-Bakari- wrote:

[Easy]
[list]
[*]01:12:207 (6,1) - thier placement is kinda too confusing for players. Example I don't think new players are this retarded

[Normal]
[list]
[*]00:02:457 (1) - to avoid the awkward 3/2 gap please place a circle here. You can (and probably should) add more 1/2 circles in order to improve the spread as it feels sligthly unbalnced now. Not entirely sure what you mean here
Note:00:26:832 - 00:27:957 - these beats can aslo be mapped in order to make the rhythm more consistent and logical.
Note2: 00:33:957 - 00:36:207 - and so on and so far, add those 1/2 circles to improve the baance and make rhythm more plable. I've left the gaps in because it's following the vocal line, but if it's really that bad, I guess I could change it owo.

Lanturn wrote:

Add a Red Timing point at 00:01:707 - so you start on the correct measure. If you play this on Nightcore, you'll notice that you get the finish one measure before it should be happening. 00:00:207 - to 00:01:707 - is all lead-in. You'll have to re-snap your notes and your greens because of this (They will probably be off by 1ms). uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ok

Hard:
00:47:457 (4) - & 01:35:457 (4) - I feel like these could be blanketed, or at least a little more even from the top and bottom. Stylistically I think it works, since blankets aren't the end of the world, and it creates an acceptable pattern (Also it's not even badly blanketed ;w;

1. Clean

1. 00:02:082 (1,2) - Nazi* How about to making a blanket with both objects to improve the aesthetics of the difficulty? something like this would be nice.
2. 00:47:832 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:07:707 - I suppose this whistle is intentional but I think would sound much better if you use an drum-finish instead this.
4. 00:17:457 (1,2) - This new combining is too short in comparison to the others so I recommend you to remove this one and consider adding one at 00:16:332 - to have consistency.
5. 00:23:082 (1,2) - Same as above.
6. 01:12:207 (3,1) - To be honest it looks a kinda hard to read so would recommend doing something like this to avoid any problems when playing the difficulty.
7. 01:54:207 (4) - Missing whistle at the head of the slider instead the end of same.
8. 01:58:707 (1) - ♥
9. 02:10:332 (1) - Clap?

1. 00:33:957 (4,1) - Pls... don't... I know this has the correct spacing but to be honest it can be a bit annoying for inexperienced players so it would be pretty great if you try to do something different here and fix it otherwise.
2. 01:21:957 (4,1) - Same as above.
3. 00:36:019 (3,1) - Feels kinda empy this part feels kinda empty, what about to adding a slider at 00:36:019 - until 00:36:394 - you should try it cause it follow the vocal imo. (like as you did here 01:17:457 (2,3,4) - )
4. 01:24:019 (3,1) - ^
5. 01:59:082 (1,1) - It doesn't have the enough time after one spinner so a quick solution to this would be snapping it at 02:00:582 - imo.
6. 02:11:082 (2,4) - I'm not fan of the overlaps like this in beginner difficulties, what about to move this object 02:12:394 (4) - to X:328 Y:200 for better appreciation and to avoid this kind of patterns, of course you should fix the spacing for the next objects.

1. 00:04:707 - What do you think to use a drum-finish instead soft-whistle? it sounds kind weird to be honest.
2. 01:07:707 (1,2,3,4) - ♥

Gero wrote:

Easy

[*]00:17:457 (1,2) - This new combining is too short in comparison to the others so I recommend you to remove this one and consider adding one at 00:16:332 - to have consistency.
[*]00:23:082 (1,2) - Same as above. This is just an issue in the way that I mapped it. A lot of possible NCs in the middle or end of a slider ;w;

Normal

00:33:957 (4,1) - Pls... don't... I know this has the correct spacing but to be honest it can be a bit annoying for inexperienced players so it would be pretty great if you try to do something different here and fix it otherwise.
[*]01:21:957 (4,1) - Same as above. I have faith that normal players can do this.

1. 02:07:707 (1,1) - just a last thing but I guess this is spam so would be cool if you could remove it.

CDFA wrote:

Diodidididiio1!!!!!!

Lizzy wrote:

grats

give me one valid reason why you chose a freaking Hatsune Miku BG for that song?
why didn't you choose something that's not anime? >>

Lanturn wrote:

Lizzy wrote:

grats

give me one valid reason why you chose a freaking Hatsune Miku BG for that song?
why didn't you choose something that's not anime? >>

read description next time. thanks

Sakura wrote:

Background's fine for me, I mean we have Nightcore songs with anime backgrounds already.