policy lynch Sakura
unvote vote: Sakura
unvote vote: Sakura
forum
Higurashi Mafia - Game Over!
posted
Total Posts
1,985
You're gonna PL me every game after that aren't you.
yes ~~ =w=
Well good news, I doubt you'd be using the term policy lynch and specially after that one game ended if you knew beforehand I was town so you just won a super town read.
On other news BRBP is still scum.
On other news BRBP is still scum.
I'm townreading BRBP atm. can't wait for your case on him ~
unvote vote: NoHItter
circular logic: Sephibro is mafia -> he's trying to set up some anti-town plan -> this -> he's mafia?
after my experience with Sakura I'm sticking to my damn playstyle of going for anyone who contradicts themselves or posts weird logic. for me I can perceive the town intent in his posts so this post seems really weird 0.0
unvote vote: NoHItter
what does him FoS'ing the same person twice imply?NoHItter wrote:
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?
it's not a discussion about a method of play. it's a discussion about your intent to find scum. given your previous games, I don't see a similar town intent to find scum in this game. = =NoHItter wrote:
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...
"here we go again" implies they did it before, can you link where they did it before plz? mb I just missed it @_@Zexion_Vi wrote:
And here we go again, acussing me of scum because I'm being shy? I'm not posting too much because of my RL lol. I don't know what's "shy" about me. Also I'm not good on scumhunting.
what is this I don't evenRantai wrote:
I don't see any logical or constructed defense.
Seems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.
circular logic: Sephibro is mafia -> he's trying to set up some anti-town plan -> this -> he's mafia?
after my experience with Sakura I'm sticking to my damn playstyle of going for anyone who contradicts themselves or posts weird logic. for me I can perceive the town intent in his posts so this post seems really weird 0.0
o.o has there been 1 before?DakeDekaane wrote:
At this rate, no lynch is going to happen. Nice timing to change the wagon.
Unvote
Vote: BRBP
Oops, my bad. I'm too used to dd/mm. But omg the 19.
Unvote
Vote: Sephibro
I have a stronger scum read on him and I'm still sticking with it.
inb4 Dake is scum.
Unvote
Vote: Sephibro
I have a stronger scum read on him and I'm still sticking with it.
inb4 Dake is scum.
And yes Irre, Sephibro's wagon.
i thought it was the 10th as well but yeah 10.19 wouldn't make much sense..didn't you say dake is scum already somewhere? @.@
How did you even think it was the 10th of the 19th month o.o
the deadline seems so high in compare to the other games i've played, i thought it's closer, but yeah idk.
Ehhh, if you played on MS you would see higher deadlines. I've even seen 27 day deadlines or stuff like 10 + Living players deadlines.
Dake is scum
and you're his partner?
Yes
.. -.- stop trolling
Our options are:
1. No Lynch - pros: since every character has at least one ability, we won't risk to lose any and we would still gather information from Nightkill's flip; if Nightkill does not occour it's all in town's favor, obviously. If we lynch a town and then another town dies N1, it's much worse than losing only one. cons: we have no chance of getting a scum killed D1 (but it's only 1/6, 1/4 or 1/3, depending if scum are 2, 3 or 4 IMO it's not worth)
2. Keep pressuring someone to get other possible information - pros: if we pressure a scum, there'll be a fakeclaim which we will eventually unmask. If we pressure a town, we'll also get useful information. cons: scum will read town's claims too
3. Policy Lynch - pros: we'll get information due to the flip. cons: we have high chance of getting a town lynched
My preference order is 1>2>3
For now it looks like I'm the only one to propose NL, most of you want a policy/random lynch and some want to pressure
Choose wisely
1. No Lynch - pros: since every character has at least one ability, we won't risk to lose any and we would still gather information from Nightkill's flip; if Nightkill does not occour it's all in town's favor, obviously. If we lynch a town and then another town dies N1, it's much worse than losing only one. cons: we have no chance of getting a scum killed D1 (but it's only 1/6, 1/4 or 1/3, depending if scum are 2, 3 or 4 IMO it's not worth)
2. Keep pressuring someone to get other possible information - pros: if we pressure a scum, there'll be a fakeclaim which we will eventually unmask. If we pressure a town, we'll also get useful information. cons: scum will read town's claims too
3. Policy Lynch - pros: we'll get information due to the flip. cons: we have high chance of getting a town lynched
My preference order is 1>2>3
For now it looks like I'm the only one to propose NL, most of you want a policy/random lynch and some want to pressure
Choose wisely
Scum can't NK in this game, unless they can increase the HS level of one person multiple times in a single night, and I doubt there's a PR that can kill.
