wtf...My score has been wiped twice
my HD DT of 1×100...
From my perspective, The first version of timing plays much better than the second one,though..
Anyway, congratz for Kawaiwkyik's first rank
(Why score wiping is so easy for BATs QAQ
yes, I'm sorry that you're just right, the second timing is even worsesammy711 wrote:
From my perspective, The first version of timing plays much better than the second one,though..
happy623 wrote:
柚子一下子就3rd rank了
[ GitahMuttan ] wrote:
I cry everytime
0.05 is always a difference and since 2nd kiai is 140 I think the first should be the same as well.Zero__wind wrote:
Chewin you mean adding an additional 140.000 red line at 00:55:456 - ?
I'm ok with that, though I don't really think it's necessary
is it really needed?
><Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
The only thing I found that needs attention is 00:33:600 - , where the drummer goes faster than normal.
That can be fixed by adding a section at Offset 33600, BPM 146
That should be all that's needed
Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
lolcubes wrote:
Requested by Chewin.Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
1. Offset: 595ms BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 33.595ms BPM: 146,00
3. Offset: 34.873ms BPM: 140,00
4. Offset: 70.843ms BPM: 139,00
5. Offset: 71.945ms BPM: 140,00
6. Offset: 72.160ms BPM: 140,00
7. Offset: 87.610ms BPM: 140,00
8. Offset: 88.895ms BPM: 135,00
9. Offset: 89.350ms BPM: 135,00
10. Offset: 94.683ms BPM: 130,00
11. Offset: 95.787ms BPM: 130,00
12. Offset: 96.017ms BPM: 116,00
13. Offset: 96.534ms BPM: 116,00
14. Offset: 97.568ms BPM: 114,00
15. Offset: 98.094ms BPM: 82,00
16. Offset: 98.815ms BPM: 82,00
17. Offset: 99.575ms BPM: 89,00
18. Offset: 99.912ms BPM: 87,00
19. Offset: 100.084ms BPM: 85,00
20. Offset: 100.260ms BPM: 126,00
21. Offset: 100.498ms BPM: 92,00
22. Offset: 101.234ms BPM: 132,00
23. Offset: 102.146ms BPM: 132,00
This is with a complete slowdown down to a +-5 ms cause there are no beats there so unfortunately best you can do is approximate it. The rest I am pretty sure it's spot on, has been tested with OD10 over 100 tries.
Several comments regarding this:[Insane]
- 00:33:595 - While I don't really agree this being 146 BPM, it does work quite well, even on OD10. Especially because there is a drum at 00:34:827 which shouldn't be mapped because the main focus is at the next red line: 00:34:873. (tldr; agree with Charles here, just -5 offset cause it's a bit late, and agree with the current way it's mapped)
- 01:11:945 - This is the correct spot where the vocals land. This will be tricky to map because it needs manual slider length editing through the .osu file. Should be done though.
- 01:35:787 - While this is really erratic and probably shouldn't be mapped, it sounds correct. I advise not to map anything from 01:35:606 - to 01:36:534. You can still have the circle at 01:35:606 though.
- The final slow down is more of a cosmetic rather than exact timing. It's too difficult to get 100% correct timing here and these parts, while sound nice, should not be mapped. I suggest to stop mapping at 01:38:815 and just use a spinner for the rest.
01:10:247 (5,6) - This should be a 5 note stream instead. Missing that drumline makes this a lot harder to play because of the timing change here. Alternatively, use a repeater which repeats 3 times instead. OK
In conclusion, be very careful how you resnap notes, some need manual resnap, and some sliders probably need manual adjustment.
thanks a lot >__<Charles445 wrote:
Added +10 to all and fixed some snapping oddities.
~Rebubbled!~
>v<Zero__wind wrote:
Resnapped preview point
Reranked.
Purposely did that for the two to avoid generating the extra tickkanpakyin wrote:
01:11:500 (2) - This slider end was supposed to snap on the red line, isn't it?
not a major stuff. though. Congrats~