wa
forum
Suzuyu - Mezameta Asa ni wa Kimi ga Tonari ni (TV Size)
posted
Total Posts
142
怎么还un。。摸摸柚子。。
柚子一下子就3rd rank了
happy623 wrote:
柚子一下子就3rd rank了
Topic Starter
Going once, going twice...
Found it to be more accurate after applying -10 ms to offset.
I cry everytime
oh what 0.0
Topic Starter
[ GitahMuttan ] wrote:
I cry everytime
shouldn't the first kiai time be 140.000BPM as well? -w-
Topic Starter
should i need more timing check?
Chewin you mean adding an additional 140.000 red line at 00:55:456 - ?
I'm ok with that, though I don't really think it's necessary
is it really needed?
I'm ok with that, though I don't really think it's necessary
is it really needed?
What happened here? im crying 
0.05 is always a difference and since 2nd kiai is 140 I think the first should be the same as well.Zero__wind wrote:
Chewin you mean adding an additional 140.000 red line at 00:55:456 - ?
I'm ok with that, though I don't really think it's necessary
is it really needed?
Well it's up to you guys, I don't want to make other mistakes about this timing
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
The only thing I found that needs attention is 00:33:600 - , where the drummer goes faster than normal.
That can be fixed by adding a section at Offset 33600, BPM 146
That should be all that's needed
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
The only thing I found that needs attention is 00:33:600 - , where the drummer goes faster than normal.
That can be fixed by adding a section at Offset 33600, BPM 146
That should be all that's needed
Topic Starter
><Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
The only thing I found that needs attention is 00:33:600 - , where the drummer goes faster than normal.
That can be fixed by adding a section at Offset 33600, BPM 146
That should be all that's needed
updated
Requested by Chewin.
1. Offset: 595ms BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 33.595ms BPM: 146,00
3. Offset: 34.873ms BPM: 140,00
4. Offset: 70.843ms BPM: 139,00
5. Offset: 71.945ms BPM: 140,00
6. Offset: 72.160ms BPM: 140,00
7. Offset: 87.610ms BPM: 140,00
8. Offset: 88.895ms BPM: 135,00
9. Offset: 89.350ms BPM: 135,00
10. Offset: 94.683ms BPM: 130,00
11. Offset: 95.787ms BPM: 130,00
12. Offset: 96.017ms BPM: 116,00
13. Offset: 96.534ms BPM: 116,00
14. Offset: 97.568ms BPM: 114,00
15. Offset: 98.094ms BPM: 82,00
16. Offset: 98.815ms BPM: 82,00
17. Offset: 99.575ms BPM: 89,00
18. Offset: 99.912ms BPM: 87,00
19. Offset: 100.084ms BPM: 85,00
20. Offset: 100.260ms BPM: 126,00
21. Offset: 100.498ms BPM: 92,00
22. Offset: 101.234ms BPM: 132,00
23. Offset: 102.146ms BPM: 132,00
This is with a complete slowdown down to a +-5 ms cause there are no beats there so unfortunately best you can do is approximate it. The rest I am pretty sure it's spot on, has been tested with OD10 over 100 tries.
Several comments regarding this:
01:10:247 (5,6) - This should be a 5 note stream instead. Missing that drumline makes this a lot harder to play because of the timing change here. Alternatively, use a repeater which repeats 3 times instead.
In conclusion, be very careful how you resnap notes, some need manual resnap, and some sliders probably need manual adjustment.
Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
1. Offset: 595ms BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 33.595ms BPM: 146,00
3. Offset: 34.873ms BPM: 140,00
4. Offset: 70.843ms BPM: 139,00
5. Offset: 71.945ms BPM: 140,00
6. Offset: 72.160ms BPM: 140,00
7. Offset: 87.610ms BPM: 140,00
8. Offset: 88.895ms BPM: 135,00
9. Offset: 89.350ms BPM: 135,00
10. Offset: 94.683ms BPM: 130,00
11. Offset: 95.787ms BPM: 130,00
12. Offset: 96.017ms BPM: 116,00
13. Offset: 96.534ms BPM: 116,00
14. Offset: 97.568ms BPM: 114,00
15. Offset: 98.094ms BPM: 82,00
16. Offset: 98.815ms BPM: 82,00
17. Offset: 99.575ms BPM: 89,00
18. Offset: 99.912ms BPM: 87,00
19. Offset: 100.084ms BPM: 85,00
20. Offset: 100.260ms BPM: 126,00
21. Offset: 100.498ms BPM: 92,00
22. Offset: 101.234ms BPM: 132,00
23. Offset: 102.146ms BPM: 132,00
This is with a complete slowdown down to a +-5 ms cause there are no beats there so unfortunately best you can do is approximate it. The rest I am pretty sure it's spot on, has been tested with OD10 over 100 tries.
Several comments regarding this:
- 00:33:595 - While I don't really agree this being 146 BPM, it does work quite well, even on OD10. Especially because there is a drum at 00:34:827 which shouldn't be mapped because the main focus is at the next red line: 00:34:873. (tldr; agree with Charles here, just -5 offset cause it's a bit late, and agree with the current way it's mapped)
- 01:11:945 - This is the correct spot where the vocals land. This will be tricky to map because it needs manual slider length editing through the .osu file. Should be done though.
- 01:35:787 - While this is really erratic and probably shouldn't be mapped, it sounds correct. I advise not to map anything from 01:35:606 - to 01:36:534. You can still have the circle at 01:35:606 though.
- The final slow down is more of a cosmetic rather than exact timing. It's too difficult to get 100% correct timing here and these parts, while sound nice, should not be mapped. I suggest to stop mapping at 01:38:815 and just use a spinner for the rest.
01:10:247 (5,6) - This should be a 5 note stream instead. Missing that drumline makes this a lot harder to play because of the timing change here. Alternatively, use a repeater which repeats 3 times instead.
In conclusion, be very careful how you resnap notes, some need manual resnap, and some sliders probably need manual adjustment.
oh you pro
I surrender, seriously
I mean I'm glad to see some more convincing timing eventually
this is the first time I tried to convince others with my own results on a complex timing
I surrender, seriously
I mean I'm glad to see some more convincing timing eventually
this is the first time I tried to convince others with my own results on a complex timing
some personal thoughts which is not impportant now
Good luckwhen I timed this song, I did find that 00:34:242 (3,4,5) - and 01:10:247 (5,6) - are a bit unstable as they are
but considering the fact that when we time a song, we're not getting answers from the producer, but representing the sog in our own ways to make it player-friendly. That means I personaly don't advocate too frequent time section settings only for some real rare unstable drum sounds. (too many uninherited points only makes getting ACC harder at times, such as the ending part of Poinsettia) But anyway, it's always good that we could finally have a timing which is precise enough for gameplay
but considering the fact that when we time a song, we're not getting answers from the producer, but representing the sog in our own ways to make it player-friendly. That means I personaly don't advocate too frequent time section settings only for some real rare unstable drum sounds. (too many uninherited points only makes getting ACC harder at times, such as the ending part of Poinsettia) But anyway, it's always good that we could finally have a timing which is precise enough for gameplay
Topic Starter
lolcubes wrote:
Requested by Chewin.Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
1. Offset: 595ms BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 33.595ms BPM: 146,00
3. Offset: 34.873ms BPM: 140,00
4. Offset: 70.843ms BPM: 139,00
5. Offset: 71.945ms BPM: 140,00
6. Offset: 72.160ms BPM: 140,00
7. Offset: 87.610ms BPM: 140,00
8. Offset: 88.895ms BPM: 135,00
9. Offset: 89.350ms BPM: 135,00
10. Offset: 94.683ms BPM: 130,00
11. Offset: 95.787ms BPM: 130,00
12. Offset: 96.017ms BPM: 116,00
13. Offset: 96.534ms BPM: 116,00
14. Offset: 97.568ms BPM: 114,00
15. Offset: 98.094ms BPM: 82,00
16. Offset: 98.815ms BPM: 82,00
17. Offset: 99.575ms BPM: 89,00
18. Offset: 99.912ms BPM: 87,00
19. Offset: 100.084ms BPM: 85,00
20. Offset: 100.260ms BPM: 126,00
21. Offset: 100.498ms BPM: 92,00
22. Offset: 101.234ms BPM: 132,00
23. Offset: 102.146ms BPM: 132,00
This is with a complete slowdown down to a +-5 ms cause there are no beats there so unfortunately best you can do is approximate it. The rest I am pretty sure it's spot on, has been tested with OD10 over 100 tries.
