it's still weird, you put tons of scumpartners, but yeah
i didn't understand what you mean with thisIrreversible wrote:
you put tons of scumpartners
no, I didn't. :> I wanna know how you intend to find out who the mafia are by playing like this. without voting people to pressure them or get information, it becomes much harder to get "sure" information, at least IMO.NoHItter wrote:
I think you misread what I wrote. I said that I wouldn't vote someone quickly unless there was sure information. Since it's D1 and we have no sure information, I won't vote quickly.
why Sakura? I'm townreading her atmSephibro wrote:
Sakura + Rantai for scum imo
Sephibro wrote:
re-read all my posts and you'll see that there's no incoherence in my thoughts
kNoHitter wrote:
Sephibro wrote:
pieguy read this topic but he didn't answer, that's suspect.Sephibro wrote:
pieguy is the only town leaning read i have for now
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.pieguy1372 wrote:
no, I didn't. :> I wanna know how you intend to find out who the mafia are by playing like this. without voting people to pressure them or get information, it becomes much harder to get "sure" information, at least IMO.
I don't understand this.Sephibro wrote:
Actually i wanted to AVOID a massclaim until i thought about that last strategy, but sinceknowing this, it is clear that a massclaim would be completely uselessCalignoBot wrote:
c. To be absolutely clear: Any character can be any alignment.
with "those posts" i mean to propose the massclaim as a good strategy in the endSephibro wrote:
Btw i can tell you that my role's abilities and alignment are the same as anime character's, that's why i supposed it was like this for every character in the game and made those posts
Thinking about it, the best it would do is allow role speculation to occur, which doesn't really help town at all.rEdo wrote:
don't wanna defend him or anything, but that could've gone out of curiousity. still, I have no idea what we're going to get even if everybody claims. in this game even Satoko could be scum, just for the shiggles, so setup speculation is pretty much useless at this point of the game.
I'm not ignore you if that makes you feel better.DakeDekaane wrote:
I love how I'm being ignored.
I've only heard from Rantai so far, what do YOU think?Irreversible wrote:
And are you going to tell the reasons why?
I believe Sakura is just making reaction tests. Pressure is put upon you when you are voted and often people say something they shouldn't have to. Anyways, seems like a good investigation. Pretty obvious Sephibro is scum, he just contradicted himself way too many times. And his reasons are just... meh.Irreversible wrote:
This might sound stupid now, but may I ask why i have a townread? People tend to trick me with that, so that's what gives be a slight scumread about you. Nevertheless, it's good that you're scumhunting.
Please dont ever target me with this.Sephibro wrote:
Calming Presence: night active - i may visit one person a night, calming them down > target loses 2HS levels
RogerSakura wrote:
.
backing your arguments with a vote helps a lot in getting discussion. proving my point :>NoHItter wrote:
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.
exactly what I want to sayfartownik wrote:
EBWODP: Forgot to mention. STOP BEING FUCKING SILLY. Flavor doesn't matter ANYHOW while judging the alignment in this game. I'm talking to Sephibro and Irreversible here. I stated that shit right in the beginning, and I thought you understood.
Sephibro wrote:
pieguy read this topic but he didn't answer, that's suspect.
@Sephibro: I'm so busy =A= I don't have the chance to post every time I look at the thread. I like to check back here every so often to keep up even if I don't have the chance to make a post orzfartownik wrote:
Sakura was writing up for a little while too. She decided to post only after I did though, with nothing else than a response to me as her first sentence.
Intredasting.
BRBP wrote:
What is my town meta then?
townIrre wrote:
This might sound stupid now, but may I ask why i have a townread? People tend to trick me with that, so that's what gives be a slight scumread about you. Nevertheless, it's good that you're scumhunting.
rEdo wrote:
Sephibro wrote:
And tbh, i still think NoLynch is a good strategy for d1 in a game like this. Well, unless you want everyone to claim d1mind to elaborate why do you think this is a good strategy?nevermind, you did that earlier. so what if we don't lynch anyone today? we also won't get to know ANYTHING from it, while the HS levels increase. we won't gain much by massclaiming either.
holy shit I just ended up typing the same stuff as farto did, AGAIN
FACK YOU STOP READING MY MIND WHILE I'M READING THE TOPIC AND RESPONDING TO THEM POSTS RESPECTIVELY IN ORDERthe game would we way too slow if scum couldn't add up less than 3 HS points, actually I believe it's more.Sephibro wrote:
the nightkill only occours when someone reaches 5 HS, I don't think that someone can reach such a high value on n1 only
FoS: Sephibro
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?rEdo wrote:
don't wanna defend him or anything, but that could've gone out of curiousity. still, I have no idea what we're going to get even if everybody claims. in this game even Satoko could be scum, just for the shiggles, so setup speculation is pretty much useless at this point of the game.
FoS: Sephibro
gonna hold on with the vote, I wanna read some more from him.
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...pieguy1372 wrote:
backing your arguments with a vote helps a lot in getting discussion. proving my point :>NoHItter wrote:
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.