If we go for no-lynch we are relying too much in PRs, which I don't like too much, as it's mere luck that we can get useful interaction/results without risking our identities, this could lead to a massclaim, which I'm still neutral to do.
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
If we go for no-lynch we are relying too much in PRs, which I don't like too much, as it's mere luck that we can get useful interaction/results without risking our identities, this could lead to a massclaim, which I'm still neutral to do.
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
I don't think so. As it was stated before, the game would be way too slow or too difficult if the scum couldn't increase multiple HS levels in a night. Taking a wild guess here, but its plausible to say they could kill a person a night if all of them targeted the same person.DakeDekaane wrote:
Scum can't NK in this game, unless they can increase the HS level of one person multiple times in a single night, and I doubt there's a PR that can kill.
If we go for no-lynch we are relying too much in PRs, which I don't like too much, as it's mere luck that we can get useful interaction/results without risking our identities, this could lead to a massclaim, which I'm still neutral to do.
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
No lynch is way too risky :c
uhm.. yeah
It means lynching someone with nothing more than just a feeling of him being scum. Policy lynch is lynching someone because he did something that may be scummy or anti-townDakeDekaane wrote:
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
The game is about that. A regular mafia game is not about PRs only, and you're rejecting the real way of playing it right now. PRs are a nice addition to the game, but they can't be treated as the main factor of winning it for the Town. Scum also has PRs and you don't know what they do (unless you're scum yourself, then you know what they do).
We're already past RVS so none of the lynches today will be random. We will gain information from it, it's better than No Lynch.
We're already past RVS so none of the lynches today will be random. We will gain information from it, it's better than No Lynch.
Don't tempt me to cut your throat with the Occam's Razor, bro.
Welp, it was just a typo in "Occam" (I wrote Ockham, fixed in 30 sec, you read so damn quickly).
Also nice topic avoidance.
btw, Occam's Razor applies to simple and obvious things only, which isn't our case
It is your case, believe me.
i analyzed pros and cons of each of those 3 strategies and expressed my preferences, what's your problem?
Sephibro wrote:
nice edit, i was about to correct that
i've just read edit = modkill so you should rather not do it farto..
Yeah, I know. Sorry for that. Wanted that post to look nice as a single one, didn't think someone would be that quick to read it.
Blue Yoshi's last post was almost one week ago, on page 6, and he was browsing the forum some minutes ago
Also:
unvote, vote: Sakura
Also:
How can you townread someone who didn't talk at all?Sakura wrote:
Town: NoHitter, Blue Yoshi, Irreversible.
unvote, vote: Sakura
town read came from my reaction test.
Topic Starter
Keep in mind that editing posts damages the integrity of the game. Refrain from editing posts even for harmless purposes and even when it won't show up.
This is an official warning. If there is evidence of post editing beyond this point, it will result in a mandatory modkill.
Prods will be sent momentarily.
This is an official warning. If there is evidence of post editing beyond this point, it will result in a mandatory modkill.
Prods will be sent momentarily.
Blue Yoshi wrote:
Explain por favor.Sakura wrote:
Vote: Blue Yoshi
Are you even reading the thread?
farto is scum anyway, so the modkill woudln't matter. 
i don't think you can handle many games at once, are you sure you posted in the right one?Sakura wrote:
Are you even reading the thread?
if you are, you should learn to read
BY was also included in the reaction test, so this applies to him as well as NH and you, apologies for not specifying.Sakura wrote:
I'm going to comment that my reason for Scum BRBP isn't meta related, but it is true I haven't mentioned it, I probably will do so next week if people still can't tell why or how I came up with those reads.Rantai wrote:
I'm a little concerned at how fast that wagon formed with a lot of meta arguments being thrown around.
And since when is me being in a lot of games a probelm? I can handle my current ammount.
