because probably we have at least one investigation roleDakeDekaane wrote:
Why would you want to gather possible PR info?
because probably we have at least one investigation roleDakeDekaane wrote:
Why would you want to gather possible PR info?
rEdo wrote:
that's not only the point, we will also see the associations between people - somebody's defending somebody else, who's offensive against who and such - with this we could deduce a potential scum combo, and that's the point of this game, isn't it? massclaiming is not a way to avoid that, I don't know why you even associate these things with each other.
again, if you want to lynch d1 we better vote early, since we may have to vote for 12 people and to listen to 12 claims. Do you think it will take less than 6 days?NoHitter wrote:
Because it's still early? I can see the merit of pressure votes, but I'm not one to vote quickly unless we have sure information. Votes should be well thought out.
Except that's not always the case. What if there's a miller or framer?Sephibro wrote:
At that point 1 among A and B is scum, so we have 50% chance of lynching scum, and we'll not have a massclaim
How are you sure that each role is unique? The mod hasn't said anything about this being role madness.Sephibro wrote:
(which is what probably would happen in case we decide to random lynch d1, since each role is unique).
Since when did a D1 random lynch equate to a D1 massclaim? You assume that people will stop voting a claimed person right away, but that isn't always the case.Sephibro wrote:
Btw if you want the random lynch d1, be aware that it will probably cause a massclaim
And what do you have to gain by provoking people into voting you?Sephibro wrote:
Hint: don't FoS me, vote me instead if you really have a suspect
Can I ask why you voted me?Sakura wrote:
Unvote
Vote: NoHitter
Sephibro wrote:
again, if you want to lynch d1 we better vote early, since we may have to vote for 12 people and to listen to 12 claims. Do you think it will take less than 12 days?
5.5) This set-up is not bastard, and therefore has none of the following: Alignment-Changing Roles or Abilities, Jesters, Cults, Misleading Roles, Unknown Role Modifiers, etc.NoHitter wrote:
Except that's not always the case. What if there's a miller or framer?
I hope this is a joke, since every role is an anime character, do you expect being more than 1 Furude Rika, for example?NoHitter wrote:
How are you sure that each role is unique? The mod hasn't said anything about this being role madness.
it doesn't equate to a massclaim, but most likely it would lead to a massclaim since each role is unique.NoHitter wrote:
Since when did a D1 random lynch equate to a D1 massclaim?
Point conceded.Sephibro wrote:
5.5) This set-up is not bastard, and therefore has none of the following: Alignment-Changing Roles or Abilities, Jesters, Cults, Misleading Roles, Unknown Role Modifiers, etc.NoHitter wrote:
Except that's not always the case. What if there's a miller or framer?
Yes each CHARACTER may be unique, but what's to say that the ABILITIES assigned to a character is NOT unique.Sephibro wrote:
I hope this is a joke, since every role is an anime character, do you expect being more than 1 Furude Rika, for example?NoHitter wrote:
How are you sure that each role is unique? The mod hasn't said anything about this being role madness.
Oh well, I see, but by nervous manner i simply mean that you kinda focus on 'early' and that votes go 'jumpy', are you worried that it hits you?NoHitter wrote:
What do you mean by nervous manner?Irreversible wrote:
I'll surely mess up if I quote the stuff above, but what I wanna say is:
Because it's still early?
We still have more than a week to decide who we vote for.
Why are you so jumpy?
Do we lynch randomly?
These are things NoHitter just said in the text above, and shows a kinda nervous manner, imo. But I 100% agree with "Votes should be well thought out. ", that's how I wanna work as well - unfortunately I got judged by that last time.
Also, you kind of removed the last quote out of context. It was addressed to Sephibro, not pieguy.
this is not townlike, people taught me, why would you want people to vote you?Sephibro wrote:
Hint: don't FoS me, vote me instead if you really have a suspect
i'm not asking people to vote me, it would be very retarded, i'm just telling how i think they should playIrreversible wrote:
this is not townlike, people taught me, why would you want people to vote you?
