Well sephi, there are other maps which actually wait for rank even longer, because other BATs don't look at it, but here we go 
[Pagno's Easy]
Well xD There are some DS errors, where the DS goes from 0.8 to 1.33 .. Anyway, there are a lot of stacks in that diff, whereas I also can't really understand why you don't follow the flow more naturally.
00:42:538 (1,2,3) - The slider goes to the left side, and the circle is on the right side. I strongly recommend that you change the first slider, to avoid having this weird flow feeling. (for comparison: 00:45:038 (1,2,3) - check that out, you've done this one quite well)
00:47:538 (1) - Due to the new combo here, the flow goes weird again. 00:46:288 (2,3,1) - The flow in that part is all straight, and that bothers me a bit, since I'm not really sure how confortable beginner will feel while playing this. This is very personal though, because I don't feel confortable playing them myself. http://puu.sh/5sXcf.jpg Some ideas, i don't know whether you'll like that or not, just tell me what you think please
00:56:288 (2,3) - That up down isn't really recommended for easy as well.. an easy should be as easy to read as possible, but with that stacks, it's rather hard >_<
01:01:913 (2) - What about something like 251 71? That curvy feeling seems quite funny!
01:02:538 (1,2) - To follow the natural flow better here, I suggest putting (2) UNDER the slider end of (1). http://puu.sh/5sXi5.jpg Something like this, is what I mean. It will grant a better flow for sure.
01:07:538 (1,2,1,2) - Stacks stacks. It would be really nice if you could think of something different here.. 01:10:038 (1,2) - Especially this pattern. I can't recommend that at all.
01:15:038 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/5sXmG.jpg
01:22:538 (1,2,1,2) - ..? What happened with the DS here?
Well, I quite disagree with some parts here, as you can see. I'm sure we can find a solution we both agree on! Just let me know what you think
[Normal]
00:45:975 (2,3) - That blanketing here looks poorly made. Please try it again :O
00:47:538 (1) - Same issue here as in easy, I strongly assume that the natural flow will be better if the circle is above the slider. http://puu.sh/5sXDR.jpg
01:29:725 (4,1,2,3) - Flows weird to be honest, same issue as before (natural flow, slider goes <- the next circle is -> .. you know)
rest is fine~
[Nemis' Hard]
Cool diff!
[galvenize]
Uhm, I'm a bit confused, 00:16:288 - this hitsound tells me it's 5%, which wouldn't be audible, yet it's really loud? how?
00:43:319 (5) - how is that really really big jump explained? D: I feel that's way too high and breaks the flow quite much, what about http://puu.sh/5sY7U.jpg ?
01:10:819 (2,3,4) - Maybe use another pattern here instead of the stack? The stack doesn't really fit here imo. Triangle, or just normal spacing?
Interesting diff.
[Insane]
00:55:975 (5,6,7,8) - overmap?
01:03:788 (1) - I guess a curve with 1 point is enough xD
01:22:069 (3) - CTRL + G grants better flow i guess
01:04:725 (4,5) - For some reason I like those, but not the stream ones. hm.. Also, I would suggest only to delete the stream where I wrote overmap, and leave the rest, since they actualy sound better.
01:32:225 (1) - You're the only one who uses NC here ;w; I would make it equal to all other diffs (well, no. the others should make it equal to your diff)
00:18:475 (4) - 00:23:475 (7) - Add NC to emphasize those sliders?
Quite jumpy!
Alright.. call me if you have any questions, or so~
[Pagno's Easy]
Well xD There are some DS errors, where the DS goes from 0.8 to 1.33 .. Anyway, there are a lot of stacks in that diff, whereas I also can't really understand why you don't follow the flow more naturally.
00:42:538 (1,2,3) - The slider goes to the left side, and the circle is on the right side. I strongly recommend that you change the first slider, to avoid having this weird flow feeling. (for comparison: 00:45:038 (1,2,3) - check that out, you've done this one quite well)
00:47:538 (1) - Due to the new combo here, the flow goes weird again. 00:46:288 (2,3,1) - The flow in that part is all straight, and that bothers me a bit, since I'm not really sure how confortable beginner will feel while playing this. This is very personal though, because I don't feel confortable playing them myself. http://puu.sh/5sXcf.jpg Some ideas, i don't know whether you'll like that or not, just tell me what you think please
00:56:288 (2,3) - That up down isn't really recommended for easy as well.. an easy should be as easy to read as possible, but with that stacks, it's rather hard >_<
01:01:913 (2) - What about something like 251 71? That curvy feeling seems quite funny!
01:02:538 (1,2) - To follow the natural flow better here, I suggest putting (2) UNDER the slider end of (1). http://puu.sh/5sXi5.jpg Something like this, is what I mean. It will grant a better flow for sure.
01:07:538 (1,2,1,2) - Stacks stacks. It would be really nice if you could think of something different here.. 01:10:038 (1,2) - Especially this pattern. I can't recommend that at all.
01:15:038 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/5sXmG.jpg
01:22:538 (1,2,1,2) - ..? What happened with the DS here?
Well, I quite disagree with some parts here, as you can see. I'm sure we can find a solution we both agree on! Just let me know what you think
[Normal]
00:45:975 (2,3) - That blanketing here looks poorly made. Please try it again :O
00:47:538 (1) - Same issue here as in easy, I strongly assume that the natural flow will be better if the circle is above the slider. http://puu.sh/5sXDR.jpg
01:29:725 (4,1,2,3) - Flows weird to be honest, same issue as before (natural flow, slider goes <- the next circle is -> .. you know)
rest is fine~
[Nemis' Hard]
Cool diff!
[galvenize]
Uhm, I'm a bit confused, 00:16:288 - this hitsound tells me it's 5%, which wouldn't be audible, yet it's really loud? how?
00:43:319 (5) - how is that really really big jump explained? D: I feel that's way too high and breaks the flow quite much, what about http://puu.sh/5sY7U.jpg ?
01:10:819 (2,3,4) - Maybe use another pattern here instead of the stack? The stack doesn't really fit here imo. Triangle, or just normal spacing?
Interesting diff.
[Insane]
00:55:975 (5,6,7,8) - overmap?
01:03:788 (1) - I guess a curve with 1 point is enough xD
01:22:069 (3) - CTRL + G grants better flow i guess
01:04:725 (4,5) - For some reason I like those, but not the stream ones. hm.. Also, I would suggest only to delete the stream where I wrote overmap, and leave the rest, since they actualy sound better.
01:32:225 (1) - You're the only one who uses NC here ;w; I would make it equal to all other diffs (well, no. the others should make it equal to your diff)
00:18:475 (4) - 00:23:475 (7) - Add NC to emphasize those sliders?
Quite jumpy!
Alright.. call me if you have any questions, or so~
