Lol I also wanted to know that. He might suddenly appear out of the blue..Pizzicato wrote:
any signs of cookiezi?
Also, good luck for all of the participants!
forum
osu! World Cup 2013 - Discussion Thread
posted
Total Posts
1,715
Also, good luck for all of the participants!
Topic Starter
I am actually thinking about reserving a slot for all countries that made it into the knock-out stage of the previous OWC. Means that everyone that ascends to knock-out stage has a reserved slot for the next years OWC.
Rest is first come firdt serve or maybe another metric (depending on ppv2)
Drop your opinions please
Rest is first come firdt serve or maybe another metric (depending on ppv2)
Drop your opinions please
No signs of cookiezi I guess XPPizzicato wrote:
any signs of cookiezi?
wasn't there talk of seeding countries or something like that? how about reserving slots for the top x seeded countries?
I like it, because without the strongest teams this is not the same.
8 or 4 would be fine. 16 is too much for seed imo.
I have an idea.
How about next years OWC there should be a requirement for the skill cap. Lets say there are certain songs picked out by the management that has a similarity of the difficulty for the maps that are going to be brought to the next years map pool. If people can pull off those off then they should be able to qualify for the tournament. On top of that, the countries that have the biggest population on this game could (doesn't have to) have reserved spots, due to the amount of players that there are in the country in example:Japan, China, US, Taiwan. They probably require more time in order to get their players chosen, that seems natural to me.
First come first serve is the most logical idea, since if the captains can't get their players chosen or to take action properly in a small duration, then it's their fault they didn't make it.
In all honest, I don't believe in the metric system, PP is already a disaster, I'm already assuming ppv2 is also going to be another calculation based system where people will figure out their way on how to farm those points just the way like the current system and the ranked score system was. Numbers don't always mean everything, it's about the skill that the player has.
How about next years OWC there should be a requirement for the skill cap. Lets say there are certain songs picked out by the management that has a similarity of the difficulty for the maps that are going to be brought to the next years map pool. If people can pull off those off then they should be able to qualify for the tournament. On top of that, the countries that have the biggest population on this game could (doesn't have to) have reserved spots, due to the amount of players that there are in the country in example:Japan, China, US, Taiwan. They probably require more time in order to get their players chosen, that seems natural to me.
First come first serve is the most logical idea, since if the captains can't get their players chosen or to take action properly in a small duration, then it's their fault they didn't make it.
In all honest, I don't believe in the metric system, PP is already a disaster, I'm already assuming ppv2 is also going to be another calculation based system where people will figure out their way on how to farm those points just the way like the current system and the ranked score system was. Numbers don't always mean everything, it's about the skill that the player has.
Topic Starter
A long lasting qualification metric can work, but I doubt that we can afford it. Especially considering that the other world cups are existent, too, the work load is immense and tbh I want to have some free-time and don't manage world cups the entire year (this goes even more for my fellow organizers and helping hands)
Please keep in mind that everything that involves manual organized matches are not working, since they can not be organized.
A map chart that has certain maps in it and not single players but countries could high rank on it could also work, but this requires a better metric than current pp. I want to wait for ppv2 before excluding the usage of ranking metrics.
Anyways reserving slots based on population seems weird to me. I think reserving slots by progress in previous owc works nicely, especially because winning group stage already rewards people even if they don't come far in the knock outs
Please keep in mind that everything that involves manual organized matches are not working, since they can not be organized.
A map chart that has certain maps in it and not single players but countries could high rank on it could also work, but this requires a better metric than current pp. I want to wait for ppv2 before excluding the usage of ranking metrics.
Anyways reserving slots based on population seems weird to me. I think reserving slots by progress in previous owc works nicely, especially because winning group stage already rewards people even if they don't come far in the knock outs
You could afford it if you didn't make the same staff in charge of all of them with the same expectations of streams etc. Every iteration that ppv2 has went through has been worse than what is in place now so I wouldn't have high hopes. And if you'd like to allow reservations for countries that made it to the single elimination bracket, why was China not reserve, but replace a slot after all of them were taken? Also curious as to why would you change the roster deadline to a week earlier just because the slots filled up fast, unless you plan on moving the rest of the event earlier there is no reason to move this deadline earlier on short notice.Loctav wrote:
A long lasting qualification metric can work, but I doubt that we can afford it. Especially considering that the other world cups are existent, too, the work load is immense and tbh I want to have some free-time and don't manage world cups the entire year (this goes even more for my fellow organizers and helping hands)
Please keep in mind that everything that involves manual organized matches are not working, since they can not be organized.