Nice oneSephibro wrote:
because probably we have at least one investigation roleDakeDekaane wrote:
Why would you want to gather possible PR info?
and just how do you expect to get sure information on D1?NoHItter wrote:
Because it's still early? I can see the merit of pressure votes, but I'm not one to vote quickly unless we have sure information. Votes should be well thought out.
last time people said this was in Touhou PyP IV and in the end everyone had a PR. so I don't think it even matters if the mod said it was role madness or not. then again it was my game so >< Honestly I'm thinking everyone has a PR of some sort, similarly to Touhou IV.NoHItter wrote:
How are you sure that each role is unique? The mod hasn't said anything about this being role madness.
why can't I change my vote till then? and how am I being "jumpy"?NoHItter wrote:
We still have more than a week to decide who we vote for. Why are you so jumpy?
you'll see if people decide to do something (and with doing something i mean pressuring someone, NH in this case)pieguy1372 wrote:
also, how will lynching someone on D1 lead to a massclaim?
here we go:pieguy1372 wrote:
last time people said this was in Touhou PyP IV and in the end everyone had a PR. so I don't think it even matters if the mod said it was role madness or not. then again it was my game so >< Honestly I'm thinking everyone has a PR of some sort, similarly to Touhou IV.
1. Correct.Sephibro wrote:
@mod:
1. each character has at least one ability or passive, am i right?
2. does each character have both passive and active ability?
3. does every character have 2 personal abilities or not? are there some with less? are there some with more?
Please answer all the questions you can
you'll see if people decide to do something (and with doing something i mean pressuring someone, NH in this case)so if we do something it'll lead to a massclaim, which is bad?
I cannot answer this question.Sephibro wrote:
@mod: is every ability unique or more than one character can have the same ability?
It could be as you say...but are you telling this because you actually think it, or because you're afraid of that strategy?Rantai wrote:
Because I fell that Caligno would not make a set up as obvious as "All main characters are definitely in and therefore confirmed not fake" (not fake because he has specifically stated that characters can be any alignment, at least that's how I read it)
I think you misread what I wrote. I said that I wouldn't vote someone quickly unless there was sure information. Since it's D1 and we have no sure information, I won't vote quickly.pieguy1372 wrote:
and just how do you expect to get sure information on D1?NoHItter wrote:
Because it's still early? I can see the merit of pressure votes, but I'm not one to vote quickly unless we have sure information. Votes should be well thought out.
Point conceded. Maybe its difference in play style, but I'm not one to shift my vote around.pieguy1372 wrote:
why can't I change my vote till then? and how am I being "jumpy"?NoHItter wrote:
We still have more than a week to decide who we vote for. Why are you so jumpy?
Wrong. That's because I felt that for this setup, massclaiming wasn't a good strategy. The last time I did this was in Stacking the Deck where we gain additional information based on the number of PR claims. In this game, I don't think we'll gain as much if we massclaimed.BRBP wrote:
Are you saying everyone's able to play any alingment exactly like they play as town? Not everyone's even aware of their own meta. While the latter doesn't apply to your massclaim attemps, it's still odd how you didn't suggest that. In all previous games you said that it's the best way to win etc, and now you're willing to skip using "the best strategy to win" just to play differently? That's not like you at all.
The idea itself wouldn't be meh at all, it would be 100% win if my assumptions were right. Btw yes, my assumptions might be wrong, but you're still taking too much distance from that strategy. You could easily be Takano Miyo - Oyashiro Supporter wanting to throw shit on working strategiesRantai wrote:
The idea itself is meh but the assumptions are completely short sighted
Oh god, so much fail.Sephibro wrote:
1. I still think that character's alignment is coherent with the anime, so my strategy would probably be all but anti-town. And most of all, i don't see why i would propose such a reliable strategy if i were scum
2. why do i think that Rantai is scum?
