1. UN DOS TRES CUATRO TI TI TI TI

1. 00:31:855 (2) - Lo único que podría decirte en este caso es que alargues la colita de ese slider hasta el tick blanco, siento que ponerlo en el azul suena raro y adelantado. Considera cambiarlo uvu
   
   En general está muy bien hecha la dificultad, simple pero es divertido por el simple hecho que los patrones no son iguales. Bonito mapa, para varias :333

1. 00:11:971 (2,1) - Se siente raro el flow acá ;_; En mi opinión siento que deberías mover el slider un poco más para la derecha para que sea más fácil la transición de estas uwu
   00:14:310 (1,2) - ^same

1. 00:00:080 (1) - No siento que esta nota deba ir, no se escucha nada.
2. 00:00:080 - hasta acá 00:06:513 - cambiaste los ritmos radicalmente, de notas en ticks azules, notas en 1/4 tales como en 00:00:080 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - pero de un salto cambiaste a patrones de 1/2. Osea si, está correcto tecnicamente pero siento que sería mucho mejor si solamente siguieses un patron en este caso ya sea el primero o a partir de 00:01:834 - Ahí tu verás que hacer.

1. This is Dax's style as I used to remember it Nada que decir al respecto

Cloudchaser wrote:

CON ESTA ROLA QUE DICEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE cuatro

General

1. UN DOS TRES CUATRO TI TI TI TI

Medio

1. 00:11:971 (2,1) - Se siente raro el flow acá ;_; En mi opinión siento que deberías mover el slider un poco más para la derecha para que sea más fácil la transición de estas uwu Fixed.
   00:14:310 (1,2) - ^same Fixed.

Duro

1. 00:00:080 (1) - No siento que esta nota deba ir, no se escucha nada. Removed. not really for keep consistency with the last diff
2. 00:00:080 - hasta acá 00:06:513 - cambiaste los ritmos radicalmente, de notas en ticks azules, notas en 1/4 tales como en 00:00:080 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - pero de un salto cambiaste a patrones de 1/2. Osea si, está correcto tecnicamente pero siento que sería mucho mejor si solamente siguieses un patron en este caso ya sea el primero o a partir de 00:01:834 - Ahí tu verás que hacer. Aquí siento que no hay problema, el cambio del primero es como la diff experto y lo sigue algo mas liviano, al ser el principio tampoco es una carga, de todas maneras, quedara en la linea, si es un problema notorio lo cambiaré a los patrones que siguen al primero, sino, nope.

Experto

1. This is Dax's style as I used to remember it Nada que decir al respecto hue

Fast mod is fast but this map is already 3gud5me you rekt m9

TOASTY

Cloudchaser wrote:

CON ESTA ROLA QUE DICEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE cuatro

General

1. UN DOS TRES CUATRO TI TI TI TI

Gero's Fácil

1. 00:31:855 (2) - Lo único que podría decirte en este caso es que alargues la colita de ese slider hasta el tick blanco, siento que ponerlo en el azul suena raro y adelantado. Considera cambiarlo uvu El slider esta siguiendo el sonido de fondo, es por eso que empieza en tick azul.
   
   En general está muy bien hecha la dificultad, simple pero es divertido por el simple hecho que los patrones no son iguales. Bonito mapa, para varias :333

TOASTY

WildOne94 wrote:

Hey There
From the Wild and Hyperion mod queue
Funny and cool map XD. Hard to find faults :3

General
This beatmap could use with some audio timing points mostly at the start because it's a bit loud. 50% from the start till 00:08:072 (1) - sounds good

Normal

Check AImod and fix the spacing issues wut

00:03:394 (1) - After this spinner is quite a big gap. And there is a bit of sound played too. My opinion would be to reduce the spinner back to 00:06:123 (1) - and add a reverse note at 00:06:513 - looking like this
The point is I can put a note after a spinner with 400 ms of distance. This is a normal, and this can be a problem for the BN.

Or this if you prefer



00:18:209 (3,1) - Nice pattern but it's not exactly on top of each other. Just align a bit to have it on perfect osu! changes his stack tools. but I moved it down, I really don't care about the DS in a normal diff Moved.

