1. Hard (2.44 stars, 516 notes)
2. Insane (3.45 stars, 648 notes)
3. Normal (1.77 stars, 267 notes)

Blade12629 wrote:

SPOILER

Hi, from #modrequest
This is my second mod.

Easy:

01:17:372 (5) - The circle should be a little bit higher, it is hard for a newbie to be that fast.
01:01:582 (2) - ^
02:01:582 (1) - a little bit closer to the end of 02:00:003 (3) -
02:14:214 (1) - ^ to the end of 02:11:846 (6) -
02:33:161 (5) - ^ to the end of 02:31:582 (4) -
02:52:109 (6) - a little bit to the right
02:58:424 (5) - a little bit closer to the end of 02:56:846 (4) -
03:05:135 (6) - turn the slider a bit up
03:26:846 (1) - a little bit to the right
03:36:319 (6) - a little bit closer to the end of 03:34:740 (5) -
03:48:951 (6) - closer to 03:49:346 (7) -
04:07:898 (5) - a little bit closer to the end of 04:05:530 (4) -
04:14:214 (5) - a litle bit closer to the end of 04:11:846 (4) -
Everything else seems fine to me

Normal difficulty seems to be okay.

Greetings,
Blade12629

1. 00:24:477 (9) - 没stack好还是故意的？如果没有连续的错位stack梗的话建议还是stack好
2. 00:30:596 (7,8,1) - ^
3. 00:40:267 (8) - 其实为什么不stack在00:39:477 (6) - 上，这个位置刚好和00:41:056 (1) - 的尾巴形成一个blanket
   
4. 00:48:951 (1) - 我觉得头朝下做斜度可能会比较好，看起来比较舒服
   
5. 01:04:346 (5) - 建议NC
6. 01:09:477 (1,2) - ^，最好换一下NC的位置
7. 01:32:767 (4) - ^，噫后面不说了...NC的主要原因除了indication以外，美观度也是一方面，你考虑一下？
8. 02:09:477 (1,2,3,4) - 做个等边呗？
9. 02:23:688 (1) - 用和之前的4一样的shape吧，这样看上去怪怪的
10. 02:47:372 (1,2,3) - 这个spacing....1-2和2-3差距几乎一样但是节奏却差了一倍，之前如果大量使用这种梗倒还好说，突然来一下有点接受不能，非常杀初见。
11. 03:18:951 (1) - 尾巴叠个soft-fin试试？
12. 不知道怎么说……觉得你的图挺有意思的，不是很遵守现在的主流flow，倒不如说这种看起来比较随意的摆设和形状给我眼前一亮的感觉。不过下次可以在做别的图的时候试试再从无序中找一下有序。就我现在看来这个图还是稍微有一点松散，不是特别紧凑。这个比较难啦就当一点方向性的意见好了:3，加油嗯~

Megurine Luka wrote:

SPOILER

Hello as requested.

因为我最近比较忙所以只看最高难度了，希望可以谅解。考虑到你也不是新mapper了，所以我想E和N应该也没什么特别需要说的？


[Hard]

1. 00:24:477 (9) - 没stack好还是故意的？如果没有连续的错位stack梗的话建议还是stack好 新版本的毛病，懒得关错位了
2. 00:30:596 (7,8,1) - ^
3. 00:40:267 (8) - 其实为什么不stack在00:39:477 (6) - 上，这个位置刚好和00:41:056 (1) - 的尾巴形成一个blanket 改了
   
