@ Mod: I just noticed this, the first post doesn't say anything about 2 mafia in the same neighbor, is this possible?
It's possible for 1, 2 or the whole scumteam to be on the same neighborhood. Scum randomizing is irrelevant of neighborhoods.Frostings wrote:
@ Mod: I just noticed this, the first post doesn't say anything about 2 mafia in the same neighbor, is this possible?
oh, well thenSakura wrote:
It's possible for 1, 2 or the whole scumteam to be on the same neighborhood. Scum randomizing is irrelevant of neighborhoods.Frostings wrote:
@ Mod: I just noticed this, the first post doesn't say anything about 2 mafia in the same neighbor, is this possible?
I can't answer this questionFrostings wrote:
@ Mod: are there any cards that interact with neighbors only? i.e. do neighbors affect cards at all?
NoFrostings wrote:
@ Mod: are we able to directly quote anyone from the neighbor chat to here?
It's strange that this question can't be answered.Sakura wrote:
I can't answer this questionFrostings wrote:
@ Mod: are there any cards that interact with neighbors only? i.e. do neighbors affect cards at all?
I'm assuming this is based on something he did in the neighborhood?Frostings wrote:
Alright guys, I think I got it
NoHitter is scum
pieguy1372 wrote:
I'm assuming this is based on something he did in the neighborhood?
I'm joking of courseDakeDekaane wrote:
What lead you to think NH is scum?
and self-voting is indicative of not scum hunting, how? I think it's fairly obvious I'm at least forming reads here.DakeDekaane wrote:
pieguy, you say selfvoting is better than just summarizing and throwing random questions?
Having neighbor chat is more useful to town than scum, but knowing who's in which color team seems a bit useless as a townie, as far as I'm concernedDakeDekaane wrote:
Neighbours are benefits more town than scum. Since they have more places to discuss their scumreads and create strategies about the use of cards and hypers. If done properly, they can force scum to act like they want to and not the opposite. Just saying my opinion and what would be an ideal situation.
"woah someone's callin me out on mah brb using ogi to save face"Frostings wrote:
Alright guys, I think I got it
NoHitter is scum
Personally, I think that self-voting does not prove to be an appropriate strategy because I see it as diverting attention from yourself in the manner that if you do it, no one will be willing to vote for you in the 50/50 chance that you are either scum or town. So I prefer it if none of you guys self vote and use it as an explanation for "scum hunting" because there is more town than scum. At least I hope so. I need to reread the rules a few more times again.pieguy1372 wrote:
and self-voting is indicative of not scum hunting, how? I think it's fairly obvious I'm at least forming reads here.
Wagon was an accidental slip. 3 + 4 = 7, you can't split 7 in half and you most definitely split a person's vote in half, so 3 is getting a little closer to 4 which is a lot more than 3. My point is, wagon was a wrong choice of words, especially since I just glanced, saw names and started with RVS because no one is saying anything important, but so far, after reading ALL ISOs, GIF is very scummy and I don't like him right now. Why would you hold out information that could be useful to everyone on seeing how to end the day?rEdo wrote:
[*]Hika with the DD vote, either not paying attention to the game or trying to counterwagon
Choofers wrote:
okay let me be more explicit since holding out on supposed information is inherently scummy: why was your vote non-rvs? do you have a gut read on pieguy this early on in the game? are you fishing for reactions?GuyInFreezer wrote:
If I wanted to elaborate now I already would have done so.
Why do you ask me? I think it was because pieguy voted himself. Simple as that, no further explanation needed. I would vote for him too but can I have everyone's stance first?rEdo wrote:
Looks like a good start. Hika, why do you think GIF voted pieguy?
