RIP in peace

Die in death.

I would requalify but it'd probably get unranked again because of bullshit "issues" and muh BN score couldn't take it Kappa :^(

rip

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Die in death.

I would requalify but it'd probably get unranked again because of bullshit "issues" and muh BN score couldn't take it Kappa :^(

i always knew BAT/BN/QAT system sucks..

who doesn't

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Die in death.

I would requalify but it'd probably get unranked again because of bullshit "issues" and muh BN score couldn't take it Kappa :^(

"muh BN score couldn't take it"

Stop using your ego as a BN as an excuse to not requalify and to make sure the map is ready for rank.

lol

just lol

Ritzeh wrote:

Static Noise Bird wrote:

Die in death.

I would requalify but it'd probably get unranked again because of bullshit "issues" and muh BN score couldn't take it Kappa :^(

"muh BN score couldn't take it"

Stop using your ego as a BN as an excuse to not requalify and to make sure the map is ready for rank.

I mean I'd hate to lose my position because of unnecessary unranks like this one, but apparently it's so difficult for you to understand that the "you can't fuck up, whether it's up to you or up to others"-system works like every other system, for example in real life. It's a shame, but when you have to choose between two options - probably fucking up again on the old task because of the other "co-workers" are still there or moving on to tasks where the risk is smaller in case other co-workers are assigned to do that task with (or in this case after) you - I'd rather choose the one which less likely gets me fired.

I'm not here to start fights, I'm just here to apparently point out the most obvious.

ranking system is p much fucked up nowadays and im sure snb has a valid reasoning behind it (or at least he knows what to do). im not a bn for myself and i had no idea about how things work anyway so i'll just leave it to him

it's easiest to bring all BNs and QATs under one's control.

have you tried that inv?

Checked easy and kyversible_insane and I'll say it's ready to go.

Fuck you Ritzeh fucking dickhole.

Lizzy wrote:

it's easiest to bring all BNs and QATs under one's control.

have you tried that inv?

Pretty sure it's up to the orange named people, and they don't want BNs in "the team" as far as I know. I mean sure that'd be more efficient, but when the hell has Loctav ever made sense anyway?

Then it should be good to go~

EDIT : poke me later in the day I'll be able to rank. fuck the limit

thank you

THANK

bahamete wrote:

please don't unqual

Alright ranked!

thank you™

nice™

nice™

nice™

dANK™

dANK™

Wow, these 1/6 jumps like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3043059 look pretty hard.

Kyubey wrote:

Wow, these 1/6 jumps like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3043059 look pretty hard.

that pattern though, pretty sick.

♥awww regratz.

You'd probably need wendao instead of wendao2000 in tags o3o You can summon QATs to do that for you if it's necessary

Congratz inv lel

but I'd prefer wendao2000 instead of wendao

sorry

no disqualifyerino plzerino
etc because dubstep

After internal discussion, we decided to disqualify this mapset over the following concerns.

[apoplexy_]

All of the issues below apply to the first part of the collab, mapped by inverness.

Some of the rhythms need improvement in terms of circle-slider composition, as they don't reflect the song's rhythm well. For example, 00:51:449 (1,2,3,4) - would make more sense like this: http://puu.sh/hrEG1/491fbcdb6c.jpg as the two beats emphasized by the song here, 00:51:878 and 00:52:163 -, would both be clickable then. It will make the pattern play more intuitively.
Other examples:
00:53:163 (1,2,3,4) -
00:58:306 (1,2,3,4) -
01:05:163 (1,2,3,4) -

01:20:306 (3,4,1) - While these kind of 1/4 jumps are generally a nice and challenging gimmick, some of them happen to not play very smoothly due to weird transitions, which makes them unpleasant to play. Examples would be:
01:28:020 (3,4,1) -
01:21:163 (3,4,1) -

[Normal]

Be careful with short multiple-repeat sliders. As they are very short, players of this level are not able to read when the slider will end. Therefore, the patterns involving them need to have simple, easily readable placement, that doesn't involve going back over the slidertrack, stacking or anything similar. Examples:
01:21:735 (5,1) -
02:43:735 (6,1) -

Additionally, there are some tiny spacing errors in this difficulty, sometimes caused by stacking, that make objects touch each other slightly although they are not supposed to, which should be fixed to avoid confusion and to make the map more polished. Examples:
00:53:163 (1,2) -
01:30:878 (4,5) -

Sorry that it took so long. We wish you the best of luck with your mapset!

[kyversible-insane_]
02:10:306 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - That sound is a constant 4/6, not 3/4 3/4 2/4, so all these objects need to be snapped to a purple line in 1/6 (or 1/3).