As I said, it's not certain. I believe he's not scum, but I wouldn't put him on the townread list either since he still might end up being scum. The list consists pretty much safe bets of players being Town, Sephibro is yet to be one.NoHitter wrote:
@farto:
You believe Sephibro's not scum, but you don't think he's town either based on your read list?
That's legit, i agree that i've been playing quite retarded lately; i had convinced myself that game alignment == anime alignment and blindly focused on that despite warnings.fartownik wrote:
As I said, it's not certain. I believe he's not scum, but I wouldn't put him on the townread list either since he still might end up being scum. The list consists pretty much safe bets of players being Town, Sephibro is yet to be one.
I'm going to comment that my reason for Scum BRBP isn't meta related, but it is true I haven't mentioned it, I probably will do so next week if people still can't tell why or how I came up with those reads.Rantai wrote:
I'm a little concerned at how fast that wagon formed with a lot of meta arguments being thrown around.
BRBP wrote:
Sakura wrote:
Vote: Blue YoshiSakura wrote:
Unvote
Vote: NoHitterThis is literally all you've said. Can you even talk?Sakura wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Sephibro
Deadline is on the 19th... yeah no.DakeDekaane wrote:
At this rate, no lynch is going to happen. Nice timing to change the wagon.
what does him FoS'ing the same person twice imply?NoHItter wrote:
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?
it's not a discussion about a method of play. it's a discussion about your intent to find scum. given your previous games, I don't see a similar town intent to find scum in this game. = =NoHItter wrote:
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...
"here we go again" implies they did it before, can you link where they did it before plz? mb I just missed it @_@Zexion_Vi wrote:
And here we go again, acussing me of scum because I'm being shy? I'm not posting too much because of my RL lol. I don't know what's "shy" about me. Also I'm not good on scumhunting.
what is this I don't evenRantai wrote:
I don't see any logical or constructed defense.
Seems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.
o.o has there been 1 before?DakeDekaane wrote:
At this rate, no lynch is going to happen. Nice timing to change the wagon.
Unvote
Vote: BRBP
I don't think so. As it was stated before, the game would be way too slow or too difficult if the scum couldn't increase multiple HS levels in a night. Taking a wild guess here, but its plausible to say they could kill a person a night if all of them targeted the same person.DakeDekaane wrote:
Scum can't NK in this game, unless they can increase the HS level of one person multiple times in a single night, and I doubt there's a PR that can kill.
If we go for no-lynch we are relying too much in PRs, which I don't like too much, as it's mere luck that we can get useful interaction/results without risking our identities, this could lead to a massclaim, which I'm still neutral to do.
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
It means lynching someone with nothing more than just a feeling of him being scum. Policy lynch is lynching someone because he did something that may be scummy or anti-townDakeDekaane wrote:
How is that random lynch thing? I can't see that happening or being suggested.
Sephibro wrote:
nice edit, i was about to correct that
How can you townread someone who didn't talk at all?Sakura wrote:
Town: NoHitter, Blue Yoshi, Irreversible.
Blue Yoshi wrote:
Explain por favor.Sakura wrote:
Vote: Blue Yoshi
i don't think you can handle many games at once, are you sure you posted in the right one?Sakura wrote:
Are you even reading the thread?
BY was also included in the reaction test, so this applies to him as well as NH and you, apologies for not specifying.Sakura wrote:
I'm going to comment that my reason for Scum BRBP isn't meta related, but it is true I haven't mentioned it, I probably will do so next week if people still can't tell why or how I came up with those reads.Rantai wrote:
I'm a little concerned at how fast that wagon formed with a lot of meta arguments being thrown around.
You might want to self vote as that made absolutely no sense.pieguy1372 wrote:
what is this I don't even
circular logic: Sephibro is mafia -> he's trying to set up some anti-town plan -> this -> he's mafia?
after my experience with Sakura I'm sticking to my damn playstyle of going for anyone who contradicts themselves or posts weird logic. for me I can perceive the town intent in his posts so this post seems really weird 0.0
An FoS by itself tells people that "You're suspicious of X", but not ready to vote for him yet. Many people FoS one person after the vote someone more suspicious, or like me, do it at the start before placing down their votes.pieguy1372 wrote:
I'm townreading BRBP atm. can't wait for your case on him ~
unvote vote: NoHItterwhat does him FoS'ing the same person twice imply?NoHItter wrote:
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things? (remember what I pointed out re: rEdo?) I am scumhunting, just in a different way than my usual "big plans", because I didn't think a "big plan" was viable for this game.pieguy1372 wrote:
it's not a discussion about a method of play. it's a discussion about your intent to find scum. given your previous games, I don't see a similar town intent to find scum in this game. = =NoHItter wrote:
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...
wait what? so by your own logic, you FoS'ing people before voting can be counted as fencesitting?NoHItter wrote:
If you do FoS someone though and not vote someone, it's as if you're sitting on the fence. If that guy does turn out to be mafia while you didn't vote him, you can simply say that you FoS'd him. Essentially its like committing a vote without actually voting.
cause scum totally can't do that for towncredNoHItter wrote:
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things?
wait, me? watDake wrote:
I wasn't afraid too much on voting BRBP as pieguy brought some points about him. (Even if he based on meta, thing which I don't like, but I'd want to trust him for now)
are you implying this is a bad thing?Rantai wrote:
but did you even have any reasons to vote him other than "oh he's got a wagon"?
no, I'm saying by saying thisRantai wrote:
Assuming I'm even reading what you were trying to convey right: I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.
