:') I'm touched that somebody kinda missed me.fartownik wrote:
Wow, Tanz. Welcome back.
/inSephibro wrote:
inb4 kevincela
It's actually my first time, Sephibro wanted me to join and after reading all the rules I decided to join :pSakura wrote:
wow kevin plays mafia? i never knew
There is no change. The deadline will remain the same, which is one week.CalignoBot wrote:
@Mod: How is the deadline affected when the leader is elected?
Not exactly. Town has 5 townies and 3 PRs, while the scum can claim whatever they want. They could even claim extra 3 PRs, but that would make a 50% lynch, which is nonsense.fartownik wrote:
3 scum will surely be in the VTs so the chances of a scumlynch will be 3/8.
y u do this ;_;Nyquill wrote:
pvote: kevinchela
are you tard or whatfartownik wrote:
Hi, if we massclaim today and everyone cooperates (from Town) we'll have 4 confirmed Townies (3 PRs + 1 Backup) vs 8 unconfirmed Vanilla Townies. 3 scum will surely be in the VTs so the chances of a scumlynch will be 3/8.
FAQ: 1. YES, I know we give ourselves for scum, but it will be easier for us to scumhunt out of 8 instead of out of 12.
2. YES, I know that if someone from Town fakeclaims then we're fucked. That's why we need everyone agreed on what we do here.
We don't claim roles. We only claim whether we are PRs or non-PRs (VTs). A number is enough to establish whether someone is Town or not. Claim can be done similarly to NH's claim in Stack the Deck (Two Style).
Not useless, but less powerful. And I've never said we have to claim roles.[/quote]CalignoBot wrote:
I fully disagree with massclaiming roles.
1. Claiming roles will just as likely make them useless as not.
Seriously, I said it already. Was there really a necessity to repeat it?CalignoBot wrote:
2. If we're ever doing this at all, we're NOT claiming roles, only that they are a PR. This is primarily due to the above. It gives the mafia a better chance to blend in, but our PRs won't be basically useless for most of the game either. This is still something I don't recommend doing.
This is the same situation as Stacking the Deck way back, except only slightly better.
are you tard or whatScum is pulling a 2/5 gambit if they want to claim PR. They can't just hop and claim it like a fucking boss and no one notices.
let's say we do this, do you really think scum will all claim vt?
if 1 scum claims pr and 2 scum claim vt your plan has NO SENSE at all and it only advantages scum because we reveal who's PR
again farto, i hope you're scum when you say these things, because if you aren't you are just tard
we're NOT doing this bullshit
ScummmCalignoBot wrote:
Also, everyone who voted to lead themselves so far has pretty much eliminated any chances of me actually voting for them today.
the dumbest thing is saying that massclaiming d1 is the dumbest thingTanzklaue wrote:
back inmmy day massclaiming at day 1 was the dumbest thing. it continues to be the dumbest thing and I won't agree to any plans of massclaiming on day 1 ever. the probability for town to get insta scum is too low at this point to warrant a massclaim.
Yes, you explained it with a shitty reason.Sephibro wrote:
in this case it's dumb and i explained why it is, in another case it could be the best thing to doTanzklaue wrote:
back inmmy day massclaiming at day 1 was the dumbest thing. it continues to be the dumbest thing and I won't agree to any plans of massclaiming on day 1 ever. the probability for town to get insta scum is too low at this point to warrant a massclaim.
just to teach you some maths, it's 2/5 gambit ONLY if scum has to claim first..the real chance scum gets away with a lucky claim is actually >than 50%fartownik wrote:
are you tard or whatScum is pulling a 2/5 gambit if they want to claim PR. They can't just hop and claim it like a fucking boss and no one notices.
let's say we do this, do you really think scum will all claim vt?
if 1 scum claims pr and 2 scum claim vt your plan has NO SENSE at all and it only advantages scum because we reveal who's PR
again farto, i hope you're scum when you say these things, because if you aren't you are just tard
we're NOT doing this bullshit
Both yours and Caligno's arguments smell scum defending themselves from the massclaim.
Because I asked you a question 1 minute after your reply? ;oIrreversible wrote:
What the fuck, I don't have to stay here 24/7, what's wrong with your gameplay? seriously
oh i see that you're well informedfartownik wrote:
That you are Town.
you can be townCTs-Th wrote:
Ahhhh... math...
I don't see anything useful in this RANDOM VOTE.CTs-Th wrote:
Let's see...
Vote: pieguy1372
Random vote is random... XD
Congratulations, you've figured out a lot of my very early game town strategy.fartownik wrote:
I don't see how it indicates alignment anyhow, you're making something up.
I don't think leader voting is enough of a deal to consider what CTs did as Town. Your read doesn't speak to me at all.CalignoBot wrote:
Congratulations, you've figured out a lot of my very early game town strategy.fartownik wrote:
I don't see how it indicates alignment anyhow, you're making something up.
But in all seriousness, I already answered that point. In a game where you vote for who you think is town, RVS suddenly becomes a hell of a lot less useful since votes are the most anti-pressure thing you can do. Voting for someone else, even at random, is a hell of a lot more useful than that.
So why exactly are pieguy and kevincela not in the same vote? Because they bandwagoned.