Several comments regarding this:[Insane]
- 00:33:595 - While I don't really agree this being 146 BPM, it does work quite well, even on OD10. Especially because there is a drum at 00:34:827 which shouldn't be mapped because the main focus is at the next red line: 00:34:873. (tldr; agree with Charles here, just -5 offset cause it's a bit late, and agree with the current way it's mapped)
- 01:11:945 - This is the correct spot where the vocals land. This will be tricky to map because it needs manual slider length editing through the .osu file. Should be done though.
- 01:35:787 - While this is really erratic and probably shouldn't be mapped, it sounds correct. I advise not to map anything from 01:35:606 - to 01:36:534. You can still have the circle at 01:35:606 though.
- The final slow down is more of a cosmetic rather than exact timing. It's too difficult to get 100% correct timing here and these parts, while sound nice, should not be mapped. I suggest to stop mapping at 01:38:815 and just use a spinner for the rest.
01:10:247 (5,6) - This should be a 5 note stream instead. Missing that drumline makes this a lot harder to play because of the timing change here. Alternatively, use a repeater which repeats 3 times instead. OK
In conclusion, be very careful how you resnap notes, some need manual resnap, and some sliders probably need manual adjustment.
fixed timing
already resnap all note, timing point
updated
thank you for timing ><
pro lolcubes (:3 」∠)
Added +10 to all and fixed some snapping oddities.
~Rebubbled!~
~Rebubbled!~
Topic Starter
thanks a lot >__<Charles445 wrote:
Added +10 to all and fixed some snapping oddities.
~Rebubbled!~
\o\ ktkr
Resnapped preview point
Reranked.
Reranked.
Topic Starter
>v<Zero__wind wrote:
Resnapped preview point
Reranked.
finally~gratz
Congrats 小柚子 \:D/
回來了
Regratz 
unranked since this map got unranked about 148971849072895times
re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re grats D:
I've always pondered over using unsnapped red timing sections at all.
Congratulations on ranking, in any case.
Congratulations on ranking, in any case.
Congrats!
01:11:500 (2) - This slider end was supposed to snap on the red line, isn't it?
not a major stuff. though. Congrats~
not a major stuff. though. Congrats~
Purposely did that for the two to avoid generating the extra tickkanpakyin wrote:
01:11:500 (2) - This slider end was supposed to snap on the red line, isn't it?
not a major stuff. though. Congrats~
The timing on this map is terrible
I've been trying for an hour and a half on normal with DT to get the SS and eventually just had to set the offset to -100 and guess on the beats it makes absolutely no sense to me. the ones at the beginning I had to hit early and ones at the end I had to hit late, just why?
I don't know how the editor works or if someone of power can make the appropriate changes but imao this map shouldn't be ranked in it's current state.
I've been trying for an hour and a half on normal with DT to get the SS and eventually just had to set the offset to -100 and guess on the beats it makes absolutely no sense to me. the ones at the beginning I had to hit early and ones at the end I had to hit late, just why?
I don't know how the editor works or if someone of power can make the appropriate changes but imao this map shouldn't be ranked in it's current state.