00:22:498 (2) - move this up to x:340 y:64 since the pattern look a bit goofy atm >w< hmm some guys says the contrary but I like this more. Moved.

Hard

00:15:870 (3) - I would NC here due to it being a 8 combo and most of your NC are 5,6 Fixed.

Also and addition to that^ I would have 00:15:870 (1,3) - both slightly curved in as it would blanket 00:16:260 (2) - nicer Changed.

00:17:430 (1) - Instead of 2 reverse it makes this hard a bit too easy. Remove one reverse and add a circle note to replace the last reverse in the centre somewhere. It will also be in the centre of the sliders going around it then like piggy in the middle :3 00:18:989 (1,2,3,4) - Changed Pattern.

00:22:888 (3,4,5) - instead of (4) I would remove this and make (3) a reverse. This way the new (4) will blanket into (3) if moved and also (3) will fit the music a bit more Nope for keep consistency

Insane

00:03:686 - Maybe add a circle note here? I can hear sound and it would fit quite well nope

00:12:751 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - imo I always think straight lines are bad flow and hard. I would try curve these notes around a bit just for better play nope

00:19:379 (2) - Not too essential but maybe ctrl + H this just so it has a slider on each side then when playing? Fixed all.

00:19:379 (2,3,4) - the timing points around these notes are not snapped Fixed.

00:20:159 (4,5,6,7) - Curve again nope

00:21:718 - instead of constant sliders on this part add a bit of variety. Might I suggest this here because there is a sound on each tick. (4,5,6)
sorry but un dos tres cuatro

00:23:278 (4) - ^ sorry but un dos tres cuatro

00:25:617 - Missing a drum sound here. I would put in a note here I followed naruto here.

00:26:397 (4) - ^ but vocals as well naruto :_c

Well I hope this helped You helped a lot, thanks so much for the mod!
Good luck :3/ Thanks /

ezek wrote:

Siguele bailando♫ Siguele bailando♪ ESO ESO ESO!!! Un dos tres cuatro!! Un dos tres cuatro!!

ezek & pkhg wrote:

Siguele bailando♫ Siguele bailando♪ ESO ESO ESO!!! Un dos tres cuatro!! Un dos tres cuatro!!

Loli Thing_ wrote:

best play ever

1. 00:00:567 (3) - spacing here can be kind of unexpected and you even ignored the sounds 00:00:275 (2,3,4) - is mapped to in the following combos
   so either i would ignore these sounds here was well for consistency or at least making the spacing less misleading
2. 00:12:361 (3) - judging by sounds this one would make perfectly for some kind of triplet or kickslider instead, changing this would also follow the logic of 00:12:751 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - a bit better imo
3. 00:17:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - compared to other patterns in the same section this is kind of completely overdone
   
   idk i only hear those

   
   the position of the timeline 00:18:307 - could also be a circle
   a similar rhythm to 00:04:953 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - would probably also fit nicely here,
   i just don't think all of that stream is there... at all.
4. 00:23:278 (4,2) - not a must but it would be cool if you could avoid these overlapping without breaking symmetry... something like this is what i'd have in mind
5. 00:25:227 - to 00:29:126 - are kind of forced rhythms which also ignore the main thing you've been following from 00:20:549 - to 00:25:227 -
   and i think doublets are kinda annoying in standard xD most annoying about this is that you ignore 00:25:617 - 00:26:397 - which are basically some of the strongest vocals in this short song but leave unmapped for the sake of having doublets also the way this chain of patterns is arranged makes for only small movement while i think it would fit better to have more movement over here
6. 00:29:906 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is overdone similarly to the first stream of it's kind

1. 00:00:275 (2,3) - basically same reasoning as Experto you don't do it the other time plus in this diff the 3/4 break between 00:00:567 (3,1) - is very hard to read since you don't really stick to consistent spacing but to patterns throughout the diff - which in itself is fine but can lead to confusion in cases like this
2. 00:01:639 (3) - i would also avoid putting this and just make it plain 1/2 the 3x repeat can be confusing for hard players imo
3. 00:04:758 (5,1) - i think you should add some movement between these 2 objects, playing them felt weird due to the fact that nearly all new combo things are more spaced from the previous note for most of the song but it''s more like 00:03:783 (2,4,5,1) - the combination of these patterns is hard to read and unstacking would help making it less confusing imo
4. 00:27:177 (2) - 00:31:076 (4) - could be 2 circles to fit the logic of 00:21:718 (4,5) - 00:23:278 (4,5) - 00:24:837 (4,5) - i would really recommend it for the 2nd link in this thing
5. 00:20:159 - why does this have a whistle