4. 00:48:951 (1) - 我觉得头朝下做斜度可能会比较好，看起来比较舒服 √
   
5. 01:04:346 (5) - 建议NC 其实差不多，dt起来根本看不见，暂时白线
6. 01:09:477 (1,2) - ^，最好换一下NC的位置
7. 01:32:767 (4) - ^，噫后面不说了...NC的主要原因除了indication以外，美观度也是一方面，你考虑一下？
8. 02:09:477 (1,2,3,4) - 做个等边呗？ done
9. 02:23:688 (1) - 用和之前的4一样的shape吧，这样看上去怪怪的 √
10. 02:47:372 (1,2,3) - 这个spacing....1-2和2-3差距几乎一样但是节奏却差了一倍，之前如果大量使用这种梗倒还好说，突然来一下有点接受不能，非常杀初见。 换了下三边
11. 03:18:951 (1) - 尾巴叠个soft-fin试试？√
12. 不知道怎么说……觉得你的图挺有意思的，不是很遵守现在的主流flow，倒不如说这种看起来比较随意的摆设和形状给我眼前一亮的感觉。不过下次可以在做别的图的时候试试再从无序中找一下有序。就我现在看来这个图还是稍微有一点松散，不是特别紧凑。这个比较难啦就当一点方向性的意见好了:3，加油嗯~

Narcissu wrote:

SPOILER

BPM ：76

可以參考 http://tieba.baidu.com/p/3649743100

然而我認為沒人會在意這個 哭了，改了之后感觉好高端啊，全是跨蓝线

說實話音效比較離譜，也許對於大部分戰五渣，比如臭了來說看上去會很厲害很帥氣。我相信換成正確的BPM后，你的經驗會告訴你就一些藍線音效是相當奇怪的。 感觉上改起来比做着还费劲

額，對於這種東方佛教風格的音樂，音效建議儘量維持穩定和統一。活潑多變的做法只適合輕快可愛的歌曲，也就是你所有的奇數小節都應該完全一樣……當然我只是敘述正常的做法，這隻是個建議 其实我并不是很懂，还是乱着吧

BG 好看 √

good luck ><

1. 长白线位置不对，正确的offset应该在现在的第二根白线处，也就是3

1. 排列懒说了，反正rankable就行

1. cs5 老图风比较dio
2. 00:32:372 (3) - 这种blanket.....
3. 00:53:490 - 不建议空着
4. 02:18:951 (1,2,3,4,5) - 不建议，flow不好而且遮挡
5. 后面的音效有些吵了，降一下音量

[Teichan] wrote:

SPOILER

吃不到花生傷心嗎

[General]

1. 长白线位置不对，正确的offset应该在现在的第二根白线处，也就是3

done

[Easy & Normal]

1. 排列懒说了，反正rankable就行

[Hard]

1. cs5 老图风比较dio
2. 00:32:372 (3) - 这种blanket.....
3. 00:53:490 - 不建议空着
4. 02:18:951 (1,2,3,4,5) - 不建议，flow不好而且遮挡
5. 后面的音效有些吵了，降一下音量

这个flow和我完全不是一个世界的，总之good luck

liangv587 wrote:

SPOILER

略dio
风格依然奔放
kiai的hit声太闷了
整体音效太响亮了，要减去或者替换一些，这是个大问题
红线重音错位了2拍，调到这里00:22:108 - 已改
[Easy]
00:43:424 (3,1,1) - 这三挤在一起真的不好，要改的话前后牵扯比较大，这里就不贴图了
00:51:319 (1) - 换成圈，缓一缓节奏
00:57:635 (4) - 同理
01:06:319 (1) - 均匀点http://puu.sh/h8AiM.jpg
02:11:846 (6) - 不要这样http://puu.sh/h8AwP.jpg
03:28:030 (3,1) - 最好错开http://puu.sh/h8APa.jpg
03:46:188 (3,5) - 干，老师喜欢闷声作大死 怕什么
03:59:214 (3,5) - ar低的情况下不能这样 隔了一个

[Normal]
01:22:503 (1,2) - ds，这种叠滑条尾巴个人在新手时期很不喜欢
01:29:214 (2,3) -
01:37:109 (2,3) -
01:59:214 (5,6) -
02:25:661 (1,2) -
02:28:819 (1,2) -
02:58:030 (4,1) -
03:05:924 (4,1) -
03:17:372 (1,2) -
03:56:846 (1,2) -
02:53:688 (1) - 向上移，错开，低难度搞毛激霸 怕啥
03:04:148 (3) - 尾巴向下

tm1209 wrote:

