Supooort all the way!!!
Yeah you really are not good with values. With that kind of requirement it wpuld be almost impossible for any map to ever reach itKris19642 wrote:
Didn't read through the thread, but if this is going to be a different classification of beatmap, perhaps an idea for this category's way to determine a map deserves approved status:
Any player who can pass the map with a B or higher can vote, once a map reaches X number of votes (1000? Not good with values), it becomes "approved".
That's pretty much saying only easy unranked maps will be able to get the leaderboard.Kris19642 wrote:
Didn't read through the thread, but if this is going to be a different classification of beatmap, perhaps an idea for this category's way to determine a map deserves approved status:
Any player who can pass the map with a B or higher can vote, once a map reaches X number of votes (1000? Not good with values), it becomes "approved".
TAG4 thoughOkoratu wrote:
As modding and ranking should be more community driven and we actively work towards moddingv2, i think it would be appropriate to have players who can pass the map vote if they think it should go into this category
My opinionJappyBabes wrote:
tbh having scoreboards on ALL submitted maps would be nice, i know there are other games that handle it this way but old approval system is next best thing
If Lach agrees with this, then so do I.Lach wrote:
Isn't this what approval was for before it changed to >6 minutes? I can't be bothered reading the thread, but holy shit that's a lot of stars.
I suppose I should chip in. If this happens it can't be for just "LMAO MY AR10 MAP IS MY FIRST MAP EVER PLZ PLAY HATUNE MIKU MY ROOM FOR PONY", but genuine maps which are designed in a way to be weird and awesome, not just difficult. Some examples would be <insert sprosive maps here>.
Currently, "approval" maps just get a heart instead of a flame, and have for almost a year now. In that time, the category has stood dormant with a few random song compilations as the first thing people see. I honestly think it's time to change that and get some truly awe-inspiring weird shit their own scoreboard.
More stuff like Evanescent. More TAG. And a little Graces of Heaven for good measure.
^disDoKito wrote:
Whatever you guys make with this idea... Please DON'T make it that you have to search for 1000 mods before getting a "gimmick map" "ranked" :c
I dont know why the OP changed the title to "gimmick maps".DoKito wrote:
Whatever you guys make with this idea... Please DON'T make it that you have to search for 1000 mods before getting a "gimmick map" "ranked" :c
I changed it just for you (the old title said unrankeable instead of gimmick) , it's long as heck now thoSea_Food wrote:
Originally it was just a suggestion to add distinction and a leaderboard for unranked maps that are not shit. But i guess all good gotta change
Thanks man. I really appreciate it. But tbh peppy can say what ever he wants, but it will be BNs or who ever gets the responsibility choice on how they intepritate the rule.Default wrote:
I changed it just for you (the old title said unrankeable instead of gimmick) , it's long as heck now thoSea_Food wrote:
Originally it was just a suggestion to add distinction and a leaderboard for unranked maps that are not shit. But i guess all good gotta change
But in the end, peppy will be the one to decide which maps will fit into the category if he ever implements it.
Nah. That's not a good idea because there's maps with 70 favourites that are awful to the point where they're unplayable. The idea is that people use common sense to sift through those 300 bad maps and approve the actual interesting stuff.mooooo1245 wrote:
Why not just have it so a map has to have a set amount of favourites (70ish?) before they can apply for leaderboards. That way it could potentially solve the issue of having 200 or so crap maps wanting leaderboards a day and allow the community to choose maps they love (eighto/jump training) getting leaderboards.
Just a thought~~
If anything, it shouldn't be easy for that exact reason. Maps should be playtested and modded by experienced players, go through the same modding process, and require 2 bubbles and a ranking BA. If just any random map can be pushed into whatever category this goes into (approval please), it defeats the whole purpose.Midge wrote:
I have some questions though. If it's gonna be this easy to get a leaderboard for your map, what would even be the point of going for real rank in your map? Is that not the point other than for it to be counted for pp? Or is this only applying to full-on, unrankable maps, and not tv-sizes or even fanzhen-esque maps, which are completely rankable?
Furthermore, I've skimmed through the thread, but I haven't read anything about a process. I'd like to see at least some idea for a structure.
Also, are IIDX maps allowed in this category? Those are unrankable, too.
That said, I really hope you refute what I've brought up, as this is a really good idea. I just want to make sure it's watertight.