A map chart that has certain maps in it and not single players but countries could high rank on it could also work, but this requires a better metric than current pp. I want to wait for ppv2 before excluding the usage of ranking metrics.
Anyways reserving slots based on population seems weird to me. I think reserving slots by progress in previous owc works nicely, especially because winning group stage already rewards people even if they don't come far in the knock outs
I don't know if the organizers plan to increase the number of participating teams, so let's just say that the next OWC also has 32 teams. If that's the case, how about if the top 8 teams from this OWC have a reserved slot for the next one? Each of these 8 teams will be placed in one of the 8 groups in the next OWC, so they wouldn't meet each other in group stage. The rest of the teams will be selected on a "first-come-first-serve" basis.
Soarezi
i dont know anything about this. so i'll ask
why cant he?
ray of hope for everyone wwwwww
why cant he?
ray of hope for everyone wwwwww
Roster deadline and his eye problems probably.Pizzicato wrote:
i dont know anything about this. so i'll ask
why cant he?
ray of hope for everyone wwwwww
I consider 8 teams much. For me, with 4 teams is enough.
What yes it is most important is that it gives early warning before the registration dates. So big countries may make the choice of their best players, and not what we saw happen: Many countries waited until the weekend to send the registration, because of their internal competitions.
What yes it is most important is that it gives early warning before the registration dates. So big countries may make the choice of their best players, and not what we saw happen: Many countries waited until the weekend to send the registration, because of their internal competitions.
Soarezi
but SC2 is okay?
I am probably pointing out the obvious, but the tournament season was announced two months ago, though no exact date was declared.ErunamoJAZZ wrote:
What yes it is most important is that it gives early warning before the registration dates. So big countries may make the choice of their best players, and not what we saw happen: Many countries waited until the weekend to send the registration, because of their internal competitions.
osu! World Cup #4The teams had a rough idea as to when they would happen. So each individual country had plenty of time to determine who were represent them.
Registration Phase: Mid - End of October 2013
Group Stage and Robin Round Stages: November 2013
Finals: Begin of December 2013
He plays PSO2 for now lolAmaiHachimitsu wrote:
but SC2 is okay?
So I don't think that is healthy for one's sight.
@edit:
Concerning prizes:
@edit:
Concerning prizes:
#1: 6 month supporter tag, profile badge, OWC trophySo that means only the captain will have some memento and the rest of the team is to be satisfied by the picture? : D
They could always share :3AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
Quote:
#1: 6 month supporter tag, profile badge, OWC trophy
So that means only the captain will have some memento and the rest of the team is to be satisfied by the picture? : D
I think the best compromise is that all teams that reach the semifinals in OWC get a BYE for the next edition, it would at least ensure a spot for the cream of the crop.
Uh, does this mean that China registered before Vietnam, or that both teams registered "after deadline"Toroguythingymajig wrote:
Vietnam's slot has been replaced by China, because according to Loctav, we were a bit late in registering. Oh well, good luck to China!
Topic Starter
I am talking about future. In this owc, no one got reserved slots
@Cxu it was a close race at the end. Due to an internal error, the Chinese sign-up disappeared but the revision history restored it. Figuring that out, China was like the 31st registree. (People should stop submitting their registration 15 times >_____>)
Vietnam was the 34th or something
@Amai everyone would get the trophy. Not only the captain, lol
@JappyBabes internal issues require it. If I don't shorten it, we will run out of time when releasing the schedules and then the cry out is even bigger.
The workload on certain things resulted in being higher than expected. We just need the definite rosters earlier. Most teams were able to arrange it (29/32 so far), so I think you can, too. I believe in you
@Cxu it was a close race at the end. Due to an internal error, the Chinese sign-up disappeared but the revision history restored it. Figuring that out, China was like the 31st registree. (People should stop submitting their registration 15 times >_____>)
Vietnam was the 34th or something
@Amai everyone would get the trophy. Not only the captain, lol
@JappyBabes internal issues require it. If I don't shorten it, we will run out of time when releasing the schedules and then the cry out is even bigger.
