becoming "complainy" which isn't due to the BNG itself, but rather due to the situation we have already for so long.OnosakiHito wrote:
It's rather the other way: We have more mappers than modders. Modders can't compensate this amount.
_Gezo_ wrote:
back off aragami fu**er
jkily grats
I have questions about the first two points:OnosakiHito wrote:
Probably most people don't know about recent QAT changes, so I will hand out some information which effecst the ranking process from now on:So in short, QAT's DQ can be seen as additional check for whatever reason and should help for more refined maps in the ranking process.
- QATs do not post anonymized anymore.
- Disqualifications can happen before a discussion.
- QATs may mod again after a DQ, but don't have to.
- QATs can rebubble/requalify a map again after a conclusion has been found.
Dunno how you guys feel about this, but seems okay for Taiko if you ask me. Normaly we talk about stuff anyway and in this way we understand each others opinion better.
As it looks, yes. Wouldn't know for what else we need it anymore.Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:
I have questions about the first two points:
- So the QAT bot will be abandoned from now on?
- Does "before a discussing" mean the discussion among QATs?
Finally. That "posting as QAT" was starting to get a bit odd.OnosakiHito wrote:
Probably most people don't know about recent QAT changes, so I will hand out some information which effecst the ranking process from now on:So in short, QAT's DQ can be seen as additional check for whatever reason and should help for more refined maps in the ranking process.
- QATs do not post anonymized anymore.
- Disqualifications can happen before a discussing.
- QATs may mod again after a DQ, but don't have to.
- QATs can rebubble/requalify a map again after a conclusion has been found.
Dunno how you guys feel about this, but seems okay for Taiko if you ask me. Normaly we talk about stuff anyway and in this way we understand each others opinion better.
It'd be pointless when it's a trivial matter (metadata, wrong snapping, etc.), as Nominators could check that by themselves. For other cases, as there will be a discussion after the DQ, it's expected for the involved QAT to be in the discussion itself, and even if he don't bubble/qualify, they would be likely giving some signs of approval after the discussion reachs an agreement.Spaghetti wrote:
Loving the changes, glad to see we're progressing. Just one thing though, is it possible that someone adds a rule in which the same QAT checks the map after requalification?
Spaghetti wrote:
This is to avoid dq's based on subjective views
Until there is no official instruction of QATs superior's, there probably won't be such add.Spaghetti wrote:
Loving the changes, glad to see we're progressing. Just one thing though, is it possible that someone adds a rule in which the same QAT checks the map after requalification?
Seems reasonableOnosakiHito wrote:
Probably most people don't know about recent QAT changes, so I will hand out some information which effecst the ranking process from now on:So in short, QAT's DQ can be seen as additional check for whatever reason and should help for more refined maps in the ranking process.
- QATs do not post anonymized anymore.
- Disqualifications can happen before a discussion.
- QATs may mod again after a DQ, but don't have to.
- QATs can rebubble/requalify a map again after a conclusion has been found.
Dunno how you guys feel about this, but seems okay for Taiko if you ask me. Normaly we talk about stuff anyway and in this way we understand each others opinion better.
Priti wrote:
Can you add me to the list? :3
getOnosakiHito wrote:
I only add those who are fully capable of Taiko. Not adding everyone here.
Also, every BN is allowed to mod other modes.
They can, but honestly iconing something that one's not very experienced at is not a really wise choice.Baraatje123 wrote:
Any BN can icon any map they want, no matter what mode it is
Baraatje123 wrote:
One thing to note
Any BN can icon any map they want, no matter what mode it is
I have bubbled a taiko set, and drum'd a hybrid set
Nowadays, things as Taiko BN (just as CTB/OM) don't exist yes, I know, I said Taiko BN because I want to mod only taiko maps, I can mod other diffs too but I don't have experience to bub or rank
However, Ono just shows the ones who are/were taiko only
The CtB/Mania lists I made also show 'multi-mode' BN
Hmm, I still think Ono should add them all, but it's his choice, and he said he'll only do Taiko only
To Sh1n1, I personally have only seen you map/mod taiko, so you should be safe :3 nuuu, I can map std too, I have 1 map ranked
around 50% of my total KD are made by Standard Mods, I still perfered to mod Taiko sets.-Sh1n1- wrote:
To Ono-sempai:
Ohh I have a question because I want to be Taiko BN, I'm Taiko modder, player and mapper but one of my dreams is rank 1 map at least of each mode, 90% of my kudosu was earned on Taiko, is it a problem if one day I want to join to BN or you wont add me at your list?
Happy to hear that :3 thank you *-*/Stefan wrote:
around 50% of my total KD are made by Standard Mods, I still perfered to mod Taiko sets.
That's not true. I put those into the list where I know that they are capable of Taiko in a great way.Baraatje123 wrote:
However, Ono just shows the ones who are/were taiko only
Yeah, that's like me though the number goes up to about 98% lol (about 2% are standard mods)-Sh1n1- wrote:
Happy to hear that :3 thank you *-*/Stefan wrote:
around 50% of my total KD are made by Standard Mods, I still perfered to mod Taiko sets.