真没办法写出点什么东西

这种神曲就应该让神马坡来摸比如osuplayer587

tutuhaha wrote:

SPOILER

哎呦这图你做的啊，前几天翻pending的时候看到的
不得不说BG很符合我的口味啊！我怎么觉得我做这图就是为了衬托BG orz
萨顶顶的这歌应该放梵文的，中文的没那个调调........
这BPM应该x2啊...然后把SV调成1.5 水仙有理有据的说服了我

[Insane]
00:35:924 (4,5,6) - 能把这个搞好看点儿不 √
00:42:635 (6,7) - 节奏上我觉得应该是这俩重叠 √
01:04:346 (5,6) - 这个没必要和前面覆盖，搞和前面比小一点的间距会比较好 错位
01:05:530 (3) - ctrl+g √
01:09:872 (2,3,4) - 间距搞小和上上的建议一样
01:23:293 (4,5) - ^
01:32:767 (4,5) - ^
01:35:924 (4,5) - ctrl+g ^ √
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3001401
大概效果就是这样
01:55:957 (x) - 这里有个1/8的音 真顾不上
02:09:872 (3,4) - ..这间距太有迷惑性了√
02:52:898 (3) - ctrl+g √
03:00:596 (2,3) - ctrl+g，然后把03:01:188 (4,5,1) - 框起来拉到x352 y256 √
03:04:346 (4) - 拉下来点碰到hp条了 √
音效有些地方太重了...........给我感觉不太好....音效部分可能需要调整 √√

[Hard]
02:39:477 (1,2,3,4) - 这块我觉得不必要减速啦 √
音效需要点大修改...........确实音效方面如果统一的话会比较好，没必要搞这么多变化，我是这么觉得了啦
加油
哦还有
真的推荐梵文版........大白话版真是..
source的话可以把专辑填上? 不能填专辑orz

Hollow Wings wrote:

SPOILER

m4m

General

1. 加一堆tag，嗯。metadata自己查吧，虽然我肯定还是要再查一遍的。
2. 所有sliderslide的音效要么弄成静音，要么弄成100ms以上的文件，必须改。

Insane

1. 00:41:056 (1) - 这边头上难道不应该是normal的finish么，看你前面都那么下的。
2. 01:11:056 (1,2,3) - 全都各自反向比较合曲的样子。
3. 01:12:635 (1) - 这边开始这个hitnormal不好听，建议换个。
4. 02:09:674 (2,3) - 换一下，因为02:09:872 (3,4) - 的ds相近，做个逆flow比较好。
5. 02:14:214 (5) - ctrl+g，理由同上。
6. 02:31:188 (4) - 这个ctrl+g比较顺手，也合曲。
7. 02:47:372 (1,2) - 这边ds变化梗，nc要么换下。
8. 老实说不错，给个星。

Hard

1. good.

Normal

1. 00:48:951 (1,2,1) - 从这边开始nc怎么回事，不像只跟vocal但也不完全在跟vocal的样子，这个部分nc一起全都重新搞过。

不得不说你这style非常合我口味，就是音效还可以挖掘一下，主要是素材方面，别的都很好。

然后你摸图太水了点，不能这么水，这是态度问题，下次再被我撞到小心被我拉黑。

这图球到泡了可以找我点心。

Sieg wrote:

SPOILER

hello

metadata:
Romanised Artist: "Sa Dingding" - according to http://puu.sh/hNTGf/5810e6b7a2.jpg and http://puu.sh/hNTKH/dd5a7f2583.jpg
Romanised Title: "Alive (Chinese Version)" - according to official CD http://puu.sh/hNTMZ/5399392ccf.jpg because artist actually translated title
^you may clarify this from QAT or someone who's experienced in Chinese metadata, actually I'll really appreciate if you'll ask

add some tags, maybe "folk", "pop", "traditional"

general:
move offset to 22109
replace drum-sliderslide.wav with proper blank file http://up.ppy.sh/files/blank.wav √
^same for normal-sliderslide
^same for soft-sliderslide
difficulty gap between Normal and Hard is way too big atm, you should
1. reduce rhythm density on hard
2. increase rhythm density on normal √
3. or map new diff in between