The workload on certain things resulted in being higher than expected. We just need the definite rosters earlier. Most teams were able to arrange it (29/32 so far), so I think you can, too. I believe in you
You are right. However, I refer to a public announcement a week earlier. Generally nobody is going to move until there is a public announcement, and a date.me3lingual wrote:
I am probably pointing out the obvious, but the tournament season was announced two months ago, though no exact date was declared.ErunamoJAZZ wrote:
What yes it is most important is that it gives early warning before the registration dates. So big countries may make the choice of their best players, and not what we saw happen: Many countries waited until the weekend to send the registration, because of their internal competitions.osu! World Cup #4The teams had a rough idea as to when they would happen. So each individual country had plenty of time to determine who were represent them.
Registration Phase: Mid - End of October 2013
Group Stage and Robin Round Stages: November 2013
Finals: Begin of December 2013
Topic Starter
If you didn't prepare in advance, it's actually your own fault imo 
You don't need a date to preset your country's team
You don't need a date to preset your country's team
honestly in order to reserve a spot you don't even need a prepared team. Might as well just pick 4 you know who will participate to get the spot. You can replace and add new players afterwards, can't you?
How about adding a Pre-Group Stage Try Out?
In order to keep it short, the Try Out will be Score based battle royal. The management can select a set of maps to test various types of skills and each team is required to play every maps in the pool. The Total Score of each team will be compared per map and given a Ranking Point. The teams will be ranked based on their total Ranking Points after completing the map pool.
The calculation of Ranking Points (rp) depends on the tournament management's system of choice and how much weighting they choose to put on a team's finish position. A very crude and simple example of Ranking Points is given below:
The top 8 teams from the previous OWC can be seeded into the Group Stage so there will be 1 seeded team in each group + 3 teams through the Try Out.
Just a thought...
In order to keep it short, the Try Out will be Score based battle royal. The management can select a set of maps to test various types of skills and each team is required to play every maps in the pool. The Total Score of each team will be compared per map and given a Ranking Point. The teams will be ranked based on their total Ranking Points after completing the map pool.
The calculation of Ranking Points (rp) depends on the tournament management's system of choice and how much weighting they choose to put on a team's finish position. A very crude and simple example of Ranking Points is given below:
- 1st: +5 Ranking Points
- 2nd/3rd: +4
- 4th-10th: +3
- 11th-15th: +2
- 16th-25th: +1
- 26th and beyond: +0
The top 8 teams from the previous OWC can be seeded into the Group Stage so there will be 1 seeded team in each group + 3 teams through the Try Out.
Just a thought...
Imamoto
I love empty idealistic suggestions, can't get more worthless. <3
let's use pp as a viable way to determine skill levels
XDbuny wrote:
let's use pp as a viable way to determine skill levels
Might as well !roll for the winner =.=
When will #cow be opened for talking?
That would be quite fair actuallyOinari-sama wrote:
Might as well !roll for the winner =.=
Topic Starter
I wonder if people read :CLoctav wrote:
Please keep in mind that everything that involves manual organized matches are not working, since they can not be organized.
@Noriko eeeh
@AmaiHachimitsu we'll see. OWC didn't start yet. No need to open it for now. Also it will be way more moderated, so you should quit your moo'ing there - else we will only have it during matches.
To bring the "world" back to osu! World Cup, I have thought of a way of ensuring there is less drama about the participating countries. tl;dr but please read before bringing out your bazookas. It's just an idea.
I know this requires even more organizing, but I think it would be fair if the world was divided into more or less equally-numbered groups, like Africa and Europe etc. In those groups, all of the countries listed in the group (which means all of the country communities in osu! would be placed in a group based on the geographical and national setting) can present their team if they want to, and in every group there would be a mini-tournament from where the best countries would proceed to the OWC, making up 32 participants. This way, each and every country, be they really small and weak or really huge and skilled, would have the chance to play for a slot in the OWC and there would not (hopefully) be a case where people would complain because this or that country didn't even get a chance. There would be universal guidelines that would apply to each group, and as there would of course be the main tournament management, a group manager for each group would be assigned to be responsible for the success of the mini-tournament. That would divide workload between the tournament management overall and it would in my opinion be easier for everyone, both the staff and the players, to handle this tournament... The mini-tournaments could be held, let's say, in mid-August or September, this would leave people enough time to practice and the management to organize.