You might want to self vote as that made absolutely no sense.pieguy1372 wrote:
what is this I don't even
circular logic: Sephibro is mafia -> he's trying to set up some anti-town plan -> this -> he's mafia?
after my experience with Sakura I'm sticking to my damn playstyle of going for anyone who contradicts themselves or posts weird logic. for me I can perceive the town intent in his posts so this post seems really weird 0.0
Assuming I'm even reading what you were trying to convey right: I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.
So about that BRBP wagon (this is mostly for me and visualising my rough thoughts)
fart - Meta and pressuring NH to massclaim (?)
Sakura - mystery tactics no. 201, yet to be revealed. Please look forward to it.
Sephibro - Meta and pressure? Jumped off almost immediately later.
Irre - I don't really understand what he was trying to say in his post, please elaborate? Something about aggression.
DD - I don't think I saw any reason except to increase a wagon? (?) Jumps off the wagon immediately.
You people confuse me, though what conclusions I draw here are mostly retrospective because I missed a large chunk of time. DD's one was the strangest of the 5, I understand a NL is bad but did you even have any reasons to vote him other than "oh he's got a wagon"?
Lynches provides information to town, No Lynch gives advantage to scum even if they can't NK. I wasn't afraid too much on voting BRBP as pieguy brought some points about him. (Even if he based on meta, thing which I don't like, but I'd want to trust him for now).
An FoS by itself tells people that "You're suspicious of X", but not ready to vote for him yet. Many people FoS one person after the vote someone more suspicious, or like me, do it at the start before placing down their votes.pieguy1372 wrote:
I'm townreading BRBP atm. can't wait for your case on him ~
unvote vote: NoHItterwhat does him FoS'ing the same person twice imply?NoHItter wrote:
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?
If you do FoS someone though and not vote someone, it's as if you're sitting on the fence. If that guy does turn out to be mafia while you didn't vote him, you can simply say that you FoS'd him. Essentially its like committing a vote without actually voting.
The fact that rEdo did this twice seems suspicious, like he wants to emphasize he's suspicious of Sephibro without actually voting him.
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things? (remember what I pointed out re: rEdo?) I am scumhunting, just in a different way than my usual "big plans", because I didn't think a "big plan" was viable for this game.pieguy1372 wrote:
it's not a discussion about a method of play. it's a discussion about your intent to find scum. given your previous games, I don't see a similar town intent to find scum in this game. = =NoHItter wrote:
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...
wait what? so by your own logic, you FoS'ing people before voting can be counted as fencesitting?NoHItter wrote:
If you do FoS someone though and not vote someone, it's as if you're sitting on the fence. If that guy does turn out to be mafia while you didn't vote him, you can simply say that you FoS'd him. Essentially its like committing a vote without actually voting.
you FoS people cause "you're not suspicious enough to make a vote on them just yet". this implies you have an intent to leave yourself the possibility to not vote
by that statement, you're leaving yourself the possibility to fencesit
can we wagon this guy plz
cause scum totally can't do that for towncredNoHItter wrote:
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things?
wait, me? watDake wrote:
I wasn't afraid too much on voting BRBP as pieguy brought some points about him. (Even if he based on meta, thing which I don't like, but I'd want to trust him for now)
are you implying this is a bad thing?Rantai wrote:
but did you even have any reasons to vote him other than "oh he's got a wagon"?
no, I'm saying by saying thisRantai wrote:
Assuming I'm even reading what you were trying to convey right: I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.
Seems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.you made an implicit assumption that he's mafia, and then you used this statement to draw the conclusion that he was mafia
can you link where he was scumpainting you plz? mb I just missed it 0.0Rantai wrote:
I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.
god he did it againfartownik wrote:
Also nice topic avoidance.
not sure if that makes you more or less suspicious, cause you did it after I explicitly said that argument doesn't work 0.0
@Sephibro:
exactly what I wanna say againfartownik wrote:
The game is about that. A regular mafia game is not about PRs only, and you're rejecting the real way of playing it right now. PRs are a nice addition to the game, but they can't be treated as the main factor of winning it for the Town. Scum also has PRs and you don't know what they do (unless you're scum yourself, then you know what they do).
We're already past RVS so none of the lynches today will be random. We will gain information from it, it's better than No Lynch.
