Hi; I'm modding here~ 
*Bolded = Unrankable or strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.
>General
Good luck on the way

*Bolded = Unrankable or strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.
>General
- Turn off the letterbox. There is a video here. Turning it on will make the letterbox overlap the video during breaks.
- Uh, the map uses 1.0x spacing for 00:00:478 (1,2), but later it goes to 0.8x. Not really a problem, but why are you doing this?
- Err, the combo pattern seems to be messed up. Sometimes, you apply an NC every stanza, but another time, you're applying it every two stanzas. Can this be made consistent please?
- 00:32:809 (1,2) - Spacing inconsistency?
- 01:35:074 (1) - Add a finish here to follow the music more accurately?
- 01:40:048 - ^
- 01:59:633 (1,1) - Uhm, more spacing problem here...
- 00:05:452 (1) - Drag the middle anchor point to (380,104) so the blanket-ish pattern here looks better?
- 00:37:161 (6) - Drag the middle node to (80,320) and the last one to (24,284) for the same reason as the suggestion above?
- 01:14:778 (5) - And for blanketing stuff again, middle node @ (352,292) and (456,356)?
- 01:29:801 (5,1) - Eh wait, what's with the spacing here...
- 01:36:939 (5) - Remove the clap here? It breaks the hitsound pattern and is just unfitting and loud.
- 01:41:913 (6) - ^
- 01:46:887 - ^
- 00:12:602 (6,1) - Somehow swapping the NC here makes the play more comfortable... at least for me.
- 00:44:312 (4,5) - This also feels more comfortable.
- 00:44:933 (6,1) - Same as 00:12:602 (6,1).
- 01:08:871 (4,5,6) - Also try this, with (4) stacked above (5)'s head?
- 01:16:799 - 01:17:110 - I'm sure as hell the vocals here just demand to be mapped... Your choice, though, but I feel kinda awkward while playing here.
- 01:36:162 (3,4) - This pattern is kinda deceiving, IMO. These can be easily read as a regular 1/2 jump than a 1/1 one. Change the rhythm so it will be like 02:06:957 (3,4)?
- 01:44:711 (7,1) - Also swap NC like 00:12:602 (6,1)?
- 02:15:506 (5,1) - ^
- 02:18:615 (2) - Make this a 1/2 slider with one repeat to follow the vocal at 02:18:770? Similar case to 01:16:799 - 01:17:110...
- 02:20:480 (6,1) - Swap NC too here? (Yep, same as 00:12:602 (6,1)).
- 00:02:809 (1,2) - Combining them into a 1/2 slider that repeats once (using the (1) slider) will create a better flow, IMO.
- 00:18:353 (2,4) - (2)'s end overlaps a large part of (4). I suggest to move (4) out from (2) since the overlap just look weird.
- 00:30:322 (3,1,2) - The spacing change here is somewhat unreadable. Probably just for me, but yeah, just saying.
- 00:34:985 (1,2) - I would've liked you to swap the NC here to follow the stanza because applying NCs according to the pattern while disregarding the stanza is not really a good thing to do, but I'll let this one slip.
- 00:38:871 (1,2) - Same as 00:02:809 (1,2).
- 00:40:115 (1,2) - The jump here, while actually fits to the song, is kinda unexpected...
- 00:46:332 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - This fits with the vocal, and I think following it here is the best choice. The current rhythm doesn't seem to actually follow anything consistently...
- 01:06:695 (4) - What about lengthening the slider to 01:06:928 since there's a sound there and it's louder than 01:06:851?
- 01:07:317 (6,1) - Swap NC? I think the combo is too long...
- 01:09:027 (2,3,4) - Hmm, change them into two 1/2 sliders with a repeat? Far more comfortable for this place, IMO.
- 01:11:514 (2,3) - ^ (Just one slider ofc.)
- 01:41:291 (6,7,8) - Considering the song's intensity is constant here (in easier terms, there's nothing in the song that indicates the need of a spacing increase), this pattern can get really confusing...
- 01:47:043 (3,4,5,6) - I'd remove (6), move (4) and (5) 1/2-beats to the right of the timeline, and add a repeat for (3). Also feels better than the previous rhythm.
- 02:05:247 (7,8) - Ctrl+G? The flow is better like that, IMO.
- 02:10:843 (8,1) - Swap NC? I think it should be obvious why.
- 02:15:817 (7,1) - ^
- 02:17:060 (3,4,5,6) - Basically same as 01:47:043 (3,4,5,6).
Good luck on the way