I know this requires even more organizing, but I think it would be fair if the world was divided into more or less equally-numbered groups, like Africa and Europe etc. In those groups, all of the countries listed in the group (which means all of the country communities in osu! would be placed in a group based on the geographical and national setting) can present their team if they want to, and in every group there would be a mini-tournament from where the best countries would proceed to the OWC, making up 32 participants. This way, each and every country, be they really small and weak or really huge and skilled, would have the chance to play for a slot in the OWC and there would not (hopefully) be a case where people would complain because this or that country didn't even get a chance. There would be universal guidelines that would apply to each group, and as there would of course be the main tournament management, a group manager for each group would be assigned to be responsible for the success of the mini-tournament. That would divide workload between the tournament management overall and it would in my opinion be easier for everyone, both the staff and the players, to handle this tournament... The mini-tournaments could be held, let's say, in mid-August or September, this would leave people enough time to practice and the management to organize.
Do you actually have to send in the form a second time for a roster update, or does the pm suffice?
Because the changes haven't been applied yet, or is it just because the tournament staff is busy?
Because the changes haven't been applied yet, or is it just because the tournament staff is busy?
Noriko this idea has been suggested in this thread already and he reply was "too much work for us"
Topic Starter
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.Omgforz wrote:
Do you actually have to send in the form a second time for a roster update, or does the pm suffice?
Because the changes haven't been applied yet, or is it just because the tournament staff is busy?
It's called asking for help, everything doesn't have to be done by one or three people or how many there is working on the well-being of the tournament. It won't ensure the effectiveness of things, it will just make them more complicated. If the staff only considered this, it'd be wonderful.AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
Noriko this idea has been suggested in this thread already and he reply was "too much work for us"
Loctav wrote:
I am actually thinking about reserving a slot for all countries that made it into the knock-out stage of the previous OWC. Means that everyone that ascends to knock-out stage has a reserved slot for the next years OWC.
Rest is first come firdt serve or maybe another metric (depending on ppv2)
Drop your opinions please
Good idea, absolutelly agree with this one, the 16 teams in fact could be the seeded teams for the next owc, two on each group.
The qualification one is also pretty good but yeah, it's too much work.
So that mean Venezuela WILL be playing with it full team or not? You haven't clear it yet and everyone in my team is worried :ILoctav wrote:
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.
Let's wait a little longer and let the management wake up first.-Pikachu- wrote:
So that mean Venezuela WILL be playing with it full team or not? You haven't clear it yet and everyone in my team is worried :ILoctav wrote:
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.
We'll probably learn this within today.The Singapore team is rather new lols.
Topic Starter
The message I sent you is yet absolute. Your team can play, the one person not.-Pikachu- wrote:
I guess so.
Don't drag stuff like this here. I told you to exchange the one person. If you did, everything is fine.
Confirmations to every team will be sent out when their roster has been finalized internally. During this, we'll add people to the wiki page. Please be patient since it can take some time to finalize everything (soooo maaaaaany pms)
I think 8 seeding countries is appropriate. 16 is half of the enrolled teams and 4 is too little to make a difference.
Edit: How about:
Seeding teams decided by the performance of teams in last 2 years:
Last year: +8(1st) +5(2nd) +3(3rd) +2 +1 +1 +1 +1
The year before last: +4(1st) +3(2nd) +2(3rd) +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
The 8 seeding teams will be divided into 8 different groups.
Edit: How about:
Seeding teams decided by the performance of teams in last 2 years:
Last year: +8(1st) +5(2nd) +3(3rd) +2 +1 +1 +1 +1
The year before last: +4(1st) +3(2nd) +2(3rd) +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
The 8 seeding teams will be divided into 8 different groups.
I think this OWC will be a close and suspensefully race, there are many good teams. Luckily Germany turned into a powerful and consistent folk of players and got pretty strong. So this year, I exceptionally believe in our team. Good luck to every team tho! :3
Also, how will technical issues be managed? I mean, if for some reason, a players game crashes, lags or freezes? Will there be a repetition for the whole map?
Or will it be ignored and called ''misfortune''?