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.pieguy1372 wrote:
wait what? so by your own logic, you FoS'ing people before voting can be counted as fencesitting?NoHItter wrote:
If you do FoS someone though and not vote someone, it's as if you're sitting on the fence. If that guy does turn out to be mafia while you didn't vote him, you can simply say that you FoS'd him. Essentially its like committing a vote without actually voting.
you FoS people cause "you're not suspicious enough to make a vote on them just yet". this implies you have an intent to leave yourself the possibility to not vote
by that statement, you're leaving yourself the possibility to fencesit
can we wagon this guy plz
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.pieguy1372 wrote:
cause scum totally can't do that for towncredNoHItter wrote:
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things?
yeah you voted him but what if you didn't? then, by your own logic, if he flips scum you can be like "oh hey I knew there was something off about him".NoHItter wrote:
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.
nice misrep, I never said it wasn't scumhuntingNoHItter wrote:
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.
I just said scum can do that and/or make the claim they did that for towncred.
pieguy1372 wrote:
are you implying this is a bad thing? So. A vote with no substantial reason and simply following the wagon is not cause for concern? I sure hope you're not implying the opposite unless you condone what is essentially sheeping.
no, I'm saying by saying thisSeems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.you made an implicit assumption that he's mafia, and then you used this statement to draw the conclusion that he was mafia
There is no assumption of him being mafia in there, I was calling him out for 1. His ill thought out plan. 2. His anti-town plan (which it was if executed) 3. He dodged my points and simply said me and sakura for mafia. Actually I never assumed he was mafia at all, ever. I may have implied it through the scumpainting though. The only thing I "assumed" was he didn't think his plan through at all (reiterated below anyway).can you link where he was scumpainting you plz? mb I just missed it 0.0Rantai wrote:
I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.Sephibro wrote:
It could be as you say...but are you telling this because you actually think it, or because you're afraid of that strategy?Actually my point throughout the entire thing was basically saying "this plan won't actually do anything beneficial for town" - if you notice from my early posts, I was attacked for questioning him, not me attacking him (I retaliated).Rantai wrote:
If you want to try to play the scumpainting game with me...
And bolding fail, whatever.
That's the point. FoS-ing by itself can mean fence sitting yes, but it's not enough to raise suspicion that much. It can truly be a gesture saying, "Hey I think this guy is suspicious." BUT the thing I was pointing out was that rEdo FoS'd Sephibro twice without voting him.pieguy1372 wrote:
yeah you voted him but what if you didn't? then, by your own logic, if he flips scum you can be like "oh hey I knew there was something off about him".NoHItter wrote:
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.
Then please tell me what things you consider to be "town intent to find scum"pieguy1372 wrote:
nice misrep, I never said it wasn't scumhuntingNoHItter wrote:
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.
I just said scum can do that and/or make the claim they did that for towncred.
Rantai, I said something about agressive answer yes. Just the way he acted: 'can you even talk' is just not a really calm manner, don't you think? Also I suppose Sakura caught 2 scum in her reaction test, due to BRBP's reaction, so we should focus on them. (Sephi and BRBP themselves, Sephi and NoHitter, BRBP and NoHitter, or all (if it's possible, afaik we don't know how many scum there is,right?)
But what still bothers me is that farto even said he's scum, so he wants to get voted doesn't he? ><
But what still bothers me is that farto even said he's scum, so he wants to get voted doesn't he? ><
Null tell on this context.Irreversible wrote:
But what still bothers me is that farto even said he's scum, so he wants to get voted doesn't he? ><
whatpieguy1372 wrote:
god he did it againfartownik wrote:
Also nice topic avoidance.
not sure if that makes you more or less suspicious, cause you did it after I explicitly said that argument doesn't work 0.0
I was referring to Sephibro pointing out my post edit instead of commenting on my status on him.
Yet you're reading stuff concerning you.BRBP wrote:
Haven't read previous page yet. Also a prod dodge, won't be around for a day or so.
You're right, I made a mistake : you MUST be involved in this scum-caught reaction thing, otherwise it wouldn't make much sense, you're rightBRBP wrote:
That makes no sense at all.Irreversible wrote:
Also I suppose Sakura caught 2 scum in her reaction test, due to BRBP's reaction, so we should focus on them.