Normal
00:33:951 (2) - you may split this into 1\2 slider + circle to emphasize strong beat on 00:34:740 () - and allow player to actually play it
00:37:109 (3) - ^ \\ 00:40:267 (3) - ^ \\ 03:08:688 (3) - ^ √
02:11:846 (6) - move this up a bit so that 6 will not overlap this 02:10:267 (4) - http://puu.sh/hNUZC/0aec9c1c6c.jpg √
03:28:030 (3,1) - this overlap is not acceptable for normal level √
03:59:214 (3,5) - don't overlap circle under slider due to low AR this will be confusing for a newbie players √

Hard
00:28:424 (1,2) - huh, this a bit confusing placement, would be great if you rearrange this pattern and move slider end from the circle
considering the distance and flow, so want Keep this way
01:22:503 (1,2) - this kind of overlaps is not clear to follow also for the better spread you should avoid them, this applies to all such patterns 01:29:214 (2,3) - etc etc
04:07:109 (2) - unadiable, you forgot soft finish I guess √

Insane
02:47:372 (1,3) - avoid to place slider start under slider body √

you may call me for a recheck after resolving general issues

1. Stack Leniency 5 would work look slighly better that 3, if you ask me. Somehow I see it as a better match for the music.

1. Try AR 4,5. It'll balance the diff spread better and match with your SV choice perfectly.
2. 00:45:793 (1,1) - I wouldn't say that it is readable enough for the easiest diff. Try to avoid this overlap and use something like this. So, newbies won't hit (1)'s tail by mistake.
3. 00:51:319 (2,3) - minor - you can make a blanket here, if you want.
   Note: there are some more sliders like these, so if you want to have some neat blankets, look through the diff again!
4. 01:16:977 (2,4) - minor - this overlap is visible and might see a little untidy. You might want to avoid it.
5. 01:20:924 (3,4) - minor - little spacing inconsistency here, please, keep it closer to x1,0.
6. 02:34:346 (9,1) - 03:50:135 (9,1) - and 02:53:293 (9,1) - I would probably move ew combo from (1) to (9). As the stronger sound appears at 02:34:740.
   Note: be sure to check it, before applying this. If you're following the vocals, this suggestion might be unnecessary.
7. 03:01:188 (2,3,4) - this placement might feel too tricky for beginners. Can you make it a little more understandable? rough example
   Note: this might require a lot of additional changes in following patterns, so, be careful
8. 03:26:846 (1) - is this new combo needed here? I don't think so, the previous one is way too short and the music isn't asking for any new combos, I believe.
9. 03:28:030 (3,1) - I like the idea but the overlap itself might trouble some newbies. Try to avoid this overlap, if possible.
   Note: 03:46:188 (3,5) - similar with the thing above.
   
   I like how this difficulty works with the song. Most of the suggestion are minor improvements for better visual experience.

1. I suggest higher AR (6,5 - 7) and HP Drain 5. Somehow it feels like a better idea for a low-BPM Hard.
2. 03:09:872 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - minor - osu automatically unstack objects, and it makes the overlaps here seem rather messy. Mind using a little higher DS to polish this pattern?
3. 03:40:267 (1) - whoops, looks like this new combo wasn't supposed to be here. It really does feel weird with the rest of your new combos. :c
4. 03:56:846 (1,2) - unstack them a little more, please. So, that (2)'s head is more readable while playing.
   
   Apart from the things above it feels nice.

