from queue
[fancy name]
00:13:909 (1,2) - the blanket's fine, just when you look at it together it's not really appealing . something like this is really cool and simple
http://puu.sh/dHqrt/a27a88fd94.jpg00:14:761 (3,4) - 00:16:125 (2,3) - these 2 are supposedly the same, but the 2nd one has a larger spacing. they share the same rhythm so they should have relatively the same spacing// and this 00:17:488 (3,4) -
00:13:909 (1,2) - 00:15:272 (1,1) - 00:16:636 (1,2) - etc. ^
00:24:818 (1) - from this point on u hear the bass so we all know it's a pretty significant change in the music, u should change up ur patterns, like slider shapes or jumps. something like 00:25:159 (2) - is a good start i guess
00:41:522 (2,3) - ehhh doesnt look so good
00:43:909 (1,2,3) - Cool pattern, but it can get better if 00:44:761 (3) - blanketed 00:43:909 (1) - as well
00:58:909 (4) - going by ur pattern this should be at the begining no?
01:08:454 (1,2) - same as what i said in the beginning. u can make this horizontal instead, and pull (2) out for a better blanket
01:08:795 (2,3,4) - ahhhhh nooo this isnt goood . do something like this it plays better and looks better too with some symmetry
http://puu.sh/dHqTT/1d3c5d0485.jpg01:10:159 (2,3,4,5) - not really a fan of these overlaps x_x if it was like this tho
http://puu.sh/dHqWT/5286e731f6.jpg01:16:977 (1) - watch the nc spamming
01:17:318 (4,1) - THIS IS NOT A 1/4 SPACING nonononon first of all the rhythm is super hard to play and 2ndly this is reallyy hard to read so pls nerf
yeah i only wanted to do something general so i'm not gunna go too in depth with this, just focus on your spacing and patterns, work with consistency in mind and you're off to a good start
good luck and have fun mapping~