So either NoHitter, sephibro, or both are your scumpartners, I suppose.
I already responded to that - I simply forgot that I did that for the first time, and at the moment I've posted a second FoS, I wanted some more information about Sephibro. you're just drilling into this too much.NoHitter wrote:
That's the point. FoS-ing by itself can mean fence sitting yes, but it's not enough to raise suspicion that much. It can truly be a gesture saying, "Hey I think this guy is suspicious." BUT the thing I was pointing out was that rEdo FoS'd Sephibro twice without voting him.
oh, and yeah.
FoS: NoHitter, Sakura
four last posts looked like you were defending from pieguy too much about that case, which irks me a lot. and Sakura isn't posting at all, she's just randomly voting with no real explanatation, not sure if busy or like Sephibro said, trying to play a cautious scum ._.
Apparently BRBP isnt the only one not reading the thread.rEdo wrote:
Sakura isn't posting at all, she's just randomly voting with no real explanatation, not sure if busy or like Sephibro said, trying to play a cautious scum ._.
again, Sakura and Rantai are the most suspect ones, followed by DD and NH, Blue Yoshi still didn't post
And Sakura, stop telling bullshit about us not reading the thread, the only interaction you had with Blue Yoshi was
And Sakura, stop telling bullshit about us not reading the thread, the only interaction you had with Blue Yoshi was
(p/2611149) This was Blue Yoshi's last postBlue Yoshi wrote:
Explain por favor.Sakura wrote:
Vote: Blue Yoshi
If you had been reading the thread you would know why I'm townreading Blue Yoshi.
cause you're scum and thus you know the identity of all the town?
Yet you still struggle to make a single decent case on me.Sephibro wrote:
again, Sakura and Rantai are the most suspect ones, followed by DD and NH, Blue Yoshi still didn't post
If I didn't actually believe that you were just plain dumb, I'd have thought you were mafia. (ie null atm)
@redo - If anything I'm more concerned about pieguy's tunnel vision on NH. Or it could just be me being biased about the fact that their entire back and forth started on a bloody meta argument.
Eh I don't see how that indicates anything but I can at least see what you mean by aggression.Irreversible wrote:
Rantai, I said something about agressive answer yes. Just the way he acted: 'can you even talk' is just not a really calm manner, don't you think? Also I suppose Sakura caught 2 scum in her reaction test, due to BRBP's reaction, so we should focus on them. (Sephi and BRBP themselves, Sephi and NoHitter, BRBP and NoHitter, or all (if it's possible, afaik we don't know how many scum there is,right?)
Wow are you really that dense.Sephibro wrote:
cause you're scum and thus you know the identity of all the town?
From the same post you grabbed the reads from.
Sakura wrote:
Yeah, his claim doesn't clear him like at all, but I don't think a full claim is necessary unless at L-1 with intent.
As for the results Irre's been waiting for.
Town: NoHitter, Blue Yoshi, Irreversible.
Scum: BRBP, Sephibro.
Yeah I was indeed reaction testing, i'm just gonna out the results for now and see if anyone can tell how I got those results.
that result came ONLY from that post that i've already posted and linked, Sakura.
first scum found already i guess
first scum found already i guess
Ok so Sephibro's eating a satoshi bat to the skull tonight (scum can't read), just gonna ignore him and focus on BRBP
are you implying actions determine intent? cause it's the other way around, intent determines actionsNoHItter wrote:
Then please tell me what things you consider to be "town intent to find scum"
sometimes just jumping on a bandwagon to add pressure is a good ideaRantai wrote:
So. A vote with no substantial reason and simply following the wagon is not cause for concern? I sure hope you're not implying the opposite unless you condone what is essentially sheeping.
you're just mad cause I'm starting to push on you too ~Rantai wrote:
@redo - If anything I'm more concerned about pieguy's tunnel vision on NH. Or it could just be me being biased about the fact that their entire back and forth started on a bloody meta argument.
yeah that's what I meanRantai wrote:
I may have implied it through the scumpainting though
but seems you did it on purpose @_@ ok then.
oh sryfartownik wrote:
I was referring to Sephibro pointing out my post edit instead of commenting on my status on him.