I agree, why ask me? But I as I stated after the above quote to rEdo, I think it's because he voted himself. I would do the same thing if I was here to SEE him do it in action because that is super duper scummy. I wouldn't do that at all.Frostings wrote:
Why is the question directed to Hika, of all people as well
Why not ask GIF directly if he has any reason to retain his vote on pieguy other than trolling in RVS which is ubiquitous in all mafia games
I don't want random hammer without my point and my questions being answered and said. That is all. I am afraid that someone may make a mistake if they're not paying attention. I am speaking of past games but I just want everyone to know that if someone is about to be HAMMERED, let them make a defense statement. That should be obvious, but just saying so far.pieguy1372 wrote:
my issue with rEdo is that, despite listing off all the stuff that happened, he didn't take any kind of stance on any of it.
the point about Hika trying to "counterwagon" me is meh. it feels like an odd thing to focus on in early game. I'd like to know what he thinks knowing this would tell him about Hika's alignment.
you're missing the pointHika wrote:
Personally, I think that self-voting does not prove to be an appropriate strategy because I see it as diverting attention from yourself in the manner that if you do it, no one will be willing to vote for you in the 50/50 chance that you are either scum or town. So I prefer it if none of you guys self vote and use it as an explanation for "scum hunting" because there is more town than scum. At least I hope so. I need to reread the rules a few more times again.
this was referring to what rEdo was saying, not anything you didHika wrote:
Sure, it's an odd thing to focus on in early game but I want to know everyone's stance on each other after my questions are answered.
why do you need everyone's stance before voting me?Hika wrote:
Why do you ask me? I think it was because pieguy voted himself. Simple as that, no further explanation needed. I would vote for him too but can I have everyone's stance first?
It's funny because Frostings wrote that in the first place, not Dakefartownik wrote:
Frostings gets + townpoints from me, the concern seemed genuine enough to convince me. On the other hand, Dake's super-new and innovative opinion that revealing our colors is not beneficial for town seems like a filler-post.
While the second and third questions are run-of-the-mill and could be asked by anyone, there's nothing substantial thereSakura wrote:
Differences:
-
-
- It's possible that all the mafia team is in the same neighborhood, they'll be completely randomized.
-
-
Jinxy wrote:
And what "concern" are you even talking about? He asked the mod 3 questions: First was if multiple scum can be in a neighbourhood which is totally in the opening post if he had read harder
I agree on not revealing our neighborhood color, imo it's useless for town if any neighborhood can have more than one scum.Frostings wrote:
Having neighbor chat is more useful to town than scum, but knowing who's in which color team seems a bit useless as a townie, as far as I'm concerned
It was way too early to make a definite stance for me at that point, that's why I wanted to gather information first. I posted It would not help me yet, but that would be something good enough to base on, I believe.pieguy1372 wrote:
my issue with rEdo is that, despite listing off all the stuff that happened, he didn't take any kind of stance on any of it. the point about Hika trying to "counterwagon" me is meh. it feels like an odd thing to focus on in early game. I'd like to know what he thinks knowing this would tell him about Hika's alignment.
Take a closer look at his ISO, you'll find a clue in his exchange of words with Choofers. Also, I didn't ask why GIF's vote on pieguy was cast, but why it's currently active.Hika wrote:
Wagon was an accidental slip. 3 + 4 = 7, you can't split 7 in half and you most definitely split a person's vote in half, so 3 is getting a little closer to 4 which is a lot more than 3. My point is, wagon was a wrong choice of words, especially since I just glanced, saw names and started with RVS because no one is saying anything important, but so far, after reading ALL ISOs, GIF is very scummy and I don't like him right now. Why would you hold out information that could be useful to everyone on seeing how to end the day?
I'd say there are so many ways to move the game forward without misleading the game like GIF ending RVS unless you're scum trying to get some towncred by self-voting.pieguy1372 wrote:
the self-vote was done, btw, because I had no idea how to move the game forward and thought someone might do something interesting if I wagoned myself
Hello scumpoints. What Hika did was nowhere close to leading anything so I have no idea what you're talking about. Seems like you're trying to share some of your own towncred with her. Bad idea my friend.Choofers wrote:
I don't have super strong reads on anyone at the moment, although I will say that it looks like Hika's playing from a town mindset; I don't think scum generally wants to lead in a game like this
Prods happen when a player hasn't posted for 24 hours.rEdo wrote:
@mod: If in range, prod Chamelo please.
Jinxy wrote:
And what "concern" are you even talking about?