gratz~
我的yf不可能這麼可愛>///<yf_bmp wrote:
Gratz~~SS美丽……
scores should be wiped nowKawaiwkyik wrote:
我改好了 但成績單還在是什麼一回事 不敢update/_\"
yes, I'm sorry that you're just right, the second timing is even worsesammy711 wrote:
From my perspective, The first version of timing plays much better than the second one,though..
happy623 wrote:
柚子一下子就3rd rank了
[ GitahMuttan ] wrote:
I cry everytime
0.05 is always a difference and since 2nd kiai is 140 I think the first should be the same as well.Zero__wind wrote:
Chewin you mean adding an additional 140.000 red line at 00:55:456 - ?
I'm ok with that, though I don't really think it's necessary
is it really needed?
><Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
The only thing I found that needs attention is 00:33:600 - , where the drummer goes faster than normal.
That can be fixed by adding a section at Offset 33600, BPM 146
That should be all that's needed
Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
lolcubes wrote:
Requested by Chewin.Well, some offset shifts should be done in my opinion, they are quite late at times. Also, I disagree with 139.XXX. 140 sounds spot on, just needs minor offset adjustment at times.Charles445 wrote:
I don't think the current timing needs any major changes.
The kiai fixes itself very quickly.
1. Offset: 595ms BPM: 140,00
2. Offset: 33.595ms BPM: 146,00
3. Offset: 34.873ms BPM: 140,00
4. Offset: 70.843ms BPM: 139,00
5. Offset: 71.945ms BPM: 140,00
6. Offset: 72.160ms BPM: 140,00
7. Offset: 87.610ms BPM: 140,00
8. Offset: 88.895ms BPM: 135,00
9. Offset: 89.350ms BPM: 135,00
10. Offset: 94.683ms BPM: 130,00
11. Offset: 95.787ms BPM: 130,00
12. Offset: 96.017ms BPM: 116,00
13. Offset: 96.534ms BPM: 116,00
14. Offset: 97.568ms BPM: 114,00
15. Offset: 98.094ms BPM: 82,00
16. Offset: 98.815ms BPM: 82,00
17. Offset: 99.575ms BPM: 89,00
18. Offset: 99.912ms BPM: 87,00
19. Offset: 100.084ms BPM: 85,00
20. Offset: 100.260ms BPM: 126,00
21. Offset: 100.498ms BPM: 92,00
22. Offset: 101.234ms BPM: 132,00
23. Offset: 102.146ms BPM: 132,00
This is with a complete slowdown down to a +-5 ms cause there are no beats there so unfortunately best you can do is approximate it. The rest I am pretty sure it's spot on, has been tested with OD10 over 100 tries.
Several comments regarding this:[Insane]
- 00:33:595 - While I don't really agree this being 146 BPM, it does work quite well, even on OD10. Especially because there is a drum at 00:34:827 which shouldn't be mapped because the main focus is at the next red line: 00:34:873. (tldr; agree with Charles here, just -5 offset cause it's a bit late, and agree with the current way it's mapped)
- 01:11:945 - This is the correct spot where the vocals land. This will be tricky to map because it needs manual slider length editing through the .osu file. Should be done though.
- 01:35:787 - While this is really erratic and probably shouldn't be mapped, it sounds correct. I advise not to map anything from 01:35:606 - to 01:36:534. You can still have the circle at 01:35:606 though.
- The final slow down is more of a cosmetic rather than exact timing. It's too difficult to get 100% correct timing here and these parts, while sound nice, should not be mapped. I suggest to stop mapping at 01:38:815 and just use a spinner for the rest.
01:10:247 (5,6) - This should be a 5 note stream instead. Missing that drumline makes this a lot harder to play because of the timing change here. Alternatively, use a repeater which repeats 3 times instead. OK
In conclusion, be very careful how you resnap notes, some need manual resnap, and some sliders probably need manual adjustment.
thanks a lot >__<Charles445 wrote:
Added +10 to all and fixed some snapping oddities.
~Rebubbled!~