You're being a hypocrite* seems like a better fit than contradicting there. whoops.
lolwut.pngDrezi wrote:
No it's not.
No need to switch from observational to derogatory here...Navizel wrote:
You're being a hypocrite* seems like a better fit than contradicting there. whoops.
If I hadn't voted for her, anyone (including you) would've said I was a hypocrite for saying I don't want to vote you anymore, but instead I don't remove my vote either.Navizel wrote:
I guess I just wrote whatever what's on my mind. I usually don't think what I'm typing when I'm on my phone. And probably because I used to write very little in mafia games.You're being contradicting here. Why would you vote Hika when you said waiting for her replacement is a good idea and we aren't in a hurry?sLaiNi wrote:
UNVOTE
I have to say that Jess' didn't contribute a lot. Still, I don't think we should vote her just now.
So I will vote Hika for known reasons. But as we aren't in a hurry it might be a good idea to wait for her replacement, wouldn't it?
So:
VOTE: Hika
PROD: Hika ( if it hasn't been done yet )
The fuck?sLaiNi wrote:
If I hadn't voted for her, anyone (including you) would've said I was a hypocrite for saying I don't want to vote you anymore, but instead I don't remove my vote either.Navizel wrote:
You're being contradicting here. Why would you vote Hika when you said waiting for her replacement is a good idea and we aren't in a hurry?
That's indeed contradicting.
no, they literally mean the same thing. One is just harsher than the other. You switched from the "you might not have thought this out properly" to "you don't follow your own words" with no provocation.Navizel wrote:
it's more of a bad grammar than derogating someone. my bad.
Eitherway the point is, that I suspected her for a long time.Navizel wrote:
I never asked you to vote someone else especially someone who hasn't posted here for 3 days.
how can you have people vote for her and not lynch her. Voting and Lynching have a direct correlation. By voting for people, they get lynched. That whole post makes no sense.sLaiNi wrote:
Eitherway the point is, that I suspected her for a long time.Navizel wrote:
I never asked you to vote someone else especially someone who hasn't posted here for 3 days.
The point is not that I don't want people to vote for her, instead I don't want us to lynch her. That was bad wording on my side there (writing vote instead of lynch).
?? you can pressure someone and decide to lynch or not based on their defense and the way others join the wagon etcetc.Ace Timing wrote:
how can you have people vote for her and not lynch her.
Exactly how I meant it.Drezi wrote:
?? you can pressure someone and decide to lynch or not based on their defense and the way others join the wagon etcetc.Ace Timing wrote:
how can you have people vote for her and not lynch her.
Oh, I hope everything is alright.Hika wrote:
Actually no, I want a replacement here. Sorry guys.
I did. Am I supposed to take a hint from the "yeah I was just reaction testing" posts?[/quote]Zexion wrote:
Did you read Hika's ISO? You can't tell me there's nothing wrong there.
For the Nth time, I'm not gonna vote you, but I can't trust you. I think I made this clear already, so why are you -still- worried about this?Navizel wrote:
Also Zexion, it's meant to lure people. If people decided to lynch me even though I claimed I'm going to scumread whoever got lured.Zexion wrote:
So now you are actually claiming? Because some posts ago you told us to interpret as we wished. You can't expect me to townread you after your attitude and shady claim. I'm not gonna trust you after that, then again, I have no intention to lynch you, at least not today.
A little note, that's not derrogatory. Being hypocrital is a non-ofensive term. Calling it "a f**** liar* would be derogatory.Ace Timing wrote:
No need to switch from observational to derogatory here...Navizel wrote:
You're being a hypocrite* seems like a better fit than contradicting there. whoops.
I'd like to join at this question here for the more experienced players. If Hika's replacement starts making sense then it could change our reads, so far why are we voting Hika is her overall attitude, I didn't see something like a scumslip...Ace Timing wrote:
How would one interact with a replacement? They won't know anything about what their predecessor was think or their plans, so how would they be able to dispel any suspicions?
Don't trust the replacements. KappaAce Timing wrote:
How would one interact with a replacement? They won't know anything about what their predecessor was think or their plans, so how would they be able to dispel any suspicions?
FoS: DreziDrezi wrote:
Navi make sure you jail me at night
I've never played this game before online, but I have played this game irl, but with a larger number of people (20-25).Nyquill wrote:
Jess, Drezi, Ace Timing
What's your experience with mafia?