[*]Because RB instantly asked for replacement as soon as he got his pc broken, even if he could still browse and post from his phone; maybe reading scum QT was too hard
[*]Because of this:The idea itself wouldn't be meh at all, it would be 100% win if my assumptions were right. Btw yes, my assumptions might be wrong, but you're still taking too much distance from that strategy. You could easily be Takano Miyo - Oyashiro Supporter wanting to throw shit on working strategiesRantai wrote:
The idea itself is meh but the assumptions are completely short sighted
Just to add that what fails the most about this strategy is the fact that we don't know exactly which characters and in the game. Then the problems comes when someone may claim to be an obscure one which isn't even on this!Sephibro wrote:
Some characters are for sure in the game. If someone claims one of those roles and there's no crossclaim, i'm gonna trust him 100%
If there's a crossclaim, we're set, as at least one of the two is scum
Then there are the "outsider" roles, which are i guess 5 maybe? SCUM ARE AMONG THESE CLAIMS FOR SURE
Well gg, i just realized that massclaiming is the right strategy to win this game
@mod: is every ability unique or more than one character can have the same ability?
Why does it seem that you WANT to claim?Sephibro wrote:
looks like i'm L-3, first claim of the game is close
Sephibro wrote:
pieguy read this topic but he didn't answer, that's suspect.
-_-Sephibro wrote:
pieguy is the only town leaning read i have for now
Rantai wrote:
@mod - can this game's alignments be determined by the character's anime "alignments"
CalignoBot in the Original Announcement wrote:
c. Alignments in this universe's canon will not be relevant in this setup.
c. To be absolutely clear: Any character can be any alignment.
knowing this, it is clear that a massclaim would be completely uselessCalignoBot wrote:
c. To be absolutely clear: Any character can be any alignment.
He thought he could act a bit careless and then claiming to get townread from us, but:Sephibro wrote:
Since most of us know the anime characters, we can make pretty accurate setup speculation. Why aren't we doing this already?
Furude Rika
Sonozaki Mion
Sonozaki Shion
Ryuuguu Rena
Hojou Satoko
Maebara Keiichi
^These characters are for sure in the game and they should be all town aligned (6/12)
It's still not confirmed that he's townCalignoBot in the Original Announcement wrote:
c. Alignments in this universe's canon will not be relevant in this setup.
c. To be absolutely clear: Any character can be any alignment.
If no, I don't need to say anymore.Dusting my hands here.
i didn't understand what you mean with thisIrreversible wrote:
you put tons of scumpartners
no, I didn't. :> I wanna know how you intend to find out who the mafia are by playing like this. without voting people to pressure them or get information, it becomes much harder to get "sure" information, at least IMO.NoHItter wrote:
I think you misread what I wrote. I said that I wouldn't vote someone quickly unless there was sure information. Since it's D1 and we have no sure information, I won't vote quickly.
why Sakura? I'm townreading her atmSephibro wrote:
Sakura + Rantai for scum imo
Sephibro wrote:
re-read all my posts and you'll see that there's no incoherence in my thoughts
kNoHitter wrote:
Sephibro wrote:
pieguy read this topic but he didn't answer, that's suspect.Sephibro wrote:
pieguy is the only town leaning read i have for now
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.pieguy1372 wrote:
no, I didn't. :> I wanna know how you intend to find out who the mafia are by playing like this. without voting people to pressure them or get information, it becomes much harder to get "sure" information, at least IMO.
I don't understand this.Sephibro wrote:
Actually i wanted to AVOID a massclaim until i thought about that last strategy, but sinceknowing this, it is clear that a massclaim would be completely uselessCalignoBot wrote:
c. To be absolutely clear: Any character can be any alignment.
with "those posts" i mean to propose the massclaim as a good strategy in the endSephibro wrote:
Btw i can tell you that my role's abilities and alignment are the same as anime character's, that's why i supposed it was like this for every character in the game and made those posts
Thinking about it, the best it would do is allow role speculation to occur, which doesn't really help town at all.rEdo wrote:
don't wanna defend him or anything, but that could've gone out of curiousity. still, I have no idea what we're going to get even if everybody claims. in this game even Satoko could be scum, just for the shiggles, so setup speculation is pretty much useless at this point of the game.
I'm not ignore you if that makes you feel better.DakeDekaane wrote:
I love how I'm being ignored.
I've only heard from Rantai so far, what do YOU think?Irreversible wrote:
And are you going to tell the reasons why?
