@Zexion: I don't understand why you unvoted me here:
p/4279800 since you could've kept your vote for pressure, if you had a townread on me or smth, then why not move your vote to Navizel at that point considering you also had issues with what he was doing.
@Jess: This post:
p/4280276 indicates you read the debate between me and Zexion (and i guess Navi) why didn't you comment on anything that happened and why did you vote Slaini when there was plenty other info to go on?
p/4280488 This post makes me uneasy, lurker warning, has Slaini done anything other than his supposed scumslip that was proved to be... not an actual scumslip but translation error afterwards?
@Slaini: What the heck is with the choice of wording here:
p/4280552 It's like "Oh hey im voting you, but you can just take it as a pat on the back!" also
p/4280877 Jess never posted (or at least anything significant) between these 2 votes, so what was the point of your vote?, ALSO: You voted "Navi" for replying heh to my vote, what did that make you think of Jess replying ":^) "to your vote
p/4281024 I have a thing with people justifying their actions with "I'm newbie" this is a newbie game, of course there's going to be newbies, you don't need to justify being a newbie, however i hate it when ppl use that fact to justify stuff they do, if you have questions about the game ask or look in the mafiascum wiki, but dont try to justify your actions because "Oh sorry im just newbie", I've already had scum do that to me twice in the past. (Also this is the famous scumslip post lol).
A couple notes about Slaini, seems like people focused too much on Slaini's scumslip than his actual body of work (which is also bad).
p/4281064 Actually looking over this, SNB might be town if Slaini's town, he had open road to join the wagon and didn't.
@Jess:
p/4281073 So any original thoughts at all?
p/4281118 I still hold Hika that unlike everyone else, she spotted a scumslip and voted it immediately, so her actions match her words.
On the subject of Zexion:
p/4281118 This post is really odd Doesn't want to vote Navi because possible L-1, yet Navi wasn't in danger of L-1 Back then, then votes Navi later when Navi's at L-2. And the only thing he ever says to Slaini is "Hi welcome, go here to learn how to play" Looking at it from another angle this post only talks about Navi's response to suspicion, who he was already suspecting anyway. Hika's post about him. And Slaini's scumslip. I'm pretty sure there's more stuff to comment on so I don't get why this post didn't comment on anything else.
p/4281227 <- Trying to call out Navizel of Beetlejuicing when he wasn't doing as such.
p/4281253 <- Ignored Navizel's reply to his accusation completely.
@Hika:
p/4281268 In fact, it's the total opposite, if people are in RVS, the treshold for what they consider scummy enough to vote is lower, because information's what needed, not abstaining from voting which gives 0 information and causes 0 reactions.
p/4281319 This (Slaini's, osu's being weird) and the next post are really awkward. And of course, Slaini completely ignoring Navi who he's scumreading... AGAIN.
.
.
.
Ah fuck this! i give up, I keep getting lazy, most of the stuff im noticing is the same stuff i had noticed before, the only new stuff i noticed is about Slaini.
I get what Drezi says about Hika, although would you mind explaining your townread of me please, i don't get how i could've done anything that could've caused said townread. I do agree that my early posts were weak, but that's because i was mostly teaching + playing + interacting with Zexion, which ended up in them coming up with a lot of words, and i also agree that anyone townreading me on my early posts should be scrutinized.
In fact... Anyone townreading me, please explain why, because i don't think i've done anything near enough to warrant such a strong townread, most of the stuff i've said is null to me.
PEdit: Oh yeah... navizel's right i forgot that scum roleblocker could just block him... derp. I blame me just waking up when i wrote that XD
, but yeah, I should not have put that "you're" there.