Mainly a taunt/sarcasm because his prev post made me wonder about his claim, and if he happened to be scum he'd want to kill me, also wanted to get in some wifom protection at the same time.Nyquill wrote:
FoS: DreziDrezi wrote:
Navi make sure you jail me at night
There's nothing town you can possibly gain from this. Explain yourself.
Never played this game before in online,played a game that smiler of this in Real life.Nyquill wrote:
Jess, Drezi, Ace Timing
What's your experience with mafia?
If you read Nyquil's posts you probably wouldn't need to ask that.Drezi wrote:
Why the two of us specifically?
I don't think Zexion is active though.Ace Timing wrote:
The first two people he suspected were you and Slaini. Of course he would ask a more active player their thoughts on said suspects. Maybe if you weren't consentrating of being sarcastic you would have noticed.
Then I rescind my earlier statement and apoligise to Drezi for being rude.Nyquill wrote:
There's a more important reason than that.
Drezi: so far I feel he's town. His initial list helped me (personaly) to get better into the game and he denotes a useful attitude for scumhunting, pointing flaws and contradictions and stuff. I'm also glad he doesn't share Sakura's paranoia for every little thing posted in the game, since I felt she was waaay to suspicious to some minor things.Nyquill wrote:
Hey Navizel, we don't care about you today. Try to be more aggressive. We are less likely to want to lynch you tommorow if you're still around. It helps us greatly. By aggressive I don't mean continually be paranoid about Zexion's read on you either.
Zexion, how do you feel about Slaini and Drezi?
Just because I haven't posted as much as I did earlier in the game doesn't mean I'm not active anymore >_<, I still read and post in the game constantly.Navizel wrote:
I don't think Zexion is active though.Ace Timing wrote:
The first two people he suspected were you and Slaini. Of course he would ask a more active player their thoughts on said suspects. Maybe if you weren't consentrating of being sarcastic you would have noticed.
Well reading Slaini is really hard because his attitude isn't really constant. He flips between scummy and ignorant (newbish) townie very often and sporadically. I've honest;y never encountered this irl so I don't really know how to interact with nor respond to such a thing. I guess the best place to put him is null-scum (and yes I know this goes against my earlier read).Navizel wrote:
Well.. by active, I mean someone who isn't lurking.
By the way to everyone, what would you do if your reads on the replacements are different from the previous players? Also, what are everyone's thoughts on Ace Timing and Slaini?
So you consider his newbish play as townie and not scummy or maybe null? I'm assuming the italicized sentences are answers for my first question. Who would you put as null-scum?Ace Timing wrote:
Well reading Slaini is really hard because his attitude isn't really constant. He flips between scummy and ignorant (newbish) townie very often and sporadically. I've honest;y never encountered this irl so I don't really know how to interact with nor respond to such a thing. I guess the best place to put him is null-scum (and yes I know this goes against my earlier read).
...but I haven't said anything about the information I recieved?Drezi wrote:
Yeah.
And I don't like the way you're going about it. You're able to shift the apparent intention of this post later based on how it's recieved.
I agree with basically everything here. Both Drezi and Slaini and you are on the Hika wagon at the moment. The only move on to the wagon that really felt wrong was Slaini's. Drezi's suggestion to move to Hika also shows he's trying to get townreads as well.Zexion wrote:
Drezi: so far I feel he's town. His initial list helped me (personaly) to get better into the game and he denotes a useful attitude for scumhunting, pointing flaws and contradictions and stuff. I'm also glad he doesn't share Sakura's paranoia for every little thing posted in the game, since I felt she was waaay to suspicious to some minor things.Nyquill wrote:
Hey Navizel, we don't care about you today. Try to be more aggressive. We are less likely to want to lynch you tommorow if you're still around. It helps us greatly. By aggressive I don't mean continually be paranoid about Zexion's read on you either.
Zexion, how do you feel about Slaini and Drezi?
Slaini: Ugh. This one is hard. Besides the total newbie attitude I don't really feel a constant attitude coming from him. If I had to take a guess, I would say he's scum for cutting up discussions and just jumping into wagons with not a lot of new ideas coming from himself (and a really passive playstyle, with many posts just saying "goodbye" and stuff like that), but then again I wouldn't be so sure to lynch him just because that. I would like to see how he plays on the following day or so to make a more strong read about him.
As long as rEdo doesn't talk, my vote stays on what was Hika.
Here are my thought on Slaini and AceNavizel wrote:
Also, what are everyone's thoughts on Ace Timing and Slaini?
