Hi, modding here
[General]
Good luck
[General]
- Meyringk's Normal have check on widescreen support while the others doesn't
- 00:08:098 (1) - How about make this a bit similiar to 00:05:504 (1) - to make the rhythm a bit consistent
- 00:18:801 (2) - Clap at tail?
- 00:28:206 (5) - Whistle at head?
- 00:30:152 (4) - Whistle at tail I can hear instrument play there a bit
- 01:10:367 (3) - How about move this to 01:10:530 - I find it play a bit better here
- 01:44:908 (1) - How about end the spinner here 01:52:530 - ? to make it consistent with others diff
Good Normal but the hitsound on slidertick somehow make it feel weird here , I mean it can lead to some misleading in rhythm so I would not to use hitsound on slidertick much imo
- 00:02:260 (5) - NC this ? the beat here sound so strong here and the rhythm here is quite different from the previous so I guess it okay to NC here
- 00:04:855 (5) - Similiar to above
- 00:17:828 (7) - Whistle at tail?
- 00:18:801 (2) - Whistle at head?
- 00:19:125 (3) - ^
- 00:25:612 (7) - Ctrl+H this? it can make the flow to the next note a bit better , and I find it quite awkward having to flow to the same direction as 00:25:287 (6) - since I feel like the music on these two notes do not really feel the same imo
- 00:33:882 (8) - How about delete this note , I feel like you first follow the instrument really nice but why you follow the vocal here it okay to follow the vocal if you can suppose to put this on a new combo pattern but it just feels weird to change the thing to follow in a middle of combo eventhough the note is at the end of the combo like this one imo
- 00:58:044 - Why not map this beat?
- 01:01:774 (2,3) - How about convert to 1/1 slider because the way the vocal sing this part is somhow a bit suit for slider imo
Great Hard
- 00:04:855 (1,4,5) - Stack this? so it feels a bit consistent with the next notes
- 00:05:179 (2) - Whistle at head?
- 00:18:477 (1) - Whitstle at tail?
- 00:19:774 (1,2,3,4,5) - How about place these like this ? imo the current one flow a bit weird at 00:20:098 (3,4) - having to move to (4) which line up with (2) then go straight to (5) which a bit line up straight to (4) , it kinda feels weird for me to apply that flow at the part where the music doesn't really has anything that feels like it need to change to sudden straight downward jumps
- 00:28:206 (8) - Ctrl+G? for better flow and spacing imo
- 00:36:314 (8) - Whistle?
Nice Insane ,I really enjoy it
- 00:05:179 (8) - Whistle at head?
- 00:14:260 (4) - Ctrl+G ? It can make a nice circular flow here 00:13:936 (3,4,5) -
- 00:18:477 (2) - Ctrl+G? for better flow and spacing
- 00:36:314 (6) - Whistle?
- 00:48:639 (1,3) - Swap place of these two for nice circular flow
- 00:53:828 (2,3) - How about make a jumps here just like what you did here 00:52:693 (4,5) - , 00:53:342 (6,1) -
- 00:59:179 (7,8) - I don't think that the jumps would be good here (8) doesn't sound emphasized , (9) is emphasized
- 01:08:422 (1) - Maybe you can make the wave shape slider here looks a bit better try adjust middle anchor point a bit
- 01:11:016 (1) - Why heading the slider downward? it make the flow to (2) a bit bad
- 01:20:259 (1,2,3) - Hmm... the music here sound a bit like here 01:19:773 (1,2,3) - so how about make the spacing a bit consistent with 01:19:773 (1,2,3) -
- 01:27:881 (1,2,3,4,5) - Star pattern here maybe ?
- 01:35:340 (1) - Why heading the slider downward? it make the flow to (2) a bit bad , well it okay if (2) was sound a bit emphasized like this one 01:22:043 (1,2) - but this one it just feels really normal
This might need a little bit works on NC consistency , I think some part the NC just feels a bit inconsistent example: 00:47:666 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - somehow some notes just doesn't okay to NC it might be better to NC the emphasized one like 00:48:314 (2,3) - so you might try to work around with NC at some parts a bit , this is just my opinion
Good luck