Zexion wrote:
Did you read Hika's ISO? You can't tell me there's nothing wrong there.
I did. Am I supposed to take a hint from the "yeah I was just reaction testing" posts?[/quote]
No. Read it from the side of Hika's masterplan.
Navizel wrote:
Zexion wrote:
So now you are actually claiming? Because some posts ago you told us to interpret as we wished. You can't expect me to townread you after your attitude and shady claim. I'm not gonna trust you after that, then again, I have no intention to lynch you, at least not today.
Also Zexion, it's meant to lure people. If people decided to lynch me even though I claimed I'm going to scumread whoever got lured.
For the Nth time, I'm not gonna vote you, but I can't trust you. I think I made this clear already, so why are you -still- worried about this?
Ace Timing wrote:
Navizel wrote:
You're being a hypocrite* seems like a better fit than contradicting there. whoops.
No need to switch from observational to derogatory here...
A little note, that's not derrogatory. Being hypocrital is a non-ofensive term. Calling it "a f**** liar* would be derogatory.
Ace Timing wrote:
How would one interact with a replacement? They won't know anything about what their predecessor was think or their plans, so how would they be able to dispel any suspicions?
I'd like to join at this question here for the more experienced players. If Hika's replacement starts making sense then it could change our reads, so far why are we voting Hika is her overall attitude, I didn't see something like a scumslip...
Also sorry for my low activity but I was pretty busy these days.
Also Sakura replacing out?

Unexpected...