It's also nice to see that Flashlight will not be part of the played modifications, since it's consisting of studying and memorizing a map.
Also, how will technical issues be managed? I mean, if for some reason, a players game crashes, lags or freezes? Will there be a repetition for the whole map?
Or will it be ignored and called ''misfortune''?
It's also nice to see that Flashlight will not be part of the played modifications, since it's consisting of studying and memorizing a map.
Topic Starter
@Cubex everything is settled in the rules, please refer to them. And please quit the FL discussions and give it a chance. Opinions stay opinions. Tastes stay tastes.
soon™Loctav wrote:
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.Omgforz wrote:
Do you actually have to send in the form a second time for a roster update, or does the pm suffice?
Because the changes haven't been applied yet, or is it just because the tournament staff is busy?
It'll get fun when #cow opens.Metro wrote:
Most boring owc thread ever.
It will get fun after drawings, I guess.
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.ZzZzZzZ
soon™Pizzicato wrote:
soon™Loctav wrote:
Changes will be applied from tomorrow on.
Topic Starter
Rosters updated.
This title is for all our future opponents http://osu.ppy.sh/s/79852
xdAmaiHachimitsu wrote:
This title is for all our future opponents http://osu.ppy.sh/s/79852
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/20156AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
This title is for all our future opponents http://osu.ppy.sh/s/79852
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
Uhhh, I'm gonna guess Loctav forgot to put harunya on our team. I'm 100% sure fabricio has put him there, and on the wiki we just have 7 players.
same case on our end. he forgot to put -Gio on our listBlue Dragon wrote:
Uhhh, I'm gonna guess Loctav forgot to put harunya on our team. I'm 100% sure fabricio has put him there, and on the wiki we just have 7 players.
Legend pleaseMetro wrote:
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
It took me several minutes to get that you used osu!tp.and why did you ignore accuracy
Matches are decided on combo, not accuracy.XPJ38 wrote:
and why did you ignore accuracy
Even if the 8 FC their accuracy is not their real accuracy as they're playing nervously. But you'd also need 8 FC's which is very rare.
And I didn't "code" the spreadsheet, Tom did. I got the idea and he helped me.
And I didn't "code" the spreadsheet, Tom did. I got the idea and he helped me.
so on the paper we're #3
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
I guess the missing players are ones who dropped out from the player check-up.
If there has been one... Maybe
If there has been one... Maybe
Thanks. I find stats like that very interesting and they will help me a lot during the streams. If anyone wants to make more statistics and stuff like that, by all means, I'd be very grateful.Metro wrote:
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
I selected the four best players according to stats but I might've fucked up in some countries. If you think another player should be on the list please PM me.
Topic Starter
As in old tradition, we seeded the teams into brackets (4 brackets this year, consisting of 8 per seeding group).
Luckily, I had helping hands, so thank you fartownik, Darksonic and Metro.
Here is the list:
Luckily, I had helping hands, so thank you fartownik, Darksonic and Metro.
Here is the list:
Top-seeded
- China
Germany
Japan
Korea
Poland
United States
Taiwan
Thailand
High-seeded
- Argentina
Brazil
Hong Kong
Latvia
Norway
Russian Federation
Sweden
United Kingdom
Low-seeded
- Australia
Austria
Canada
Finland
France
Indonesia
Italy
Netherlands
Unseeded
- Belgium
Bulgaria
Chile
Estonia
New Zealand
Philippines
Singapore
Venezuela
Norway as High-seeded? This is too good to be true.
Overall it seems this list has had expert opinion.
Overall it seems this list has had expert opinion.
HAHAHA UFCK YOU METRO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I LAIGH AT UR FACE HAHAHAHAAJ
fabriciorby wrote:
HAHAHA UFCK YOU METRO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I LAIGH AT UR FACE HAHAHAHAAJ
i ahte youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu seriouslyyyyy talkin
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHA
lmao fabri
what the actual fuck lol
Ilye_old
I can analyze info from previous osu world cupsMr Color wrote:
Thanks. I find stats like that very interesting and they will help me a lot during the streams. If anyone wants to make more statistics and stuff like that, by all means, I'd be very grateful.Metro wrote:
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
e.g.