Seems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.you made an implicit assumption that he's mafia, and then you used this statement to draw the conclusion that he was mafia
can you link where he was scumpainting you plz? mb I just missed it 0.0Rantai wrote:
I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.
god he did it againfartownik wrote:
Also nice topic avoidance.
exactly what I wanna say againfartownik wrote:
The game is about that. A regular mafia game is not about PRs only, and you're rejecting the real way of playing it right now. PRs are a nice addition to the game, but they can't be treated as the main factor of winning it for the Town. Scum also has PRs and you don't know what they do (unless you're scum yourself, then you know what they do).
We're already past RVS so none of the lynches today will be random. We will gain information from it, it's better than No Lynch.
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.pieguy1372 wrote:
wait what? so by your own logic, you FoS'ing people before voting can be counted as fencesitting?NoHItter wrote:
If you do FoS someone though and not vote someone, it's as if you're sitting on the fence. If that guy does turn out to be mafia while you didn't vote him, you can simply say that you FoS'd him. Essentially its like committing a vote without actually voting.
you FoS people cause "you're not suspicious enough to make a vote on them just yet". this implies you have an intent to leave yourself the possibility to not vote
by that statement, you're leaving yourself the possibility to fencesit
can we wagon this guy plz
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.pieguy1372 wrote:
cause scum totally can't do that for towncredNoHItter wrote:
If that were true then why was I rereading the thread and looking for questionable things?
yeah you voted him but what if you didn't? then, by your own logic, if he flips scum you can be like "oh hey I knew there was something off about him".NoHItter wrote:
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.
nice misrep, I never said it wasn't scumhuntingNoHItter wrote:
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.
pieguy1372 wrote:
are you implying this is a bad thing? So. A vote with no substantial reason and simply following the wagon is not cause for concern? I sure hope you're not implying the opposite unless you condone what is essentially sheeping.
no, I'm saying by saying thisSeems you ran out of steam for your half-assed anti-town plan fast and now resorting to baseless accusations.you made an implicit assumption that he's mafia, and then you used this statement to draw the conclusion that he was mafia
There is no assumption of him being mafia in there, I was calling him out for 1. His ill thought out plan. 2. His anti-town plan (which it was if executed) 3. He dodged my points and simply said me and sakura for mafia. Actually I never assumed he was mafia at all, ever. I may have implied it through the scumpainting though. The only thing I "assumed" was he didn't think his plan through at all (reiterated below anyway).can you link where he was scumpainting you plz? mb I just missed it 0.0Rantai wrote:
I never specifically said he's mafia, just I matched his scumpainting with scumpainting (I very specifically mentioned that intention) to make a point (ie his scumpainting attempts were annoying me so I shall do so back) while trying to make another point that his plan sucked for town.Sephibro wrote:
It could be as you say...but are you telling this because you actually think it, or because you're afraid of that strategy?Actually my point throughout the entire thing was basically saying "this plan won't actually do anything beneficial for town" - if you notice from my early posts, I was attacked for questioning him, not me attacking him (I retaliated).Rantai wrote:
If you want to try to play the scumpainting game with me...
That's the point. FoS-ing by itself can mean fence sitting yes, but it's not enough to raise suspicion that much. It can truly be a gesture saying, "Hey I think this guy is suspicious." BUT the thing I was pointing out was that rEdo FoS'd Sephibro twice without voting him.pieguy1372 wrote:
yeah you voted him but what if you didn't? then, by your own logic, if he flips scum you can be like "oh hey I knew there was something off about him".NoHItter wrote:
And who did I vote after I FoS'd Sephibro again? Please don't twist my words. FoS-ing is fine, but doing it twice to the same person without voting brings into question WHY someone FoS'd in the first place.
Then please tell me what things you consider to be "town intent to find scum"pieguy1372 wrote:
nice misrep, I never said it wasn't scumhuntingNoHItter wrote:
Then please tell me what "town intent to find scum" for you is if rereading the thread and looking for questionable things is not scumhunting at all.
I just said scum can do that and/or make the claim they did that for towncred.
Null tell on this context.Irreversible wrote:
But what still bothers me is that farto even said he's scum, so he wants to get voted doesn't he? ><
whatpieguy1372 wrote:
god he did it againfartownik wrote:
Also nice topic avoidance.
not sure if that makes you more or less suspicious, cause you did it after I explicitly said that argument doesn't work 0.0
Yet you're reading stuff concerning you.BRBP wrote:
Haven't read previous page yet. Also a prod dodge, won't be around for a day or so.