wait, what? Sakura called NH as town. she only called Sephi and BRBP as scum 0.0Irreversible wrote:
Also I suppose Sakura caught 2 scum in her reaction test, due to BRBP's reaction, so we should focus on them. (Sephi and BRBP themselves, Sephi and NoHitter, BRBP and NoHitter, or all (if it's possible, afaik we don't know how many scum there is,right?)
what about fartownik and Rantai?Sephibro wrote:
btw BRBP's behaviour is really close to his own in Information Mafia, where he was scum. I agree on pressuring him
this. even if it was just for pressure, something about that wagon just seems off for me >_<//Sakura wrote:
the speed of sephibro's wagon while not alignment indicative is something I don't like.
oh hey NH was the last one on the wagon 0.0
Yeah, exceptional activity!
\o/
Yo scum man.Rantai wrote:
Yeah, exceptional activity!
Serious statement, sarcasm through the roof.
Seriously where is everyone?
Seriously where is everyone?
are we going to say nothing at all until deadline?
@mod: requesting a replacement for Blue Yoshi
@mod: requesting a replacement for Blue Yoshi
The people that hadn't specify their votes should do that, simple as that.
SPECIFIED*
YOU SEE I DON'T EDIT I'M A GOOD BOY
YOU SEE I DON'T EDIT I'M A GOOD BOY
can I request this modvote? or however it's called xD
@mod: vote count please
@mod: vote count please
Actually... the pair of Sephibro & rEdo seems overly plausible in my head at the moment.Unofficial Votecount wrote:
[3] BRBP -- fartownik, Sakura, Irreversible
[3] Sephibro -- Zexion_Vi, NoHitter, DakeDekaane
[2] Sakura -- BlueYoshi, Sephibro
[1] NoHitter -- pieguy1372
[1] pieguy1372 -- Rantai
[0] Blue Yoshi --
[0] DakeDekaane --
[0] fartownik --
[0] Irreversible --
[0] Rantai --
[0] rEdo --
[0] Zexion_Vi --
Not Voting -- rEdo, BRBP
Deadline is at 10:30 AM CST (GMT-6) on 10/19.
I don't remember voting, unless RB did.
Oh he did.
Actually I'm going to leave it there for now, because I'm biased. (read back for the reason)
Actually I'm going to leave it there for now, because I'm biased. (read back for the reason)
Okay so, I find it quite suspicious that BRBP just doesn't talk anymore just because he has 3 votes on him.
this is exactly how BRBP was playing Information Mafia, in which he was scum, but i didn't play any game with him where he wasn't scum so i can't say
I'm ok with a policy lynch on BRBP, BUT Sephibro doesn't like them, what to do?
Well I'm only one person, if 7 players want a lynch, lynch will be
well, since nobody is saying something.
too bad nobody is doing anything, silence goes always in scum's favor, as we saw on Vengeful Mafia game
orz
Guyz plz do magic. If you don't want to vote someone from the most-voted right now, explain why. If you want to stay on your current vote, explain why. If you don't want to vote, explain why too.
Why don't you start?
BRBP is the most-voted at the moment and I think I've explained enough why I'm voting him.
i moved away from the BRBP wagon because nobody else seemed willing to pressure him
unvote, vote BRBP
btw, Sakura is still my main suspect
unvote, vote BRBP
btw, Sakura is still my main suspect
I haven't formed an opinion on BRBP at the moment and I was concerned on the wagon on him previously.
I am staying on pieguy because his massive tunnel based on meta is giving off a lot of alarm bells, seems like it's forced to make it look like content.
I am staying on pieguy because his massive tunnel based on meta is giving off a lot of alarm bells, seems like it's forced to make it look like content.
Indeed it is, but I can remember I tunneled him due that and lost, so it's a null read so far for me.
MOD: I'm on V/LA until the 17th. Hopefully earlier.
My PC monitor broke and I'm having trouble posting from mobile. Sorry about this.
If I can't get it fixed by then, feel free to replace.
My PC monitor broke and I'm having trouble posting from mobile. Sorry about this.
If I can't get it fixed by then, feel free to replace.
Topic Starter
Vote Count 1.06
A public diner isn't a good place for private discussions.