I hope that I don't ruin the game in anyway ._. If I do so, tell me, please.-[Jess]- wrote:
but his action make the thing get worse.
This is one of the reasons why I am scum reading you. It really feels like you want to please town so you won't be lynched or killed.sLaiNi wrote:
I hope that I don't ruin the game in anyway ._. If I do so, tell me, please.-[Jess]- wrote:
but his action make the thing get worse.
lol, guess what you want in terms of that ^^Navizel wrote:
This is one of the reasons why I am scum reading you. It really feels like you want to please town so you won't be lynched or killed.
I thought that was one of the points of this game...Navizel wrote:
This is one of the reasons why I am scum reading you. It really feels like you want to please town so you won't be lynched or killed.
tfw one rude post-[Jess]- wrote:
Ace:
His words are rude.
Wait for rEdo to say something first.than we will have final conclusion.(with cookies and milk)sLaiNi wrote:
So we are close to the deadline. How do we get to a final conclusion?
See the rules.sLaiNi wrote:
What would happen in case of a draw?
Not going to happen, because tbh in that case I'll put in my vote on a whim just to get someone lynched, but in the case of that happening, I think no one would get lynchedsLaiNi wrote:
What would happen in case of a draw?
That's actually not very good. Its a lot easier to find scum the day after if someone is lynched.sLaiNi wrote:
Okay, in our case no-one will be lynched
Am I missing something or is this a fucking scumclaim?sLaiNi wrote:
That's so right. That is something I should definitly change. But that has nothing to do with me being scum, [...]Sakura wrote:
It feels like you're more concerned with how people look at you than actually finding scum.
inb4 sLaiNi & Ace Timing scumteam, it would be topkek/10Ace Timing wrote:
Current Reads:
Town:
Slaini
Null:
Everyone else.
Oh hey this is what I have thought too. Am I scum to you?Ace Timing wrote:
The reason why I am (currently) convinced that SNB is scum is that when I made that earlier read, he immediately thought that me and Slaini were a scum team. There was no real reason he should think so, so therefore, he must of been a scum trying to get me or Slaini lynched. Still can figure out what Hika is, as he hasn't been on in awhile. I honestly forgot why Sakura is null-scum. I'll probably remember, but I came up with these after seeing the responses to the read I made earlier. I picked Slaini simply because he was suspected of a scumslip earler on, and I was already kind of inclined to believe he was town. Kek.
So you said it'd be better to wait for a replacement, yet you voted her, okay.sLaiNi wrote:
I have to say that Jess' didn't contribute a lot. Still, I don't think we should vote her just now.
So I will vote Hika for known reasons. But as we aren't in a hurry it might be a good idea to wait for her replacement, wouldn't it?
I obviously meant the way he's swinging votes, not the lurking part.rEdo wrote:
Like honestly, I don't really see a case against Hika except for being lurky as fuck and voting people for shiggles, but isn't that the same thing sLaiNi's been doing?
People still think that was an actual read? That would actually be topkek now that I think about it.rEdo wrote:
inb4 sLaiNi & Ace Timing scumteam, it would be topkek/10Ace Timing wrote:
Current Reads:
Town:
Slaini
Null:
Everyone else.
I've heard this before, but what post did I make that could actually be dubbed WIFOM?rEdo wrote:
Ace Timing is a fucking pile of WIFOM all around.
p/4287543/Ace Timing wrote:
People still think that was an actual read? That would actually be topkek now that I think about it.
That was more of a joke.Ace Timing wrote:
I've heard this before, but what post did I make that could actually be dubbed WIFOM?
2. Sakurato this:
3. Hika
2. NyquillSakura
3. rEdoHika
2. [url=http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=682935&t=340639]Nyquill[/url] [s][url=http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=289422&t=340639]Sakura[/url][/s]
3. [url=http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=49329&t=340639]rEdo[/url] [s][url=http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=277415&t=340639]Hika[/url][/s]
Why are you voting me instead of sLaiNi?Drezi wrote:
Why aren't you voting rEdo?
Ok. This is why it is a lot easier to find scum after a lynch. When there is no lynch two people are dead. Now based on the posts of the desceased, the remaining players must find people who are likely to have wantwd them dead. On the other hand if you have lynched someone, you now have a smaller pool of people to choose from, as if you mislynched, there are now 6 players alive instead of 7. Another reason is, if you DO lynch a scum you don't have to figure out who wanted who dead with 2 possible suspects, now you only have to deal with one.rEdo wrote:
p/4300686/ (elaborate please? I think I'm misunderstanding)