GuyInFreezer wrote:

massclaim d1.
Discuss.

Raging Bull wrote:

Aw shit you guys suck.


What do you mean soft with like no votes?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Nyquill: |XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX|

bubbajack8 wrote:

Why would you soft any role when you aren't being voted.

Raging Bull wrote:

I was going to explain why, but rereading my PM made me realize it was a bad idea.

Sephibro wrote:

still nyquill's bar is pretty full for one who hasn't posted anything yet

GuyInFreezer wrote:

fferyllt wrote:

welcome to feryland.

Last time you said this you were scum though

Sephibro wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

massclaim d1.
Discuss.

pure shit

nl d1
don't discuss, do it

Raging Bull wrote:

bubbajack8 wrote:

Why would you soft any role when you aren't being voted.

Hmm, actually I do like an explanation on why it is bad.

I was going to explain why, but rereading my PM made me realize it was a bad idea.

NoHitter wrote:

Vote: bubba

Also, what question? o.O

NoHitter wrote:

Because the forum's generally inactive. We used to do plurality lynches before. I admit that the hammer only system increases activity, but not enough. The compromise of lynching if the target is at least L-1 fits better.

fferyllt wrote:

NoHitter wrote:

Because the forum's generally inactive. We used to do plurality lynches before. I admit that the hammer only system increases activity, but not enough. The compromise of lynching if the target is at least L-1 fits better.

Activity is not an issue there, but the TeamLiquid site's mafia community uses a hybrid lynch mechanic. Achieve majority before deadline and the game day ends with a majority lynch. If it doesn't, then the player with the most votes at the end of the day is lynched.

Sephibro wrote:

confirm your double vote you fool

bubbajack8 wrote:

1. There's no pressure on you. Makes you look like scared scum.
2. If you were actually town it makes you a night target.
3. There's no town reason to soft a role that blatantly.

Tanzklaue wrote:

yea, also plurality lynch gives scum less insentive to just sit back and do nothing.

Sephibro wrote:

also everybody who's town please vote the majority lynch thanks

Tanzklaue wrote:

Nyquill wrote:

Hi v/la until Monday, children's card games tournament.

which card game?

fferyllt wrote:

Sephibro wrote:

also everybody who's town please vote the majority lynch thanks

??

Sakura wrote:

Please PM me whether you'd prefer plurality or majority lynch and I'll follow the one with the most votes.

Sephibro wrote:

fferyllt wrote:

??

Sakura wrote:

Please PM me whether you'd prefer plurality or majority lynch and I'll follow the one with the most votes.

fferyllt wrote:

GiF why do you think bubbajack is scum?

Tanzklaue wrote:

yea, also plurality lynch gives scum less MORE insentive to just sit back and do nothing.

Sephibro wrote:

watch this game for example
t/156555

I was mafia with GIF and DakeDekaane, we just waited until the deadline for a plurality lynch without actually doing anything

GuyInFreezer wrote:

My god can we talk something other than this plurality/majority shit
it does nothing to move the game forward

CalignoBot wrote:

calling fferylt town for claiming double-voter reeks.

Sephibro wrote:

confirm your double vote you fool

fferyllt wrote:

VOTE: GiF

2nd VOTE: fferyllt

Sakura wrote:

GuyInFreezer (1) - fferyllt
fferyllt (1) - fferyllt

Sephibro wrote:

ok let's talk about doublevoter role

we recently had a game where there was a town doublevoter (rEdo) and a scum doublevoter (CalignoBot) (multiball)

there were 2 big differences between these 2 roles:
1. town dv has to post his second vote on topic, as if it was a normal vote, while scum dv could post it by pm to the mod
2. town dv appeared with his name in the votecount for both his votes, while the second vote of scum dv was anonymous

fferyllt wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

My god can we talk something other than this plurality/majority shit
it does nothing to move the game forward

Says the guy who doesn't want to talk about why he's voting the guy he's voting.

Sephibro wrote:

CalignoBot wrote:

calling fferylt town for claiming double-voter reeks.

Sephibro wrote:

confirm your double vote you fool

fferyllt wrote:

VOTE: GiF

2nd VOTE: fferyllt

Sakura wrote:

GuyInFreezer (1) - fferyllt
fferyllt (1) - fferyllt

here's a consideration i made in Touhou V mafia

Sephibro wrote:

ok let's talk about doublevoter role

we recently had a game where there was a town doublevoter (rEdo) and a scum doublevoter (CalignoBot) (multiball)

there were 2 big differences between these 2 roles:
1. town dv has to post his second vote on topic, as if it was a normal vote, while scum dv could post it by pm to the mod
2. town dv appeared with his name in the votecount for both his votes, while the second vote of scum dv was anonymous

do you need further explanation Caligno or is it clear enough?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Hmm
let's flashwagon navizel for lulz (and for that newb mafia game)

vote: Navizel

CalignoBot wrote:

How does claiming on D1 mean they won't be able to use it for scum-benefiting reasons? Hiding the double vote until the last moment is giving up a powerful role for your team for the ability to scumclaim later by suddenly bringing it out.

Sephibro wrote:

ops i forgot it
vote: GuyInFreezer

Navizel wrote:

This one's not missing.

Vote: GIF

NoHitter wrote:

CalignoBot wrote:

How does claiming on D1 mean they won't be able to use it for scum-benefiting reasons? Hiding the double vote until the last moment is giving up a powerful role for your team for the ability to scumclaim later by suddenly bringing it out.

Because keeping a hidden double vote is an auto-win in Ly-Lo.

Sephibro wrote:

offend everybody