Its Korea's 4th apperance in owc
In last OWC Taiwan reached semifinals
XXX played against YYY 3 times alredy and won 2 matches (after drawings)
individual players stats for specific map (after revealing mappool)
The thing is if this will be useful?
why u doing this to me
well with cookiezi retired i wonder who would win this world cup. ready the popcorn!
well with cookiezi retired i wonder who would win this world cup. ready the popcorn!Of course it's a common knowledge that Korea team does not exist without Cookiezi. I bet that Germany will win since they have CookEasy which is the most similar to Cookiezi.
pls
Soarezi
What about meAmaiHachimitsu wrote:
well with cookiezi retired i wonder who would win this world cup. ready the popcorn!Of course it's a common knowledge that Korea team does not exist without Cookiezi. I bet that Germany will win since they have CookEasy which is the most similar to Cookiezi.
pls
pls
Second on Italy team, t-thanks ;_;Metro wrote:
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
Topic Starter
I still wait for your replyfabriciorby wrote:
why u doing this to me
Btw: I had to postpone the drawings to the 31st Oct. Sorry. (Studying for a master degree eats time, you know :C )
AmaiHachimitsu wrote:
well with cookiezi retired i wonder who would win this world cup. ready the popcorn!Of course it's a common knowledge that Korea team does not exist without Cookiezi. I bet that Germany will win since they have CookEasy which is the most similar to Cookiezi.
pls
This is fixed.My Accuracy Sucks wrote:
Second on Italy team, t-thanks ;_;Metro wrote:
For anyone interested: owc Team Strenght.
Also removed Niko from the spreadsheet. He asked me to do it because he won't play any owc matches.
I did this from my mobile, somehow broke something and can't fix it. I'll fix it in a few hours.
Well that's actually not what I meant at all but ok xDMetro wrote:
This is fixed.My Accuracy Sucks wrote:
Second on Italy team, t-thanks ;_;
Also removed Niko from the spreadsheet. He asked me to do it because he won't play any owc matches.
I did this from my mobile, somehow broke something and can't fix it. I'll fix it in a few hours.
Topic Starter
Theeeere we go again.
You all know that talking about ToS violation is prohibited in public.
So don't do it again. I really don't feel like dropping silences now, so feel warned for the next time
(if you disagree with the management, you are free to quit. But do it silently, because I actually don't give a poop about what you think is fair or not - especially in this regard)
FYI: I rejected obvious troll submissions, based on the registered people. When a roster contained one banned account and more than 2 players without a single play count on osu! Standard or the ones that could not even pass a single Normal diff with better than a C, I ignored the registration.
The rules clearly state that all registrations get checked. Not only based on your account standing.
This tournament is a service hosted by me. I try to be fair and neutral. If you feel unfairly treated, it's kinda unclever to attack me and my management in public, since you will not help yourself.
If you don't want to play on the OWC, just don't show up. Some free wins for your group. But don't say that you would be better than all of the rest if you didn't even try.
Majority of the player base arranged with exchanging players that didn't pass our checks. If you fail to agree that we do that, ignore this tournament. You have no rights to participate here, it's a privilege. Sorry to sound so arrogant, but you always forget that it is not as a matter of course to have an OWC and to have you and your wishes in.
Tl;dr: if you don't like this OWC and how it is made, just leave. But don't get on my and everyone's else nerves. Thank you.
You all know that talking about ToS violation is prohibited in public.
So don't do it again. I really don't feel like dropping silences now, so feel warned for the next time
(if you disagree with the management, you are free to quit. But do it silently, because I actually don't give a poop about what you think is fair or not - especially in this regard)
FYI: I rejected obvious troll submissions, based on the registered people. When a roster contained one banned account and more than 2 players without a single play count on osu! Standard or the ones that could not even pass a single Normal diff with better than a C, I ignored the registration.
The rules clearly state that all registrations get checked. Not only based on your account standing.
This tournament is a service hosted by me. I try to be fair and neutral. If you feel unfairly treated, it's kinda unclever to attack me and my management in public, since you will not help yourself.
If you don't want to play on the OWC, just don't show up. Some free wins for your group. But don't say that you would be better than all of the rest if you didn't even try.
Majority of the player base arranged with exchanging players that didn't pass our checks. If you fail to agree that we do that, ignore this tournament. You have no rights to participate here, it's a privilege. Sorry to sound so arrogant, but you always forget that it is not as a matter of course to have an OWC and to have you and your wishes in.