1. 00:11:191 (1,2) - these is kind of weird because the repeat slider follows the 3/4 bg noise while the 1/1 slider follows regular instruments, which makes for weird polarity just following one instrument would be easier to comprehendo imo
2. 00:14:310 (1) - this is kind of imaginary and would be better off like this
3. 00:15:870 (1,2,3) - this one could be a bit more interesting if you made 00:16:260 (2) - an 1/2 slider to follow the drums
4. i like the idea of having most of the kiai as circles, it makes for some difference for a beginner while being not too hard to do which is nice if only 00:18:989 (1) - and 00:20:939 (2) - wouldn't overlap though lakdfjlakjfd

1. while i don't speak the language i could think this is the equivalent of Gero's Facil right??
2. 00:23:668 (1,2) - one of the few things i think should be changed, most of the diff and especially the kiai follows vocals with sliders and these 2 sliders follow... something but not the even more dominant vocal, i'd recommend to change that to either a mix of 2/1 and 1/1 sliders or just full 1/1 sliders
3. 00:29:906 (1,2) - while it follows the song correctly it is also kind of hard to read , making this a 3/1 slider and a 2/1 slider for simplicity would avoid that issue completely while still following the song the blue tick rhythm just feels weird :V

Okoratu wrote:

why is your hitsound a mp3;;;.asdfjklheadsfjklh .wav pls alk;fjd easter ball egg
[general]
give me your metadata source
B)
Here is your sauce: https://youtu.be/yrQgCz_Hr2U
Here is your sonidito: https://youtu.be/x47NYUbtYb0
Here is your naruto bomb: https://youtu.be/gyQ9UHPwW4g
So if you see, Hechizeros Band - El Sonidito + Naruto - Artificial intelligence bomb = El Bombito!

[Experto]

1. 00:00:567 (3) - spacing here can be kind of unexpected and you even ignored the sounds 00:00:275 (2,3,4) - is mapped to in the following combos
   so either i would ignore these sounds here was well for consistency or at least making the spacing less misleading Is just the Begin, It was mapped like that for force naruto's rythm, if you see , the next patterns is about the tipically drum of 1/4 and it was maked like that bcz the reasons (Yeah, I don't know how to explain myself but I want to keep this pattern like that)
2. 00:12:361 (3) - judging by sounds this one would make perfectly for some kind of triplet or kickslider instead, changing this would also follow the logic of 00:12:751 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - a bit better imo Changed. (With (2) too)
3. 00:17:430 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - compared to other patterns in the same section this is kind of completely overdone Changed entire pattern, please take a look.
   
   idk i only hear those

   
   the position of the timeline 00:18:307 - could also be a circle
   a similar rhythm to 00:04:953 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - would probably also fit nicely here,
   i just don't think all of that stream is there... at all.
4. 00:23:278 (4,2) - not a must but it would be cool if you could avoid these overlapping without breaking symmetry... something like this is what i'd have in mind Changed. (Now is also a bit more harder)
5. 00:25:227 - to 00:29:126 - are kind of forced rhythms which also ignore the main thing you've been following from 00:20:549 - to 00:25:227 -
   and i think doublets are kinda annoying in standard xD most annoying about this is that you ignore 00:25:617 - 00:26:397 - which are basically some of the strongest vocals in this short song but leave unmapped for the sake of having doublets also the way this chain of patterns is arranged makes for only small movement while i think it would fit better to have more movement over here I can't make easy stuff in an Expert diff, also, the rythm is fine imo, This isn't a big problem for the experimented players, also, a ''retry'' make the map more interesting.
6. 00:29:906 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is overdone similarly to the first stream of it's kind Sorry. I can change the first stream but I can't change this moustache stream.