Desperate-kun wrote:

01:20:306 (3,4,1) - While these kind of 1/4 jumps are generally a nice and challenging gimmick, some of them happen to not play very smoothly due to weird transitions, which makes them unpleasant to play. Examples would be:
01:28:020 (3,4,1) -
01:21:163 (3,4,1) -

Just for clarification/agreement on this, would be better placed as such (basically stacking the single notes on the start of the next slider):
01:20:306 (3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/hrLJ7/c085222fa4.png
01:21:163 (3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/hrLNC/3116c5453c.png
01:28:020 (3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/hrLVE/972b04b98b.png
and the missed one 01:27:163 (3,4,1) - http://puu.sh/hrLZM/1b151921a5.png

There are other ones later on but this should just explain it easier.

Yoeri wrote:

[kyversible-insane_]
02:10:306 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - That sound is a constant 4/6, not 3/4 3/4 2/4, so all these objects need to be snapped to a purple line in 1/6 (or 1/3).

Nope, the current rhythm is correct.

*drumroll*

And the award for the most subjective unrank goes tooooo

This song seems very hard to map. Congrats on getting ranked twice but I think it's kinda the song's fault for being so complex and unorthodox.

honestly i had no idea how far had the ranking or qualifying system had become and how things work so i'll just let it flow i guess


waiting for wendao to look over his parts
oh and some patterns on normal somehow lost a bit of the hitsounds, i'll handle that

bu,per: yeah the wubs are snapped onto 1/4 like desperate kun said

BNs can't make up their minds of when to qualify a map?

because they're to "cool"

@inverness

Sorry, yes ofc they are snapped to 1/6, not to 1/4 (the ones mentioned in the disqualification reason).

masih di sekolah gw... :^(

sorry for the disqualification

you can't be serious

EDIT: it appears like it's never too late to give feedback... and boooy, i think it really does need some. lol i could have actually mapped a diff by now.


02:26:878 (2,1) - This is painful to play. What I'd do is a triple on a slider instead. Something like this maybe. If necessary, increase spacing from (3) to (4) and accordingly to next (1).
02:28:592 (5,1) - This is even more painful.. ow it hurts. I see your thought why it's not just a five-objects stream but instead ending with a slider, because you can hear that sound in the music as well. The problem is, you need to hold the cursor on the slider since it's facing left, but the next object is on the right side. It'll be a lot better to make a blanket out of it, like this.
02:32:592 (1,2,3,1) - Liked this pattern! cool job!
02:34:592 (2,1) - Questionable spacing... I'm not gonna say anything about it other than it's questionable since it's still sort of playable.
02:35:163 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1) - I dislike the spacing here and the direction the stream is leading. 02:34:735 (1,2) - These objects suggest cursor movement towards the lower center of the playfield. If that stream were to be Ctrl G'd and accordingly spaced, it'd go down in the twinkling of an eye. I'd make it less curved as well, in that case. It's quite playable nonetheless, but I'm on about the looks instead.
02:36:735 (2,1) - I would have preferred a triple leading into (1).
02:40:306 (1) - I do not see reason at all why this shouldn't be a circle. It's just making the pattern more complicated than it has to be. Explain please?
02:40:735 (1,2,3) - This looks, feels and plays out of place. The distance from (2) to (3) is truly exaggerated in comparison to the combo before and in my opinion is not justified.
02:41:592 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I find this pattern extra-ordinarily bad since it's deliberately inversely arranged, facing in one direction and having a triple at the end where the pattern started, with the SAME time gap between the objects. I would have instead applied a triangle structure, leaving the player to less complicated jump, like this.
02:42:878 (1,1) - This is antijumping at its finest... not. This is completely counter-intuitive to the player's anticipation and looks bad.
02:42:306 (7,1,2,3,1) - Doesn't play well for me either. Don't know about others, I'm solely sure about myself.
02:46:306 (1,2,3,4,1) - The triple is facing a different way than the general flow is (next pattern).
02:46:735 (1,2,3,1) - The flow issue from before results here in troubling gameplay as the cursor is required to move precisely here.
02:49:592 (3) - I would have loved to see this as a circle instead. And tbh I don't see reason why this shouldn't be a circle. I see more reason against making it a slider, since it's pausing cursor movement, however briefly.
02:50:163 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Neat idea here, though!
02:52:306 (1,2,3,4) - Emphasis is put on wrong points with wrong objects. I would have just left six circles here, 2x3 circles (as in, 2 combos à 3 circles). Maybe like this. It really doesn't matter what way you arrange (triangles or unfinished squares) or space them (3 circles even, jump, 3 circles even, another jump to next combo).
02:58:306 (1,1) - I dislike playing this pattern due to the second slider ending waaay somewhere else, as in, not anywhere near the next slider start.
02:59:163 (1,2,3) - TBH, Ctrl G on this plays better imo.
03:01:735 (1,1,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Wonderful pattern! =^-^=

Also liked how uncomplicatedly Hanzer's part went down, nice job overall on the diff!