Tl;dr: if you don't like this OWC and how it is made, just leave. But don't get on my and everyone's else nerves. Thank you.
khalifa father
It is country not privileged we all share same value, i not play for winning score/rank but play for fun but would like to participate with other country around world is experience, not many bahrain play such game but when do treated like this is not feel god.Loctav wrote:
Theeeere we go again.
You all know that talking about ToS violation is prohibited in public.
So don't do it again. I really don't feel like dropping silences now, so feel warned for the next time
(if you disagree with the management, you are free to quit. But do it silently, because I actually don't give a poop about what you think is fair or not - especially in this regard)
FYI: I rejected obvious troll submissions, based on the registered people. When a roster contained one banned account and more than 2 players without a single play count on osu! Standard or the ones that could not even pass a single Normal diff with better than a C, I ignored the registration.
The rules clearly state that all registrations get checked. Not only based on your account standing.
This tournament is a service hosted by me. I try to be fair and neutral. If you feel unfairly treated, it's kinda unclever to attack me and my management in public, since you will not help yourself.
If you don't want to play on the OWC, just don't show up. Some free wins for your group. But don't say that you would be better than all of the rest if you didn't even try.
Majority of the player base arranged with exchanging players that didn't pass our checks. If you fail to agree that we do that, ignore this tournament. You have no rights to participate here, it's a privilege. Sorry to sound so arrogant, but you always forget that it is not as a matter of course to have an OWC and to have you and your wishes in.
Tl;dr: if you don't like this OWC and how it is made, just leave. But don't get on my and everyone's else nerves. Thank you.
https://osu.ppy.sh/p/pp?s=3&o=1&c=BH#jumpto
we have sufficient player can pass normal for tournament , of course not winning but we can playing song , we have all are human value same it is not different from rank and pixel picture score we have equal live , you are judge from poor culture learn it basic of
it is ugly manner you ignore and not said this , also was delete many user support bahrain post is big disappoint treatment , i have sad now , god i wishing all god life
god bye tournament , thank you user reply and helping
Topic Starter
You are free to try again participating on OWC next year, if you don't sign up with banned users and users who did not even played this game on the level the OWC is for. I am not interested in what country you are, but I simply took a look on your roster and considered as unfair to you and the rest of the player base you let you into a world championship, if you did not even fulfill the basic skill requirements for it.
As soon as you and your team reached a competitive skill level fitting for the OWC, feel free to try again later.
As soon as you and your team reached a competitive skill level fitting for the OWC, feel free to try again later.
khalifa father
it is not skill, it is only picture game , you have blind for not let human play it equal valueLoctav wrote:
You are free to try again participating on OWC next year, if you don't sign up with banned users and users who did not even played this game on the level the OWC is for. I am not interested in what country you are, but I simply took a look on your roster and considered as unfair to you and the rest of the player base you let you into a world championship, if you did not even fulfill the basic skill requirements for it.
As soon as you and your team reached a competitive skill level fitting for the OWC, feel free to try again later.
owc Team Strength fixed now.
Soarezi
Do they let bad players join Ice hockey world cups, football world cups etc?
Do they let bad players join LoL world championship?
No.
Why would people want to see bad players against insanely good players?
There's a clear reason you guys are not accepted. This rule applies to every single tournament there is in the world, unless it's specially meant for (bad) players.
owait i believe that guy is a troll
Do they let bad players join LoL world championship?
No.
Why would people want to see bad players against insanely good players?
There's a clear reason you guys are not accepted. This rule applies to every single tournament there is in the world, unless it's specially meant for (bad) players.
owait i believe that guy is a troll
This doesn't make sense in some point, because if it was like that they would accept strong teams like Japan or Korea only. The only owc purpose is to have fun only imo, even if we know that probably the champion will be the same as last years, and many teams have a big advantage against many others, that doesn't mean it will be a good tournament too and that everyone can have fun.Soarezi wrote:
Do they let bad players join Ice hockey world cups, football world cups etc?
Do they let bad players join LoL world championship?
No.
Why would people want to see bad players against insanely good players?
There's a clear reason you guys are not accepted. This rule applies to every single tournament there is in the world, unless it's specially meant for (bad) players.