[4] BRBP -- fartownik, Sakura, Irreversible, Sephibro (L-3)
[3] Sephibro -- Zexion_Vi, NoHitter, DakeDekaane
[1] NoHitter -- pieguy1372
[1] pieguy1372 -- Rantai
[1] Sakura -- BlueYoshi
[0] Blue Yoshi --
[0] DakeDekaane --
[0] fartownik --
[0] Irreversible --
[0] Rantai --
[0] rEdo --
[0] Zexion_Vi --
Not Voting -- rEdo, BRBP
Deadline is at 10:30 AM CST (GMT-6) on 10/19.
NoHitter is V/LA until Oct. 17.
Searching for a replacement for Blue Yoshi.
A public diner isn't a good place for private discussions.
[4] BRBP -- fartownik, Sakura, Irreversible, Sephibro (L-3)
[3] Sephibro -- Zexion_Vi, NoHitter, DakeDekaane
[1] NoHitter -- pieguy1372
[1] pieguy1372 -- Rantai
[1] Sakura -- BlueYoshi
[0] Blue Yoshi --
[0] DakeDekaane --
[0] fartownik --
[0] Irreversible --
[0] Rantai --
[0] rEdo --
[0] Zexion_Vi --
Not Voting -- rEdo, BRBP
Deadline is at 10:30 AM CST (GMT-6) on 10/19.
NoHitter is V/LA until Oct. 17.
Searching for a replacement for Blue Yoshi.
town: Sakura, Sephibro, Irre
null-town: DakeDekaane, fartownik, BRBP
null: everyone else
scum: NH
also, is the tunneling or the meta more important?
and I blame the long deadlines for the lack of activity. my game with only 4 days for each game day was like one of the most active games with only 12 players and 4 game days 0.0 and it seems the longer the deadline (Information Mafia, Newbie 9, etc.) the less active the game.
unvote vote: BRBP
I'm tentatively townreading him atm but mb it's a good idea to add pressure to see if we can get something. also this is L - 2
I wanna lynch NH. he's acting really weird plus I'm getting all sorts of weird vibes from the Sephibro wagon, which he was incidentally the last one on. @_@ besides that, I'm fine with anyone who's under "null" or "scum" above.
null-town: DakeDekaane, fartownik, BRBP
null: everyone else
scum: NH
that's an interesting pointIrreversible wrote:
Okay so, I find it quite suspicious that BRBP just doesn't talk anymore just because he has 3 votes on him.
answer my questionSephibro wrote:
this is exactly how BRBP was playing Information Mafia, in which he was scum, but i didn't play any game with him where he wasn't scum so i can't say
can you link where I'm "tunneling"? I'm trying to pressure NH a lot but I'm not focusing on just him. = =Rantai wrote:
I am staying on pieguy because his massive tunnel based on meta is giving off a lot of alarm bells, seems like it's forced to make it look like content.
also, is the tunneling or the meta more important?
can you explain why rEdo plz? you weren't even mentioning him anywhere before o.ofartownik wrote:
Actually... the pair of Sephibro & rEdo seems overly plausible in my head at the moment.
and I blame the long deadlines for the lack of activity. my game with only 4 days for each game day was like one of the most active games with only 12 players and 4 game days 0.0 and it seems the longer the deadline (Information Mafia, Newbie 9, etc.) the less active the game.
unvote vote: BRBP
I'm tentatively townreading him atm but mb it's a good idea to add pressure to see if we can get something. also this is L - 2
I wanna lynch NH. he's acting really weird plus I'm getting all sorts of weird vibes from the Sephibro wagon, which he was incidentally the last one on. @_@ besides that, I'm fine with anyone who's under "null" or "scum" above.
nah I wasn't referring to a claim, I was referring to a possible suspicious action that you might do if you get pressuredBRBP wrote:
Won't work. I refuse to let scum get a 1-by-1 massclaim by bringing everyone close to a lynch with just lazy pressure votes. Make a real case and try again.
stuff like this is why I had a townread on you in the first place though. unvote
vote: NoHItter
wanna lynch NH with me? ~
Topic Starter
GuyInFreezer replaces Blue Yoshi effective immediately.
Do I need to read this or no
Page 7.
omg ppl are actually using FoS.
omg ppl are actually using FoS.