the rest is pretty cool i would avoid overmapping for the sake of whatever in a 30 second song though <3

[Duro]

1. 00:00:275 (2,3) - basically same reasoning as Experto you don't do it the other time plus in this diff the 3/4 break between 00:00:567 (3,1) - is very hard to read since you don't really stick to consistent spacing but to patterns throughout the diff - which in itself is fine but can lead to confusion in cases like this Is just he beginnnn :c (Is not hard at all, just 3 objects)
2. 00:01:639 (3) - i would also avoid putting this and just make it plain 1/2 the 3x repeat can be confusing for hard players imo Well, You will need more than 1 play to pass hard diff o3o
3. 00:04:758 (5,1) - i think you should add some movement between these 2 objects, playing them felt weird due to the fact that nearly all new combo things are more spaced from the previous note for most of the song but it''s more like 00:03:783 (2,4,5,1) - the combination of these patterns is hard to read and unstacking would help making it less confusing imo With the combo colour is enought, almost, in this diff and up.
4. 00:27:177 (2) - 00:31:076 (4) - could be 2 circles to fit the logic of 00:21:718 (4,5) - 00:23:278 (4,5) - 00:24:837 (4,5) - i would really recommend it for the 2nd link in this thing Fixed.
5. 00:20:159 - why does this have a whistle the frogs.

[Medio]

• 
  No changes here :'(

to confirm
metadata yup
changes yup
rankability of whatever language is spoken in mexico diffnames yup (already my mom says it's ok) okno, It's okay xD

anyways idk depending on what you do with these suggestions call me back or search for someone else

Okoratu wrote:

[Oni]
00:01:639 (8,9,10) - i couldn't help but notice that you mapped the 1/6 in 00:31:466 (196,197,198,199) - but ignored it here, idk how much taco people care about this level of consistency but it'd make more sense to me if you mapped both 1/6 <<< Is possible ...
00:14:895 (86) - plays better as a k to me o.o <<< follow high sound and is a bit down in this note...
00:18:989 (112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126) - as i said to the std diffs the stream this is mapped to is not that much in the music but more like a series of triplets or some stuff like that oO
idk how this is in taiko since i'm by no means an expert bot deleting 00:19:087 - and 00:19:477 - could end up playing better as a k ddk ddkkddkkd pattern <<< O.O !!! .... orz

[Muzu]
00:21:718 (86,87) - this doublet is kinda random considering you didn't do doublets in 00:23:180 (93) - 00:24:837 (99) - etc, i'd either do more doublets or get rid of this one doublet <<< Is kiai time and have same doublet almost until finish...

ezek wrote:

El BG se mira mejor asi en mi opinion:

BG

Tu decides si usarlo o no..

Okoratu wrote:

[Facil de Gero]

1. while i don't speak the language i could think this is the equivalent of Gero's Facil right?? Yeah, you're right "Gero's Facil" is equivalent as "Gero's Easy" but you know, spanglish combination doesn't works well in my opinion also in case that you wanted to know what "Facil" means.
2. 00:23:668 (1,2) - one of the few things i think should be changed, most of the diff and especially the kiai follows vocals with sliders and these 2 sliders follow... something but not the even more dominant vocal, i'd recommend to change that to either a mix of 2/1 and 1/1 sliders or just full 1/1 sliders Sure thing, fixed.
3. 00:29:906 (1,2) - while it follows the song correctly it is also kind of hard to read , making this a 3/1 slider and a 2/1 slider for simplicity would avoid that issue completely while still following the song the blue tick rhythm just feels weird :V Well It has enough time after the previous one slider so I think it's fine also spacing is consistent so I see no reason to change it, sorry.

osu file format v14

[General]
AudioFilename: El Bombito.mp3
AudioLeadIn: 1500
PreviewTime: 8072
Countdown: 0
SampleSet: Normal
StackLeniency: 0.7
Mode: 0
LetterboxInBreaks: 0
WidescreenStoryboard: 1