1. 00:28:030 (9) - try to Ctrl+G this slider, it will fit better and help you to stress the strong beats at 00:27:635 - and 00:28:030
2. 01:03:556 (2,3,4,5,6) - interesting pattern, I like it! ♥
3. 01:18:951 (1) - minor - the curve in the end feels forced and unnatural. Can you simplify the shape and make it correspond more with the song?
   Note: 03:26:846 (1,2) and 04:11:056 (1,2) - same happens here. That sudden curve + stack combination feels really confusing to me.
4. 03:10:266 - are you sure about ignoring the drum here? it is really strong and leaving this place empty makes me feel uncofortable. :c
   
   Nice job there!

-Bakari- wrote:

Chinese sounds mysterious <3

Anyways, as promised.

[General]

1. Stack Leniency 5 would work look slighly better that 3, if you ask me. Somehow I see it as a better match for the music.

√

[Normal]

1. Try AR 4,5. It'll balance the diff spread better and match with your SV choice perfectly. √
2. 00:45:793 (1,1) - I wouldn't say that it is readable enough for the easiest diff. Try to avoid this overlap and use something like this. So, newbies won't hit (1)'s tail by mistake. √
3. 00:51:319 (2,3) - minor - you can make a blanket here, if you want.
   Note: there are some more sliders like these, so if you want to have some neat blankets, look through the diff again!
   √ revised with the previous advise
4. 01:16:977 (2,4) - minor - this overlap is visible and might see a little untidy. You might want to avoid it. √
5. 01:20:924 (3,4) - minor - little spacing inconsistency here, please, keep it closer to x1,0. √
6. 02:34:346 (9,1) - 03:50:135 (9,1) - and 02:53:293 (9,1) - I would probably move ew combo from (1) to (9). As the stronger sound appears at 02:34:740. √
   Note: be sure to check it, before applying this. If you're following the vocals, this suggestion might be unnecessary.
   some revise about this
7. 03:01:188 (2,3,4) - this placement might feel too tricky for beginners. Can you make it a little more understandable? rough example √
   Note: this might require a lot of additional changes in following patterns, so, be careful
8. 03:26:846 (1) - is this new combo needed here? I don't think so, the previous one is way too short and the music isn't asking for any new combos, I believe. √
9. 03:28:030 (3,1) - I like the idea but the overlap itself might trouble some newbies. Try to avoid this overlap, if possible. √
   Note: 03:46:188 (3,5) - similar with the thing above. √
   
   I like how this difficulty works with the song. Most of the suggestion are minor improvements for better visual experience.

[Hard]

1. I suggest higher AR (6,5 - 7) and HP Drain 5. Somehow it feels like a better idea for a low-BPM Hard. √
2. 03:09:872 (2,3,4,5,1,2) - minor - osu automatically unstack objects, and it makes the overlaps here seem rather messy. Mind using a little higher DS to polish this pattern? √
3. 03:40:267 (1) - whoops, looks like this new combo wasn't supposed to be here. It really does feel weird with the rest of your new combos. :c Orz
4. 03:56:846 (1,2) - unstack them a little more, please. So, that (2)'s head is more readable while playing.
   √
   Apart from the things above it feels nice.

[Insane]

1. 00:28:030 (9) - try to Ctrl+G this slider, it will fit better and help you to stress the strong beats at 00:27:635 - and 00:28:030 √
2. 01:03:556 (2,3,4,5,6) - interesting pattern, I like it! ♥
3. 01:18:951 (1) - minor - the curve in the end feels forced and unnatural. Can you simplify the shape and make it correspond more with the song? √some revise, make it following the vocal
   Note: 03:26:846 (1,2) and 04:11:056 (1,2) - same happens here. That sudden curve + stack combination feels really confusing to me. √
4. 03:10:266 - are you sure about ignoring the drum here? it is really strong and leaving this place empty makes me feel uncofortable. :c
   because want following the zither Orz, so keep
   Nice job there!

Find me when you're ready!

Sieg wrote:

great

-Bakari- wrote:

After a quick re-check everythink looks fresh and ready.

Qualified!