I believe Sakura is just making reaction tests. Pressure is put upon you when you are voted and often people say something they shouldn't have to. Anyways, seems like a good investigation. Pretty obvious Sephibro is scum, he just contradicted himself way too many times. And his reasons are just... meh.Irreversible wrote:
This might sound stupid now, but may I ask why i have a townread? People tend to trick me with that, so that's what gives be a slight scumread about you. Nevertheless, it's good that you're scumhunting.
Please dont ever target me with this.Sephibro wrote:
Calming Presence: night active - i may visit one person a night, calming them down > target loses 2HS levels
RogerSakura wrote:
.
backing your arguments with a vote helps a lot in getting discussion. proving my point :>NoHItter wrote:
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.
exactly what I want to sayfartownik wrote:
EBWODP: Forgot to mention. STOP BEING FUCKING SILLY. Flavor doesn't matter ANYHOW while judging the alignment in this game. I'm talking to Sephibro and Irreversible here. I stated that shit right in the beginning, and I thought you understood.
Sephibro wrote:
pieguy read this topic but he didn't answer, that's suspect.
@Sephibro: I'm so busy =A= I don't have the chance to post every time I look at the thread. I like to check back here every so often to keep up even if I don't have the chance to make a post orzfartownik wrote:
Sakura was writing up for a little while too. She decided to post only after I did though, with nothing else than a response to me as her first sentence.
Intredasting.
BRBP wrote:
What is my town meta then?
townIrre wrote:
This might sound stupid now, but may I ask why i have a townread? People tend to trick me with that, so that's what gives be a slight scumread about you. Nevertheless, it's good that you're scumhunting.
rEdo wrote:
Sephibro wrote:
And tbh, i still think NoLynch is a good strategy for d1 in a game like this. Well, unless you want everyone to claim d1mind to elaborate why do you think this is a good strategy?nevermind, you did that earlier. so what if we don't lynch anyone today? we also won't get to know ANYTHING from it, while the HS levels increase. we won't gain much by massclaiming either.
holy shit I just ended up typing the same stuff as farto did, AGAIN
FACK YOU STOP READING MY MIND WHILE I'M READING THE TOPIC AND RESPONDING TO THEM POSTS RESPECTIVELY IN ORDERthe game would we way too slow if scum couldn't add up less than 3 HS points, actually I believe it's more.Sephibro wrote:
the nightkill only occours when someone reaches 5 HS, I don't think that someone can reach such a high value on n1 only
FoS: Sephibro
Was there really a need for you to FoS the same person twice?rEdo wrote:
don't wanna defend him or anything, but that could've gone out of curiousity. still, I have no idea what we're going to get even if everybody claims. in this game even Satoko could be scum, just for the shiggles, so setup speculation is pretty much useless at this point of the game.
FoS: Sephibro
gonna hold on with the vote, I wanna read some more from him.
This is starting to be more of a discussion about preferred method of play rather than the game itself...pieguy1372 wrote:
backing your arguments with a vote helps a lot in getting discussion. proving my point :>NoHItter wrote:
Discussion? You don't have to pressure vote people early to get information. I prefer placing my votes after discussion has taken place.
As I said, it's not certain. I believe he's not scum, but I wouldn't put him on the townread list either since he still might end up being scum. The list consists pretty much safe bets of players being Town, Sephibro is yet to be one.NoHitter wrote:
@farto:
You believe Sephibro's not scum, but you don't think he's town either based on your read list?
That's legit, i agree that i've been playing quite retarded lately; i had convinced myself that game alignment == anime alignment and blindly focused on that despite warnings.fartownik wrote:
As I said, it's not certain. I believe he's not scum, but I wouldn't put him on the townread list either since he still might end up being scum. The list consists pretty much safe bets of players being Town, Sephibro is yet to be one.
I'm going to comment that my reason for Scum BRBP isn't meta related, but it is true I haven't mentioned it, I probably will do so next week if people still can't tell why or how I came up with those reads.Rantai wrote:
I'm a little concerned at how fast that wagon formed with a lot of meta arguments being thrown around.