So we're essentially stuck to playing the same meta everyone is accustomed to or else we're scum? Meta arguments are weak at best.pieguy1372 wrote:
I remember you always doing RQS and the one time you didn't (Two's game) you were mafia. case in pointNoHitter wrote:
Try looking at my older games.
Because it's still early? I can see the merit of pressure votes, but I'm not one to vote quickly unless we have sure information. Votes should be well thought out.pieguy1372 wrote:
wait so when you get a reason for voting someone you instead FoS and continue without a vote? dafuq, can you explain this plzNoHitter wrote:
I think this could be interpreted as a "nightkill".
FoS: Sephibro
vote: NoHItter
mb NH + Sephibro team here? it seems likely NH was afraid of people wagoning on Sephibro o.o
We still have more than a week to decide who we vote for. Why are you so jumpy?pieguy1372 wrote:
oh god Irre did the same thing. and rEdo FoS'ed while keeping his RVS vote. why aren't you all voting outside RVS ;w;
OK then. Let's say we do follow your plan and NL.Sephibro wrote:
I never said i want a massclaim, quite the opposite: i want to AVOID a massclaim, which would happen if we try to random lynch as we're doing.
I'll explain better. Let's say someone gets pressured hard and is put in L-2; at this point he will claim his role, and two things can happen:
1. best case scenario: someone comes out claiming the same role. One of them two is scum
2. nobody else claims the same role: if that person claimed something credible, we'll vote another person, who will claim and so on
A accuses B of being scum by a Night Action. B explains it because of a very credible reason.
What's next? Do we NL again? Do we lynch randomly?