[Editor]
DistanceSpacing: 1
BeatDivisor: 4
GridSize: 4
TimelineZoom: 1.8

[Metadata]
Title:El Bombito
TitleUnicode:El Bombito
Artist:MowtenDoo
ArtistUnicode:MowtenDoo
Creator:DaxMasterix
Version:Facil de Gero
Source:
Tags:hechizeros band sonidito xtrem3x naruto artifical intelligence bomb famicom Gero
BeatmapID:694814
BeatmapSetID:239262

[Difficulty]
HPDrainRate:2
CircleSize:3
OverallDifficulty:2
ApproachRate:3
SliderMultiplier:1
SliderTickRate:1

[Events]
//Background and Video events
0,0,"HALLO.jpg",0,0
Video,0,"VivaMexicoCabrones.avi"
//Break Periods
//Storyboard Layer 0 (Background)
//Storyboard Layer 1 (Fail)
//Storyboard Layer 2 (Pass)
//Storyboard Layer 3 (Foreground)
//Storyboard Sound Samples

[TimingPoints]
275,389.888881668724,4,1,0,80,1,0
20549,-100,4,1,0,80,0,1
31271,-100,4,1,1,80,0,0


[Colours]
Combo1 : 242,24,57
Combo2 : 0,128,64
Combo3 : 255,255,255

[HitObjects]
436,112,275,6,0,B|436:196|348:196|348:284,1,200,4|4,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:
392,376,1444,1,4,0:3:0:0:
436,284,1834,2,0,B|436:196|348:196|348:111,1,200,4|4,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:
163,111,3394,6,0,B|164:196|76:196|76:284,1,200,4|4,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:
120,376,4563,1,4,0:3:0:0:
163,284,4953,2,0,B|163:196|75:196|76:112,1,200,4|4,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:
120,16,6123,5,2,0:3:0:0:
208,152,6708,2,0,B|236:160|256:190|256:190|276:160|304:152,2,125,2|2|2,0:3|0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:
256,64,8072,5,4,0:0:0:0:
304,152,8462,2,0,B|304:227|304:227|304:301|352:337,1,200,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
256,372,9632,1,2,0:2:0:0:
159,337,10022,2,0,B|208:301|208:227|208:227|208:152,1,200,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
188,56,11191,2,0,B|232:56|256:31|256:31|280:56|324:56,2,150,2|2|8,0:2|0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
100,104,12751,6,0,P|87:55|99:7,1,100,2|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
188,56,13531,2,0,P|200:104|188:152,1,100,2|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
100,200,14310,6,0,P|192:166|284:200,1,200,2|2,0:2|0:2,0:0:0:0:
372,248,15480,1,8,0:0:0:0:
460,200,15870,2,0,B|456:156|476:128|476:128|456:100|460:56,2,150,2|2|8,0:2|0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
372,248,17430,6,0,P|324:260|276:248,1,100,2|8,0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
200,312,18209,2,0,P|152:300|104:312,1,100,2|8,0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
24,372,18989,6,0,L|112:192,1,200,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
44,116,20159,1,10,0:0:0:0:
114,45,20549,6,0,B|152:100|220:100|220:100|296:100,1,200,4|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
366,29,21718,1,8,0:0:0:0:
436,100,22108,2,0,B|422:148|422:148|436:196,1,100,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
365,265,22888,2,0,B|379:313|379:313|365:361,1,100,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
276,312,23668,6,0,L|428:312,2,150,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
175,312,25227,2,0,B|127:312|127:312|87:352,1,100,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
19,277,26007,2,0,L|90:206,1,100,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
164,140,26787,6,0,P|255:173|347:140,1,200,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
420,68,27957,1,8,0:0:0:0:
324,36,28346,2,0,B|288:60|256:66|256:66|224:60|188:36,2,150,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
420,68,29906,6,0,P|256:165|92:68,1,400,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
220,48,31953,2,0,B|256:59|256:59|292:48,1,75,2|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

DaxMasterix wrote:

Thanks so much kokororatu 4 the bubble! xtrem3x, Gero and pkhg for the post! also, thanks to the gringo called ezek for the BG!
now.. "Don't worry guys, I got this''

ezek wrote:

whoa! the time lapse between the bubble and the heart was very short!
gratz!

Deif wrote:

Duro o3o

Deif wrote:

Duro o3o